Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
630 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT REPORT We solicited and received comments on the draft report from the Health
631 APPENDIX A BACKGROUND ON MEDICAID MANAGED CARE
- Page 582 and 583: 580 Summary As Medicaid</st
- Page 584 and 585: 582 Chapter 3 Medicaid</str
- Page 586 and 587: 584 carve-out approach: - improves
- Page 588 and 589: 586 Coordinating Medical and Non-Me
- Page 590 and 591: 588 Oregon,8 program planners origi
- Page 592 and 593: 590 Medicaid syste
- Page 594 and 595: 592 Oversight/Monitoring Quality De
- Page 596 and 597: 594 with family and friends, contac
- Page 598 and 599: 596 * The type(s) of data necessary
- Page 600 and 601: 598 * Specificity of desired result
- Page 602 and 603: 600 Initiatives under way may prove
- Page 604 and 605: 602 a estring the services authoriz
- Page 606 and 607: 604 Development of appropriate plan
- Page 608 and 609: 606 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL The
- Page 610 and 611: Establishing core developmental tea
- Page 612 and 613: 610 taken into account considerable
- Page 614 and 615: PURPOSE 612 INTRODUCTION Our purpos
- Page 616 and 617: 614 MANAGED CARE PENETRATION The de
- Page 618 and 619: 616 CHALLENGES AND RESPONSES Our re
- Page 620 and 621: 618 > In building up and maintainin
- Page 622 and 623: 620 * For the most part, the agenci
- Page 624 and 625: 622 beginning to look for associate
- Page 626 and 627: 624 challenge will be to ensure tha
- Page 628 and 629: 626 RETOOLING AS AN ISSUE Retooling
- Page 630 and 631: 628 finding effective ways of deali
- Page 634 and 635: Defining Managed <
- Page 636 and 637: DATE: JU 27 1997 TO: June Gibbs Bro
- Page 638 and 639: 636 protocols will be enhanced thro
- Page 640 and 641: 638 Broad and explicit state health
- Page 642 and 643: 640 APPENDIX C ENDNOTES 1. See, for
- Page 644 and 645: 642 The First Biannual Report of th
- Page 646 and 647: 644 30. In Massachusetts, for examp
- Page 648 and 649: 646 CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL HEALTH CA
- Page 650 and 651: Prface 648 The U.S. Maternal and Ch
- Page 652 and 653: 650 L DEFINING AND IDENTIFYING CHIL
- Page 654 and 655: 2. Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)
- Page 656 and 657: 654 Limits * This approach identifi
- Page 658 and 659: 656 To what extent does the definit
- Page 660 and 661: 658 II. FAMILY PARTICIPATION IN MAN
- Page 662 and 663: 660 Description This is an integrat
- Page 664 and 665: 12. American Academy of Pediatries
- Page 666 and 667: 664 knowledge of a child's conditio
- Page 668 and 669: 666 though only the NACHRI approach
- Page 670 and 671: 668 Sources Ash A, Porell F, Gruenb
- Page 672 and 673: C. Recommended Adivities 670 With t
- Page 674 and 675: 672 B. Examples of Current Research
- Page 676 and 677: 674 The Practice Parameters Project
- Page 678 and 679: 076 -Administrative Survey: Enrollm
- Page 680 and 681: 678 Description This guide provides
630<br />
COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT REPORT<br />
We solicited and received comments <strong>on</strong> the draft report from the Health <str<strong>on</strong>g>Care</str<strong>on</strong>g> Financing<br />
Administrati<strong>on</strong>, the Acting Assistant Secretary for Health (ASH), and the Assistant<br />
Secretary for Planning and Evaluati<strong>on</strong> (ASPE). The ASPE c<strong>on</strong>curred without elaborati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
The HCFA and ASH comments appear in full in appendix B. Below we summarize them<br />
and offer our resp<strong>on</strong>se in italics.<br />
The HCFA c<strong>on</strong>curred with our first two recommendati<strong>on</strong>s. It reinforced the importance<br />
of using existing mechanisms to help States learn from <strong>on</strong>e another as they move from<br />
fee-for-service to managed care arrangements. It also agreed with the importance of<br />
reviewing and revising HCFA m<strong>on</strong>itoring protocols so that they are sufficiently sensitive<br />
to the organizati<strong>on</strong>al challenges associated with expanded managed care.<br />
With respect to our third recommendati<strong>on</strong> calling for the State <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> agencies to<br />
scrutinize possible adverse effects of managed care expansi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> the performance of<br />
established fee-for-service functi<strong>on</strong>s, HCFA offered a partial c<strong>on</strong>currence. It noted that<br />
acti<strong>on</strong>s taken in resp<strong>on</strong>se to the first two recommendati<strong>on</strong>s could alleviate the need for<br />
such scrutiny and that HCFA, as our report indicates, is already doing a good deal to<br />
m<strong>on</strong>itor possible adverse effects.<br />
In line with the above comment, HCFA suggested that our reference to "danger signs' in<br />
the fee-for-service sector be changed to "c<strong>on</strong>cerns." It also suggested that the States<br />
discussed in the report be given the opportunity to comment <strong>on</strong> it.<br />
We c<strong>on</strong>sidered HCFA's suggesti<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> characterizing the possible problems in the fee-forservice<br />
sector as 'c<strong>on</strong>cerns' rather than 'danger signs. ' We decided to retain the latter<br />
term because it more accurately reflected what we heard and observed in the study States.<br />
At the same time, as we note in the report, we present the danger signs as early alerts<br />
that could emerge as significant problems if not adequately addressed.<br />
C<strong>on</strong>cerning HCFA's other comment about obtaining feedbackfrom the States reviewed, we<br />
have received c<strong>on</strong>siderable comment from them during the course offraming ourfindings<br />
and recommendati<strong>on</strong>s. We are distributing the report widely am<strong>on</strong>g the States, and, as is<br />
our custom, will include with it a userfeedbackform invitingfirther comment.<br />
Finally, the Acting Assistant Secretary of Health did not comment <strong>on</strong> specific findings or<br />
recommendati<strong>on</strong>s in the report, but did offer four suggesti<strong>on</strong>s intended to enhance the<br />
transiti<strong>on</strong> process to <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care. They are helpful suggesti<strong>on</strong>s that warrant<br />
c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> by the States and HCFA. They c<strong>on</strong>cern the involvement of the State health<br />
departments in the managed care process, the need for broad stakeholder involvement in<br />
the process, the need to strengthen the integrati<strong>on</strong> of public health c<strong>on</strong>cerns into the<br />
change process, and the importance of strengthening compliance, m<strong>on</strong>itoring, and<br />
evaluati<strong>on</strong> at the State level.<br />
19