Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
592 Oversight/Monitoring Quality Determining Goals The critical first step to monitoring quality is to be clear about the expected results of services for consumers, plans and the system. Several states noted the importance of engaging stakeholders early on to determine goals and how they ought to be measured. However, various stakeholders often have conflicting goals and priorities; balancing these views can be challenging. In order to gather public input, New York's Quality Assurance Task Force surveyed approximately 2000 stakeholders regarding desired outcomes. Massachusetts made 'the public' an active participant in the contract development process by convening workgroups of different stakeholders, which created standards included in the purchasing specifications. While, Iowa used a Request for Information process to obtain stakeholder input on performance measures. Sixty indicators developed are now in use. States stressed that the standards traditionally used by commercial managed care organizations may not work for non-commercial populations. One way to work around this is to create evaluation teams for the creation and review of the requests for proposals including the
593 * The 'outcomes", both short-and long-term. 9 States are moving toward stressing accountability of outcomes or results, rather than simply accountability of finances. However, the science of outcome measurement has not sufficiently advanced to rely on these measures exclusively. Efforts currently underway to develop such outcomes include: * The Center for Self-Help Research at the University of California at Berkeley developed an empowerment scale examining the person's ability to make decisions on concrete issues in his/her personal life, meeting basic needs, and participating in organizations.10 * The Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation at Boston University developed an empowerment scale used in consumer-run self-help programs. It examines such issues as control over one's life, achievement of goals, self-esteem and self-efficacy.' 1 * The outcome measurement system developed by the University of Cincinnati's Quality Center is now being used in 12 states. It tracks four measures: mental health symptoms, daily social functioning, perception of physical health and patient satisfactions * The Child Welfare League of America's Odyssey Project is examining outcomes for about 2,500 emotionally disturbed children and teens in residential settings. Outcomes to be examined at the end of treatment include: placements into less intensive settings, family reunifications and adoptions, educational achievements, level of life skills, behavioral problems, and social competencies. Outcomes at one- and two-year follow-ups include: employment, educational achievement, personal satisfaction with life, satisfaction with services, connections 9 Avedis Donabedian, 'Evaluating the Quality of Medical
- Page 544 and 545: 542 Finally, coordination for vulne
- Page 546 and 547: 544 Care Coordinat
- Page 548 and 549: 546 home health agency developed a
- Page 550 and 551: 548 develop a case management syste
- Page 552 and 553: 550 Coordinating services is compli
- Page 554 and 555: Highlights 552 Effective care coord
- Page 556 and 557: 554 beneficiaries that belong to th
- Page 558 and 559: 556 services when needed. This is t
- Page 560 and 561: 558 federal government and not at s
- Page 562 and 563: 560 cannot enroll a person in a Med
- Page 564 and 565: 562 Medicare members are not typica
- Page 566 and 567: 564 Regence HMO Oregon staff noted
- Page 568 and 569: 566 community based organizations t
- Page 570 and 571: 568 Although technical advice for c
- Page 572 and 573: 570 Risk pools are usually used to
- Page 574 and 575: 572 Internal Quality Program Standa
- Page 576 and 577: 574 enrollee utilization patterns,
- Page 578 and 579: 576 that the overall prevalence of
- Page 580 and 581: 578 HMOs with risk contracts must h
- Page 582 and 583: 580 Summary As Medicaid</st
- Page 584 and 585: 582 Chapter 3 Medicaid</str
- Page 586 and 587: 584 carve-out approach: - improves
- Page 588 and 589: 586 Coordinating Medical and Non-Me
- Page 590 and 591: 588 Oregon,8 program planners origi
- Page 592 and 593: 590 Medicaid syste
- Page 596 and 597: 594 with family and friends, contac
- Page 598 and 599: 596 * The type(s) of data necessary
- Page 600 and 601: 598 * Specificity of desired result
- Page 602 and 603: 600 Initiatives under way may prove
- Page 604 and 605: 602 a estring the services authoriz
- Page 606 and 607: 604 Development of appropriate plan
- Page 608 and 609: 606 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL The
- Page 610 and 611: Establishing core developmental tea
- Page 612 and 613: 610 taken into account considerable
- Page 614 and 615: PURPOSE 612 INTRODUCTION Our purpos
- Page 616 and 617: 614 MANAGED CARE PENETRATION The de
- Page 618 and 619: 616 CHALLENGES AND RESPONSES Our re
- Page 620 and 621: 618 > In building up and maintainin
- Page 622 and 623: 620 * For the most part, the agenci
- Page 624 and 625: 622 beginning to look for associate
- Page 626 and 627: 624 challenge will be to ensure tha
- Page 628 and 629: 626 RETOOLING AS AN ISSUE Retooling
- Page 630 and 631: 628 finding effective ways of deali
- Page 632 and 633: 630 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT REPORT We
- Page 634 and 635: Defining Managed <
- Page 636 and 637: DATE: JU 27 1997 TO: June Gibbs Bro
- Page 638 and 639: 636 protocols will be enhanced thro
- Page 640 and 641: 638 Broad and explicit state health
- Page 642 and 643: 640 APPENDIX C ENDNOTES 1. See, for
592<br />
Oversight/M<strong>on</strong>itoring Quality<br />
Determining Goals<br />
The critical first step to m<strong>on</strong>itoring quality is to be clear about the expected results of<br />
services for c<strong>on</strong>sumers, plans and the system.<br />
Several states noted the importance of engaging stakeholders early <strong>on</strong> to determine<br />
goals and how they ought to be measured. However, various stakeholders often<br />
have c<strong>on</strong>flicting goals and priorities; balancing these views can be challenging. In<br />
order to gather public input, New York's Quality Assurance Task Force surveyed<br />
approximately 2000 stakeholders regarding desired outcomes. Massachusetts made<br />
'the public' an active participant in the c<strong>on</strong>tract development process by c<strong>on</strong>vening<br />
workgroups of different stakeholders, which created standards included in the<br />
purchasing specificati<strong>on</strong>s. While, Iowa used a Request for Informati<strong>on</strong> process to<br />
obtain stakeholder input <strong>on</strong> performance measures. Sixty indicators developed are<br />
now in use.<br />
States stressed that the standards traditi<strong>on</strong>ally used by commercial managed care<br />
organizati<strong>on</strong>s may not work for n<strong>on</strong>-commercial populati<strong>on</strong>s. One way to work<br />
around this is to create evaluati<strong>on</strong> teams for the creati<strong>on</strong> and review of the requests<br />
for proposals including the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> agency, mental health departments, other state<br />
agencies, and c<strong>on</strong>sumers.<br />
From a c<strong>on</strong>sumer's perspective, the goal of managed mental health care is to assist<br />
recovery and build functi<strong>on</strong>al capacity. This can be measured m "n<strong>on</strong>-medical<br />
ways" such as the capacity to hold a job or participate in school. Such quality of life<br />
issues can be difficult to define. Wisc<strong>on</strong>sin's Children Come First program's<br />
performance measures include the child's success in school, lack of involvement<br />
with the juvenile justice system, and expressed family satisfacti<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Measuring Success<br />
Quality assessment calls for observing and collecting informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> three aspects of<br />
care.<br />
* The "structural" elements, such as accreditati<strong>on</strong> status of a health plan.<br />
* The "processes", or what practiti<strong>on</strong>ers do to and for their patients from<br />
preventi<strong>on</strong> and screening to diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitati<strong>on</strong> or<br />
support services.<br />
The Nati<strong>on</strong>al Academy for State Health Policy* @8/97 ><br />
IV-89