29.07.2013 Views

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

410<br />

Appendix I<br />

Scope and Methodology<br />

To ensure quality in their <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care programs, states use a<br />

number of quality assurance and oversight mechanisms. For example,<br />

some states require accreditati<strong>on</strong> of plans by independent entities, such as<br />

the Nati<strong>on</strong>al <str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> Quality Assurance. Most states build into their<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tracts with managed care plans a variety of accountability measures<br />

and processes. Once states have c<strong>on</strong>tracted with plans, they m<strong>on</strong>itor the<br />

plans to ensure that they comply with these requirements.<br />

Based <strong>on</strong> our review of federal requirements and guidelines and state<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tracts and supporting documents, we identified a number of<br />

accountability measures and processes that states comm<strong>on</strong>ly include in<br />

their c<strong>on</strong>tracts with managed care plans. States can rely <strong>on</strong> various<br />

c<strong>on</strong>trols to assess compliance with some of these measures-including<br />

plan licensing, physician credentialing. and fiscal solvency requirements.<br />

Some accountability measures are more difficult to develop c<strong>on</strong>trols for<br />

and, therefore, are more difficult to m<strong>on</strong>itor.<br />

To assess state efforts to hold managed care plans accountable for<br />

meeting <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> program goals and providing beneficiaries enrolled in<br />

capitated managed care plans the care they need, we narrowed the focus<br />

of our study to three areas: ensuring an adequate provider network,<br />

tracking the medical care provided to beneficiaries. and assessing<br />

beneficiary satisfacti<strong>on</strong>. From am<strong>on</strong>g numerous quality assurance<br />

measures and processes, we identified 10 that states comm<strong>on</strong>ly use to<br />

m<strong>on</strong>itor plan compliance In these accountability areas. Health <str<strong>on</strong>g>Care</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Financing Administrati<strong>on</strong> (HCFA) officials and experts we c<strong>on</strong>tacted agreed<br />

that these measures and processes are essential to ensuring that plans<br />

meet the terms of their c<strong>on</strong>tracts. (See table 1. 1.)<br />

Table 1.1: Selected Accountability<br />

Measures and P e Accountability area Measure or process<br />

Adequacy of provider network -Patient-to-primary-care-physician raos<br />

-Access to specialists<br />

-Travel distances and waiting fimes<br />

Adequacy of medical care<br />

Beneficiary sassfact<strong>on</strong><br />

-Utilizati<strong>on</strong> statstics<br />

-Encounter data<br />

-Cirnical studies<br />

_Medical record audits<br />

-Satrsfacti<strong>on</strong> surveys<br />

-Grievance procedares<br />

-Disenroliment data<br />

PaP 30<br />

GCAO/HSH97.86 M&did Ma-d Ce Aountsbdlty

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!