29.07.2013 Views

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

437<br />

of pers<strong>on</strong>s who can observe and identify problems in service quality and<br />

notify appropriate officials when there are deficiencies.<br />

Because program quality depends <strong>on</strong> the active participati<strong>on</strong> of recipients,<br />

families, and service providers, states are also providing substantial<br />

trsin nr to these groups to encourage a-id s-trengther. their participati<strong>on</strong><br />

Training can include informing recipients and families of available service<br />

providers, procedures for providing feedback about services, and steps to<br />

take if quality is not improved Training for service providers may focus <strong>on</strong><br />

reinforcing the fact that the recipient and family have the right to make<br />

choices about services and that staff must be resp<strong>on</strong>sive to those choices<br />

unless they are inappropriate for safety c<strong>on</strong>cerns or for other compelling<br />

reas<strong>on</strong>s, such as available financial resources.<br />

States are also modifying how they m<strong>on</strong>itor quality. Traditi<strong>on</strong>ally, they<br />

emphasized compliance with certain criteria, such as maintaining a<br />

minimum level of staff resources and implementing standard care<br />

processes. Some states are focusing their quality m<strong>on</strong>itoring more <strong>on</strong><br />

outcome measures for each individual while still assessing providers'<br />

compliance with program standards. For example, states, including the<br />

three we visited, are trying to determine whether the recipients are living<br />

where and with whom they chose, whether they are safe in this<br />

envir<strong>on</strong>ment, and whether they are satisfied with their envir<strong>on</strong>ment and<br />

the services they receive.<br />

States are also attempting to make their oversight less intrusive for the<br />

recipients. For example, some states use trained volunteers to interview<br />

recipients at their homes <strong>on</strong> a periodic basis to check the quality of<br />

services received In other instances, although case managers are required<br />

to meet recipients <strong>on</strong> a regular basis, meetings can be arranged at the<br />

recipient's c<strong>on</strong>venience, including in the evening or <strong>on</strong> weekends or at a<br />

place the recipient likes to meet at, such as at his or her home or local<br />

park or library. Case managers talk with the recipients and their families<br />

about the quality of the services they receive and take any acti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

necessary to correct deficiencies.<br />

Some Recipients May Face While officials in the three states we visited and other experts agree that<br />

Avoidable Risks Until many pers<strong>on</strong>s prefer services provided at home to services provided in<br />

States More Fully Develop instituti<strong>on</strong>s or other group settings, they also note that providing services<br />

and Implemet Evolving at and home<br />

ohplement<br />

presents unique problems Evolving in ensuring<br />

focus<br />

quality.<br />

is<br />

Because<br />

<strong>on</strong> providing<br />

the new<br />

individual choice, the types of services that are<br />

Approaches to Quality<br />

P.e Is<br />

GAME1G fl-ge.is0 Wdwr P-V- f- D _. DIibId

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!