Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

aging.senate.gov
from aging.senate.gov More from this publisher
29.07.2013 Views

237 PACE/Partnership programs guide long term care Two Wisconsin ong>Medicaidong> programs are saving as foreetmes in theo sae's long term con redesign plan Tbe PACE and Wisconsin Partnership programs, while shasing similar goals and target gloUps, am two distinct managed care programs tdit seek to provide compphebmive cam to IhAil Daldety ad In tbe case of the Wisconsin Parnership Program. the physically disabled. PACE sandsfar Program for Al bdusive Car for the Elderly. The prograim bopn in 1990 in Mlwaukee under the name Community Crc for the Eldy (CCE)ad ipanded cl Eider Cae tDmnc Counry in 1995. The PACE program is a congressionally aotherized lication of tbo matagod c system pioneered by On Lok Senior Health Services of San Francisco, CA. On Lok is a natonlly recognized program for fris elderly personas. Tbe Wisconsin Parnership Program (WPP) began when the Bureau of Long Tam Support Within the DOH. DHFS, was awarded a gant by dte Robert Wood Johnson Foundation in 1994. WPP is a -- del used to provide services for the frail elderly and personas with physical disabilitim.Currendytiesu ae throee active WPP agencies in Wisconsin. These are Elder ong>Careong> of Dane Coulty in Mado wbich began operating WPP in February of 1996: Community ong>Careong> for dte Elderly in Mllhanke, which begn operating in May of 1996; and Access to Independence In Madison. which began opcraxing WPP in the summer of 1996. Both programs are voluntary and are designed to provide frail elderly pesons (and in the cae of Wpp persons with disabilities) with the support needed to avoid being placed in a nurring home Boh programs accomplish this goal by coordinating local rdsl and social avimes. Community ong>Careong> for the Elderly. Elder ong>Careong>, and Access to Independence have connracts with the Dcpartment of Health and Faunily Services to provide ong>Medicaidong> servicn to thcir brget Sroups. They operate with capitacd fundin, but reimburse some npatiest and hospital OrAntab ad xtay fees, nd home health services on a fee-for-scrvicc basis.o Reprinted with peamniruionfrom rthe Jamrvy, 1997 Forward nawi war.

238 Ms. CHRISTENSEN. Thank you. I think Jane is going to tell us about some of the other States and what they are doing. STATEMENT OF JANE HORVATH, DIRECTOR OF MEDICAID PROJECTS, NATIONAL ACADEMY FOR STATE HEALTH POLICY Ms. HORVATH. I am going to take probably a more shotgun approach to this issue this morning. I appreciate the opportunity to be here, and thank you for inviting me. The National Academy for State Health Policy is a nonprofit organization based in Portland, ME. We receive most of our funding through foundations and do work with specific States around issues. We have done a lot of work around enrollment of elderly and disabled populations into ong>Medicaidong> managed care programs for a number of years, and I myself am working on a project with another very special population within ong>Medicaidong>, which is foster care children enrollment into ong>Medicaidong> managed care. I am working on a Cummings Foundation project specifically with five States, building interagency teams, to look at how best to do this for I think what is arguably the most vulnerable of generally vulnerable population of ong>Medicaidong> clientele. I want to just give you some background, and I really wanted to zero in on special needs adults and children within ong>Medicaidong> and, in our experience, the things that States have to consider, I want to give some brief examples of how States have approached the issue of ong>Medicaidong> managed care and vulnerable populations. I have some handouts with charts that I'm not going to go into detail on, but just reference. Our records show that as of January of this year, there were 26 States that were enrolling elderly and/or some portion of disabled populations into risk-based ong>Medicaidong> managed care. I think what is most important to keep in mind when you think about this population and you think about what States are doing is to understand that currently, of the 38 risk-contracting States, that most ong>Medicaidong> managed care programs as of yet do not integrate long-term care or long-term support under a capitated program, which becomes a crucial aspect when you are talking about children and adults with special health care needs. Concurrent with that, the other important caveat to keep in mind is that most ong>Medicaidong> programs, whether or not they are enrolling elderly and disabled, do not integrate Medicare into their system of care. It is an extremely difficult thing to do. It is not for lack of desire on the part of State ong>Medicaidong> agencies, but that's another whole issue of politics and policies. You need to keep in mind because both of those caveats when long-term care services and supports are not integrated, people have to walk through at least two systems, and it can create cost-shifting incentives that did not necessarily exist in the fee-for-service system. When Medicare is not integrated, it can certainly create cost-shifting incentives that did not exist under fee-for-service. So we try to keep these things in mind when we are thinking about enroling special needs populations, elderly/disabled adults and children, into ong>Medicaidong> managed care. These issues are not

