29.07.2013 Views

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MS. CHRISTENSEN. Steve.<br />

250<br />

STATEMENT OF STEPHEN A. SOMERS, PRESIDENT, CENTER<br />

FOR HEALTH CARE STRATEGIES, INC.<br />

Mr. SOMERS. Thank you, and good morning. I am Stephen<br />

Somers, and for the Hill staffers am<strong>on</strong>g you, you have in Jane<br />

Horvath and myself two former <str<strong>on</strong>g>Senate</str<strong>on</strong>g> staffers who are examples<br />

of what your future might be like-you too may be able to testify<br />

before a panel <strong>on</strong> managed care at the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Senate</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Special</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<strong>on</strong> <strong>Aging</strong>. It is a real pleasure to be here.<br />

It is an h<strong>on</strong>or as well to be here with Bill Scanl<strong>on</strong> and Jane, because<br />

they represent two of the supreme catalogers of what is going<br />

<strong>on</strong> across the States with respect to <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care. I turn<br />

to the GAO and to the Nati<strong>on</strong>al Academy for State Health Policy<br />

c<strong>on</strong>stantly for informati<strong>on</strong> about where particular States stand, so<br />

I commend to your attenti<strong>on</strong> their materials.<br />

It is always a Pleasure to be <strong>on</strong> a panel with officials from Wisc<strong>on</strong>sin<br />

and Maryland. I worked at the Robert Wood Johns<strong>on</strong> Foundati<strong>on</strong><br />

for many years, and for health care philanthropy, Wisc<strong>on</strong>sin<br />

and Maryland are two States that are c<strong>on</strong>stantly seen as lighthouses<br />

or beac<strong>on</strong>s, which is to say leaders, in progressive model development<br />

and innovati<strong>on</strong>. It also means that they get all the grant<br />

m<strong>on</strong>ey, too, so I expect to be hearing more from Wisc<strong>on</strong>sin and<br />

Maryland in the future.<br />

The Center for Health <str<strong>on</strong>g>Care</str<strong>on</strong>g> Strategies is a n<strong>on</strong>profit organizati<strong>on</strong><br />

running two major programs for the Robert Wood Johns<strong>on</strong> Foundati<strong>on</strong><br />

(RWJF) and also <strong>on</strong>e for the Annie E. Casey Foundati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

There are two programs for RWJF. One is called the Building<br />

Health Systems Program-actually, Wisc<strong>on</strong>sin has gotten substantial<br />

funding under that program from the Foundati<strong>on</strong>-and the<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Managed</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Care</str<strong>on</strong>g> Program. Both of them are focusing <strong>on</strong><br />

how to make health systems work better for people with chr<strong>on</strong>ic<br />

health problems.<br />

As you probably know, the Robert Wood Johns<strong>on</strong> Foundati<strong>on</strong> is<br />

a large health care philanthropy. It spends about $250 milli<strong>on</strong> a<br />

year <strong>on</strong> dem<strong>on</strong>strati<strong>on</strong> projects training, evaluati<strong>on</strong> and research<br />

programs. A lot of them are large multi-site nati<strong>on</strong>al programs.<br />

The <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Managed</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Care</str<strong>on</strong>g> Program (MMCP) is just <strong>on</strong>e of<br />

them, and I am going to focus the remainder of my time up<strong>on</strong> that<br />

program, which is described in your packet, and for which there is<br />

a Request for Proposals (RFP) attached.<br />

The program is a $21 milli<strong>on</strong> nati<strong>on</strong>al program, the goal of which<br />

is stated in your material, to make managed care work for <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

recipients, especially those with chr<strong>on</strong>ic health c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s. I<br />

would very much agree with what Peggy Bartels of Wisc<strong>on</strong>sin said<br />

about <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care in particular having the opportunity<br />

to lead the rest of the managed care market place with respect to<br />

serving these populati<strong>on</strong>s. This is because the commercial plans<br />

just have not served these populati<strong>on</strong>s before, and <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> has<br />

the kinds of requirements and attenti<strong>on</strong> to quality issues that<br />

should serve as a guide for all other managed care enterprises<br />

serving disabled populati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

The objectives of the MMCP are to build capacity am<strong>on</strong>g the purchasers-principally<br />

the States and, to some degree increasingly,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!