Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
656 To what extent does the definition capture the population of children with special health care needs? Does it include children with or at risk of physical, behavioral, emotional, and developmental conditions that result in elevated service needs? 2. Reliability 3. Cost To what extent is the definition subject to measurement error? For example, a functional assessment of a chronic condition is subject to the biases of the person conducting the assessment. Even though children with special health care needs are acknowledged to share a range of issues across a broad spectrum of conditions, does the definition contain significant 'gray areas in its application, such as identifying children at risk of special needs? Would the definition be consistent across different health plans? What investment would be required to implement the definition? Do the benefits of identifying these children outweigh the primary data collection and administration costs associated with implementation? 4. Acceptability Is the definition and the steps required to implement it acceptable to payers, providers, and consumers? If not, is there a way to identify problem areas and to address them? 5. Availability To what extent is the definition operational or ready to be implemented for purposes of identifying children in managed care settings? Is additional developmental work needed? Has there been adequate testing of the definition to determine its validity and reliability? 6. Fleribility Is the definition consistent with the benefit package provided under
C. Recommnended Atihitles 657 While there is no accepted operational approach that rmanaged care plans can use to identify children with special needs, there are several alternate strategies states and plans might consider, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. These include diagnostic, functional. service, categorical, or combined approaches. The expert work group suggested several recommendations. 1. Most existing approaches for identifying children with special health needs have serious limitations. Several new tools will be available soon that will help improve the identification of these children, including those developed by Stein et al., NACHRI, and Landgraf. Until then, states should continue their efforts at developing creative identification mechanisms. 2. State Title V programs, plan managers, health professionals, families, and academics should begin to work together regarding the development and application of improved systems for identification, building on the new tools soon to be available. 3. Emerging efforts by states and managed care plans for identifying children with special health care needs should be monitored. Promising new efforts should be identified and evaluated. 4. Additional attention is needed to develop mechanisms for identifying children at risk for special service needs. Currently, there is little agreement in the field about which children are at risk. S. A national profile of the number and characteristics of children with special health needs, based on MCHB's definition, should be developed using new information from the National Health Interview Survey on Disability. This profile can be used as a national baseline for monitoring changes over time in access, satisfaction, and use of services by children with special health needs. 3
- Page 608 and 609: 606 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL The
- Page 610 and 611: Establishing core developmental tea
- Page 612 and 613: 610 taken into account considerable
- Page 614 and 615: PURPOSE 612 INTRODUCTION Our purpos
- Page 616 and 617: 614 MANAGED CARE PENETRATION The de
- Page 618 and 619: 616 CHALLENGES AND RESPONSES Our re
- Page 620 and 621: 618 > In building up and maintainin
- Page 622 and 623: 620 * For the most part, the agenci
- Page 624 and 625: 622 beginning to look for associate
- Page 626 and 627: 624 challenge will be to ensure tha
- Page 628 and 629: 626 RETOOLING AS AN ISSUE Retooling
- Page 630 and 631: 628 finding effective ways of deali
- Page 632 and 633: 630 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT REPORT We
- Page 634 and 635: Defining Managed <
- Page 636 and 637: DATE: JU 27 1997 TO: June Gibbs Bro
- Page 638 and 639: 636 protocols will be enhanced thro
- Page 640 and 641: 638 Broad and explicit state health
- Page 642 and 643: 640 APPENDIX C ENDNOTES 1. See, for
- Page 644 and 645: 642 The First Biannual Report of th
- Page 646 and 647: 644 30. In Massachusetts, for examp
- Page 648 and 649: 646 CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL HEALTH CA
- Page 650 and 651: Prface 648 The U.S. Maternal and Ch
- Page 652 and 653: 650 L DEFINING AND IDENTIFYING CHIL
- Page 654 and 655: 2. Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)
- Page 656 and 657: 654 Limits * This approach identifi
- Page 660 and 661: 658 II. FAMILY PARTICIPATION IN MAN
- Page 662 and 663: 660 Description This is an integrat
- Page 664 and 665: 12. American Academy of Pediatries
- Page 666 and 667: 664 knowledge of a child's conditio
- Page 668 and 669: 666 though only the NACHRI approach
- Page 670 and 671: 668 Sources Ash A, Porell F, Gruenb
- Page 672 and 673: C. Recommended Adivities 670 With t
- Page 674 and 675: 672 B. Examples of Current Research
- Page 676 and 677: 674 The Practice Parameters Project
- Page 678 and 679: 076 -Administrative Survey: Enrollm
- Page 680 and 681: 678 Description This guide provides
- Page 682 and 683: 680 APPENDIX 1: PARTICIPANT LIST MA
- Page 684 and 685: 682 MANAGED CARE EXPERT WORK GROUP
- Page 686 and 687: 684 APPENDIX H: BIBLIOGRAPHY MANAGE
- Page 688 and 689: 686 MANAGED CARE EXPERT WORK GROUP
- Page 690 and 691: 688 MAKING MEDICAID MANAGED CARE PR
- Page 692 and 693: 690 On Saturday, July 13, 1996 and
- Page 694 and 695: INTRODUCTION Medicaid</stro
- Page 696 and 697: 694 INTRODUCTION People living with
- Page 698 and 699: 696 |CONSENSUS FOR ATO of many of o
- Page 700 and 701: - 698 There is a huge need to educa
- Page 702 and 703: 700 People fiving with HIV, and the
- Page 704 and 705: 702 The HIV epidemic disproportiona
- Page 706 and 707: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH
C. Recommnended Atihitles<br />
657<br />
While there is no accepted operati<strong>on</strong>al approach that rmanaged care plans can use to<br />
identify children with special needs, there are several alternate strategies states and plans might<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sider, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. These include diagnostic, functi<strong>on</strong>al.<br />
service, categorical, or combined approaches. The expert work group suggested several<br />
recommendati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
1. Most existing approaches for identifying children with special health needs have<br />
serious limitati<strong>on</strong>s. Several new tools will be available so<strong>on</strong> that will help<br />
improve the identificati<strong>on</strong> of these children, including those developed by Stein<br />
et al., NACHRI, and Landgraf. Until then, states should c<strong>on</strong>tinue their efforts<br />
at developing creative identificati<strong>on</strong> mechanisms.<br />
2. State Title V programs, plan managers, health professi<strong>on</strong>als, families, and<br />
academics should begin to work together regarding the development and<br />
applicati<strong>on</strong> of improved systems for identificati<strong>on</strong>, building <strong>on</strong> the new tools<br />
so<strong>on</strong> to be available.<br />
3. Emerging efforts by states and managed care plans for identifying children with<br />
special health care needs should be m<strong>on</strong>itored. Promising new efforts should be<br />
identified and evaluated.<br />
4. Additi<strong>on</strong>al attenti<strong>on</strong> is needed to develop mechanisms for identifying children at<br />
risk for special service needs. Currently, there is little agreement in the field<br />
about which children are at risk.<br />
S. A nati<strong>on</strong>al profile of the number and characteristics of children with special<br />
health needs, based <strong>on</strong> MCHB's definiti<strong>on</strong>, should be developed using new<br />
informati<strong>on</strong> from the Nati<strong>on</strong>al Health Interview Survey <strong>on</strong> Disability. This<br />
profile can be used as a nati<strong>on</strong>al baseline for m<strong>on</strong>itoring changes over time in<br />
access, satisfacti<strong>on</strong>, and use of services by children with special health needs.<br />
3