29.07.2013 Views

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Principal Findings<br />

Few States Have<br />

Significant Experience<br />

Euv- esa 7<br />

321<br />

capitati<strong>on</strong> rates <strong>on</strong> average costs for large segments of statewide <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

populati<strong>on</strong>s, such as families with children or disabled individuals.<br />

However, within the disabled populati<strong>on</strong> some groups, such as<br />

quadriplegics or AIDs patients, have substantially higher medical costs<br />

(sometimes more than $50,000 in a given year), while others, such as<br />

mildly disabled individuals, may have few or no additi<strong>on</strong>al costs bey<strong>on</strong>d<br />

those of the general populati<strong>on</strong>. The ability to identify individuals with<br />

iigh-crst disabilities could lead nimaged caie plais to try to avoid<br />

enrolling them or to encourage them to disenroll by limiting services<br />

inappropriately. The development of more appropriate rate-setting<br />

approaches that link rates more closely to individuals' likely costs is still in<br />

the experimental stage. States are further al<strong>on</strong>g in adopting methods to<br />

share the risk of losses experienced by plans that enroll a relatively large<br />

number of high-cost individuals. For example, reinsurance programs are<br />

the most comm<strong>on</strong> form of sharing such losses. A few states are adopting<br />

an approach called a 'risk corridor,' which limits the amount of profit that<br />

health care plans can earn as well as the amount of loss they could face,<br />

thereby reducing the incentive to inappropriately limit services or to avoid<br />

enrolling high-cost individuals.<br />

Ariz<strong>on</strong>a, Delaware, Oreg<strong>on</strong>, Tennessee, Utah, and Virginia are the <strong>on</strong>ly<br />

states requiring some or all of their disabled beneficiaries to participate in<br />

prepaid care programs. These states enroll disabled beneficiaries in<br />

prepaid managed care plans that also cover other types of <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

recipients. Ariz<strong>on</strong>a's program, established in 1982 and currently enrolling<br />

more than 70,000 disabled, is the <strong>on</strong>ly mandatory program more than 3<br />

years old. In c<strong>on</strong>trast, Massachusetts, Ohio, Wisc<strong>on</strong>sin, and the District of<br />

Columbia have small-scale voluntary programs solely for disabled<br />

individuals, n<strong>on</strong>e of which serves more than 3,000 beneficiaries. Seven<br />

other states (California, Colorado, Florida, Maryland, Michigan, New<br />

Jersey, and Pennsylvania), as well as Massachusetts, allow disabled<br />

beneficiaries to enroll voluntarily in plans open to other <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

beneficiaries. In these states, less than 20 percent of the disabled<br />

populati<strong>on</strong> have chosen to enroll.<br />

One problem identified thus far in states with federal approval to restrict<br />

beneficiaries' freedom to change providers has been coordinating<br />

P.9. 4<br />

GAOiHtEH.S6-136 Wfedilid Mhetged Core for the Db,,bied

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!