Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

aging.senate.gov
from aging.senate.gov More from this publisher
29.07.2013 Views

656 To what extent does the definition capture the population of children with special health care needs? Does it include children with or at risk of physical, behavioral, emotional, and developmental conditions that result in elevated service needs? 2. Reliability 3. Cost To what extent is the definition subject to measurement error? For example, a functional assessment of a chronic condition is subject to the biases of the person conducting the assessment. Even though children with special health care needs are acknowledged to share a range of issues across a broad spectrum of conditions, does the definition contain significant 'gray areas in its application, such as identifying children at risk of special needs? Would the definition be consistent across different health plans? What investment would be required to implement the definition? Do the benefits of identifying these children outweigh the primary data collection and administration costs associated with implementation? 4. Acceptability Is the definition and the steps required to implement it acceptable to payers, providers, and consumers? If not, is there a way to identify problem areas and to address them? 5. Availability To what extent is the definition operational or ready to be implemented for purposes of identifying children in managed care settings? Is additional developmental work needed? Has there been adequate testing of the definition to determine its validity and reliability? 6. Fleribility Is the definition consistent with the benefit package provided under ong>Medicaidong> or commercial insurance plans? Are services available once a child with special health needs is identified? Evaluative criteria must be flexible to address new advances in condition. recognition and intervention. 7

C. Recommnended Atihitles 657 While there is no accepted operational approach that rmanaged care plans can use to identify children with special needs, there are several alternate strategies states and plans might consider, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. These include diagnostic, functional. service, categorical, or combined approaches. The expert work group suggested several recommendations. 1. Most existing approaches for identifying children with special health needs have serious limitations. Several new tools will be available soon that will help improve the identification of these children, including those developed by Stein et al., NACHRI, and Landgraf. Until then, states should continue their efforts at developing creative identification mechanisms. 2. State Title V programs, plan managers, health professionals, families, and academics should begin to work together regarding the development and application of improved systems for identification, building on the new tools soon to be available. 3. Emerging efforts by states and managed care plans for identifying children with special health care needs should be monitored. Promising new efforts should be identified and evaluated. 4. Additional attention is needed to develop mechanisms for identifying children at risk for special service needs. Currently, there is little agreement in the field about which children are at risk. S. A national profile of the number and characteristics of children with special health needs, based on MCHB's definition, should be developed using new information from the National Health Interview Survey on Disability. This profile can be used as a national baseline for monitoring changes over time in access, satisfaction, and use of services by children with special health needs. 3

C. Recommnended Atihitles<br />

657<br />

While there is no accepted operati<strong>on</strong>al approach that rmanaged care plans can use to<br />

identify children with special needs, there are several alternate strategies states and plans might<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sider, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. These include diagnostic, functi<strong>on</strong>al.<br />

service, categorical, or combined approaches. The expert work group suggested several<br />

recommendati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

1. Most existing approaches for identifying children with special health needs have<br />

serious limitati<strong>on</strong>s. Several new tools will be available so<strong>on</strong> that will help<br />

improve the identificati<strong>on</strong> of these children, including those developed by Stein<br />

et al., NACHRI, and Landgraf. Until then, states should c<strong>on</strong>tinue their efforts<br />

at developing creative identificati<strong>on</strong> mechanisms.<br />

2. State Title V programs, plan managers, health professi<strong>on</strong>als, families, and<br />

academics should begin to work together regarding the development and<br />

applicati<strong>on</strong> of improved systems for identificati<strong>on</strong>, building <strong>on</strong> the new tools<br />

so<strong>on</strong> to be available.<br />

3. Emerging efforts by states and managed care plans for identifying children with<br />

special health care needs should be m<strong>on</strong>itored. Promising new efforts should be<br />

identified and evaluated.<br />

4. Additi<strong>on</strong>al attenti<strong>on</strong> is needed to develop mechanisms for identifying children at<br />

risk for special service needs. Currently, there is little agreement in the field<br />

about which children are at risk.<br />

S. A nati<strong>on</strong>al profile of the number and characteristics of children with special<br />

health needs, based <strong>on</strong> MCHB's definiti<strong>on</strong>, should be developed using new<br />

informati<strong>on</strong> from the Nati<strong>on</strong>al Health Interview Survey <strong>on</strong> Disability. This<br />

profile can be used as a nati<strong>on</strong>al baseline for m<strong>on</strong>itoring changes over time in<br />

access, satisfacti<strong>on</strong>, and use of services by children with special health needs.<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!