29.07.2013 Views

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

States Could Experience<br />

Adverse Selecti<strong>on</strong> and<br />

Lose M<strong>on</strong>ey With <str<strong>on</strong>g>Managed</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Care</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

368<br />

Rkk-A4tid Rhi. ad RIk-6h.t Coo<br />

Drueld B.Wkid<br />

impossible situati<strong>on</strong>. However, these states had limited ability to verify or<br />

refute such claims with any certainty.<br />

Health plans are not the <strong>on</strong>ly players in the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care<br />

marketplace thai can face adverse selecti<strong>on</strong> and financial risks. When<br />

prepaid managed care plan enrollment is voluntary (as it is in 11 of the 17<br />

states now using prepaid care for some or all of their disabled<br />

beneficiaries), the state may experience adverse selecti<strong>on</strong>. Specifically,<br />

where participati<strong>on</strong> is voluntary, beneficiaries with relatively few health<br />

care needs (who may have few, if any, existing relati<strong>on</strong>ships with<br />

specialists) may choose prepaid care, while beneficiaries needing more<br />

expensive care (who may have l<strong>on</strong>g-standing relati<strong>on</strong>ships with specific<br />

providers) may choose to remain in fee-for-service care. When enrollment<br />

is mandatory but excepti<strong>on</strong>s are allowed, a state may similarly face<br />

adverse selecti<strong>on</strong><br />

Enrollment patterns in which the users of the most expensive medical<br />

services are in fee-for-service care and the relatively healthy in prepaid<br />

managed care are not problematic if the rate the state pays the health<br />

plans is adequately adjusted for the health status of the enrollees<br />

However, in many cases, the rates paid to health plans are based <strong>on</strong> the<br />

average cost of providing care to an entire eligibility category and may not<br />

appropriately account for those that do not elect prepaid care.<br />

C<strong>on</strong>sequently, the state pays the ful cost of treating the expensive<br />

beneficiaries through fee-for-service care and too high a rate for the<br />

lower-cost health plan members. This problem may be compounded in<br />

that it is likely that future capitati<strong>on</strong> rates would be based <strong>on</strong> the costs of<br />

serving those remaining in fee-for-service care-individuals who are likely<br />

to be less healthy and c<strong>on</strong>sequently more costly.<br />

Just as it is difficult to tell f a health plan is experiencing adverse<br />

selecti<strong>on</strong>, it is very difficult to determine whether a state is experiencing<br />

adverse selecti<strong>on</strong>. An Oreg<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> official suspects that the state's<br />

enrollment exempti<strong>on</strong> process for disabled individuals, which allows case<br />

workers to determine if prepaid managed care is appropriate for individual<br />

beneficiaries, may be resulting in adverse selecti<strong>on</strong> for the state.<br />

PM. 62<br />

gCIAMEa-II-ISS Medlkid MFed C,,, for Q. D6.bid

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!