Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
B-27035 390 numbers of patients. Information from patients, while more accessible than medical records, can be problematic as well. Patients typically are not in a position to know what specific care or services they need for a given condition and often cannot assess the appropriateness of the care they receive-or do not receive. In addition, patients new to managed care may confuse differences in the way the system is meant to operate with deficiencies In the care provided. Problems associated with obtaining meaningful patient survey information may be even more pronounced for those in the surveyed population with unique language or cultural needs or who are unaccustomed to receiving routine health care in a structured system. Educating and Informing prospective and newly enrolled beneficiaries about managed care and helping them learn how to use the system-as some states have done in their
Compliance With Primary
- Page 342 and 343: Table 21 nEnollmen of Disabled Bene
- Page 344 and 345: 342 chona Se. As To~ed Id C"fn, Dai
- Page 346 and 347: Table a& Eabent to Which 17 State I
- Page 348 and 349: 346 So A- hbydf TSo -d Cam fo DIbbi
- Page 350 and 351: Table 2.5: Extent to Which 17 State
- Page 352 and 353: 350 8t" Age Bowi T-Mar 11 Cue fRa D
- Page 354 and 355: 352 C".Pt a Q...itA- Efl~t. . - C f
- Page 356 and 357: Addressing Concerns Through Enrollm
- Page 358 and 359: Assignment Active Management of a D
- Page 360 and 361: 358 fo.V D Axd B ref .Ak,.d - CC-e
- Page 362 and 363: Targeted Quality-of-Care</s
- Page 364 and 365: Encounter Data Analysis Shows Poten
- Page 366 and 367: 364 Chapter 4 Risk-Adjusted Rates a
- Page 368 and 369: 366 Cu.pd 4 Rk-A4tAjLd Row Ad RIASW
- Page 370 and 371: States Could Experience Adverse Sel
- Page 372 and 373: 370 Ckspt. 4 JUek-Mtod Rate Wd HIa
- Page 374 and 375: 372 Ch.piWr 4 JU-i.k.d Row md RJAk-
- Page 376 and 377: 374 Coob,, 4 RkikAdjned Rtr -d Rub-
- Page 378 and 379: 376 rued R.I. . 2".shBd c- provider
- Page 380 and 381: 378 c-5 Obh- .. I, Co.eWda, ad CHe
- Page 382 and 383: 380 Ob-e-eU-o, Co-ded, end C-ost pr
- Page 384 and 385: 382 United States General Accountin
- Page 386 and 387: Results in Brief B-Z70335 384 manag
- Page 388 and 389: B-2Kn0 386 assess service utilizati
- Page 390 and 391: Table 1: Characteristics of <strong
- Page 394 and 395: B-270335 392 number of primary care
- Page 396 and 397: B-Z7Oa33 394 developed on the premi
- Page 398 and 399: States Challenged to Develop Effect
- Page 400 and 401: B-270335 398 that beneficiary use o
- Page 402 and 403: B.270335 400 of the care provided a
- Page 404 and 405: States Could Learn More From Improv
- Page 406 and 407: Targeted Analyses of Grievance Data
- Page 408 and 409: Observations Agency Comments and Ou
- Page 410 and 411: B-270335 408 Finally, the experts w
- Page 412 and 413: 410 Appendix I Scope and Methodolog
- Page 414 and 415: - I 412 App-edU I Sw Wd Methodology
- Page 416 and 417: 414 AppeAdt U Fedo.I aod Stt. Ove0s
- Page 418 and 419: 416 Appendix III Major Contributors
- Page 420 and 421: GAO July 1996 GAO/HEHS-96-120 418 U
- Page 422 and 423: B-26632 420 family home, rather tha
- Page 424 and 425: Background 1-206320 422 traditional
- Page 426 and 427: States Use Waivers to Expand and Ch
- Page 428 and 429: 84=20 426 Figure 1: Staftes Use of
- Page 430 and 431: B-266320 428 began the 1990s with s
- Page 432 and 433: B26320 430 variety of other service
- Page 434 and 435: Enrollment Caps and Management Prac
- Page 436 and 437: Change in Federal Rule Could Result
- Page 438 and 439: States Are Introducing Innovations
- Page 440 and 441: B-nato 438 offered and the means fo
Compliance With Primary<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Care</str<strong>on</strong>g> Physician<br />
Requirements Provides<br />
