Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

aging.senate.gov
from aging.senate.gov More from this publisher
29.07.2013 Views

604 Development of appropriate plans and providers requires a focus on the special needs of persons with mental illness. Plans need the capacity to develop and obtain the wide range of services needed by persons with mental illness. Benefits need to be designed to provide sufficient accountability but still allow enough flexibility to encourage plans to develop individualized, consumer-sensitive care approaches and to overcome the institutional bias of fee-for-service ong>Medicaidong>. Because persons with mental illness need a range of services and supports, managed care programs should maximize coordination with other services (educational, juvenile justice, vocational, supportive, etc.) assisting the beneficiary. Clear expectations, reflecting consumer input, must be monitored carefully. These expectations must recognize that managed mental health care is a work in progress, particularly regarding the appropriateness of rates and risk-sharing adjustments. States will be challenged to develop effective systems of managed mental health care. They need sufficient resources (staff, data capacity, quality oversight, consumer and stakeholder involvement) to meet the task. The National Academy for State Health Policy 0 © 8/97 IV-101

605 Department of Health and Human Services OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Retooling State ong>Medicaidong> For ong>Managedong> ong>Careong> Agencies JUNE GIBBS BROWN Inspector General August 1997 OEI-01-95-00260

604<br />

Development of appropriate plans and providers requires a focus <strong>on</strong> the special<br />

needs of pers<strong>on</strong>s with mental illness. Plans need the capacity to develop and obtain<br />

the wide range of services needed by pers<strong>on</strong>s with mental illness. Benefits need to<br />

be designed to provide sufficient accountability but still allow enough flexibility to<br />

encourage plans to develop individualized, c<strong>on</strong>sumer-sensitive care approaches and<br />

to overcome the instituti<strong>on</strong>al bias of fee-for-service <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g>. Because pers<strong>on</strong>s with<br />

mental illness need a range of services and supports, managed care programs should<br />

maximize coordinati<strong>on</strong> with other services (educati<strong>on</strong>al, juvenile justice,<br />

vocati<strong>on</strong>al, supportive, etc.) assisting the beneficiary.<br />

Clear expectati<strong>on</strong>s, reflecting c<strong>on</strong>sumer input, must be m<strong>on</strong>itored carefully. These<br />

expectati<strong>on</strong>s must recognize that managed mental health care is a work in progress,<br />

particularly regarding the appropriateness of rates and risk-sharing adjustments.<br />

States will be challenged to develop effective systems of managed mental health<br />

care. They need sufficient resources (staff, data capacity, quality oversight, c<strong>on</strong>sumer<br />

and stakeholder involvement) to meet the task.<br />

The Nati<strong>on</strong>al Academy for State Health Policy 0 © 8/97<br />

IV-101

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!