Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

aging.senate.gov
from aging.senate.gov More from this publisher
29.07.2013 Views

572 Internal Quality Program Standards Internal quality program standards refer to the standards that states require each plan's quality assurance/improvement program to meet. 37 Ensuring that plan internal systems work to ensure the delivery of quality care is an important first step in ensuring that the overall program delivers quality care. In general, states require plans to establish a committee to oversee all plan activity, including establishing standards for participating providers, identifying issues for study, conducting studies, and developing the plan's response to study findings. Most states specify some aspects of the committee's structure, some of the sources of information the committee must use to identify study topics and may sometimes even identify a specific study topic. Although most states include specifications for the same types of issues, some states that enroll special populations into ong>Medicaidong> managed care plans have modified their specific requirements to better accommodate the health care needs of these populations. As demonstrated by Chart H, in 1996 many states based these standards either on NCQA's standards or the previously discussed QARI guidelines. Oregon, for example, includes C H several provisions in its National Academy for State Health Policy administrative code to ensure that ong>Medicaidong> Manged Cae each.plan.s internal quality QQuality Improvement Strategies each plan's internal quality Risk-Baud Coltr duig assurance system will meet the 100% [AMC & 0 SS N needs of the elderly and persons 90S ROt.atd l25 019y with disabilities. Specifically, this 80S . t. State specifies that the 70 W % 63% 61% S, membership of the quality assurance committee shall include 60 < .. . 20. ... a . 9% or have access to consultation e* from individuals with knowledge _ a of all populations served .t . including those who are elderly or who have a disability. In addition, 20. 10 . Oregon specifies that several of the 0% .j reviews 38 each plan is required to QAlU~ State-specified NCQA Platn performmus eaddresans t theqneds to requtred to guidelines standards standards perform enrollee perform must address the needs of satisfaction surveys plan members who are elderly or Standards Used for Plan's Internal QI Program 37 Under the Batanced Budget Act of 1997, HCFA will develop quality assurance standards for use by states in preparing a quality assessment or improvement strategy. Internal quality program standards must be at least as extensive as those imposed by HCFA. 38 Areas that plans must review include: an annual review of the plan's entire quality assurance program, utilization of services and its relationship to adverse or unexpected outcomes, and review of member educational programs. The National Academy for State Health Policy* 0 8/97 IV-69

573 who have a disability. Finally, this State specifies that the committee must review and analyze all complaints on a quarterly basis, "including review of persistent and significant complaints from OMAP members (or their representatives) who are Aged, Blind, Disabled or Children Receiving SOSCF or OYA Services." Many other states take an approach similar to Tennessee's. This State seeks to ensure that the plan's quality assurance program is comprehensive for all ong>Medicaidong> beneficiaries enrolled in the plan. Specifically, the Tennessee contract states that these activities must "review the entire range of care provided by the organization, by assuring that all demographic groups, care settings, and types of services are included in the scope of the review." Tennessee's contract goes on to further specify that for the clinical studies the plan must perform, "...reflects the population served by the managed care organization in terms of age groups, disease categories, and special risk status." Finally, continuing this theme Tennessee specifies that the plan must develop clinical guidelines for the "full spectrum of populations enrolled in the plan." External Reviews In addition to standards for a plan's internal quality assurance/improvement system, states perform their own studies to directly examine the care provided to ong>Medicaidong> enrollees. Federal regulations require that states hire an external quality review organization (EQRO) to review the care provided by comprehensive health plans on an annual basis. In addition many states undertake their own studies to directly examine some aspects of the care delivered by plans. These studies were discussed in detail in the last chapter of Volume II, so that discussion will not be repeated here. Rather this section discusses some of the studies two states that have programs that serve special populations (Oregon and Arizona) are undertaking. State Experience with EQRO Reviews Under ong>Medicaidong>, the state agency must contract with a peer review organization (PRO), a PRO-like entity or an accreditation agency to evaluate the quality of care within reach plan serving ong>Medicaidong> beneficiaries. There are no federal prescriptions for the scope of work conducted under the external quality review function for ong>Medicaidong>, and, over time, states have broadened this activity to include focused studies, random record reviews, assessments of a plan's internal quality management program and member surveys.39 In Oregon the EQRO contract is overseen by the Research and Analysis team within the State's quality assurance unit. This team also reviews plan solvency, reviews 39 The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 expands the types of entities that are qualified to conduct the external independent review of managed care plans. Also, HCFA, in coordination with the National Governors' Association and The National ong>Committeeong> for Quality Assurance, will develop the protocols for the external quality review function. The National Academy for State Health Policy * t 8/97 IV-70

