Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
278 primary care case management arrangements are different from HMOs, PHPs, and HIOs in that they operate on a fee-for service basis and are typically created and run by the states. Under these arrangements, a primary care physician coordinates and approves an array of services in addition to providing primary care services. In most PCCM systems, physicians are paid case-management fees (typically $3 per beneficiary per month) in addition to their regular fee-for-service payments for the primary care services they provide. In others, physicians are placed at financial risk for some services (usually ambulatory care). Physicians may determine the level of their
279 exercise in purifying bad data. Although the numbers are important for policymakers who need to evaluate
- Page 230 and 231: 227 Wraparound Milwaukee saving dol
- Page 232 and 233: 229 Another positive outcome of the
- Page 234 and 235: 231 AltDoughl Nkvie' iniCil costs i
- Page 236 and 237: 233 CCE's staff consist of a variet
- Page 238 and 239: 235 Al the cturent time, there is n
- Page 240 and 241: 237 PACE/Partnership programs guide
- Page 242 and 243: 239 necessarily relevant to the AFD
- Page 244 and 245: 241 about including these specialty
- Page 246 and 247: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Ct-u B.1r- M.mb
- Page 248 and 249: Considerations: 245 Enrolling <stro
- Page 250 and 251: 247 Medicaid <stro
- Page 252 and 253: a. some counties 249 b. mandatory e
- Page 254 and 255: 251 counties as well-of managed car
- Page 256 and 257: 253 In other States devolution is m
- Page 258 and 259: 255 /-LCenter for Health Ca
- Page 260 and 261: 257 Forums on Managed</stro
- Page 262 and 263: 259 Medicaid Carve
- Page 264 and 265: 261 So I view Medicaid</str
- Page 266 and 267: 264 Medicaid: Spen
- Page 268 and 269: 266 a 50 percent match. 2 Since 198
- Page 270 and 271: 268 If enrollment of eligible indiv
- Page 272 and 273: 270 drugs, ICF services, and optome
- Page 274 and 275: 272 Table 20-1. Medicaid</s
- Page 276 and 277: 274 The slowdown in spending after
- Page 278 and 279: 276 Section 1115 Demonstration Waiv
- Page 282 and 283: 280 Table 20-2. Enrollment in <stro
- Page 284 and 285: 282 / Figure 20-6. Enrollment Growt
- Page 286 and 287: 284 Marnaged-care growth at the sta
- Page 288 and 289: 286 Figure 20-9. Enrollment in Risk
- Page 290 and 291: 288 The extent of problems in repor
- Page 292 and 293: 290 plans (PPRC 1996). In other are
- Page 294 and 295: 292 There appears to be a clear tre
- Page 296 and 297: Enrollment and Disenrollment Polici
- Page 298 and 299: 296 individually with plans over ra
- Page 300 and 301: 298 Health Care Fi
- Page 302 and 303: Medicaid M
- Page 304 and 305: Support & Services Office 120 W. Tw
- Page 306 and 307: INTRODUCTION 304 Presently, nearly
- Page 308 and 309: 306 more mandatory services. Full-r
- Page 310 and 311: 308 the ability of beneficiaries to
- Page 312 and 313: 310 managed care also requires the
- Page 314 and 315: 312 condition period. Such requirem
- Page 316 and 317: 314 If a state contracts with or in
- Page 318 and 319: Appendix A State Activity* 316 Many
- Page 320 and 321: GA { I ~United States (3 Mu General
- Page 322 and 323: Results in Brief E.. - 320
- Page 324 and 325: Significant Efforts Needed to Ensur
- Page 326 and 327: Recommendations Agency Comments E-d
- Page 328 and 329: cow 326 Chapter 4 Traditional Rate-
279<br />
exercise in purifying bad data. Although the numbers are important for policymakers who need to<br />
evaluate <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> trends, it is important to emphasize that better data are needed.' 3<br />
Counting Enrollees in <str<strong>on</strong>g>Managed</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Care</str<strong>on</strong>g>. The goal of this secti<strong>on</strong> is to derive two sets of numbers for<br />
nati<strong>on</strong>al and state level managed-care enrollment corresp<strong>on</strong>ding to two different criteria for including<br />
plans and arrangements. One is a count of <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> beneficiaries who participate in any kind Of<br />
managed care for a broad range of health services. The sec<strong>on</strong>d is a count of beneficiaries who enroll in<br />
an HMO or other health plan that is at full risk for a comprehensive range of services. In each case,<br />
managed-care carve-out arrangements that provide <strong>on</strong>ly dental or behavioral health services are<br />
excluded.<br />
Excluding Carve-Out Plans. HCFA's annual reports <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed-care enrollment have<br />
overcounted managed-care enrollment in significant ways (HCFA 1996a; 1997). An indicator of the<br />
problem was that HCFA's 1995 data showed six states (Colorado, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Oreg<strong>on</strong>,<br />
Utah, and Washingt<strong>on</strong>) with more than 100 percent of their beneficiaries enrolled in managed care."<br />
Calculated enrollment rates varied from 101 percent to 589 percent.<br />
Dental and behavioral health managed-care plans provide substantially less than the full range of<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> services. For example, certain plans in 3 states provide <strong>on</strong>ly dental services, and plans in II<br />
states are restricted to behavioral health services (generally mental health and substance abuse).' 5<br />
These plans are sometimes referred to as carve-out plans. Some beneficiaries in these states enroll in<br />
both a regular managed-care plan and either a behavioral health plan or dental plan-and are thus<br />
counted twice. In fact, in some states enrollment in a fee-for service PCCM arrangement may<br />
automatically trigger enrollment in a risk-based behavioral health plan. Other beneficiaries may enroll<br />
<strong>on</strong>ly in these carve-out plans. Nati<strong>on</strong>ally, these two types of plans represent about 17 percent of<br />
HCFA's 1995 count of <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed-care enrollees (Table 20-2).to About 4 percent are in<br />
dental plans, and 13 percent are in behavioral health plans.<br />
" In 1995, researchers at Lewin-VHI prepared an analysis of <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed-care enrollment. They coltected<br />
enrollment numbers directly from state officials and compared themn with HCFA's numbers. Their analysis shows that there<br />
may be even more inaccuracies than revealed by the Commissi<strong>on</strong>'s analysis (Lewin-VHI 1995).<br />
" A footnote <strong>on</strong> HCFA's enrollment tables suggested the problem, "Totals include duplicated counts of eligibles<br />
enrolled in multiple plans." In Hawaii, HCFA reported an additi<strong>on</strong>al data problem. Those enrolted under Hawaii's<br />
Secti<strong>on</strong> Il15 waiver are counted in the enrollment total, but not in the denominator (total recipients) (HCFA 1996a).<br />
" In additi<strong>on</strong> to the dental and behavioral health plans, there are plans in some states that provide <strong>on</strong>ly primary care<br />
services or an even more limited set of services, such as delivery and postpartum care <strong>on</strong>ly or newborn services <strong>on</strong>ly. They<br />
typically exclude hospital services, although they may require primary care physicians to review hospital admissi<strong>on</strong>s. These<br />
plans, however, appear not to duplicate coverage with other plans. They are not excluded from the Commissi<strong>on</strong>'s counts, in<br />
part because they are not well-distinguished from some PCCM plans.<br />
" Plans are identified, with enrollment counts, by HCFA (1996a). More detailed descripti<strong>on</strong>s are in a report <strong>on</strong> plans<br />
operating under Secti<strong>on</strong> 1915(b) waivers (HCFA 1996e).<br />
1997 Annual Report to C<strong>on</strong>grers/Chapter 20 428