Incomplete Informati<strong>on</strong><br />
About Network Adequacy<br />
3-270335<br />
391<br />
as there are few standards for health service utilizati<strong>on</strong>, there are few<br />
standards for what c<strong>on</strong>stitutes a sufficient provider network. Three of the<br />
four states have established a specific number of primary care physicians<br />
that a plan must have, and all require plans to provide a full range of<br />
specialty services. The states also have relied <strong>on</strong> criteria that measure<br />
beneficiaries' ability to reach their primary care physician within a<br />
reas<strong>on</strong>able timue, in terms of miaximum travel distances and waiting times.<br />
After c<strong>on</strong>tract award, the states use various m<strong>on</strong>itoring techniques to<br />
determine the extent to which provider practices are in fact open to<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> beneficiaries. These measures, however, do not necessarily<br />
ensure that beneficiaries have access to the care that they need. Whether<br />
these measures provide meaningful informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> beneficiary access is<br />
largely dependent <strong>on</strong> whether state m<strong>on</strong>itoring efforts are independent<br />
and systematic and go bey<strong>on</strong>d plan-reported, paper-based indicati<strong>on</strong>s of<br />
compliance.<br />
One criteri<strong>on</strong> that states have established in an effort to ensure a sufficient<br />
provider network relates to the availability of primary care physicians,<br />
expressed as a ratio of enrolled beneficiaries per primary care physician.'<br />
At the time of our review, Ariz<strong>on</strong>a and Tennessee used a maximum<br />
patient-to-primary-care-physician ratio of 2,500 to 1, as required by the<br />
c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s of their dem<strong>on</strong>strati<strong>on</strong> waivers, and Pennsylvania required<br />
plans to meet a ratio of 1.600 to IL. Wisc<strong>on</strong>sin did not have specific<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tractual requirements for plans but looked for a ratio of approximately<br />
1,200 to 1. To m<strong>on</strong>itor plan compliance with these ratios, the states require<br />
plans to submit updated provider listings either annually, to coincide with<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tract renewal, or as frequently as m<strong>on</strong>thly. The states also require<br />
plans to report all changes to the network as they occur and to note in<br />
their provider directories given to beneficiaries those providers who<br />
currently do not accept new patients."<br />
The states that we visited have found that plans in their managed care<br />
programs have complied with their patient-to-primary-care-physician<br />
ratios, But compliance with these ratios may not indicate actual physician<br />
capacity or <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> beneficiaries access to care. We believe that the<br />
tIn 1994. Uenrea w <strong>on</strong>e ph-rooy cor physlclo tor ecey 1.173 Unlded Slo es dd-<strong>on</strong><strong>on</strong> (bod <strong>on</strong> GAO<br />
uenlsy of It HHS Aro- R-esource FiL).<br />
' ,nenhWln i October 1997. Aretne wl requor pl<strong>on</strong>s I to.- h -xoldpoUsR-<br />
-pd. -ycecphyicmL- o t- Or tot t<strong>on</strong> x o0edotso nod 1.zt 200 to fo cltldn<strong>on</strong> coder o 13.<br />
ATypIcally, pln dlecgo -nn upd.ted -n 11y. co-neqnnly. b-ftines mot directy co.toct f.n<br />
0m099 - pln f<strong>on</strong> 0 -e t f<strong>on</strong>ot<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> phyinC aclikbodIy<br />
PWF9<br />
C.g9WIME97-86 S edleed Goqed car tbllty