29.07.2013 Views

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

525<br />

* the state should develop corrective acti<strong>on</strong> strategies to improve the<br />

health plan's performance-perhaps through a corrective acti<strong>on</strong> plan<br />

or the impositi<strong>on</strong> of c<strong>on</strong>tract penalties.<br />

This chapter is based primarily <strong>on</strong> informati<strong>on</strong> gathered during site visits and<br />

interviews with state officials, managed care organizati<strong>on</strong>s and advocates in<br />

Ariz<strong>on</strong>a, California, New Jersey, Oreg<strong>on</strong> and Tennessee. All of these states enroll<br />

some members of special populati<strong>on</strong>s into their <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care programs.<br />

Site Visit State Background<br />

State Year Risk-Based SSI Enrollment as of Aged Enrollment as of<br />

Iogram. Begar. jun^e 30, .996 Junre 30 ,1996<br />

Ariz<strong>on</strong>a 1982 Acute care 57A412 33,690<br />

1989 L<strong>on</strong>g term care<br />

(Both programs are<br />

mandatory.)<br />

California 1983 Mandatory 48,832 13,657<br />

1972 Voluntary l<br />

New Jersey 1985 Mandatory 5,387<br />

198145 Voluntary l<br />

Oreg<strong>on</strong> 1995 11,799 (MH <strong>on</strong>ly) 7.871 (MH <strong>on</strong>ly)<br />

31,311 (dental <strong>on</strong>ly) 20,909 (dental <strong>on</strong>ly)<br />

31,671 (comprehensive) 16,759 (comprehensive)<br />

Tennessee 1994 217.666 151.370<br />

Accessl<br />

Most states use multiple methods for ensuring access for <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care<br />

enrollees (see Volume II for details about many of these methods). But, there are<br />

access issues that are of particular c<strong>on</strong>cern to members of special populati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

People with chr<strong>on</strong>ic c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s worry that they will be unable to access physicians<br />

and specialists familiar with their health and functi<strong>on</strong>al needs or specialists with<br />

whom they have a l<strong>on</strong>g standing relati<strong>on</strong>ship. Members of these groups also want<br />

services that maintain their functi<strong>on</strong>al capacity in their own homes or in residential<br />

I Readers should be aware that Title IV-H, § 4705 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997<br />

requires states to have access standards (and m<strong>on</strong>itor plan compliance with these standards) 'so that<br />

covered services are available within reas<strong>on</strong>able timeframes and in a manner that ensures c<strong>on</strong>tinuity of<br />

care and adequate primary care and specialized services capacity.' Title IV-H also specifies that these<br />

standards 'shall be c<strong>on</strong>sistent with standards that the Secretary first establishes within 1 year after the<br />

date of the enactment of this secti<strong>on</strong>." These new requirements will become effective <strong>on</strong> January 1,<br />

1999.<br />

The Nati<strong>on</strong>al Academy for State Health Policy * © 8/97 IV-22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!