Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
314 If a state contracts with or intends to contract with a capitated health care organization and makes a capitation payment 2 9 to the organization for providing MediGrant services, including at least inpatient hospital services and physician services, the state's MediGrant plan must include a description of the use of actuarial science in projecting expenditures, utilization for enrollees, and setting capitation payment rates. States are also required to describe the qualifications that participating plans must meet, including whether it must obtain a state license, or be accredited or certified in order to participate as a capitated health organization in the MediGrant plan. In addition, states must develop a process for disseminating to contractors the information on capitation rates and historical fee-forservice cost and utilization data. Unlike the traditional
Conclusion 315 Over the past decade, managed care arrangements have become a viable alternative to states seeking innovative strategies to provide medical assistance beneficiaries with quality health care in a costeffective manner. Designing and implementing a
- Page 266 and 267: 264 Medicaid: Spen
- Page 268 and 269: 266 a 50 percent match. 2 Since 198
- Page 270 and 271: 268 If enrollment of eligible indiv
- Page 272 and 273: 270 drugs, ICF services, and optome
- Page 274 and 275: 272 Table 20-1. Medicaid</s
- Page 276 and 277: 274 The slowdown in spending after
- Page 278 and 279: 276 Section 1115 Demonstration Waiv
- Page 280 and 281: 278 primary care case management ar
- Page 282 and 283: 280 Table 20-2. Enrollment in <stro
- Page 284 and 285: 282 / Figure 20-6. Enrollment Growt
- Page 286 and 287: 284 Marnaged-care growth at the sta
- Page 288 and 289: 286 Figure 20-9. Enrollment in Risk
- Page 290 and 291: 288 The extent of problems in repor
- Page 292 and 293: 290 plans (PPRC 1996). In other are
- Page 294 and 295: 292 There appears to be a clear tre
- Page 296 and 297: Enrollment and Disenrollment Polici
- Page 298 and 299: 296 individually with plans over ra
- Page 300 and 301: 298 Health Care Fi
- Page 302 and 303: Medicaid M
- Page 304 and 305: Support & Services Office 120 W. Tw
- Page 306 and 307: INTRODUCTION 304 Presently, nearly
- Page 308 and 309: 306 more mandatory services. Full-r
- Page 310 and 311: 308 the ability of beneficiaries to
- Page 312 and 313: 310 managed care also requires the
- Page 314 and 315: 312 condition period. Such requirem
- Page 318 and 319: Appendix A State Activity* 316 Many
- Page 320 and 321: GA { I ~United States (3 Mu General
- Page 322 and 323: Results in Brief E.. - 320
- Page 324 and 325: Significant Efforts Needed to Ensur
- Page 326 and 327: Recommendations Agency Comments E-d
- Page 328 and 329: cow 326 Chapter 4 Traditional Rate-
- Page 330 and 331: Chapter I Background 328 Me
- Page 332 and 333: ovapt I 330 the option of extending
- Page 334 and 335: Federal Requirements Govern State U
- Page 336 and 337: Table 1.2: Comparison of Ma
- Page 338 and 339: Objectives, Scope, and Methodology
- Page 340 and 341: 338 Chapter 2 States Are Moving Tow
- Page 342 and 343: Table 21 nEnollmen of Disabled Bene
- Page 344 and 345: 342 chona Se. As To~ed Id C"fn, Dai
- Page 346 and 347: Table a& Eabent to Which 17 State I
- Page 348 and 349: 346 So A- hbydf TSo -d Cam fo DIbbi
- Page 350 and 351: Table 2.5: Extent to Which 17 State
- Page 352 and 353: 350 8t" Age Bowi T-Mar 11 Cue fRa D
- Page 354 and 355: 352 C".Pt a Q...itA- Efl~t. . - C f
- Page 356 and 357: Addressing Concerns Through Enrollm
- Page 358 and 359: Assignment Active Management of a D
- Page 360 and 361: 358 fo.V D Axd B ref .Ak,.d - CC-e
- Page 362 and 363: Targeted Quality-of-Care</s
- Page 364 and 365: Encounter Data Analysis Shows Poten
C<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong><br />
315<br />
Over the past decade, managed care arrangements have become a viable alternative to states seeking<br />
innovative strategies to provide medical assistance beneficiaries with quality health care in a costeffective<br />
manner. Designing and implementing a <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care program involves a plethora<br />
of issues which the states, providers and citizens must address. Many of the basic comp<strong>on</strong>ents for the<br />
development of a sound <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care program remains the same irrespective of whether<br />
the public <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> assistance plan is a federal-state matching program or a block grant Am<strong>on</strong>g the<br />
range of significant c<strong>on</strong>cems, ensuring the financial solvency of <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care plans is<br />
prominent. Ensuring financial solvency involves not <strong>on</strong>ly setting meaningful capital and reserve<br />
requirements but establishing standards and m<strong>on</strong>itoring adequately the business practices of plans.<br />
Regulators in state insurance departments, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> agencies, or other applicable agencies may have<br />
areas of expertise the c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> of which will facilitate state efforts to design an effective program.<br />
By working with providers and citizens within the state, states regulators will maximize their ability to<br />
balance the goals of protecting c<strong>on</strong>sumers, disseminating informati<strong>on</strong> to all c<strong>on</strong>cerned parties about<br />
the new managed care system, and facilitating the ability of managed care plans to perform their<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tractual obligati<strong>on</strong>s effectively.<br />
ONAIC 1996 13<br />
44-098 97-11