Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

aging.senate.gov
from aging.senate.gov More from this publisher
29.07.2013 Views

554 beneficiaries that belong to the population served by the program may choose a health plan or remain in the fee-for-service system. (3) States may implement a mandatory managed care program under which beneficiaries must select a health plan or a primary care case management provider. 2 3 As shown by Chart C,24 states appear to be divided as to which of the options to select-even within the same state. For example, some states may have a voluntary HMO program and a mandatory mental health carve-out program. Or, as in Utah, a program may be voluntary in the rural areas of the state and mandatory in the urban areas. 90% 82% n-31 23 As previously discussed states may currently establish voluntary programs without need of a waiver. Also, Title IV-H of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 will, as of October 1997, enable states to establish mandatory programs without need of a federal waiver for all ong>Medicaidong> beneficiaries except: dual eligibles, certain children with special health care needs and (under most circumstances) American Indians. 24 All charts in this Volume are based on information reported by states and reflect program status as of June 30, 1996. For more information about an individual state's policies please refer to Volume 1. The National Academy for State Health Policy * © 8/97 Chart C National Academy for State Health Policy ong>Medicaidong> ong>Managedong> ong>Careong> Enrollment Polides Risk-Based Contracting w 64% ~~68% 70 -16 leAFDC & E 551 * Elderly Related no n=19 Ill ~~~~~~~~~~~~47% 0 I .' n-s c 40%. . .,.,.,.,. - 36% Fib 305 : . ...... 24% . - .24% SD a~~~~~n9 e. 21 ~20% 1% n 10% . Nsll~i{m 10% Mandatory Voluntary Voluntary Alternative to a mandatory PCCM Enrollment Structure Note; The same state may opetate both . mandatory anda voluntary pmngram. IV-51

555 The next level of decision making is National Arsdemy for State Health Poticy which members of Mnmitment Policies populations that are Rsk-Bad Ct otherwise eligible from El AFDC C1 SSI * Elddy the program will Il 0 5 1 _UssI either be given the S Nopportunity to opt out . _e s_ of a mandatory adult. program or be excluded from 4-% enrollment (Chart D). X For example, states shr t tfi I , frequently allow people who are u A- i, currently under treatment to delay - Medc.d I C% l i enrollment until after the treatment is completed or until the L Z-P as". provider can transition t.. the beneficiary to a plan provider (short term medical). R c a g losty4 . b g 0s Another group that is frequently carved out M..&-aboo '. s -5. 0 5-25 are those who are 0M 1o% 20% 30M 40 50% 00% 50% 50% 90% 100% receiving institutional Percent of States care. States may decide to carve-out these individuals because p td unK - t mood populd- 3150 h 0=.. 30 por atApl . W the state feels that the individual's care is already being coordinated by the institution. Many states also carve-out dual eligibles (those eligible for both ong>Medicaidong> and Medicare) due to the administrative difficulties of coordinating the two programs described throughout this volume. Enrollment Process The process of enrolling beneficiaries into ong>Medicaidong> managed care plans is a critical component of providing access to quality health care services. States have built their systems with the expectation that beneficiaries who know what they need and prefer and who voluntarily select a plan that meets those needs are more likely to be satisfied with the plan and to use services as they are needed. Beneficiaries need a process that fully informs them about the availability of plans and their networks, the implications of managed care and the procedures for effectively accessing The National Academy for State Health Policy * 08/97 IV-52

554<br />

beneficiaries that bel<strong>on</strong>g to the populati<strong>on</strong> served by the program may choose a<br />

health plan or remain in the fee-for-service system. (3) States may implement a<br />

mandatory managed care program under which beneficiaries must select a health<br />

plan or a primary care case management provider. 2 3 As shown by Chart C,24 states<br />

appear to be divided as to which of the opti<strong>on</strong>s to select-even within the same<br />

state. For example, some states may have a voluntary HMO program and a<br />

mandatory mental health carve-out program. Or, as in Utah, a program may be<br />

voluntary in the rural areas of the state and mandatory in the urban areas.<br />

90% 82%<br />

n-31<br />

23 As previously discussed states may currently establish voluntary programs without need<br />

of a waiver. Also, Title IV-H of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 will, as of October 1997, enable states to<br />

establish mandatory programs without need of a federal waiver for all <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> beneficiaries except: dual<br />

eligibles, certain children with special health care needs and (under most circumstances) American<br />

Indians.<br />

24 All charts in this Volume are based <strong>on</strong> informati<strong>on</strong> reported by states and reflect program<br />

status as of June 30, 1996. For more informati<strong>on</strong> about an individual state's policies please refer to<br />

Volume 1.<br />

The Nati<strong>on</strong>al Academy for State Health Policy * © 8/97<br />

Chart C<br />

Nati<strong>on</strong>al Academy for State Health Policy<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Managed</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Care</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Enrollment Polides<br />

Risk-Based C<strong>on</strong>tracting<br />

w 64% ~~68%<br />

70 -16<br />

leAFDC & E 551 * Elderly<br />

Related no n=19<br />

Ill ~~~~~~~~~~~~47%<br />

0 I .' n-s<br />

c 40%. . .,.,.,.,. - 36%<br />

Fib 305 : . ...... 24% . - .24%<br />

SD a~~~~~n9 e. 21<br />

~20% 1% n<br />

10% . Nsll~i{m<br />

10%<br />

Mandatory Voluntary Voluntary<br />

Alternative to a<br />

mandatory PCCM<br />

Enrollment Structure<br />

Note; The same state may opetate both . mandatory anda voluntary<br />

pmngram.<br />

IV-51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!