238<br />

Ms. CHRISTENSEN. Thank you.<br />

I think Jane is going to tell us about some of the other States<br />

and what they are doing.<br />

STATEMENT OF JANE HORVATH, DIRECTOR OF MEDICAID<br />

PROJECTS, NATIONAL ACADEMY FOR STATE HEALTH POLICY<br />

Ms. HORVATH. I am going to take probably a more shotgun approach<br />

to this issue this morning. I appreciate the opportunity to<br />

be here, and thank you for inviting me.<br />

The Nati<strong>on</strong>al Academy for State Health Policy is a n<strong>on</strong>profit organizati<strong>on</strong><br />

based in Portland, ME. We receive most of our funding<br />

through foundati<strong>on</strong>s and do work with specific States around issues.<br />

We have d<strong>on</strong>e a lot of work around enrollment of elderly and<br />

disabled populati<strong>on</strong>s into <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care programs for a<br />

number of years, and I myself am working <strong>on</strong> a project with another<br />

very special populati<strong>on</strong> within <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g>, which is foster care<br />

children enrollment into <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care. I am working <strong>on</strong><br />

a Cummings Foundati<strong>on</strong> project specifically with five States, building<br />

interagency teams, to look at how best to do this for I think<br />

what is arguably the most vulnerable of generally vulnerable populati<strong>on</strong><br />

of <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> clientele.<br />

I want to just give you some background, and I really wanted to<br />

zero in <strong>on</strong> special needs adults and children within <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> and,<br />

in our experience, the things that States have to c<strong>on</strong>sider, I want<br />

to give some brief examples of how States have approached the<br />

issue of <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care and vulnerable populati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

I have some handouts with charts that I'm not going to go into<br />

detail <strong>on</strong>, but just reference.<br />

Our records show that as of January of this year, there were 26<br />

States that were enrolling elderly and/or some porti<strong>on</strong> of disabled<br />

populati<strong>on</strong>s into risk-based <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care. I think what<br />

is most important to keep in mind when you think about this populati<strong>on</strong><br />

and you think about what States are doing is to understand<br />

that currently, of the 38 risk-c<strong>on</strong>tracting States, that most <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

managed care programs as of yet do not integrate l<strong>on</strong>g-term<br />

care or l<strong>on</strong>g-term support under a capitated program, which becomes<br />

a crucial aspect when you are talking about children and<br />

adults with special health care needs.<br />

C<strong>on</strong>current with that, the other important caveat to keep in<br />

mind is that most <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> programs, whether or not they are enrolling<br />

elderly and disabled, do not integrate Medicare into their<br />

system of care. It is an extremely difficult thing to do. It is not for<br />

lack of desire <strong>on</strong> the part of State <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> agencies, but that's another<br />

whole issue of politics and policies. You need to keep in mind<br />

because both of those caveats when l<strong>on</strong>g-term care services and<br />

supports are not integrated, people have to walk through at least<br />

two systems, and it can create cost-shifting incentives that did not<br />

necessarily exist in the fee-for-service system. When Medicare is<br />

not integrated, it can certainly create cost-shifting incentives that<br />

did not exist under fee-for-service.<br />

So we try to keep these things in mind when we are thinking<br />

about enroling special needs populati<strong>on</strong>s, elderly/disabled adults<br />

and children, into <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care. These issues are not

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!