Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
572 Internal Quality Program Standards Internal quality program standards refer to the standards that states require each plan's quality assurance/improvement program to meet. 37 Ensuring that plan internal systems work to ensure the delivery of quality care is an important first step in ensuring that the overall program delivers quality care. In general, states require plans to establish a committee to oversee all plan activity, including establishing standards for participating providers, identifying issues for study, conducting studies, and developing the plan's response to study findings. Most states specify some aspects of the committee's structure, some of the sources of information the committee must use to identify study topics and may sometimes even identify a specific study topic. Although most states include specifications for the same types of issues, some states that enroll special populations into
573 who have a disability. Finally, this State specifies that the committee must review and analyze all complaints on a quarterly basis, "including review of persistent and significant complaints from OMAP members (or their representatives) who are Aged, Blind, Disabled or Children Receiving SOSCF or OYA Services." Many other states take an approach similar to Tennessee's. This State seeks to ensure that the plan's quality assurance program is comprehensive for all
- Page 524 and 525: 522 special populations, and states
- Page 526 and 527: 524 Chapter 2 Care
- Page 528 and 529: 526 settings. Finally, plans that s
- Page 530 and 531: 5281 needs. For example, women who
- Page 532 and 533: 530 Oregon's rules require that pla
- Page 534 and 535: 532 beneficiaries on July 1, 1997.
- Page 536 and 537: 534 facility's delivery, dosage, an
- Page 538 and 539: 536 * Strategies for measuring netw
- Page 540 and 541: 538. arrangements with traditional
- Page 542 and 543: 540 community based or well elders.
- Page 544 and 545: 542 Finally, coordination for vulne
- Page 546 and 547: 544 Care Coordinat
- Page 548 and 549: 546 home health agency developed a
- Page 550 and 551: 548 develop a case management syste
- Page 552 and 553: 550 Coordinating services is compli
- Page 554 and 555: Highlights 552 Effective care coord
- Page 556 and 557: 554 beneficiaries that belong to th
- Page 558 and 559: 556 services when needed. This is t
- Page 560 and 561: 558 federal government and not at s
- Page 562 and 563: 560 cannot enroll a person in a Med
- Page 564 and 565: 562 Medicare members are not typica
- Page 566 and 567: 564 Regence HMO Oregon staff noted
- Page 568 and 569: 566 community based organizations t
- Page 570 and 571: 568 Although technical advice for c
- Page 572 and 573: 570 Risk pools are usually used to
- Page 576 and 577: 574 enrollee utilization patterns,
- Page 578 and 579: 576 that the overall prevalence of
- Page 580 and 581: 578 HMOs with risk contracts must h
- Page 582 and 583: 580 Summary As Medicaid</st
- Page 584 and 585: 582 Chapter 3 Medicaid</str
- Page 586 and 587: 584 carve-out approach: - improves
- Page 588 and 589: 586 Coordinating Medical and Non-Me
- Page 590 and 591: 588 Oregon,8 program planners origi
- Page 592 and 593: 590 Medicaid syste
- Page 594 and 595: 592 Oversight/Monitoring Quality De
- Page 596 and 597: 594 with family and friends, contac
- Page 598 and 599: 596 * The type(s) of data necessary
- Page 600 and 601: 598 * Specificity of desired result
- Page 602 and 603: 600 Initiatives under way may prove
- Page 604 and 605: 602 a estring the services authoriz
- Page 606 and 607: 604 Development of appropriate plan
- Page 608 and 609: 606 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL The
- Page 610 and 611: Establishing core developmental tea
- Page 612 and 613: 610 taken into account considerable
- Page 614 and 615: PURPOSE 612 INTRODUCTION Our purpos
- Page 616 and 617: 614 MANAGED CARE PENETRATION The de
- Page 618 and 619: 616 CHALLENGES AND RESPONSES Our re
- Page 620 and 621: 618 > In building up and maintainin
- Page 622 and 623: 620 * For the most part, the agenci
573<br />
who have a disability. Finally, this State specifies that the committee must review<br />
and analyze all complaints <strong>on</strong> a quarterly basis, "including review of persistent and<br />
significant complaints from OMAP members (or their representatives) who are<br />
Aged, Blind, Disabled or Children Receiving SOSCF or OYA Services."<br />
Many other states take an approach similar to Tennessee's. This State seeks to<br />
ensure that the plan's quality assurance program is comprehensive for all <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
beneficiaries enrolled in the plan. Specifically, the Tennessee c<strong>on</strong>tract states that<br />
these activities must "review the entire range of care provided by the organizati<strong>on</strong>,<br />
by assuring that all demographic groups, care settings, and types of services are<br />
included in the scope of the review." Tennessee's c<strong>on</strong>tract goes <strong>on</strong> to further specify<br />
that for the clinical studies the plan must perform, "...reflects the populati<strong>on</strong> served<br />
by the managed care organizati<strong>on</strong> in terms of age groups, disease categories, and<br />
special risk status." Finally, c<strong>on</strong>tinuing this theme Tennessee specifies that the plan<br />
must develop clinical guidelines for the "full spectrum of populati<strong>on</strong>s enrolled in<br />
the plan."<br />
External Reviews<br />
In additi<strong>on</strong> to standards for a plan's internal quality assurance/improvement<br />
system, states perform their own studies to directly examine the care provided to<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> enrollees. Federal regulati<strong>on</strong>s require that states hire an external quality<br />
review organizati<strong>on</strong> (EQRO) to review the care provided by comprehensive health<br />
plans <strong>on</strong> an annual basis. In additi<strong>on</strong> many states undertake their own studies to<br />
directly examine some aspects of the care delivered by plans. These studies were<br />
discussed in detail in the last chapter of Volume II, so that discussi<strong>on</strong> will not be<br />
repeated here. Rather this secti<strong>on</strong> discusses some of the studies two states that have<br />
programs that serve special populati<strong>on</strong>s (Oreg<strong>on</strong> and Ariz<strong>on</strong>a) are undertaking.<br />
State Experience with EQRO Reviews<br />
Under <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g>, the state agency must c<strong>on</strong>tract with a peer review organizati<strong>on</strong><br />
(PRO), a PRO-like entity or an accreditati<strong>on</strong> agency to evaluate the quality of care<br />
within reach plan serving <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> beneficiaries. There are no federal prescripti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
for the scope of work c<strong>on</strong>ducted under the external quality review functi<strong>on</strong> for<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g>, and, over time, states have broadened this activity to include focused<br />
studies, random record reviews, assessments of a plan's internal quality<br />
management program and member surveys.39<br />
In Oreg<strong>on</strong> the EQRO c<strong>on</strong>tract is overseen by the Research and Analysis team within<br />
the State's quality assurance unit. This team also reviews plan solvency, reviews<br />
39 The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 expands the types of entities that are qualified to<br />
c<strong>on</strong>duct the external independent review of managed care plans. Also, HCFA, in coordinati<strong>on</strong> with the<br />
Nati<strong>on</strong>al Governors' Associati<strong>on</strong> and The Nati<strong>on</strong>al <str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g> for Quality Assurance, will develop the<br />
protocols for the external quality review functi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
The Nati<strong>on</strong>al Academy for State Health Policy * t 8/97 IV-70