Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

aging.senate.gov
from aging.senate.gov More from this publisher
29.07.2013 Views

Appendix A State Activity* 316 Many states have acquired significant experience in the design and implementation of ong>Medicaidong> managed care programs. As states evaluate or develop their own programs, it may be useful to consider how other states have addressed certain issues. State experience in the areas of risk adjustment, reinsurance, and transition periods have been highlighted below. Risk Adjustment: According to a study prepared by the Project HOPE Center for Health Affairs, ong>Medicaidong> ong>Managedong> ong>Careong> Program Access Requirement: Final Report to the Prospective Payment Assessment Commission, several-states, including Arizona, Florida, Massachusetts and Oregon, provide separate capitation rates for enrollees in different ong>Medicaidong> eligibility categories. Reinsurance: Some ong>Medicaidong> managed care programs developed by states with Section 1115 waivers, including Arizona, Delaware, Massachusetts, and Minnesota, have reinsurance provisions. - Transition Periods: Some states have implemented their ong>Medicaidong> managed care programs on a phased-in basis. For example, Oregon enrolled AFDC recipients in 1994 and phased in enrollment of elderly and disabled populations, individuals needing mental health and chemical dependency services, and foster children during 1995. Vermont's ong>Medicaidong> managed care program is designed to include a three-year phase-in period. As planned, the program will enroll AFDC recipients and persons with incomes at or below the poverty line in 1996. Beginning in 1997, Supplemental Security Income (SSI) recipients and persons with incomes between 100 percent and 125 percent of poverty are to be enrolled. In 1998, state residents with incomes between 126 percent and 150 percent of poverty may enroll. Unlike Oregon and Vermont, Connecticut enrollees are being phased-in on the basis of geographic -area instead of by eligibility category. 'Source: Group Health Association of America ©NAIC 1996 ., 14

GAO July 1996 GAO/HEHIS-96-136 317 United States General Accounting Office Report to the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member, Subcommittee on ong>Medicaidong> and Health ong>Careong> for Low-Income Families, ong>Committeeong> on Finance, U.S. ong>Senateong> MEDICAID MANAGED CARE Serving the Disabled Challenges State Programs C A 0 A d,% years

Appendix A<br />

State Activity*<br />

316<br />

Many states have acquired significant experience in the design and implementati<strong>on</strong> of <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

managed care programs. As states evaluate or develop their own programs, it may be useful to<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sider how other states have addressed certain issues. State experience in the areas of risk<br />

adjustment, reinsurance, and transiti<strong>on</strong> periods have been highlighted below.<br />

Risk Adjustment:<br />

According to a study prepared by the Project HOPE Center for Health Affairs, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Managed</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Care</str<strong>on</strong>g> Program Access Requirement: Final Report to the Prospective Payment Assessment<br />

Commissi<strong>on</strong>, several-states, including Ariz<strong>on</strong>a, Florida, Massachusetts and Oreg<strong>on</strong>, provide separate<br />

capitati<strong>on</strong> rates for enrollees in different <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> eligibility categories.<br />

Reinsurance:<br />

Some <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care programs developed by states with Secti<strong>on</strong> 1115 waivers, including<br />

Ariz<strong>on</strong>a, Delaware, Massachusetts, and Minnesota, have reinsurance provisi<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

- Transiti<strong>on</strong> Periods:<br />

Some states have implemented their <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care programs <strong>on</strong> a phased-in basis. For<br />

example, Oreg<strong>on</strong> enrolled AFDC recipients in 1994 and phased in enrollment of elderly and disabled<br />

populati<strong>on</strong>s, individuals needing mental health and chemical dependency services, and foster children<br />

during 1995.<br />

Verm<strong>on</strong>t's <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care program is designed to include a three-year phase-in period. As<br />

planned, the program will enroll AFDC recipients and pers<strong>on</strong>s with incomes at or below the poverty<br />

line in 1996. Beginning in 1997, Supplemental Security Income (SSI) recipients and pers<strong>on</strong>s with<br />

incomes between 100 percent and 125 percent of poverty are to be enrolled. In 1998, state residents<br />

with incomes between 126 percent and 150 percent of poverty may enroll.<br />

Unlike Oreg<strong>on</strong> and Verm<strong>on</strong>t, C<strong>on</strong>necticut enrollees are being phased-in <strong>on</strong> the basis of geographic<br />

-area instead of by eligibility category.<br />

'Source: Group Health Associati<strong>on</strong> of America<br />

©NAIC 1996 ., 14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!