Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

aging.senate.gov
from aging.senate.gov More from this publisher
29.07.2013 Views

Objectives, Scope, and Methodology . c.. Bud. 336 'perverse incentives' inherent in a prepaid managed care approach.' 8 While incentives in a fee-for-service system may encourage a provider to deliver too many services, prepaid programs may encourage health plans to deliver fewer, or less expensive, services than enrollees need, such as using a physical therapist skilled in sports medicine rather than in specific disabilities such as spinal abnormalities. The Chairman and Ranking Minority Member of the Subcommittee on ong>Medicaidong> and Health ong>Careong> for Low-Income Families of the ong>Senateong> ong>Committeeong> on Finance asked us to exanine (1) the extent to which states are implementing prepaid ong>Medicaidong> managed care for disabled beneficiaries and (2) what steps states have taken to safeguard the interests of the three major stakeholder groups-disabled beneficiaries, prepaid health care plans, and the government-with a focus on quality assurance and rate-setting mechanisms. On the basis of discussions with subcommittee staff, we focused our review on the delivery of primary and acute medical services. We also focused our work on prepaid managed care programs-thus excluding those types of managed care that are not risk based-because prepayment has the potential to result in underservice to enrolled members. To identify states with ong>Medicaidong> managed care programs for disabled beneficiaries, we reviewed HCFA documentation and interviewed national ong>Medicaidong> experts, including officials at organizations such as the National Academy for State Health Policy and the ong>Medicaidong> Working Group. From the 17 states identified as having ong>Medicaidong> prepaid managed care programs for their disabled population,' 9 we obtained information on a wide range of topics, including quality-monitoring activities and rate-setting methodologies. We interviewed officials in these states to obtain their views on problems they had encountered serving disabled individuals in prepaid managed care plans and ways they had gone about solving them. On the basis of what we learned about the states as a whole, we selected three states-Arizona, Oregon, and Massachusetts-for additional study. Arizona and Oregon have relatively long-standing programs that provide a eUndr pep.t -agd p-tdia.eot-e. to .e,, me., plte- are gfnne eao the lbk--ht , deifcoveI - hn c .jttit sd f- CO U.0 -atr 1ey, they ya keep the e if the ot f proldeg -eec is les tht the U.0 teed in -pa bhe 17 ,.e - Axin Caiffota, Cotondo, Del-t. th DIot Or Cotlki%, Ftrottd Ma. M.. h-, dchlga New Jetey, Ohio, tieto, Petnnyttl, Te , MA, Voigia, .td V. tts-in. P.Se 20 e AHERS--IXS Rediid Wed cow roe tle DiMled

co.w I B.-kgro.w 337 degree of operational expenence generally not present in other states. Massachusetts has administered for almost 5 years a targeted program for severely incapacitated adults that has served as a model for other state experiments. Our work in these three states included interviewing ong>Medicaidong> and other state official selected providers, and advocacy grouos. We obtained and analyzed data provided by the three states, and where they were available, we reviewed existing federal, state, and independent studies of the programs. During our review, we also interviewed other researchers and knowledgeable officials and reviewed available studies of managed care programs for disabled persons. We performed our work for this study between November 1995 and May 1996 in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. Page 21 GAWsIRS-DIS6 Wedfrd M-Uad C- .r h IHObLud

Objectives, Scope,<br />

and Methodology<br />

.<br />

c..<br />

Bud.<br />

336<br />

'perverse incentives' inherent in a prepaid managed care approach.' 8<br />

While incentives in a fee-for-service system may encourage a provider to<br />

deliver too many services, prepaid programs may encourage health plans<br />

to deliver fewer, or less expensive, services than enrollees need, such as<br />

using a physical therapist skilled in sports medicine rather than in specific<br />

disabilities such as spinal abnormalities.<br />

The Chairman and Ranking Minority Member of the Subcommittee <strong>on</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> and Health <str<strong>on</strong>g>Care</str<strong>on</strong>g> for Low-Income Families of the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Senate</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> Finance asked us to exanine (1) the extent to which states<br />

are implementing prepaid <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care for disabled<br />

beneficiaries and (2) what steps states have taken to safeguard the<br />

interests of the three major stakeholder groups-disabled beneficiaries,<br />

prepaid health care plans, and the government-with a focus <strong>on</strong> quality<br />

assurance and rate-setting mechanisms. On the basis of discussi<strong>on</strong>s with<br />

subcommittee staff, we focused our review <strong>on</strong> the delivery of primary and<br />

acute medical services. We also focused our work <strong>on</strong> prepaid managed<br />

care programs-thus excluding those types of managed care that are not<br />

risk based-because prepayment has the potential to result in<br />

underservice to enrolled members.<br />

To identify states with <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care programs for disabled<br />

beneficiaries, we reviewed HCFA documentati<strong>on</strong> and interviewed nati<strong>on</strong>al<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> experts, including officials at organizati<strong>on</strong>s such as the Nati<strong>on</strong>al<br />

Academy for State Health Policy and the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> Working Group. From<br />

the 17 states identified as having <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> prepaid managed care<br />

programs for their disabled populati<strong>on</strong>,' 9 we obtained informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> a<br />

wide range of topics, including quality-m<strong>on</strong>itoring activities and<br />

rate-setting methodologies. We interviewed officials in these states to<br />

obtain their views <strong>on</strong> problems they had encountered serving disabled<br />

individuals in prepaid managed care plans and ways they had g<strong>on</strong>e about<br />

solving them.<br />

On the basis of what we learned about the states as a whole, we selected<br />

three states-Ariz<strong>on</strong>a, Oreg<strong>on</strong>, and Massachusetts-for additi<strong>on</strong>al study.<br />

Ariz<strong>on</strong>a and Oreg<strong>on</strong> have relatively l<strong>on</strong>g-standing programs that provide a<br />

eUndr pep.t -agd<br />

p-tdia.eot-e. to .e,,<br />

me., plte- are gfnne<br />

eao the<br />

lbk--ht , deifcoveI<br />

- hn c .jttit sd f- CO<br />

U.0 -atr<br />

1ey, they ya<br />

keep the e if the ot f proldeg -eec is les tht the U.0 teed in -pa<br />

bhe 17 ,.e - Axin Caiffota, Cot<strong>on</strong>do, Del-t. th DIot Or Cotlki%, Ftrottd<br />

Ma. M.. h-, dchlga New Jetey, Ohio, tieto, Petnnyttl, Te , MA,<br />

Voigia, .td V. tts-in.<br />

P.Se 20<br />

e AHERS--IXS Rediid Wed cow roe tle DiMled

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!