29.07.2013 Views

Review: Phosphorus in Fish Nutrition

Review: Phosphorus in Fish Nutrition

Review: Phosphorus in Fish Nutrition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

diet. Schäfer et al. (1995b) fed common carp for 63 days with a soybean meal-fish meal based diet (ca. 0.24%<br />

available P/DM) with or without supplemental Ca(H 2PO 4) 2. The fish growth and the contents of ash and P <strong>in</strong><br />

dorsal scales and whole body <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> proportion to the amount of P added to the basal diet (ca. 0.42 or 0.60%<br />

available P/DM). The backbone (defatted) and opercula seems to be less sensitive than scales to dietary available P<br />

concentrations. Kim et al. (1998) estimated dietary available P requirement for mirror carp to be about 0.7% for<br />

the maximum growth and m<strong>in</strong>imum loss of P (per kg wt ga<strong>in</strong>). The feed conversion of the diets was about 1.0<br />

(max). <strong>Fish</strong> (body wt, <strong>in</strong>itial 18 g; f<strong>in</strong>al max 44 g) were fed diets conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g fish meal, soybean meal, wheat flour,<br />

etc. with varied levels of P supplied as Ca(H 2PO 4) 2. The authors calculated the available P content of the<br />

P-supplemented diets assum<strong>in</strong>g that the P <strong>in</strong> Ca(H 2PO 4) 2 was 90% available. The f<strong>in</strong>al body P content of the fish<br />

was similar among treatments, but wt ga<strong>in</strong> of the fish clearly responded to the dietary P concentrations. The <strong>in</strong>itial<br />

fish had even lower concent ration of P <strong>in</strong> the body than fish fed the diet of the lowest P content (0.24% available P)<br />

for 8 weeks. This suggests that the dietary requirement might be overestimated s<strong>in</strong>ce P-deficient fish require P not<br />

only for growth but also for replenish<strong>in</strong>g the body P pool. The retetion plateau of P has been shown to be<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluenced by the P status of the body or previous diet history (Edwards & Gillis 1959, Sugiura et al. 2000).<br />

P requirement <strong>in</strong> Salmonids<br />

Ketola (1975) studied the dietary requirement of P for Atlantic salmon based on weight ga<strong>in</strong>, feed conversion and<br />

bone ash content. Incremental amounts of P were added to the basal diet conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g soybean meal (70%) and<br />

CaCO 3 (3%). <strong>Fish</strong> grew from 6.5 g to only 9.8 g (max.) dur<strong>in</strong>g a 5 wk feed<strong>in</strong>g period with feed conversion rang<strong>in</strong>g<br />

1.69-2.75. Although the basal diet conta<strong>in</strong>ed 0.7% total P, the content of available P might be substantially low<br />

(not measured). The Ca added to the basal diet could precipitate phytate-P and some Pi. Og<strong>in</strong>o & Takeda (1978)<br />

estimated dietary P requirement for ra<strong>in</strong>bow trout <strong>in</strong> a 6 wk feed<strong>in</strong>g trial us<strong>in</strong>g egg album<strong>in</strong>-based diets of four P<br />

levels and two Ca levels. <strong>Fish</strong> consum<strong>in</strong>g P-adequate diets <strong>in</strong>creased their <strong>in</strong>itial weight about 3 times (<strong>in</strong>itial wt.<br />

1.2 g, f<strong>in</strong>al max wt. 3.6 g) with the feed efficiency of 1.1 (max). The dietary requirement of availabl e P for the<br />

normal growth was between 0.32 and 0.64% <strong>in</strong> the low-Ca diet, and more than 1.1% (no plateau) <strong>in</strong> the high-Ca diet<br />

(the authors concluded di fferently). Levels of Ca and P <strong>in</strong> the whole body of fish fed the low-Ca diet <strong>in</strong>creas ed<br />

proportionately to the dietary P levels (no plateau); however, the ash level reached the plateau at 0.64% P <strong>in</strong> the diet.<br />

