Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

aging.senate.gov
from aging.senate.gov More from this publisher
29.07.2013 Views

278 primary care case management arrangements are different from HMOs, PHPs, and HIOs in that they operate on a fee-for service basis and are typically created and run by the states. Under these arrangements, a primary care physician coordinates and approves an array of services in addition to providing primary care services. In most PCCM systems, physicians are paid case-management fees (typically $3 per beneficiary per month) in addition to their regular fee-for-service payments for the primary care services they provide. In others, physicians are placed at financial risk for some services (usually ambulatory care). Physicians may determine the level of their ong>Medicaidong> caseloads, up to a state-specified limit. PCCM arrangements operate in 31 states and the District of Columbia; a few states operate multiple programs. Measuring Enrollment and Spending in ong>Medicaidong> ong>Managedong> ong>Careong> The Commission estimates that total ong>Medicaidong> enrollment in all types of managed care in June 1996 was about 12.8 million, or 38.6 percent of all beneficiaries. There has been a steady growth in enrollment, resulting in more than a fourfold increase since 1991. In the last year alone, enrollment grew by one-third from 9.6 million beneficiaries (26.6 percent) in June 1995. Because managed-care enrollees are drawn disproportionately from low-income adults and children, the program's less costly populations, spending on ong>Medicaidong> managed care represented only about 5 percent of total program spending in 1994. More recent spending data are not available. Obtaining accurate counts for both enrollment and spending is not a simple task. The Commission's estimates of enrollment for 1995 and 1996 are lower than those published by the Health ong>Careong> Financing Administration (HCFA 1996a; HCFA 1997). HCFA originally reported enrollment of 11.6 million ong>Medicaidong> beneficiaries in 1995 and 13.3 million in 1996.12 The principal reason for the differences between Commission and HCFA estimates is the inclusion or exclusion of different types of managed-care plans or arrangements. Enrollment in plans that are at full risk for the cost of ong>Medicaidong> services was about 8.8 million in 1996 (26.5 percent of all beneficiaries). These managed-care plans (generally all plans except PCCM arrangements) are more like those typically found in Medicare and the private sector. Growth in these types of plans has also been rapid-up 44 percent in one year. Use of managed care by states varies considerably across the country. In five states (and Puerto Rico), more than three of four beneficiaries are in full-risk managed-care plans. At the same time, over onethird of the states have little or no enrollment, although many of these states run significant PCCM programs. The following sections describe the Commission's analysis of managed-care enrollment and spending, aimed at deriving more accurate counts at both national and state levels. To some extent, this is an II HCFA corrected its t995 number in its report on i996 enrollment issued in February 1997. The corrected estimate of 9.8 million is very similar-but not identical-to that derived by the Commission for this report. 427 Physician Payment Review Commission

279 exercise in purifying bad data. Although the numbers are important for policymakers who need to evaluate ong>Medicaidong> trends, it is important to emphasize that better data are needed.' 3 Counting Enrollees in ong>Managedong> ong>Careong>. The goal of this section is to derive two sets of numbers for national and state level managed-care enrollment corresponding to two different criteria for including plans and arrangements. One is a count of ong>Medicaidong> beneficiaries who participate in any kind Of managed care for a broad range of health services. The second is a count of beneficiaries who enroll in an HMO or other health plan that is at full risk for a comprehensive range of services. In each case, managed-care carve-out arrangements that provide only dental or behavioral health services are excluded. Excluding Carve-Out Plans. HCFA's annual reports on ong>Medicaidong> managed-care enrollment have overcounted managed-care enrollment in significant ways (HCFA 1996a; 1997). An indicator of the problem was that HCFA's 1995 data showed six states (Colorado, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Oregon, Utah, and Washington) with more than 100 percent of their beneficiaries enrolled in managed care." Calculated enrollment rates varied from 101 percent to 589 percent. Dental and behavioral health managed-care plans provide substantially less than the full range of ong>Medicaidong> services. For example, certain plans in 3 states provide only dental services, and plans in II states are restricted to behavioral health services (generally mental health and substance abuse).' 5 These plans are sometimes referred to as carve-out plans. Some beneficiaries in these states enroll in both a regular managed-care plan and either a behavioral health plan or dental plan-and are thus counted twice. In fact, in some states enrollment in a fee-for service PCCM arrangement may automatically trigger enrollment in a risk-based behavioral health plan. Other beneficiaries may enroll only in these carve-out plans. Nationally, these two types of plans represent about 17 percent of HCFA's 1995 count of ong>Medicaidong> managed-care enrollees (Table 20-2).to About 4 percent are in dental plans, and 13 percent are in behavioral health plans. " In 1995, researchers at Lewin-VHI prepared an analysis of ong>Medicaidong> managed-care enrollment. They coltected enrollment numbers directly from state officials and compared themn with HCFA's numbers. Their analysis shows that there may be even more inaccuracies than revealed by the Commission's analysis (Lewin-VHI 1995). " A footnote on HCFA's enrollment tables suggested the problem, "Totals include duplicated counts of eligibles enrolled in multiple plans." In Hawaii, HCFA reported an additional data problem. Those enrolted under Hawaii's Section Il15 waiver are counted in the enrollment total, but not in the denominator (total recipients) (HCFA 1996a). " In addition to the dental and behavioral health plans, there are plans in some states that provide only primary care services or an even more limited set of services, such as delivery and postpartum care only or newborn services only. They typically exclude hospital services, although they may require primary care physicians to review hospital admissions. These plans, however, appear not to duplicate coverage with other plans. They are not excluded from the Commission's counts, in part because they are not well-distinguished from some PCCM plans. " Plans are identified, with enrollment counts, by HCFA (1996a). More detailed descriptions are in a report on plans operating under Section 1915(b) waivers (HCFA 1996e). 1997 Annual Report to Congrers/Chapter 20 428

