29.07.2013 Views

Review: Phosphorus in Fish Nutrition

Review: Phosphorus in Fish Nutrition

Review: Phosphorus in Fish Nutrition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.4, 4.1 and 3.3. The acidified diet was fed to ra<strong>in</strong>bow trout (95-130 g <strong>in</strong> body wt) for 140 days either solely or <strong>in</strong><br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ation with the control diet (non-acidified, pH 6.6) at various ratios. These authors found that 1.5-2.5%<br />

dietary acid levels depress ed feed <strong>in</strong>take and growth of the fish. At 1.25%-level of acidi fication, the dietary pH<br />

was 5.3 (hydrochloric acid), 4.6 (formic acid), and 4.3 (sulfuric acid). The feed <strong>in</strong>take of fish did not differ, but<br />

feed conversion was low <strong>in</strong> formic acid and sulfuric acid groups. <strong>Fish</strong> growth was also low <strong>in</strong> formic acid and<br />

sulfuri c acid groups <strong>in</strong> the first month compared with non-acidified and hydrochlori c acid groups; however, all<br />

groups showed similar growth dur<strong>in</strong>g the second and third months. Asgard & Austreng (1981) reported that<br />

formic acid alone or <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with sulfuric acid is, from practical and economical reasons, best suited to make<br />

acid silage of fish offal. Hardy et al. (1983) studied the effects of acidi fication. Acidified fish meal and acidi fied<br />

fish silage both slightly reduced growth and feed effi ciency of ra<strong>in</strong>bow trout <strong>in</strong> 84 days of feed<strong>in</strong>g compared with<br />

those neutralized with Ca(OH) 2. Those wet materials were acidifi ed with 2% sulfuric acid and 0.75% propionic<br />

acid, which after dry<strong>in</strong>g and mix<strong>in</strong>g with other materials concentrated to 5.9% of the diet. Thus, the diet acidity<br />

seems to be very high compared with other acidification studies especially because strong acids like sulfuric acid are<br />

almost completely dissociated. This study <strong>in</strong>dicated that the fish fed the acidi fied (non-neutralized) diets had<br />

higher P and Ca contents <strong>in</strong> the body than the other fish fed neutralized diets (though the authors did not mention<br />

this), suggest<strong>in</strong>g acidification <strong>in</strong>creased availability of dietary P. This also suggests that the silage may be used<br />

without neutralization, and the diet may be prepared as moist pellets and stored at ambient temperature.<br />

The advantage of dietary acidi fication is that the acid can <strong>in</strong>crease P digestibility, which was not a matter of<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> the past. Vielma & Lall (1997) reported that ra<strong>in</strong>bow trout <strong>in</strong>creased absorption of P, Ca and Mg when<br />

a fish meal-based diet was supplemented with formic acid (0, 4, 10 mL/kg). However, the level of <strong>in</strong>crease was<br />

small (70% P-absorption <strong>in</strong> non-acidifi ed diet vs 75% <strong>in</strong> acidified diet). The dietary pH was 6.3 and 5.3 <strong>in</strong><br />

non-acidi fied and acidified diets, respectively. However, the pH of the <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al contents (both proximal and<br />

distal) of the fish fed the acidi fi ed diet was higher than that of fish fed the nonacidi fied diet. Vielma et al. (1999)<br />

fed ra<strong>in</strong>bow trout (<strong>in</strong>itial wt 3 g) for 6 weeks with case<strong>in</strong>-based diets conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g varied levels of bone meal with or<br />

without supplemental citric acid. The diet conta<strong>in</strong>ed total P <strong>in</strong> the amount of 0.5-0.6%; and citric acid was added <strong>in</strong><br />

the amounts of 0, 0.4, 0.8 and 1.6%; which resulted <strong>in</strong> the dietary pH of 6.0, 5.7, 5.4 and 5.0, respectively. Dietary<br />

supplementation of citric acid <strong>in</strong>creased whole-body concent rations of ash, P, and Ca, but only modestly (0.297 vs<br />

