Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
B-2Kn0 386 assess service utilization patterns. Pennsylvania's use of encounter data was even more limited. Al four states also use data from plan-conducted clinical studies and state-conducted medical record audits to help assess patient care. Improved plan and state methodologies, however, could Increase the usefulness of the data collected from these reviews. The four states that we visited also have sought to assess the adequacy of patient care by tapping Into Information provided directly by
AgesM 387 coordinate the delivery of health services.' Some plans pay their subcontracted providers on a fee-for-service basis for care provided, while others pass certain financial risks on to providers by linking the providers' revenues or profits to the total number of services provided to plan enrollees. While capitated managed care has strong cost-containment incentives, it also provides incentives for plans and providers to limit services-not only must plans and providers absorb all costs that exceed the capitation rate, they profit If the capitation rate exceeds their costs. Nationwide, most states initially Implemented
- Page 338 and 339: Objectives, Scope, and Methodology
- Page 340 and 341: 338 Chapter 2 States Are Moving Tow
- Page 342 and 343: Table 21 nEnollmen of Disabled Bene
- Page 344 and 345: 342 chona Se. As To~ed Id C"fn, Dai
- Page 346 and 347: Table a& Eabent to Which 17 State I
- Page 348 and 349: 346 So A- hbydf TSo -d Cam fo DIbbi
- Page 350 and 351: Table 2.5: Extent to Which 17 State
- Page 352 and 353: 350 8t" Age Bowi T-Mar 11 Cue fRa D
- Page 354 and 355: 352 C".Pt a Q...itA- Efl~t. . - C f
- Page 356 and 357: Addressing Concerns Through Enrollm
- Page 358 and 359: Assignment Active Management of a D
- Page 360 and 361: 358 fo.V D Axd B ref .Ak,.d - CC-e
- Page 362 and 363: Targeted Quality-of-Care</s
- Page 364 and 365: Encounter Data Analysis Shows Poten
- Page 366 and 367: 364 Chapter 4 Risk-Adjusted Rates a
- Page 368 and 369: 366 Cu.pd 4 Rk-A4tAjLd Row Ad RIASW
- Page 370 and 371: States Could Experience Adverse Sel
- Page 372 and 373: 370 Ckspt. 4 JUek-Mtod Rate Wd HIa
- Page 374 and 375: 372 Ch.piWr 4 JU-i.k.d Row md RJAk-
- Page 376 and 377: 374 Coob,, 4 RkikAdjned Rtr -d Rub-
- Page 378 and 379: 376 rued R.I. . 2".shBd c- provider
- Page 380 and 381: 378 c-5 Obh- .. I, Co.eWda, ad CHe
- Page 382 and 383: 380 Ob-e-eU-o, Co-ded, end C-ost pr
- Page 384 and 385: 382 United States General Accountin
- Page 386 and 387: Results in Brief B-Z70335 384 manag
- Page 390 and 391: Table 1: Characteristics of <strong
- Page 392 and 393: B-27035 390 numbers of patients. In
- Page 394 and 395: B-270335 392 number of primary care
- Page 396 and 397: B-Z7Oa33 394 developed on the premi
- Page 398 and 399: States Challenged to Develop Effect
- Page 400 and 401: B-270335 398 that beneficiary use o
- Page 402 and 403: B.270335 400 of the care provided a
- Page 404 and 405: States Could Learn More From Improv
- Page 406 and 407: Targeted Analyses of Grievance Data
- Page 408 and 409: Observations Agency Comments and Ou
- Page 410 and 411: B-270335 408 Finally, the experts w
- Page 412 and 413: 410 Appendix I Scope and Methodolog
- Page 414 and 415: - I 412 App-edU I Sw Wd Methodology
- Page 416 and 417: 414 AppeAdt U Fedo.I aod Stt. Ove0s
- Page 418 and 419: 416 Appendix III Major Contributors
- Page 420 and 421: GAO July 1996 GAO/HEHS-96-120 418 U
- Page 422 and 423: B-26632 420 family home, rather tha
- Page 424 and 425: Background 1-206320 422 traditional
- Page 426 and 427: States Use Waivers to Expand and Ch
- Page 428 and 429: 84=20 426 Figure 1: Staftes Use of
- Page 430 and 431: B-266320 428 began the 1990s with s
- Page 432 and 433: B26320 430 variety of other service
- Page 434 and 435: Enrollment Caps and Management Prac
- Page 436 and 437: Change in Federal Rule Could Result
B-2Kn0<br />
386<br />
assess service utilizati<strong>on</strong> patterns. Pennsylvania's use of encounter data<br />
was even more limited. Al four states also use data from plan-c<strong>on</strong>ducted<br />
clinical studies and state-c<strong>on</strong>ducted medical record audits to help assess<br />
patient care. Improved plan and state methodologies, however, could<br />
Increase the usefulness of the data collected from these reviews.<br />
The four states that we visited also have sought to assess the adequacy of<br />
patient care by tapping Into Informati<strong>on</strong> provided directly by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
beneficiaries enrolled In managed care, such as patient satisfacti<strong>on</strong><br />
surveys and data gathered from grievance processes. While it Is Important<br />
to gauge patients' satisfacti<strong>on</strong> with the care they receive, satisfacti<strong>on</strong> data<br />
generally are not reliable measures of quality: most people lack the<br />
knowledge needed to adequately evaluate the appropriateness of the care<br />
they receive-or do not receive. In additi<strong>on</strong>, newcomers to managed care<br />
may not fully understand how the system operates to effectively access<br />
services, advocate <strong>on</strong> their own behalf. or register dissatisfacti<strong>on</strong> with<br />
their plan or provider. This is especially true for individuals with diverse<br />
language and cultural needs. Regardless, we found that if the states we<br />
visited improved certain methodologies for designing satisfacti<strong>on</strong> surveys<br />
and stratified their survey and grievance data, they would have a better<br />
understanding of the needs and c<strong>on</strong>cerns of their <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> beneficiaries<br />
enrolled in managed care-especially those with special needs or chr<strong>on</strong>ic<br />
illnesses, who may experience problems in accessing services but whose<br />
numbers are too small to show up in analyses of broad-based data.<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g>. ajoint federal-state health financing program for the poor.<br />
Background provides health care for about 37 milli<strong>on</strong> low-income people. 3 In fiscal year<br />
1996, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> expenditures accounted for more than 20 percent of state<br />
budgets. To help c<strong>on</strong>trol expenditures and expand access to health care,<br />
36 states have mandated enrollment for some porti<strong>on</strong> of their <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
populati<strong>on</strong> in managed care programs. As of June 1995, nearly 14 percent<br />
of <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> eligibles were enrolled in capitated programs.<br />
Under a capitated managed care system, states pay c<strong>on</strong>tracted plans a<br />
m<strong>on</strong>thly per-enrollee amount before services are delivered-a distinct<br />
departure from the traditi<strong>on</strong>al claims-based fee-for-service system in<br />
which providers are paid for each service as bills are submitted. In turn,<br />
the plans employ or subc<strong>on</strong>tract with primary care physicians, who<br />
1Medkceid -wtAbhled In 1965 a ide XtIX ofX th. S.. Secsy Aot (42 US.C. 1396 ci #q.).<br />
Mild to &deiniod at the isie keeL with teftte oeaght by HCFA within the oep-nn of<br />
Health end Heman Seie (HHS).<br />
PWF 4<br />
CGAO HS-97-6 Med.ice Meed C_ A-eetebtIty