573<br />

who have a disability. Finally, this State specifies that the committee must review<br />

and analyze all complaints <strong>on</strong> a quarterly basis, "including review of persistent and<br />

significant complaints from OMAP members (or their representatives) who are<br />

Aged, Blind, Disabled or Children Receiving SOSCF or OYA Services."<br />

Many other states take an approach similar to Tennessee's. This State seeks to<br />

ensure that the plan's quality assurance program is comprehensive for all <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

beneficiaries enrolled in the plan. Specifically, the Tennessee c<strong>on</strong>tract states that<br />

these activities must "review the entire range of care provided by the organizati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

by assuring that all demographic groups, care settings, and types of services are<br />

included in the scope of the review." Tennessee's c<strong>on</strong>tract goes <strong>on</strong> to further specify<br />

that for the clinical studies the plan must perform, "...reflects the populati<strong>on</strong> served<br />

by the managed care organizati<strong>on</strong> in terms of age groups, disease categories, and<br />

special risk status." Finally, c<strong>on</strong>tinuing this theme Tennessee specifies that the plan<br />

must develop clinical guidelines for the "full spectrum of populati<strong>on</strong>s enrolled in<br />

the plan."<br />

External Reviews<br />

In additi<strong>on</strong> to standards for a plan's internal quality assurance/improvement<br />

system, states perform their own studies to directly examine the care provided to<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> enrollees. Federal regulati<strong>on</strong>s require that states hire an external quality<br />

review organizati<strong>on</strong> (EQRO) to review the care provided by comprehensive health<br />

plans <strong>on</strong> an annual basis. In additi<strong>on</strong> many states undertake their own studies to<br />

directly examine some aspects of the care delivered by plans. These studies were<br />

discussed in detail in the last chapter of Volume II, so that discussi<strong>on</strong> will not be<br />

repeated here. Rather this secti<strong>on</strong> discusses some of the studies two states that have<br />

programs that serve special populati<strong>on</strong>s (Oreg<strong>on</strong> and Ariz<strong>on</strong>a) are undertaking.<br />

State Experience with EQRO Reviews<br />

Under <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g>, the state agency must c<strong>on</strong>tract with a peer review organizati<strong>on</strong><br />

(PRO), a PRO-like entity or an accreditati<strong>on</strong> agency to evaluate the quality of care<br />

within reach plan serving <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> beneficiaries. There are no federal prescripti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

for the scope of work c<strong>on</strong>ducted under the external quality review functi<strong>on</strong> for<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g>, and, over time, states have broadened this activity to include focused<br />

studies, random record reviews, assessments of a plan's internal quality<br />

management program and member surveys.39<br />

In Oreg<strong>on</strong> the EQRO c<strong>on</strong>tract is overseen by the Research and Analysis team within<br />

the State's quality assurance unit. This team also reviews plan solvency, reviews<br />

39 The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 expands the types of entities that are qualified to<br />

c<strong>on</strong>duct the external independent review of managed care plans. Also, HCFA, in coordinati<strong>on</strong> with the<br />

Nati<strong>on</strong>al Governors' Associati<strong>on</strong> and The Nati<strong>on</strong>al <str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g> for Quality Assurance, will develop the<br />

protocols for the external quality review functi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

The Nati<strong>on</strong>al Academy for State Health Policy * t 8/97 IV-70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!