Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
B-Z7Oa33 394 developed on the premise that certain factors-such as lengthy travel times and distances, a physician's failure to schedule appointments in a timely manner, and excessive wait times in the physician's office-can discourage patients from seeking care. In general, the states we visited established maximum travel requirements of 20 miles or 30 minutes for urban areas and 30 miles or 30 minutes for rural areas. For their specialist networks, the four states do not have or grant some exceptions to travel requirements, since significant portions of their
Systems for Assessing Adequacy of Medical
- Page 346 and 347: Table a& Eabent to Which 17 State I
- Page 348 and 349: 346 So A- hbydf TSo -d Cam fo DIbbi
- Page 350 and 351: Table 2.5: Extent to Which 17 State
- Page 352 and 353: 350 8t" Age Bowi T-Mar 11 Cue fRa D
- Page 354 and 355: 352 C".Pt a Q...itA- Efl~t. . - C f
- Page 356 and 357: Addressing Concerns Through Enrollm
- Page 358 and 359: Assignment Active Management of a D
- Page 360 and 361: 358 fo.V D Axd B ref .Ak,.d - CC-e
- Page 362 and 363: Targeted Quality-of-Care</s
- Page 364 and 365: Encounter Data Analysis Shows Poten
- Page 366 and 367: 364 Chapter 4 Risk-Adjusted Rates a
- Page 368 and 369: 366 Cu.pd 4 Rk-A4tAjLd Row Ad RIASW
- Page 370 and 371: States Could Experience Adverse Sel
- Page 372 and 373: 370 Ckspt. 4 JUek-Mtod Rate Wd HIa
- Page 374 and 375: 372 Ch.piWr 4 JU-i.k.d Row md RJAk-
- Page 376 and 377: 374 Coob,, 4 RkikAdjned Rtr -d Rub-
- Page 378 and 379: 376 rued R.I. . 2".shBd c- provider
- Page 380 and 381: 378 c-5 Obh- .. I, Co.eWda, ad CHe
- Page 382 and 383: 380 Ob-e-eU-o, Co-ded, end C-ost pr
- Page 384 and 385: 382 United States General Accountin
- Page 386 and 387: Results in Brief B-Z70335 384 manag
- Page 388 and 389: B-2Kn0 386 assess service utilizati
- Page 390 and 391: Table 1: Characteristics of <strong
- Page 392 and 393: B-27035 390 numbers of patients. In
- Page 394 and 395: B-270335 392 number of primary care
- Page 398 and 399: States Challenged to Develop Effect
- Page 400 and 401: B-270335 398 that beneficiary use o
- Page 402 and 403: B.270335 400 of the care provided a
- Page 404 and 405: States Could Learn More From Improv
- Page 406 and 407: Targeted Analyses of Grievance Data
- Page 408 and 409: Observations Agency Comments and Ou
- Page 410 and 411: B-270335 408 Finally, the experts w
- Page 412 and 413: 410 Appendix I Scope and Methodolog
- Page 414 and 415: - I 412 App-edU I Sw Wd Methodology
- Page 416 and 417: 414 AppeAdt U Fedo.I aod Stt. Ove0s
- Page 418 and 419: 416 Appendix III Major Contributors
- Page 420 and 421: GAO July 1996 GAO/HEHS-96-120 418 U
- Page 422 and 423: B-26632 420 family home, rather tha
- Page 424 and 425: Background 1-206320 422 traditional
- Page 426 and 427: States Use Waivers to Expand and Ch
- Page 428 and 429: 84=20 426 Figure 1: Staftes Use of
- Page 430 and 431: B-266320 428 began the 1990s with s
- Page 432 and 433: B26320 430 variety of other service
- Page 434 and 435: Enrollment Caps and Management Prac
- Page 436 and 437: Change in Federal Rule Could Result
- Page 438 and 439: States Are Introducing Innovations
- Page 440 and 441: B-nato 438 offered and the means fo
- Page 442 and 443: 440 We are sending copies of this r
- Page 444 and 445: C-m 442 Table 2: Changes in Number
B-Z7Oa33<br />
394<br />
developed <strong>on</strong> the premise that certain factors-such as lengthy travel<br />
times and distances, a physician's failure to schedule appointments in a<br />
timely manner, and excessive wait times in the physician's office-can<br />
discourage patients from seeking care.<br />
In general, the states we visited established maximum travel requirements<br />
of 20 miles or 30 minutes for urban areas and 30 miles or 30 minutes for<br />
rural areas. For their specialist networks, the four states do not have or<br />
grant some excepti<strong>on</strong>s to travel requirements, since significant porti<strong>on</strong>s of<br />
their <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> populati<strong>on</strong> can reside in rural areas where certain types of<br />
specialty care may not be available. These states also require providers to<br />
meet state-established standards for scheduling appointments and<br />
attending to beneficiaries in a timely manner.' 2<br />
To determine whether plans are complying with the time and distance<br />
travel requirements, each state we visited reviews documentati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> the<br />
locati<strong>on</strong> of provider sites prior to c<strong>on</strong>tracting with a plan and <strong>on</strong> a periodic<br />
schedule after c<strong>on</strong>tracting. Ariz<strong>on</strong>a and Tennessee, for example, use a<br />
computer-based zip-code program. This allows them to determine whether<br />
the locati<strong>on</strong>s of the primary care physicians and other providers in the<br />
network, such as dentists and hospitals, meet c<strong>on</strong>tractual time and<br />
distance requirements. In additi<strong>on</strong>, each state requires plans to provide<br />
transportati<strong>on</strong> for beneficiaries who require medical attenti<strong>on</strong> and who<br />
cannot get to their provider's locati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> their own, such as the elderly.<br />
These four states use various approaches-involving plan-provided data or<br />
independent checks-to m<strong>on</strong>itor provider compliance with wait-time<br />
requirements. For example, each state requires plans to include<br />
appointment standards in its subc<strong>on</strong>tracts with providers and to review<br />
logs to ensure that providers comply. During their periodic compliamce<br />
reviews, the states review the plans procedures to ensure that providers<br />
have complied with the standards: the states also review selected sign-in<br />
and appointment books. For example, Tennessee found during <strong>on</strong>e<br />
quarterly review of plan networks that some plans were not complying<br />
with the c<strong>on</strong>tractual travel requirements for their dental networks.<br />
According to state officials, the plans were notified of the deficiencies, and<br />
most took acti<strong>on</strong>s to resolve them. In at least <strong>on</strong>e case, a plan did not take<br />
acti<strong>on</strong> and the state withheld 10 percent of the plan's capitati<strong>on</strong> payment<br />
Ce-riy the to staes reqairneofts to hedule appointments with prdmy cart pttynicis re<br />
s e. ay apoipnetts fru emergenCy rar. within 24 W 48 bos h uf bgertor stck rare nod 2 to 3<br />
weeks For .ouit pcerrtie ae Reqirents For tn-otfice -iittNg timls ar gereruily 3ti to45<br />
mstt S n s-ates to specity apinm nn rtasds tur spe iaity reerinr aud dental services, no<br />
weil n taetnity. mmai his-. tro sutt abas services<br />
idW 12<br />
GAIHEHS-97-88 Mdial Mnad Car AaunstbUtty