29.07.2013 Views

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Standards for Members'<br />

Rights and<br />

Resp<strong>on</strong>sibilities<br />

790<br />

a) Members' Rights (RR 1)<br />

NCQA's statement of rights is minimalist and does not include the<br />

range of rights issues normally addressed in public mental health systems.<br />

Important rights, well-established in law, are omitted, such as the<br />

right to receive services free from discriminati<strong>on</strong> based <strong>on</strong> race, gender,<br />

age, nati<strong>on</strong>al origin or disability; the right to give informed c<strong>on</strong>sent, the<br />

right to refuse treatment, the right of access, the right to adequate care<br />

and treatment, the right to review records, the right to execute advance<br />

directives, and the right to be treated with respect.<br />

Other rights recognized in mental health care settings are also missing.<br />

The right to an individualized plan of care and to be a partner in<br />

treatment planning, the right to care in the least restrictive setting, the<br />

right to a sec<strong>on</strong>d opini<strong>on</strong> and the right to change providers are not referenced.<br />

For additi<strong>on</strong>al informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> individual rights under managed bebatioral<br />

health care plans, see the Bazel<strong>on</strong> Cenrer issue paper <strong>on</strong> rights flisted i*<br />

resource attatbmen).<br />

b) Informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> Rights<br />

Standards for distributi<strong>on</strong> of informati<strong>on</strong> to members c<strong>on</strong>cerning<br />

their rights require <strong>on</strong>ly that the plan 'distribute' the rganizati<strong>on</strong>'s policy.<br />

Entirely missing are requirements <strong>on</strong> how that should be d<strong>on</strong>e. Public<br />

purchasers will want to require plans to ensure that all members<br />

fully understand their rights and have ready access to this informati<strong>on</strong><br />

when they are c<strong>on</strong>cerned that their rights may be being violated. Rights<br />

statements, for example, could be required to be distributed in all<br />

provider offices and mailed annually with plan informati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

c) Member Resp<strong>on</strong>sibilities(R 1)<br />

NCQA's listing of member resp<strong>on</strong>sibilities is extremely problematic,<br />

and it is unclear what happens if a member fails to carry out these<br />

'resp<strong>on</strong>sibilities.' Most public systems do not take this approach to provisi<strong>on</strong><br />

of mental health care and some of the NCQA standards need to<br />

be overridden for an effective public system. Especially problematic is<br />

.the standard that members must follow plans and instructi<strong>on</strong>s for care.<br />

Member n<strong>on</strong>-compliance with treatment plans may be reflective of poor<br />

treatment plans and lack of provider resp<strong>on</strong>siveness. Attempting to compel<br />

members' compliance through accreditati<strong>on</strong> standards is unacceptable.<br />

States should ensure that no managed care plan can disenroll a<br />

NCQA Accreditati<strong>on</strong> Standards for <str<strong>on</strong>g>Managed</str<strong>on</strong>g> Behavioral Healshcare Organiati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

POLICY ANALYSIS BY THE BAZELON CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH LAWA 10J

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!