Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
516 experience with special populations. (Volume II contains more information on the use of outcomes measures.) With Whom will the State Contract?
517 is moving in this direction now that its managed care program (and managed care marketplace) has matured. 12 * Large Risk Pools. In general, a large portion of the total cost of caring for vulnerable populations is due to the cost of caring for a small number of people within these populations. Some states have found that spreading the risk of subpopulations across the broader
- Page 468 and 469: 466 United States General Accountin
- Page 470 and 471: Results in Brief B-276078 468 care
- Page 472 and 473: B-270078 470 Medi-Cal was implement
- Page 474 and 475: _.27_7 Tab 1: Mad-C Eiglbli and Enr
- Page 476 and 477: ~~- - o~~BZ760?S 474 I J I the enro
- Page 478 and 479: B.276078 476 delaying the contracti
- Page 480 and 481: State's Education Process Has Not R
- Page 482 and 483: B.276078 480 and thereby supplement
- Page 484 and 485: Weaknesses in State Management of t
- Page 486 and 487: B-276078 484 standards can provide
- Page 488 and 489: Insufficient Communication and Invo
- Page 490 and 491: Some Safety-Net Providers Are Encou
- Page 492 and 493: Conclusions B-276D78 490 Safety-net
- Page 494 and 495: B-270078 492 current enrollment bro
- Page 496 and 497: Contents Letter 494 Appendix 30 Sco
- Page 498 and 499: (1115) oPP. -.M.taoy 496 oversight
- Page 500 and 501: 498 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Volume of
- Page 502 and 503: 500 Is Lock-in to a Managed
- Page 504 and 505: 502 Plan and Provider Issues ......
- Page 506 and 507: 504 Chapter 1 Program Design Issues
- Page 508 and 509: 506 Other studies attest to improve
- Page 510 and 511: 508 Will the Program Be Voluntary o
- Page 512 and 513: 510 additional option for people wi
- Page 514 and 515: 512 contractor collect spenddown pa
- Page 516 and 517: 514 Option A is still quite rare. P
- Page 520 and 521: 518 particularly on a full risk bas
- Page 522 and 523: 520 Dual eligibility raises a disti
- Page 524 and 525: 522 special populations, and states
- Page 526 and 527: 524 Chapter 2 Care
- Page 528 and 529: 526 settings. Finally, plans that s
- Page 530 and 531: 5281 needs. For example, women who
- Page 532 and 533: 530 Oregon's rules require that pla
- Page 534 and 535: 532 beneficiaries on July 1, 1997.
- Page 536 and 537: 534 facility's delivery, dosage, an
- Page 538 and 539: 536 * Strategies for measuring netw
- Page 540 and 541: 538. arrangements with traditional
- Page 542 and 543: 540 community based or well elders.
- Page 544 and 545: 542 Finally, coordination for vulne
- Page 546 and 547: 544 Care Coordinat
- Page 548 and 549: 546 home health agency developed a
- Page 550 and 551: 548 develop a case management syste
- Page 552 and 553: 550 Coordinating services is compli
- Page 554 and 555: Highlights 552 Effective care coord
- Page 556 and 557: 554 beneficiaries that belong to th
- Page 558 and 559: 556 services when needed. This is t
- Page 560 and 561: 558 federal government and not at s
- Page 562 and 563: 560 cannot enroll a person in a Med
- Page 564 and 565: 562 Medicare members are not typica
- Page 566 and 567: 564 Regence HMO Oregon staff noted
516<br />
experience with special populati<strong>on</strong>s. (Volume II c<strong>on</strong>tains more informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> the<br />
use of outcomes measures.)<br />
With Whom will the State C<strong>on</strong>tract?<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> agencies use a variety of c<strong>on</strong>tractors to serve vulnerable populati<strong>on</strong>s,<br />
including commercial HMOs, county-based plans, community-based providers, and<br />
HMO/specialty center partnerships. Selected examples are shown in the table below.<br />
Type<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Special</str<strong>on</strong>g> Populati<strong>on</strong> C<strong>on</strong>tractors: State Examples<br />
Commercial HMOs Ariz<strong>on</strong>a AHCCCS (CIGNA)<br />
Colorado (Rocky Mountain HMO)<br />
Oreg<strong>on</strong> (Providence Health Plans)<br />
Tennessee (Prudential)<br />
Examples<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> Plans, Ariz<strong>on</strong>a ALTCS (Maricopa County Health Plan)<br />
including County Plans Oreg<strong>on</strong> (<str<strong>on</strong>g>Care</str<strong>on</strong>g> Oreg<strong>on</strong>)<br />
Sister State Agency Ariz<strong>on</strong>a ALTCS (Department of Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Security, for people with<br />
developmental disabilities)<br />
Community-based Massachusetts (Community Medical Alliance)<br />
Providers Wisc<strong>on</strong>sin (Partnership)<br />
HMO/<str<strong>on</strong>g>Special</str<strong>on</strong>g>ty Ohio (ABC)<br />
Center Partnerships Wisc<strong>on</strong>sin (I<str<strong>on</strong>g>Care</str<strong>on</strong>g>)<br />
A quick glance at the table shows that states are not limiting themselves to <strong>on</strong>e<br />
approach. In fact, in order to meet HCFA's two-plan requirement for mandatory<br />
programs, states may need to encourage the development of multiple c<strong>on</strong>tracting<br />
arrangements. Factors states c<strong>on</strong>sider when selecting an approach include the<br />
following.<br />
Purchasing Philosophy and Market C<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
A state's purchasing philosophy and the market c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s within the state can<br />
affect its c<strong>on</strong>tractor selecti<strong>on</strong> process in a number of ways.<br />
* Commercial Market. Those states with a well-developed and<br />
competitive commercial HMO marketplace may find that these<br />
existing HMOs offer the best opportunity to obtain the highest quality<br />
health care at the best price. Commercial HMOs already have the<br />
infrastructure needed to manage care and so can generally afford to<br />
offer the 'best deal'-although some states have also found that what a<br />
plan can provide does not always match what a plan is willing to offer.<br />
Generally speaking, Massachusetts fall into this category, and Ariz<strong>on</strong>a<br />
The Nati<strong>on</strong>al Academy for State Health Policy e © 8/97<br />
IV-13