Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
310 managed care also requires the commitment of staff who have developed the appropriate expertise in the critical elements of planning and implementing managed care programs. * Hold Harmless Provisions Federal law requires that
311 The regulation of marketing practices is an important component of both state and health plans' efforts to protect consumers and to communicate the objectives of a
- Page 262 and 263: 259 Medicaid Carve
- Page 264 and 265: 261 So I view Medicaid</str
- Page 266 and 267: 264 Medicaid: Spen
- Page 268 and 269: 266 a 50 percent match. 2 Since 198
- Page 270 and 271: 268 If enrollment of eligible indiv
- Page 272 and 273: 270 drugs, ICF services, and optome
- Page 274 and 275: 272 Table 20-1. Medicaid</s
- Page 276 and 277: 274 The slowdown in spending after
- Page 278 and 279: 276 Section 1115 Demonstration Waiv
- Page 280 and 281: 278 primary care case management ar
- Page 282 and 283: 280 Table 20-2. Enrollment in <stro
- Page 284 and 285: 282 / Figure 20-6. Enrollment Growt
- Page 286 and 287: 284 Marnaged-care growth at the sta
- Page 288 and 289: 286 Figure 20-9. Enrollment in Risk
- Page 290 and 291: 288 The extent of problems in repor
- Page 292 and 293: 290 plans (PPRC 1996). In other are
- Page 294 and 295: 292 There appears to be a clear tre
- Page 296 and 297: Enrollment and Disenrollment Polici
- Page 298 and 299: 296 individually with plans over ra
- Page 300 and 301: 298 Health Care Fi
- Page 302 and 303: Medicaid M
- Page 304 and 305: Support & Services Office 120 W. Tw
- Page 306 and 307: INTRODUCTION 304 Presently, nearly
- Page 308 and 309: 306 more mandatory services. Full-r
- Page 310 and 311: 308 the ability of beneficiaries to
- Page 314 and 315: 312 condition period. Such requirem
- Page 316 and 317: 314 If a state contracts with or in
- Page 318 and 319: Appendix A State Activity* 316 Many
- Page 320 and 321: GA { I ~United States (3 Mu General
- Page 322 and 323: Results in Brief E.. - 320
- Page 324 and 325: Significant Efforts Needed to Ensur
- Page 326 and 327: Recommendations Agency Comments E-d
- Page 328 and 329: cow 326 Chapter 4 Traditional Rate-
- Page 330 and 331: Chapter I Background 328 Me
- Page 332 and 333: ovapt I 330 the option of extending
- Page 334 and 335: Federal Requirements Govern State U
- Page 336 and 337: Table 1.2: Comparison of Ma
- Page 338 and 339: Objectives, Scope, and Methodology
- Page 340 and 341: 338 Chapter 2 States Are Moving Tow
- Page 342 and 343: Table 21 nEnollmen of Disabled Bene
- Page 344 and 345: 342 chona Se. As To~ed Id C"fn, Dai
- Page 346 and 347: Table a& Eabent to Which 17 State I
- Page 348 and 349: 346 So A- hbydf TSo -d Cam fo DIbbi
- Page 350 and 351: Table 2.5: Extent to Which 17 State
- Page 352 and 353: 350 8t" Age Bowi T-Mar 11 Cue fRa D
- Page 354 and 355: 352 C".Pt a Q...itA- Efl~t. . - C f
- Page 356 and 357: Addressing Concerns Through Enrollm
- Page 358 and 359: Assignment Active Management of a D
- Page 360 and 361: 358 fo.V D Axd B ref .Ak,.d - CC-e
311<br />
The regulati<strong>on</strong> of marketing practices is an important comp<strong>on</strong>ent of both state and health plans'<br />
efforts to protect c<strong>on</strong>sumers and to communicate the objectives of a <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care<br />
arrangement. States should, however, be attuned to the broader impact that some marketing<br />
regulati<strong>on</strong>s will have <strong>on</strong> enrollment practices of plans, such as their ability to determine the<br />
populati<strong>on</strong>s for which they will provide or arrange health care services.<br />
* Issues related to auto-enrollment<br />
Educated c<strong>on</strong>sumer choice is key to the success of a managed care program. The automatic<br />
assignment of individuals either because the beneficiary did not select at all or because their first<br />
selecti<strong>on</strong> is closed has the potential to lead to high levels of c<strong>on</strong>sumer dissatisfacti<strong>on</strong> and<br />
n<strong>on</strong>compliance. For <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care programs where beneficiaries are mandated to receive<br />
care from a managed care provider, many states have measured the success of their educati<strong>on</strong> efforts<br />
by reviewing the assignment rate of <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> beneficiaries. Low assignment rates tend to indicate that<br />
beneficiaries are more c<strong>on</strong>tent with the care provided in the program. States should strive to develop<br />
and implement c<strong>on</strong>sumer educati<strong>on</strong> programs which maximize beneficiary participati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
States may also want to examine practices related to the assignment of auto-enrollment populati<strong>on</strong>s to<br />
low bid plans. Efforts to increase the number of enrollees assigned to a low bidder may minimize the<br />
positive benefits to the program derived from c<strong>on</strong>sumer choice.' ThTs process also may have<br />
implicati<strong>on</strong>s relating to the relative health risk of auto-enrolled vs. voluntarily enrolled populati<strong>on</strong>s,<br />
with c<strong>on</strong>comitant financial implicati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
* C<strong>on</strong>sequences of disenrollment trends and applicability of portability requirements<br />
A fundamental premise of managed care is the promoti<strong>on</strong> of primary and preventive health services,<br />
plans and payors seek to achieve cost savings through this preventive investment. However, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
managed care enrollments are by definiti<strong>on</strong> short term (half of all <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> enrollees lose coverage<br />
within 12 m<strong>on</strong>ths).' Federal <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> law enables states to guarantee eligibility for a specific period<br />
of time bey<strong>on</strong>d changes in a beneficiary's financial status. 24 Some states have taken advantage of this<br />
opti<strong>on</strong>. When c<strong>on</strong>sidering whether to guarantee eligibility for a specific length of time, states may<br />
need to weigh the costs of guaranteeing l<strong>on</strong>ger eligibility against the adverse incentives that could<br />
result from shorter enrollment periods.<br />
Several states with insurance portability requirements applicable to the commercial sector have also<br />
acted to encourage or require commercial plans to "count" <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> coverage when c<strong>on</strong>sidering<br />
whether the impositi<strong>on</strong> of preexisting c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> limitati<strong>on</strong>s or waiting periods are appropriate. Ohio,<br />
for example, has a statute which recognizes all forms of health plans as satisfying the preexisting<br />
21 GAO at 27; Trish Riley et al., <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Managed</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Care</str<strong>on</strong>g>: The State of the Art, A Guidefor States<br />
(Nati<strong>on</strong>al Academy for State Health Policy, 1990), p. 2.<br />
22 "Ten Key Issues for States Under <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Managed</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Care</str<strong>on</strong>g>", George Washingt<strong>on</strong> University Center for Health<br />
Policy Research.<br />
23 Id.<br />
24 Gencral Accounting Office at 25.<br />
CNAIC 1996