Among fish fed high-Ca diets, there seemed to be no plateau at all for ash, Ca and P contents <strong>in</strong> the body. The P<br />

availability (absorption) <strong>in</strong> the low-Ca and high-Ca diets was not measured. Watanabe et al. (1980) determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

the dietary P requirement for chum salmon (<strong>in</strong>itial wt. 1.5 g, f<strong>in</strong>al max. wt. 4.9 g) <strong>in</strong> a 7 wk-feed<strong>in</strong>g trial. <strong>Fish</strong> were<br />

fed four times daily to apparent satiation. Feed effi ciency ranged from 33% (lowest P) to 101% (adequate P).<br />

The diets conta<strong>in</strong>ed ~0.37% Ca supplied primarily as Ca lactate. The absorption (availability) of dietary P was not<br />

measured. The estimated dietary P requirement for growth and bone development was 0.5-0.6% as total P. <strong>Fish</strong><br />

receiv<strong>in</strong>g the diet of the lowest P content had markedly lower fat content <strong>in</strong> the body and viscera, which is an<br />

opposite observation from others. Ketola (1985) devised a new, low-cost diet that conta<strong>in</strong>ed only a modest amount<br />

of P supplied ma<strong>in</strong>ly from defluor<strong>in</strong>ated rock phosphate. He claimed that the diet supported "significantly slower,<br />

but adequate growth" and reduced P pollution by more than 50%. The P pollution that the author meant was the<br />

soluble P that was not reta<strong>in</strong>ed by the fish. This soluble fraction of P excreted by fish generally represents dietary<br />

available P that was absorbed by the fish and excreted subsequently via ur<strong>in</strong>e due to an excess <strong>in</strong>take. Apparently,<br />

the total P <strong>in</strong> diets was more than the dietary requirement s<strong>in</strong>ce the basal diet conta<strong>in</strong>ed soybean meal and case<strong>in</strong> (or<br />

corn gluten meal) as the major <strong>in</strong>gredients, and this diet was further supplied with either dicalcium phosphate or<br />

defluor<strong>in</strong>ated rock phosphate <strong>in</strong> the amount about the dietary requirement for the fish. Depend<strong>in</strong>g on the<br />

availability of P <strong>in</strong> these P sources, the fish simply excrete an excess portion as soluble P. This excess portion must<br />

be reduced by reduc<strong>in</strong>g the amount of available (excess) P <strong>in</strong> the diet to the m<strong>in</strong>imum requirement level for the fish.<br />

Unfortunately, the author reported neither the amount of P reta<strong>in</strong>ed by the fish (body P content) nor the amount<br />

excreted <strong>in</strong>to feces (P availability), nor even the total amount of P <strong>in</strong> the diets. Vielma & Lall (1998a) fed Atlantic<br />

salmon (<strong>in</strong>itial wt 15 g) to satiation for 16 wk. The basal diet conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 4 mg P/g (0.15 mg available P per KJ DE)<br />

was supplemented with eight graded levels of Ca(H 2PO 4) 2·H 2O. The fish required 0.28 mg available P per KJ DE.<br />

Increas<strong>in</strong>g dietary P <strong>in</strong>creased P and Ca levels <strong>in</strong> plasma and bone, whereas liver cholecalci ferol level decreased.<br />

In P-defi cient fish, the ur<strong>in</strong>e P concentration was 0.10 mmol/L before feed<strong>in</strong>g and 0.25 mmol/L after feed<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

whereas <strong>in</strong> P-replete fish these concentrations were 1.09 and 5.11 mmol/L, respectively. The apparent absorption<br />

of P was lower <strong>in</strong> P-replete fish than <strong>in</strong> P-deficient fish. Vielma et al. (2002) reported significantly lower tolerance<br />

of whitefish aga<strong>in</strong>st high water temperature <strong>in</strong> dietary P restriction. But, there was no detectable difference <strong>in</strong><br />

low-oxygen tolerance <strong>in</strong> dietary P deficiency.<br />

© 2000, 2005. Shozo H. Sugiura. All rights reserved.<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!