0.313%P <strong>in</strong> non-acidified vs the most-acidified diets, respectively). Sugiura et al. (1998) reported that<br />

supplement<strong>in</strong>g a fish meal-based diet with citric acid at a level of 5% <strong>in</strong>creas ed P absorption from 75% (non-acid<br />

diet) to 87% <strong>in</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>bow trout. However, sodium citrate had no effect, and sodium bicarbonate decreased the<br />

apparent P absorption. Fecal P content of fish fed acidifi ed diets was about 1/3 of the non-acidified group.<br />

Supplement<strong>in</strong>g a high-ash diet (2.0%P) with citric acid <strong>in</strong>creased ur<strong>in</strong>ary P and decreased fecal P, with no change <strong>in</strong><br />

body P retention <strong>in</strong> fish. Thus, fecal P can be reduced by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g P availability (by acidification), while ur<strong>in</strong>ary<br />

P must be reduced by reduc<strong>in</strong>g P content <strong>in</strong> the diet. Inorganic acids also <strong>in</strong>creased availability of P <strong>in</strong> fish<br />

meal-bas ed diet from 71% (non-acidi fied, pH 6.1) to 95% (sulfuric acid, pH 2.4) or 88% (hydrochloric acid, pH2.0).<br />

The fish accept ed the acidic diets dur<strong>in</strong>g 23 days of satiation feed<strong>in</strong>g with slight (sulfuric acid) or some<br />

(hydrochloric acid) reduction of feed <strong>in</strong>take. Add<strong>in</strong>g citric acid to a soybean meal-based diet conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g no fish<br />

meal had without effect on P availability. However, P availability <strong>in</strong>creased markedly when both citric acid and<br />

phytase were added compared with when only phytase was added to the diet. Radcliffe et al. (1998), however, did<br />

not see any synergistic <strong>in</strong>teraction between dietary phytase and citric acid <strong>in</strong> corn-soybean meal-bas ed diets fed to<br />

wean<strong>in</strong>g pigs. Also, the addition of citric acid alone had little effects on performance and Ca digestibility. Some<br />

workers observed a reduction of <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al pH <strong>in</strong> pigs fed acidi fied diets (Scipioni et al. 1978, Burnell et al. 1988),<br />

which may prevent m<strong>in</strong>erals from be<strong>in</strong>g precipitated and phytase from be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>activated <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al lumen.<br />

Thus, low <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al pH may confer favorable lum<strong>in</strong>al environment for P absorption. However, <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al<br />

sodium-phosphate cotranspoters (type-II) have a strong pH preference. In mammals, they are generally more<br />

active at acidic pH, whereas <strong>in</strong> fish they are much more active at alikal<strong>in</strong>e pH (see “P transport” section). The<br />

<strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al pH of fishes is strongly alkali (especially of seawater fishes) compared with homeotherms due presumably<br />

to low bacterial fermentation <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al lumen of fishes (Wilson et al. 2002). In fish <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>e, therefore, the<br />

NaPi transporter is very active, whereas at the same time P tends to precipitate. However, high bicarbonate<br />

concentrations <strong>in</strong> the lumen of fish <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>e may protect some phosphatre salts from be<strong>in</strong>g precipitated. Maier &<br />

Tullis (1984) noted that lower<strong>in</strong>g dietary pH (by <strong>in</strong>clusion of acetic acid) or rais<strong>in</strong>g the pH (by ammonium<br />

hydroxide) of an algae-based diet had a significant effect on the gut pH of tilapia. Chonan et al. (1998) reported<br />

that the absorption of dietary Ca and P <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> gastrectimized rats when lactic acid was added to the diet.<br />

Jongbloed et al. (2000) studied the effect of lactic acid (1.6 or 3.2% /diet) and formic acid (0.8 or 1.6%)<br />

supplementation to a pig diet with or without microbial phytase. Both phytase and acids <strong>in</strong>creased P digestibility;<br />

however, there was no <strong>in</strong>teraction. The acid level did not affect the P-digestibility. The acidification did not<br />

© 2000, 2005. Shozo H. Sugiura. All rights reserved.<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!