29.07.2013 Views

Review: Phosphorus in Fish Nutrition

Review: Phosphorus in Fish Nutrition

Review: Phosphorus in Fish Nutrition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

weight of 40-50 pounds, as animals receiv<strong>in</strong>g the same ration but supplemented with calcium phosphate. After<br />

reach<strong>in</strong>g this po<strong>in</strong>t loss of weight began, followed by collapse. Pigs on the low-P ration ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed P levels <strong>in</strong> soft<br />

tissues and organs constant and comparable to those of normally fed pigs; however, they drew P from the skeleton,<br />

but removed Ca and P <strong>in</strong> the proportion found <strong>in</strong> tricalcium phosphate. Gregersen (1911) found <strong>in</strong> rats that even<br />

with an abundant <strong>in</strong>take of P <strong>in</strong> assimilable form, no P is reta<strong>in</strong>ed from a prote<strong>in</strong>-free diet. Mellanby (1919) noted<br />

that rickets developed much more readily <strong>in</strong> the fast-grow<strong>in</strong>g dogs than <strong>in</strong> those grow<strong>in</strong>g slowly. So, he<br />

characterized rickets "a disease of rapid growth". McCollum et al. (1921) found that the addition of butter to a<br />

rachitogenic diet, which was low <strong>in</strong> P and high <strong>in</strong> Ca, <strong>in</strong>creased the growth of rats and as a result produced more<br />

severe rickets.<br />

Day & McCollum (1939) fed weaned rats with a diet conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g only 0.017% P but otherwise adequate<br />

for growth. These workers observed that P-restrict ed rats grew and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed a fairly good appetite for 2-4 weeks,<br />

then the animals gradually became <strong>in</strong>active and used legs as little as possible, and died <strong>in</strong> 7-9 weeks on the deficient<br />

diet. The authors said, "The most strik<strong>in</strong>g effect of the P deficiency was on calcium . . . the loss of calcium is so<br />

much greater than of phosphorus." They also reported spontaneous fractures, and progressive rarefaction of bones<br />

by X-ray exam<strong>in</strong>ation. The lethargic condition of the animals may be related to the low ATP level associated with<br />

P deficiency (discussed <strong>in</strong> the section: Metabolic responses). Gillis et al. (1948) fed chicks a diet conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 0.03%<br />

P, but otherwise capable to support optimum growth. The chicks ate well for 3 or 4 days and made small <strong>in</strong>itial<br />

ga<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> weight. After this, there was a rapid decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> appetite, a general weakness, reluctance to stand or use legs,<br />

and ly<strong>in</strong>g on their sides. All chicks died between 5th and 10th day on the diet. These researchers are mention<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that there is a latent period <strong>in</strong> P deficiency, dur<strong>in</strong>g which the animal is apparently (at least externally) normal. In<br />

undernourished human subjects, Rudman et al. (1975) noted that the retention of P, K, Na and Cl virtually halted<br />

when N (am<strong>in</strong>o acids) was withdrawn from the otherwise complete hyperalimentation fluid. At all levels of N<br />

<strong>in</strong>take, these five elements <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g N reta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the body at a fixed ratio. Withdrawal of P also halted the<br />

retention of the other elem ents. When N, K, or P was withdrawn from the fluid, <strong>in</strong>fused glucose cont<strong>in</strong>ued to be<br />

utilized completely; however, a larger portion of glucose was used for lipogenesis than dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fusion of the<br />

complete formula. Nose & Arai (1979) reported that Japanes e eel required 0.27% Ca and 0.29% P <strong>in</strong> diet for<br />

optimum growth. The highest weight ga<strong>in</strong> of the fish dur<strong>in</strong>g the feed<strong>in</strong>g period (lasted 6-10 weeks ) was about 75%<br />

(of the <strong>in</strong>itial wt) <strong>in</strong> the Ca experiment and only 45% <strong>in</strong> the P experiment. When growth magnification is low, the<br />

dietary requirement of most nutrients may well be underestimated if fish growth is used as the response criterion,<br />

whereas it could be overestimated if the retention or tissue concentration of test nutrients is used as the response<br />

criteria. For example, if feed<strong>in</strong>g duration is too short, the requirement estimate based on growth can be zero, while<br />

that based on retention will be <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ity (no plateau). Certa<strong>in</strong> duration of feed<strong>in</strong>g that allows suffi cient<br />

multiplication of the <strong>in</strong>itial body size will be necessary <strong>in</strong> estimat<strong>in</strong>g the dietary requirements. Also, when feed<br />

efficiency is low, the dietary requirement will be low. In the P study, the fish ga<strong>in</strong>ed only 45% dur<strong>in</strong>g the 10<br />

week-feed<strong>in</strong>g period, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that the basal diet used <strong>in</strong> the experiment was of very poor quality or the rear<strong>in</strong>g<br />

method was <strong>in</strong>adequate. In many studies deal<strong>in</strong>g with large fish, the growth magnification tends to be small, which<br />

encounters a problem similar to this (see Section: P requirement for Large fish). Hardy et al. (1993) fed juvenile<br />

ra<strong>in</strong>bow trout for 8 weeks with a P-deficient diet, a P-adequate diet or the mixture of these two diets at various ratios.<br />

<strong>Fish</strong> fed the P-defi cient diet showed cl<strong>in</strong>ical P-defici ency signs, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g anorexia, transient lethargy, reduced<br />

growth, and dark coloration <strong>in</strong> 5 weeks, while fish fed the mixture of the P-defi cient and P-adequate diets at a 9:1<br />

ratio showed these signs <strong>in</strong> 7 weeks. Subcl<strong>in</strong>ical P defici ency did not affect fish growth until after the body P store<br />

was reduced below a certa<strong>in</strong> threshold level. Storebakken et al. (2000) could reduce both the fecal and metabolic<br />

P excretion of Atlantic salmon by replac<strong>in</strong>g fish meal <strong>in</strong> the diet with soyprote<strong>in</strong> concentrate. Total P content of the<br />

soyprote<strong>in</strong> diet and the fish meal diet was 1.2% and 1.8%, respectively. The fish growth did not differ at the end of<br />

the 84-day feed<strong>in</strong>g period; however, the fish fed soyprote<strong>in</strong> diet had markedly lower P and Ca contents as well as<br />

Ca/P ratio <strong>in</strong> the whole body. The fish (<strong>in</strong>itial wt. ~0.2kg) only doubled their weight dur<strong>in</strong>g the experiment. The<br />

results clearly <strong>in</strong>dicate that the growth does not respond until after body P store is reduced below a certa<strong>in</strong> threshold<br />

level. The risk is that the <strong>in</strong>itial body P store (pool size) is variable depend<strong>in</strong>g on the diet history of fish. The<br />

growth reduction can be immediate if the diet is P deficient and the fish do not have enough P sav<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> body.<br />

What are the Response Criteria?<br />

McCay et al. (1927) wrote "In evaluat<strong>in</strong>g the effectiveness of the diets we have employed two criteria, the rate of<br />

growth and the rate of death." This is a rational position to establish nutrient requirements s<strong>in</strong>ce both criteria are<br />

practically important. Other responses such as feed efficiency, economical efficiency, disease resistance, fish<br />

(fillet) quality, and environmental effects are also self-explanatory. However, one wonders upon what grounds<br />

© 2000, 2005. Shozo H. Sugiura. All rights reserved.<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!