Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
568 Although technical advice for calculating and adjusting rates based on these new factors is beyond the scope of this publication there are a number of publications available to those interested in these subjects. Three of particular interest are: * Richard Kronick and Tony Dreyfus, The Challenge of Risk Adjustment for People with Disabilities: Health Based Payment for
569 . 0 r. I c E a. E __ . t e s V a E . As shown in Chart G stop loss/reinsurance is the most popular form of risk-sharing among states with managed care programs. Under this form of risk-sharing the plan is usually responsible for an individual enrollee's care until total costs for that individual exceed a pre-determined threshold ($50,000 for example) after that point the entity sponsoring the stop loss becomes responsible for the cost of caring for the individual. This form of risk-sharing protects the contractor from excessive loss, but does not provide the State any means of recouping excessive profit (if the state wishes to do so). The next most popular strategies are risk corridors and risk pools. These methods of sharing risk depend more on aggregate experience than individual experience. In other words, they share overall program financial risk between the state and the plan or among plans. Specifically, risk corridors are a means of protecting both the plan and the state from financial risk on an aggregate basis. At is simplest, this approach could consist of the plan and the state agreeing to split any loss or profit that exceeds 25% of revenue from capitation payments for
- Page 520 and 521: 518 particularly on a full risk bas
- Page 522 and 523: 520 Dual eligibility raises a disti
- Page 524 and 525: 522 special populations, and states
- Page 526 and 527: 524 Chapter 2 Care
- Page 528 and 529: 526 settings. Finally, plans that s
- Page 530 and 531: 5281 needs. For example, women who
- Page 532 and 533: 530 Oregon's rules require that pla
- Page 534 and 535: 532 beneficiaries on July 1, 1997.
- Page 536 and 537: 534 facility's delivery, dosage, an
- Page 538 and 539: 536 * Strategies for measuring netw
- Page 540 and 541: 538. arrangements with traditional
- Page 542 and 543: 540 community based or well elders.
- Page 544 and 545: 542 Finally, coordination for vulne
- Page 546 and 547: 544 Care Coordinat
- Page 548 and 549: 546 home health agency developed a
- Page 550 and 551: 548 develop a case management syste
- Page 552 and 553: 550 Coordinating services is compli
- Page 554 and 555: Highlights 552 Effective care coord
- Page 556 and 557: 554 beneficiaries that belong to th
- Page 558 and 559: 556 services when needed. This is t
- Page 560 and 561: 558 federal government and not at s
- Page 562 and 563: 560 cannot enroll a person in a Med
- Page 564 and 565: 562 Medicare members are not typica
- Page 566 and 567: 564 Regence HMO Oregon staff noted
- Page 568 and 569: 566 community based organizations t
- Page 572 and 573: 570 Risk pools are usually used to
- Page 574 and 575: 572 Internal Quality Program Standa
- Page 576 and 577: 574 enrollee utilization patterns,
- Page 578 and 579: 576 that the overall prevalence of
- Page 580 and 581: 578 HMOs with risk contracts must h
- Page 582 and 583: 580 Summary As Medicaid</st
- Page 584 and 585: 582 Chapter 3 Medicaid</str
- Page 586 and 587: 584 carve-out approach: - improves
- Page 588 and 589: 586 Coordinating Medical and Non-Me
- Page 590 and 591: 588 Oregon,8 program planners origi
- Page 592 and 593: 590 Medicaid syste
- Page 594 and 595: 592 Oversight/Monitoring Quality De
- Page 596 and 597: 594 with family and friends, contac
- Page 598 and 599: 596 * The type(s) of data necessary
- Page 600 and 601: 598 * Specificity of desired result
- Page 602 and 603: 600 Initiatives under way may prove
- Page 604 and 605: 602 a estring the services authoriz
- Page 606 and 607: 604 Development of appropriate plan
- Page 608 and 609: 606 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL The
- Page 610 and 611: Establishing core developmental tea
- Page 612 and 613: 610 taken into account considerable
- Page 614 and 615: PURPOSE 612 INTRODUCTION Our purpos
- Page 616 and 617: 614 MANAGED CARE PENETRATION The de
- Page 618 and 619: 616 CHALLENGES AND RESPONSES Our re
568<br />
Although technical advice for calculating and adjusting rates based <strong>on</strong> these new<br />
factors is bey<strong>on</strong>d the scope of this publicati<strong>on</strong> there are a number of publicati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
available to those interested in these subjects. Three of particular interest are:<br />
* Richard Kr<strong>on</strong>ick and T<strong>on</strong>y Dreyfus, The Challenge of Risk Adjustment<br />
for People with Disabilities: Health Based Payment for <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Programs, (Princet<strong>on</strong>, NJ: The Center for Health <str<strong>on</strong>g>Care</str<strong>on</strong>g> Strategies, 1997).<br />
* T<strong>on</strong>y Dreyfus, Using Payment to Promote Better <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Managed</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Care</str<strong>on</strong>g> for People with AIDS , (Washingt<strong>on</strong> DC: The Henry J. Kaiser<br />
Family Foundati<strong>on</strong>, 1997). This publicati<strong>on</strong> was produced for The<br />
Kaiser Family Foundati<strong>on</strong> Workgroup <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> for Pers<strong>on</strong>s with<br />
AIDS, which was c<strong>on</strong>vened by The Nati<strong>on</strong>al Academy for State Health<br />
Policy.<br />
* Issues specific to financing and payment for dual eligibles are discussed<br />
in The Nati<strong>on</strong>al Academy for State Health Policy's publicati<strong>on</strong>,<br />
Integrati<strong>on</strong> of Acute and L<strong>on</strong>g Term <str<strong>on</strong>g>Care</str<strong>on</strong>g>, due to be released in early<br />
September, 1997.<br />
Sharing Risk<br />
States may wish to c<strong>on</strong>sider sharing risk with plans that serve special populati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
As previously discussed, there is significant variati<strong>on</strong> in cost am<strong>on</strong>g members of<br />
special populati<strong>on</strong>s. Until states implement and test systems for calculating and<br />
varying payment rates that better accommodate the wide variati<strong>on</strong> in cost they may<br />
wish to share risk with plans. This could help ensure that neither the plans nor the<br />
state are harmed financially during the implementati<strong>on</strong> of <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care<br />
for elderly pers<strong>on</strong>s or pers<strong>on</strong>s with disabilities. This will in turn help reassure<br />
beneficiaries and their advocates that plans will not inappropriately deny care due to<br />
insufficient funds to cover the cost of care.<br />
Even after states develop rate payment methods that work for pers<strong>on</strong>s with<br />
disabilities and the elderly, some states may want to c<strong>on</strong>sider c<strong>on</strong>tinuing to share<br />
risk with c<strong>on</strong>tractors for some subpopulati<strong>on</strong>s. For example, the accepted treatment<br />
protocols for treating pers<strong>on</strong>s with HIV has changed rapidly in the past. Sharing<br />
risk is <strong>on</strong>e way of providing protecti<strong>on</strong> to plans c<strong>on</strong>cerned that changing treatments<br />
may create significant increases in the cost of caring for some subgroups. Some<br />
models of risk-sharing, such as risk-corridors, may also provide states an<br />
opportunity to recoup any excessive profits plans could make if changes in<br />
technology actually lowered the over-all cost of caring for <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> beneficiaries.<br />
The Nati<strong>on</strong>al Acaderny for State Health Poicy * 0 8/97<br />
IV-65