29.07.2013 Views

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

569<br />

. 0 r.<br />

I c E a. E<br />

__ . t e s<br />

V a E .<br />

As shown in Chart G stop loss/reinsurance is the most popular form of risk-sharing<br />

am<strong>on</strong>g states with managed care programs. Under this form of risk-sharing the<br />

plan is usually resp<strong>on</strong>sible for an individual enrollee's care until total costs for that<br />

individual exceed a pre-determined threshold ($50,000 for example) after that point<br />

the entity sp<strong>on</strong>soring the stop loss becomes resp<strong>on</strong>sible for the cost of caring for the<br />

individual. This form of risk-sharing protects the c<strong>on</strong>tractor from excessive loss, but<br />

does not provide the State any means of recouping excessive profit (if the state<br />

wishes to do so).<br />

The next most popular strategies are risk corridors and risk pools. These methods of<br />

sharing risk depend more <strong>on</strong> aggregate experience than individual experience. In<br />

other words, they share overall program financial risk between the state and the<br />

plan or am<strong>on</strong>g plans. Specifically, risk corridors are a means of protecting both the<br />

plan and the state from financial risk <strong>on</strong> an aggregate basis. At is simplest, this<br />

approach could c<strong>on</strong>sist of the plan and the state agreeing to split any loss or profit<br />

that exceeds 25% of revenue from capitati<strong>on</strong> payments for <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> beneficiaries <strong>on</strong><br />

a fifty/fifty basis. In order to create appropriate incentives most states that use this<br />

approach have multiple corridors that entail sharing profit and loss in different<br />

proporti<strong>on</strong>s depending <strong>on</strong> the amount of profit or loss. Several states such as<br />

Wisc<strong>on</strong>sin and Ohio use this approach in their programs designed to serve pers<strong>on</strong>s<br />

with disability.<br />

The Nati<strong>on</strong>al Academy for State Health Policy * 0 8/97<br />

IV 66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!