29.07.2013 Views

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

375<br />

Curt- 4<br />

Rkk-.Adjtd at Ed Iexkl,4i cR<br />

HedP Rfdt I--to o Id-<br />

Drobwd Bnosfi-<br />

Risk Corridors Risk Have Five states-the Corridors<br />

District of Columbia, Massachusetts, Ohio, Utah, and<br />

Greatest Impact <strong>on</strong> the potentially negative incentives affecting health plans'treatment of<br />

Negative Financial disabled enrollees.4 Unlike reinsurance, risk corridors work in two<br />

Incentives directi<strong>on</strong>s, sharing both losses and profits with health plans below and<br />

Incentives above preestablished ratios.<br />

Have Wisc<strong>on</strong>sin-are building risk corridors into their c<strong>on</strong>tracts to help mitigate<br />

As the <strong>on</strong>ly mechanism that specifically imits health plan profits, risk<br />

corridors have the greatest impact <strong>on</strong> incentives facing health plans to<br />

either reach for the lowest-cost recipients in any given rate cell or to<br />

underserve the high-cost enrollees they cannot avoid. The point at which<br />

profit and loss sharing begins-the width of the risk corridor-varies from<br />

state to state, as does the degree to which profits and losses are shared.<br />

Table 4.3 shows the risk corridor arrangement Massachusetts has in is<br />

current c<strong>on</strong>tract with a plan that provides prepaid care for the severely<br />

disabled<br />

Table 4.3: Massachusetts Risk<br />

Corridor for Plan Providing Prepaid<br />

Cam to th SHr"Y Disabled<br />

Sttuat<strong>on</strong> at end of c<strong>on</strong>tract period<br />

Plan has medical expenditures totaling<br />

more than 10% below capitati<strong>on</strong> payments<br />

Outcome<br />

The difference above 10% revets to the<br />

state<br />

Plan has medicalr.enditwres between<br />

o and 10% below capitat<strong>on</strong> payments<br />

Plan keeps 40% of the ditlerence: 60%<br />

reverts to the state<br />

Plan has medical expenditures between<br />

o and 10% abme capitati<strong>on</strong> payments<br />

State pays 50% of the difference<br />

Plan has medical expenditures totaling<br />

mere than 10% above capitati<strong>on</strong> payments<br />

Slate pays 75% of the difference<br />

Source: Masaacivevts Executive Ofice of Health da H-uran tarv ces<br />

By reducing the potential for profits, the state is affecting implicit health<br />

plan calculati<strong>on</strong>s regarding the costs and benefits of restricting services.<br />

When $1 saved from restricting service translates to SS of profit, a health<br />

plan may be willing to risk losing enrollees who are dissatisfied with<br />

health plan service. With risk corridors, however, $1 saved may <strong>on</strong>ly<br />

translate to 30 or 40 cents in profit, reducing the benefit side of the<br />

equati<strong>on</strong> Because health plans understand how risk corridor<br />

arrangements operate before entering into <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> prepaid care<br />

agreements, corridors also have the unique feature of being a retrospective<br />

adjustment with a prospective impact. Risk corridors and their profit<br />

limits may affect health plan risk arrangements established with individual<br />

en Stc to tha Se lato thmnn h bettdraIr mats et da<br />

Zrhedoa to te pra tste diwiole& t bt ep-de in Oscmben IttS<br />

noe 59<br />

tlasMkE-36-tt Medd I1ated ca be te he 1ied

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!