Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
- I 412 App-edU I Sw Wd Methodology For each state, we reviewed the contractual and other requirements the states have established with plans for these selected accountability indicators. We also interviewed officials from the state
413 Appendix II Federal and State Oversight Roles of
- Page 364 and 365: Encounter Data Analysis Shows Poten
- Page 366 and 367: 364 Chapter 4 Risk-Adjusted Rates a
- Page 368 and 369: 366 Cu.pd 4 Rk-A4tAjLd Row Ad RIASW
- Page 370 and 371: States Could Experience Adverse Sel
- Page 372 and 373: 370 Ckspt. 4 JUek-Mtod Rate Wd HIa
- Page 374 and 375: 372 Ch.piWr 4 JU-i.k.d Row md RJAk-
- Page 376 and 377: 374 Coob,, 4 RkikAdjned Rtr -d Rub-
- Page 378 and 379: 376 rued R.I. . 2".shBd c- provider
- Page 380 and 381: 378 c-5 Obh- .. I, Co.eWda, ad CHe
- Page 382 and 383: 380 Ob-e-eU-o, Co-ded, end C-ost pr
- Page 384 and 385: 382 United States General Accountin
- Page 386 and 387: Results in Brief B-Z70335 384 manag
- Page 388 and 389: B-2Kn0 386 assess service utilizati
- Page 390 and 391: Table 1: Characteristics of <strong
- Page 392 and 393: B-27035 390 numbers of patients. In
- Page 394 and 395: B-270335 392 number of primary care
- Page 396 and 397: B-Z7Oa33 394 developed on the premi
- Page 398 and 399: States Challenged to Develop Effect
- Page 400 and 401: B-270335 398 that beneficiary use o
- Page 402 and 403: B.270335 400 of the care provided a
- Page 404 and 405: States Could Learn More From Improv
- Page 406 and 407: Targeted Analyses of Grievance Data
- Page 408 and 409: Observations Agency Comments and Ou
- Page 410 and 411: B-270335 408 Finally, the experts w
- Page 412 and 413: 410 Appendix I Scope and Methodolog
- Page 416 and 417: 414 AppeAdt U Fedo.I aod Stt. Ove0s
- Page 418 and 419: 416 Appendix III Major Contributors
- Page 420 and 421: GAO July 1996 GAO/HEHS-96-120 418 U
- Page 422 and 423: B-26632 420 family home, rather tha
- Page 424 and 425: Background 1-206320 422 traditional
- Page 426 and 427: States Use Waivers to Expand and Ch
- Page 428 and 429: 84=20 426 Figure 1: Staftes Use of
- Page 430 and 431: B-266320 428 began the 1990s with s
- Page 432 and 433: B26320 430 variety of other service
- Page 434 and 435: Enrollment Caps and Management Prac
- Page 436 and 437: Change in Federal Rule Could Result
- Page 438 and 439: States Are Introducing Innovations
- Page 440 and 441: B-nato 438 offered and the means fo
- Page 442 and 443: 440 We are sending copies of this r
- Page 444 and 445: C-m 442 Table 2: Changes in Number
- Page 446 and 447: 444 App-ar I So-p and Mraodsogo ent
- Page 448 and 449: 446 Appendix H Medicaid</st
- Page 450 and 451: 448 App-di. f M~I Wd., _. So 4 Of0
- Page 452 and 453: 450 App-.i. il _-.1 - Desd s UCFVA'
- Page 454 and 455: 452 Apeadls mn Stadad Seee - Defind
- Page 456 and 457: 454 Appedi. M St.d.ed Se&ee s Dneoe
- Page 458 and 459: Chore 456 Am..& IV LAO n.Gd .Mt. ,
- Page 460 and 461: Occupational Therapy and Assessment
- Page 462 and 463: Psychological Services Provider Typ
- I<br />
412<br />
App-edU I<br />
Sw Wd Methodology<br />
For each state, we reviewed the c<strong>on</strong>tractual and other requirements the<br />
states have established with plans for these selected accountability<br />
indicators. We also interviewed officials from the state <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g>. health,<br />
and insurance agencies to discuss specific c<strong>on</strong>tract requirements with<br />
managed care plans, state oversight activities and state acti<strong>on</strong>s available<br />
or taken as a result of m<strong>on</strong>itoring, and state plans for changes in and<br />
expansi<strong>on</strong>s to their managed care programs.<br />
To identify federal requirements and guidance available to states to<br />
oversee their <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care programs, we interviewed officials<br />
from HCFA'S central office and Chicago and Philadelphia regi<strong>on</strong>al offices.<br />
the Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) Office of Inspector<br />
General, and state-level advocacy groups. We also interviewed experts<br />
with The George Washingt<strong>on</strong> University Center for Health Policy<br />
Research, the Nati<strong>on</strong>al Associati<strong>on</strong> of <str<strong>on</strong>g>Managed</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Care</str<strong>on</strong>g> Regulators, the<br />
Nati<strong>on</strong>al <str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> Quality Assurance, and the Nati<strong>on</strong>al Associati<strong>on</strong> of<br />
Insurance Commissi<strong>on</strong>ers. Finally, we c<strong>on</strong>sulted with the following<br />
experts and researchers in the course of our work: Jane Horvath. Nati<strong>on</strong>al<br />
Academy for State Health Policy, Washingt<strong>on</strong>, D.C.; Robert Hurley,<br />
Medical College of Virginia, Richm<strong>on</strong>d, Virginia; and Stephen Somers and<br />
Karen Brodsky, Center for Health Strategies. Princet<strong>on</strong>, New Jersey.<br />
We performed our work between October 1995 and March 1997 in<br />
accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards.<br />
Pqp 32 t 42M,7-fs Mediced M-d C'.- Antclfty