Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

aging.senate.gov
from aging.senate.gov More from this publisher
29.07.2013 Views

568 Although technical advice for calculating and adjusting rates based on these new factors is beyond the scope of this publication there are a number of publications available to those interested in these subjects. Three of particular interest are: * Richard Kronick and Tony Dreyfus, The Challenge of Risk Adjustment for People with Disabilities: Health Based Payment for ong>Medicaidong> Programs, (Princeton, NJ: The Center for Health ong>Careong> Strategies, 1997). * Tony Dreyfus, Using Payment to Promote Better ong>Medicaidong> ong>Managedong> ong>Careong> for People with AIDS , (Washington DC: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, 1997). This publication was produced for The Kaiser Family Foundation Workgroup on ong>Medicaidong> for Persons with AIDS, which was convened by The National Academy for State Health Policy. * Issues specific to financing and payment for dual eligibles are discussed in The National Academy for State Health Policy's publication, Integration of Acute and Long Term ong>Careong>, due to be released in early September, 1997. Sharing Risk States may wish to consider sharing risk with plans that serve special populations. As previously discussed, there is significant variation in cost among members of special populations. Until states implement and test systems for calculating and varying payment rates that better accommodate the wide variation in cost they may wish to share risk with plans. This could help ensure that neither the plans nor the state are harmed financially during the implementation of ong>Medicaidong> managed care for elderly persons or persons with disabilities. This will in turn help reassure beneficiaries and their advocates that plans will not inappropriately deny care due to insufficient funds to cover the cost of care. Even after states develop rate payment methods that work for persons with disabilities and the elderly, some states may want to consider continuing to share risk with contractors for some subpopulations. For example, the accepted treatment protocols for treating persons with HIV has changed rapidly in the past. Sharing risk is one way of providing protection to plans concerned that changing treatments may create significant increases in the cost of caring for some subgroups. Some models of risk-sharing, such as risk-corridors, may also provide states an opportunity to recoup any excessive profits plans could make if changes in technology actually lowered the over-all cost of caring for ong>Medicaidong> beneficiaries. The National Acaderny for State Health Poicy * 0 8/97 IV-65

569 . 0 r. I c E a. E __ . t e s V a E . As shown in Chart G stop loss/reinsurance is the most popular form of risk-sharing among states with managed care programs. Under this form of risk-sharing the plan is usually responsible for an individual enrollee's care until total costs for that individual exceed a pre-determined threshold ($50,000 for example) after that point the entity sponsoring the stop loss becomes responsible for the cost of caring for the individual. This form of risk-sharing protects the contractor from excessive loss, but does not provide the State any means of recouping excessive profit (if the state wishes to do so). The next most popular strategies are risk corridors and risk pools. These methods of sharing risk depend more on aggregate experience than individual experience. In other words, they share overall program financial risk between the state and the plan or among plans. Specifically, risk corridors are a means of protecting both the plan and the state from financial risk on an aggregate basis. At is simplest, this approach could consist of the plan and the state agreeing to split any loss or profit that exceeds 25% of revenue from capitation payments for ong>Medicaidong> beneficiaries on a fifty/fifty basis. In order to create appropriate incentives most states that use this approach have multiple corridors that entail sharing profit and loss in different proportions depending on the amount of profit or loss. Several states such as Wisconsin and Ohio use this approach in their programs designed to serve persons with disability. The National Academy for State Health Policy * 0 8/97 IV 66

568<br />

Although technical advice for calculating and adjusting rates based <strong>on</strong> these new<br />

factors is bey<strong>on</strong>d the scope of this publicati<strong>on</strong> there are a number of publicati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

available to those interested in these subjects. Three of particular interest are:<br />

* Richard Kr<strong>on</strong>ick and T<strong>on</strong>y Dreyfus, The Challenge of Risk Adjustment<br />

for People with Disabilities: Health Based Payment for <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Programs, (Princet<strong>on</strong>, NJ: The Center for Health <str<strong>on</strong>g>Care</str<strong>on</strong>g> Strategies, 1997).<br />

* T<strong>on</strong>y Dreyfus, Using Payment to Promote Better <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Managed</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Care</str<strong>on</strong>g> for People with AIDS , (Washingt<strong>on</strong> DC: The Henry J. Kaiser<br />

Family Foundati<strong>on</strong>, 1997). This publicati<strong>on</strong> was produced for The<br />

Kaiser Family Foundati<strong>on</strong> Workgroup <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> for Pers<strong>on</strong>s with<br />

AIDS, which was c<strong>on</strong>vened by The Nati<strong>on</strong>al Academy for State Health<br />

Policy.<br />

* Issues specific to financing and payment for dual eligibles are discussed<br />

in The Nati<strong>on</strong>al Academy for State Health Policy's publicati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

Integrati<strong>on</strong> of Acute and L<strong>on</strong>g Term <str<strong>on</strong>g>Care</str<strong>on</strong>g>, due to be released in early<br />

September, 1997.<br />

Sharing Risk<br />

States may wish to c<strong>on</strong>sider sharing risk with plans that serve special populati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

As previously discussed, there is significant variati<strong>on</strong> in cost am<strong>on</strong>g members of<br />

special populati<strong>on</strong>s. Until states implement and test systems for calculating and<br />

varying payment rates that better accommodate the wide variati<strong>on</strong> in cost they may<br />

wish to share risk with plans. This could help ensure that neither the plans nor the<br />

state are harmed financially during the implementati<strong>on</strong> of <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care<br />

for elderly pers<strong>on</strong>s or pers<strong>on</strong>s with disabilities. This will in turn help reassure<br />

beneficiaries and their advocates that plans will not inappropriately deny care due to<br />

insufficient funds to cover the cost of care.<br />

Even after states develop rate payment methods that work for pers<strong>on</strong>s with<br />

disabilities and the elderly, some states may want to c<strong>on</strong>sider c<strong>on</strong>tinuing to share<br />

risk with c<strong>on</strong>tractors for some subpopulati<strong>on</strong>s. For example, the accepted treatment<br />

protocols for treating pers<strong>on</strong>s with HIV has changed rapidly in the past. Sharing<br />

risk is <strong>on</strong>e way of providing protecti<strong>on</strong> to plans c<strong>on</strong>cerned that changing treatments<br />

may create significant increases in the cost of caring for some subgroups. Some<br />

models of risk-sharing, such as risk-corridors, may also provide states an<br />

opportunity to recoup any excessive profits plans could make if changes in<br />

technology actually lowered the over-all cost of caring for <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> beneficiaries.<br />

The Nati<strong>on</strong>al Acaderny for State Health Poicy * 0 8/97<br />

IV-65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!