Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
286 Figure 20-9. Enrollment in Risk-Based
287 Table 20-5. Enrollment in
- Page 238 and 239: 235 Al the cturent time, there is n
- Page 240 and 241: 237 PACE/Partnership programs guide
- Page 242 and 243: 239 necessarily relevant to the AFD
- Page 244 and 245: 241 about including these specialty
- Page 246 and 247: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Ct-u B.1r- M.mb
- Page 248 and 249: Considerations: 245 Enrolling <stro
- Page 250 and 251: 247 Medicaid <stro
- Page 252 and 253: a. some counties 249 b. mandatory e
- Page 254 and 255: 251 counties as well-of managed car
- Page 256 and 257: 253 In other States devolution is m
- Page 258 and 259: 255 /-LCenter for Health Ca
- Page 260 and 261: 257 Forums on Managed</stro
- Page 262 and 263: 259 Medicaid Carve
- Page 264 and 265: 261 So I view Medicaid</str
- Page 266 and 267: 264 Medicaid: Spen
- Page 268 and 269: 266 a 50 percent match. 2 Since 198
- Page 270 and 271: 268 If enrollment of eligible indiv
- Page 272 and 273: 270 drugs, ICF services, and optome
- Page 274 and 275: 272 Table 20-1. Medicaid</s
- Page 276 and 277: 274 The slowdown in spending after
- Page 278 and 279: 276 Section 1115 Demonstration Waiv
- Page 280 and 281: 278 primary care case management ar
- Page 282 and 283: 280 Table 20-2. Enrollment in <stro
- Page 284 and 285: 282 / Figure 20-6. Enrollment Growt
- Page 286 and 287: 284 Marnaged-care growth at the sta
- Page 290 and 291: 288 The extent of problems in repor
- Page 292 and 293: 290 plans (PPRC 1996). In other are
- Page 294 and 295: 292 There appears to be a clear tre
- Page 296 and 297: Enrollment and Disenrollment Polici
- Page 298 and 299: 296 individually with plans over ra
- Page 300 and 301: 298 Health Care Fi
- Page 302 and 303: Medicaid M
- Page 304 and 305: Support & Services Office 120 W. Tw
- Page 306 and 307: INTRODUCTION 304 Presently, nearly
- Page 308 and 309: 306 more mandatory services. Full-r
- Page 310 and 311: 308 the ability of beneficiaries to
- Page 312 and 313: 310 managed care also requires the
- Page 314 and 315: 312 condition period. Such requirem
- Page 316 and 317: 314 If a state contracts with or in
- Page 318 and 319: Appendix A State Activity* 316 Many
- Page 320 and 321: GA { I ~United States (3 Mu General
- Page 322 and 323: Results in Brief E.. - 320
- Page 324 and 325: Significant Efforts Needed to Ensur
- Page 326 and 327: Recommendations Agency Comments E-d
- Page 328 and 329: cow 326 Chapter 4 Traditional Rate-
- Page 330 and 331: Chapter I Background 328 Me
- Page 332 and 333: ovapt I 330 the option of extending
- Page 334 and 335: Federal Requirements Govern State U
- Page 336 and 337: Table 1.2: Comparison of Ma
287<br />
Table 20-5. Enrollment in <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> Risk-Based <str<strong>on</strong>g>Managed</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>Care</str<strong>on</strong>g> Plans, 1994-1996<br />
(percentage of beneficiaries)<br />
State 1994 1995 1996<br />
United States 14.7% 16.8% 26.5%<br />
Alabama 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />
Alaska 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />
Ariz<strong>on</strong>a 69.1 68.3 86.1<br />
Arkansas 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />
California 15.3 19.0 23.1<br />
Colorado 8.0 13.7 27.5<br />
C<strong>on</strong>necticut 0.0 0.0 61.3<br />
Delaware 3.5 8.4 77.6<br />
District of Columbia 12.6 34.0 30.1<br />
Florida 20.5 24.9 25.4<br />
Georgia 0.0 0.0 0.3<br />
Hawaii 4.1 80.4<br />
Idaho 0.0 .0 0'.0<br />
Illinois 7.3 9.2 12.9<br />
Indiana 0.0 6.3 11.8<br />
Iowa 2.7 8.3 12.0<br />
Kansas 0.0 0.0 4.4<br />
Kentucky 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />
Louisiana 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />
Maine 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />
Maryland 24.8 28.9 25.4<br />
Massachusetts 16.6 11.8 13.3<br />
Michigan 20.3 25.1 29.0<br />
Minnesota 28.2 29.7 33.2<br />
Mississippi 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />
Missouri 4.6 4.6 33.7<br />
M<strong>on</strong>tana 0.0 0.0 0.8<br />
Nebraska 0.0 0.0 15.3<br />
Nevada 13.5 26.4 40.9<br />
New Hampshire 9.9 11.3 16.4<br />
New Jersey 3.3 11.9 42.8<br />
New Mexico 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />
New York 11.3 19.7 23.3<br />
North Carolina 0.5 0.5 0.5<br />
North Dakota 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />
Ohio 11.8 13.8 32.3<br />
Oklahoma 0.0 0.0 19.4<br />
Oreg<strong>on</strong> 67.8 68.0 80.8<br />
Pennsylvania 27.8 37.9 32.0<br />
Puerto Rico 5.1 5.1 76.3<br />
Rhode Island 1.6 44.7 62.7<br />
South Carolina 0.0 0.0 0.6<br />
South Dakota 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />
Tennessee 90.8 54.8 100.0<br />
Texas 1.3 1.2 1.4<br />
Utah 13.1 24.7 66.4<br />
Verm<strong>on</strong>t 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />
Virginia 0.0 8.0 38.0<br />
Washingt<strong>on</strong> 27.9 56.6 59.5<br />
West Virginia 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />
Wisc<strong>on</strong>sin 26.4 30.7 30.3<br />
Wyoming 0.0 0.0 0.6<br />
SOURCE. Physidan Payment Review Commissi<strong>on</strong> analysis of Health <str<strong>on</strong>g>Care</str<strong>on</strong>g> Financing Administrati<strong>on</strong> data<br />
(HCFA 1995; 1996a; 1997).<br />
Individuals who enrolled in managed-care plans under Hawaii's Secti<strong>on</strong> 1115 waiver are counted in enrollment<br />
totals, but not in the denominator (total recipients).<br />
NOTE., Enrollment numbers are adjusted to exclude primary care case management arrangements and<br />
enrollees In dental and behavioral health plans.<br />
1997 Annual Report to C<strong>on</strong>gress/Chapter 20 436