29.07.2013 Views

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IV. QUALITY OF CARE<br />

A. Problem Statement<br />

671<br />

The state-of-the-art in assessing quality of care both at the managed care plan level and<br />

state and community system level for children with or at risk of chr<strong>on</strong>ic c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s is very<br />

limited. At the plan level, performance measures specifically targeted for this populati<strong>on</strong> have<br />

been difficult to develop for several reas<strong>on</strong>s. The time and cost associated with developing<br />

practice guidelines is enormous. Relatively few pediatric practice guidelines exist, restricting<br />

plans' ability to adequately judge outcomes of care. Also, given the nature of childhood<br />

chr<strong>on</strong>ic c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s - few prevalent and many rare c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s with large differences in<br />

functi<strong>on</strong>al impacts and frequent co-morbidities -- it is unlikely that major quality gains will<br />

come by proceeding c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> by c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>, except for the most prevalent c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s. Further<br />

complicating progress in developing quality measures at the plan level is the absence of a<br />

uniform definiti<strong>on</strong>, the c<strong>on</strong>cern of many managed care plans regarding adverse selecti<strong>on</strong> if<br />

they do a good job in this area, and the competing demands <strong>on</strong> plans to collect an<br />

unprecedented amount of quality data to meet new accreditati<strong>on</strong> standards and c<strong>on</strong>tractual<br />

requirements.<br />

At the systems level, performance measures have lagged behind the development of<br />

individual or plan measures. A core set of well-tested indicators, comparable to HEDIS, do<br />

not exist for m<strong>on</strong>itoring the quality of state and community-based systems for children with<br />

special health needs. The organizati<strong>on</strong>, financing, and delivery health services for this<br />

populati<strong>on</strong> varies tremendously across and within states and communities making<br />

comparability almost impossible. Also, unlike encounter data and medical records, data<br />

sources for m<strong>on</strong>itoring state and community systems performance are very limited. Finally,<br />

still unresolved is the questi<strong>on</strong> of authority and resp<strong>on</strong>sibility for c<strong>on</strong>ducting system-wide<br />

performance reviews for children. Is this the functi<strong>on</strong> of the Title V program, the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

agency, or the state health department?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!