279<br />

exercise in purifying bad data. Although the numbers are important for policymakers who need to<br />

evaluate <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> trends, it is important to emphasize that better data are needed.' 3<br />

Counting Enrollees in <str<strong>on</strong>g>Managed</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Care</str<strong>on</strong>g>. The goal of this secti<strong>on</strong> is to derive two sets of numbers for<br />

nati<strong>on</strong>al and state level managed-care enrollment corresp<strong>on</strong>ding to two different criteria for including<br />

plans and arrangements. One is a count of <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> beneficiaries who participate in any kind Of<br />

managed care for a broad range of health services. The sec<strong>on</strong>d is a count of beneficiaries who enroll in<br />

an HMO or other health plan that is at full risk for a comprehensive range of services. In each case,<br />

managed-care carve-out arrangements that provide <strong>on</strong>ly dental or behavioral health services are<br />

excluded.<br />

Excluding Carve-Out Plans. HCFA's annual reports <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed-care enrollment have<br />

overcounted managed-care enrollment in significant ways (HCFA 1996a; 1997). An indicator of the<br />

problem was that HCFA's 1995 data showed six states (Colorado, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Oreg<strong>on</strong>,<br />

Utah, and Washingt<strong>on</strong>) with more than 100 percent of their beneficiaries enrolled in managed care."<br />

Calculated enrollment rates varied from 101 percent to 589 percent.<br />

Dental and behavioral health managed-care plans provide substantially less than the full range of<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> services. For example, certain plans in 3 states provide <strong>on</strong>ly dental services, and plans in II<br />

states are restricted to behavioral health services (generally mental health and substance abuse).' 5<br />

These plans are sometimes referred to as carve-out plans. Some beneficiaries in these states enroll in<br />

both a regular managed-care plan and either a behavioral health plan or dental plan-and are thus<br />

counted twice. In fact, in some states enrollment in a fee-for service PCCM arrangement may<br />

automatically trigger enrollment in a risk-based behavioral health plan. Other beneficiaries may enroll<br />

<strong>on</strong>ly in these carve-out plans. Nati<strong>on</strong>ally, these two types of plans represent about 17 percent of<br />

HCFA's 1995 count of <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed-care enrollees (Table 20-2).to About 4 percent are in<br />

dental plans, and 13 percent are in behavioral health plans.<br />

" In 1995, researchers at Lewin-VHI prepared an analysis of <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed-care enrollment. They coltected<br />

enrollment numbers directly from state officials and compared themn with HCFA's numbers. Their analysis shows that there<br />

may be even more inaccuracies than revealed by the Commissi<strong>on</strong>'s analysis (Lewin-VHI 1995).<br />

" A footnote <strong>on</strong> HCFA's enrollment tables suggested the problem, "Totals include duplicated counts of eligibles<br />

enrolled in multiple plans." In Hawaii, HCFA reported an additi<strong>on</strong>al data problem. Those enrolted under Hawaii's<br />

Secti<strong>on</strong> Il15 waiver are counted in the enrollment total, but not in the denominator (total recipients) (HCFA 1996a).<br />

" In additi<strong>on</strong> to the dental and behavioral health plans, there are plans in some states that provide <strong>on</strong>ly primary care<br />

services or an even more limited set of services, such as delivery and postpartum care <strong>on</strong>ly or newborn services <strong>on</strong>ly. They<br />

typically exclude hospital services, although they may require primary care physicians to review hospital admissi<strong>on</strong>s. These<br />

plans, however, appear not to duplicate coverage with other plans. They are not excluded from the Commissi<strong>on</strong>'s counts, in<br />

part because they are not well-distinguished from some PCCM plans.<br />

" Plans are identified, with enrollment counts, by HCFA (1996a). More detailed descripti<strong>on</strong>s are in a report <strong>on</strong> plans<br />

operating under Secti<strong>on</strong> 1915(b) waivers (HCFA 1996e).<br />

1997 Annual Report to C<strong>on</strong>grers/Chapter 20 428

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!