29.07.2013 Views

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

761<br />

requirements or oversight, who will be served, how l<strong>on</strong>g they will receive<br />

services, which services they will receive and how much m<strong>on</strong>ey<br />

will be spent <strong>on</strong> their care.<br />

In additi<strong>on</strong> to creating its own definiti<strong>on</strong> of 'medically necessary,'<br />

the state should expect that mnged care pbans, as they implement that<br />

definiti<strong>on</strong>, will set more detailed and c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>-specific criteria. States<br />

should therefore require that the plan's internal rules for implementing<br />

the state's definiti<strong>on</strong>, such as practice guidelines, be made available both<br />

to the state and to advocacy groups in the state. In this manner, the<br />

plan's operating criteria can be reviewed to ensure that they meet the<br />

state's expectati<strong>on</strong>s with respect to the provisi<strong>on</strong> of services.<br />

C<strong>on</strong>sumer, family and advocacy groups are increasingly c<strong>on</strong>cerned<br />

about whether managed care for mental health services will allow individual<br />

choice and be provided in sufficient amount to meet individual<br />

needs. These groups are now organizing to influence many aspects of<br />

their state's RFP and c<strong>on</strong>tract, including the definiti<strong>on</strong> of 'medically<br />

necessary.' Many states are now recognizing the need to c<strong>on</strong>sult c<strong>on</strong>sumers,<br />

families and advocates about the c<strong>on</strong>tracts. Since these documents<br />

will govern the public system for years to come, their success<br />

depends <strong>on</strong> their support by important stakeholders in the state.<br />

PROBLEMS WITH T here are some serious problems with the current state c<strong>on</strong>tracts<br />

c<strong>on</strong>cerning medically necessary care. Most are not specific enough and<br />

THE CURRENT grant managed care companies too much discreti<strong>on</strong>. As a result, states<br />

may leave themselves liable for mandated <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> services that the<br />

APPROACH plans will not provide-in particular, services that go bey<strong>on</strong>d the plan's<br />

very traditi<strong>on</strong>al c<strong>on</strong>cepts of what is necessary.<br />

Most c<strong>on</strong>tracts between states and managed care entities provide<br />

minimal guidance <strong>on</strong> what is to be c<strong>on</strong>sidered a medically necessary<br />

mental health service. Some have no definiti<strong>on</strong> at all of this important<br />

phrase. This gives the managed care entity extremely broad discreti<strong>on</strong><br />

to determine what services will be furnished to individual members of<br />

the plan at particular times and can also lead to c<strong>on</strong>fusi<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g members<br />

as to what services they7-re entitled to receive. In some cases, the<br />

state will find that mandated <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> services are not being provided<br />

through the masnaged care entity and that this is quite legal under the<br />

Defining 'Medicallv Necessary' Serv.ies to Protcc, Plan Members<br />

POLICY ANALYSIS BY THE BAZELON CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH LAW 7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!