Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
584 carve-out approach: - improves the capacity to meet the mental health needs of severe and persistently mentally ill adults and children; - is an important first step in developing expertise in managed mental health care; - compensates for mainstream plans' lack of experience, capacity or willingness to provide mental health services; - improves access by assuring that mental health needs do not "fall through the cracks;" - alleviates the bias of the traditional medically-oriented managed care system against mental. health; - may operate more effectively and efficiently (professionals who perform large numbers of specialized procedures for certain conditions should enjoy economies of scale 4 ); - may reduce or prevent risk selection; - allows for reinvestment of savings gained from inpatient and other 24-hour care into other mental health services; and - clarifies administrative tasks (for example, prior to carving out managed mental health programs, several states noted that many HMOs sub-contracted behavioral health to other organizations, making these services difficult for the state to monitor). Partial carve-out model: Delaware and Washington both have partial carve-out models, but their models have little in common. - Delaware, only allows managed care organizations to provide less acute mental health services. State agencies continue to provide many services (such as psychiatric hospitalization and residential treatment) for adults and children with severe and prolonged mental illness. This system arose from the concern that the managed care organizations did not have the capacity to provide deep-end services. - Washington carves-out nearly all mental health services, except those provided in primary care settings, limited psychological testing and one hour per month with a psychiatrist. Washington's community mental health program operates under legislatively mandated regional (county-based) authorities. Supporting the established, if ever-changing, system of care for people with mental illness is the chosen course. States using partial carve outs seek to tailor their programs to get the best of both strategies. 4 Ibid, p. 8. The National Academy for State Health Policy * 0 8/97 IV.81
585 Goals of
- Page 536 and 537: 534 facility's delivery, dosage, an
- Page 538 and 539: 536 * Strategies for measuring netw
- Page 540 and 541: 538. arrangements with traditional
- Page 542 and 543: 540 community based or well elders.
- Page 544 and 545: 542 Finally, coordination for vulne
- Page 546 and 547: 544 Care Coordinat
- Page 548 and 549: 546 home health agency developed a
- Page 550 and 551: 548 develop a case management syste
- Page 552 and 553: 550 Coordinating services is compli
- Page 554 and 555: Highlights 552 Effective care coord
- Page 556 and 557: 554 beneficiaries that belong to th
- Page 558 and 559: 556 services when needed. This is t
- Page 560 and 561: 558 federal government and not at s
- Page 562 and 563: 560 cannot enroll a person in a Med
- Page 564 and 565: 562 Medicare members are not typica
- Page 566 and 567: 564 Regence HMO Oregon staff noted
- Page 568 and 569: 566 community based organizations t
- Page 570 and 571: 568 Although technical advice for c
- Page 572 and 573: 570 Risk pools are usually used to
- Page 574 and 575: 572 Internal Quality Program Standa
- Page 576 and 577: 574 enrollee utilization patterns,
- Page 578 and 579: 576 that the overall prevalence of
- Page 580 and 581: 578 HMOs with risk contracts must h
- Page 582 and 583: 580 Summary As Medicaid</st
- Page 584 and 585: 582 Chapter 3 Medicaid</str
- Page 588 and 589: 586 Coordinating Medical and Non-Me
- Page 590 and 591: 588 Oregon,8 program planners origi
- Page 592 and 593: 590 Medicaid syste
- Page 594 and 595: 592 Oversight/Monitoring Quality De
- Page 596 and 597: 594 with family and friends, contac
- Page 598 and 599: 596 * The type(s) of data necessary
- Page 600 and 601: 598 * Specificity of desired result
- Page 602 and 603: 600 Initiatives under way may prove
- Page 604 and 605: 602 a estring the services authoriz
- Page 606 and 607: 604 Development of appropriate plan
- Page 608 and 609: 606 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL The
- Page 610 and 611: Establishing core developmental tea
- Page 612 and 613: 610 taken into account considerable
- Page 614 and 615: PURPOSE 612 INTRODUCTION Our purpos
- Page 616 and 617: 614 MANAGED CARE PENETRATION The de
- Page 618 and 619: 616 CHALLENGES AND RESPONSES Our re
- Page 620 and 621: 618 > In building up and maintainin
- Page 622 and 623: 620 * For the most part, the agenci
- Page 624 and 625: 622 beginning to look for associate
- Page 626 and 627: 624 challenge will be to ensure tha
- Page 628 and 629: 626 RETOOLING AS AN ISSUE Retooling
- Page 630 and 631: 628 finding effective ways of deali
- Page 632 and 633: 630 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT REPORT We
- Page 634 and 635: Defining Managed <
585<br />
Goals of <str<strong>on</strong>g>Managed</str<strong>on</strong>g> Mental Health <str<strong>on</strong>g>Care</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
States asserted that the issue is not whether to carve out mental health managed<br />
care, but how care can best be managed for pers<strong>on</strong>s with mental health needs. These<br />
states believed that managed care can move the current medically-based system to a<br />
system promoting preventi<strong>on</strong>, rehabilitati<strong>on</strong>, and recovery, but emphasized that the<br />
goals in moving mental health services or populati<strong>on</strong>s into managed care must be<br />
clear. They agreed that the goals of mental health managed care are to:<br />
* integrate physical and mental health care to provide a seamless system<br />
of care that treats the whole pers<strong>on</strong>;5<br />
* help individuals with mental illness toward recovery and toward<br />
maximizing their choices and independence;<br />
* promote community-based, highly individualized services; and<br />
* use dollars more efficiently.<br />
While there has been c<strong>on</strong>siderable criticism about the cost-saving goals of managed<br />
care, these states stressed that the current payment system of care for pers<strong>on</strong>s with<br />
mental illness is not efficient for the c<strong>on</strong>sumers nor for the payers. Fee-for-service<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> limits the types of services provided and has a str<strong>on</strong>g instituti<strong>on</strong>al bias,<br />
while managed care has the potential to provide more flexible, c<strong>on</strong>sumer-oriented<br />
benefits. Most of the 35 states (plus the District of Columbia) offering mental health<br />
services through managed care have used the savings from managed care to<br />
broaden their service coverage for mental health.6<br />
States cauti<strong>on</strong>ed that the growing popularity of disease management within<br />
managed care is generally inc<strong>on</strong>sistent with the goals of maximizing choice for<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sumers and providing care that best addresses the needs of the whole pers<strong>on</strong>.<br />
They cauti<strong>on</strong>ed that disease management can be medically-oriented and diagnosisbased<br />
while the goals of the managed mental health care system are to further<br />
functi<strong>on</strong>al capacity and recovery.<br />
5 A study completed by Indiana's <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> agency of its n<strong>on</strong>-instituti<strong>on</strong>alized <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
disabled populati<strong>on</strong> found that nearly 30% of the beneficiaries with a psychiatric diagnosis also had<br />
serious physical health problems. Source: Collette Croze, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Managed</str<strong>on</strong>g> Mental Healthcare.<br />
(Portland, ME: Nati<strong>on</strong>al Academy for State Health Policy, 1995).<br />
6 From the forthcoming publicati<strong>on</strong> by The Lewin Group: SAMHSA <str<strong>on</strong>g>Managed</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Care</str<strong>on</strong>g> Tracking<br />
System: Phase 1, Executive Summaty to Final Report.<br />
The Nati<strong>on</strong>al Academy for State Health Policy 0 8/97 IV-82