29.07.2013 Views

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

WHAT PUBLIC<br />

PURCHASERS<br />

CAN DO -<br />

Oentietw<br />

782<br />

analysis of the NCQA standards, the Bazel<strong>on</strong> Center does not intend to<br />

endorse the use of any particular accreditati<strong>on</strong> process.<br />

The NCQA Standards for Accreditati<strong>on</strong> of <str<strong>on</strong>g>Managed</str<strong>on</strong>g> Behavioral<br />

Healthcare Organizati<strong>on</strong>s encompass standards for<br />

* Quality Management and Improvement (Standards QI I to QI 11)<br />

* Accessibility, Availability, Referral and Triage (Standards AR I to AR 4)<br />

* Utilizati<strong>on</strong> Management (Standards UM I to UM 9)<br />

* Credentialing and Recredentialing (Standards CR I to CR 13)<br />

* Members' Rights and Resp<strong>on</strong>sibilities (RR I to RR 8)<br />

* Preventive Behavioral Health Services (Standards PH I to PH 4)<br />

* Clinical Evaluati<strong>on</strong> and Treatment Records Standards TR I to TR 3)<br />

In making the move to managed care, states and other public purchasers<br />

should review various proposed standards for managed care entities<br />

serving the public sector and make their own decisi<strong>on</strong>s about which<br />

to accept or adapt to their particular circumstances. One approach<br />

would be to draw from the state system's existing standards.<br />

While declining to endorse any entity's specific accreditati<strong>on</strong> standards,<br />

the Bazel<strong>on</strong> Center does recommend that purchasers who elect to<br />

use the NCQA standards as a base strengthen them in certain critical areas,<br />

listed below. Manypublic purchasers may well wish to go further.<br />

The NCQA standards have the following general shortcomings<br />

with respect to issues of importance to public-sector mental health and<br />

addicti<strong>on</strong> service delivery:<br />

C<strong>on</strong>sumer Involvement<br />

There are no standards for member involvement in the critical decisi<strong>on</strong>s<br />

made by the plan (i.e., no requirements for c<strong>on</strong>sumer participati<strong>on</strong><br />

<strong>on</strong> advisory committees or governing bodies). Further, while the<br />

final standards are an improvement over a draft released for comment in<br />

1996, the requirements for members to be involved in various aspects of<br />

the plan, or to receive informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> critical aspects, are minimal.<br />

Public Informati<strong>on</strong><br />

A c<strong>on</strong>tract to-provide public-sector services must operate in a far<br />

more open way than a c<strong>on</strong>tract with an employer. NCQA fails to ad-<br />

NCQA Accreditati<strong>on</strong> Standards for <str<strong>on</strong>g>Managed</str<strong>on</strong>g> Behavioral Healthcare Organizati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

POLICY ANALYSIS BY THE BAZELON CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH LAW<br />

-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!