Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
Appendix A State Activity* 316 Many states have acquired significant experience in the design and implementation of
GAO July 1996 GAO/HEHIS-96-136 317 United States General Accounting Office Report to the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member, Subcommittee on
- Page 268 and 269: 266 a 50 percent match. 2 Since 198
- Page 270 and 271: 268 If enrollment of eligible indiv
- Page 272 and 273: 270 drugs, ICF services, and optome
- Page 274 and 275: 272 Table 20-1. Medicaid</s
- Page 276 and 277: 274 The slowdown in spending after
- Page 278 and 279: 276 Section 1115 Demonstration Waiv
- Page 280 and 281: 278 primary care case management ar
- Page 282 and 283: 280 Table 20-2. Enrollment in <stro
- Page 284 and 285: 282 / Figure 20-6. Enrollment Growt
- Page 286 and 287: 284 Marnaged-care growth at the sta
- Page 288 and 289: 286 Figure 20-9. Enrollment in Risk
- Page 290 and 291: 288 The extent of problems in repor
- Page 292 and 293: 290 plans (PPRC 1996). In other are
- Page 294 and 295: 292 There appears to be a clear tre
- Page 296 and 297: Enrollment and Disenrollment Polici
- Page 298 and 299: 296 individually with plans over ra
- Page 300 and 301: 298 Health Care Fi
- Page 302 and 303: Medicaid M
- Page 304 and 305: Support & Services Office 120 W. Tw
- Page 306 and 307: INTRODUCTION 304 Presently, nearly
- Page 308 and 309: 306 more mandatory services. Full-r
- Page 310 and 311: 308 the ability of beneficiaries to
- Page 312 and 313: 310 managed care also requires the
- Page 314 and 315: 312 condition period. Such requirem
- Page 316 and 317: 314 If a state contracts with or in
- Page 320 and 321: GA { I ~United States (3 Mu General
- Page 322 and 323: Results in Brief E.. - 320
- Page 324 and 325: Significant Efforts Needed to Ensur
- Page 326 and 327: Recommendations Agency Comments E-d
- Page 328 and 329: cow 326 Chapter 4 Traditional Rate-
- Page 330 and 331: Chapter I Background 328 Me
- Page 332 and 333: ovapt I 330 the option of extending
- Page 334 and 335: Federal Requirements Govern State U
- Page 336 and 337: Table 1.2: Comparison of Ma
- Page 338 and 339: Objectives, Scope, and Methodology
- Page 340 and 341: 338 Chapter 2 States Are Moving Tow
- Page 342 and 343: Table 21 nEnollmen of Disabled Bene
- Page 344 and 345: 342 chona Se. As To~ed Id C"fn, Dai
- Page 346 and 347: Table a& Eabent to Which 17 State I
- Page 348 and 349: 346 So A- hbydf TSo -d Cam fo DIbbi
- Page 350 and 351: Table 2.5: Extent to Which 17 State
- Page 352 and 353: 350 8t" Age Bowi T-Mar 11 Cue fRa D
- Page 354 and 355: 352 C".Pt a Q...itA- Efl~t. . - C f
- Page 356 and 357: Addressing Concerns Through Enrollm
- Page 358 and 359: Assignment Active Management of a D
- Page 360 and 361: 358 fo.V D Axd B ref .Ak,.d - CC-e
- Page 362 and 363: Targeted Quality-of-Care</s
- Page 364 and 365: Encounter Data Analysis Shows Poten
- Page 366 and 367: 364 Chapter 4 Risk-Adjusted Rates a
Appendix A<br />
State Activity*<br />
316<br />
Many states have acquired significant experience in the design and implementati<strong>on</strong> of <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
managed care programs. As states evaluate or develop their own programs, it may be useful to<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sider how other states have addressed certain issues. State experience in the areas of risk<br />
adjustment, reinsurance, and transiti<strong>on</strong> periods have been highlighted below.<br />
Risk Adjustment:<br />
According to a study prepared by the Project HOPE Center for Health Affairs, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Managed</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Care</str<strong>on</strong>g> Program Access Requirement: Final Report to the Prospective Payment Assessment<br />
Commissi<strong>on</strong>, several-states, including Ariz<strong>on</strong>a, Florida, Massachusetts and Oreg<strong>on</strong>, provide separate<br />
capitati<strong>on</strong> rates for enrollees in different <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> eligibility categories.<br />
Reinsurance:<br />
Some <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care programs developed by states with Secti<strong>on</strong> 1115 waivers, including<br />
Ariz<strong>on</strong>a, Delaware, Massachusetts, and Minnesota, have reinsurance provisi<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
- Transiti<strong>on</strong> Periods:<br />
Some states have implemented their <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care programs <strong>on</strong> a phased-in basis. For<br />
example, Oreg<strong>on</strong> enrolled AFDC recipients in 1994 and phased in enrollment of elderly and disabled<br />
populati<strong>on</strong>s, individuals needing mental health and chemical dependency services, and foster children<br />
during 1995.<br />
Verm<strong>on</strong>t's <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care program is designed to include a three-year phase-in period. As<br />
planned, the program will enroll AFDC recipients and pers<strong>on</strong>s with incomes at or below the poverty<br />
line in 1996. Beginning in 1997, Supplemental Security Income (SSI) recipients and pers<strong>on</strong>s with<br />
incomes between 100 percent and 125 percent of poverty are to be enrolled. In 1998, state residents<br />
with incomes between 126 percent and 150 percent of poverty may enroll.<br />
Unlike Oreg<strong>on</strong> and Verm<strong>on</strong>t, C<strong>on</strong>necticut enrollees are being phased-in <strong>on</strong> the basis of geographic<br />
-area instead of by eligibility category.<br />
'Source: Group Health Associati<strong>on</strong> of America<br />
©NAIC 1996 ., 14