Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
237 PACE/Partnership programs guide long term care Two Wisconsin
238 Ms. CHRISTENSEN. Thank you. I think Jane is going to tell us about some of the other States and what they are doing. STATEMENT OF JANE HORVATH, DIRECTOR OF MEDICAID PROJECTS, NATIONAL ACADEMY FOR STATE HEALTH POLICY Ms. HORVATH. I am going to take probably a more shotgun approach to this issue this morning. I appreciate the opportunity to be here, and thank you for inviting me. The National Academy for State Health Policy is a nonprofit organization based in Portland, ME. We receive most of our funding through foundations and do work with specific States around issues. We have done a lot of work around enrollment of elderly and disabled populations into
- Page 190 and 191: 187 HealthChoice and People with <s
- Page 192 and 193: 189 HealthChoice and People with <s
- Page 194 and 195: 191 Take these three steps to choos
- Page 196 and 197: 193 Call 1-800-888-1965 if you are
- Page 198 and 199: IF YOU HAVE HIV/AIDS 195 MCO staff
- Page 200 and 201: 197 * Refer you to a medical specia
- Page 202 and 203: *pV 199 SERVICES FOR CHILDREN IN ST
- Page 204 and 205: 201 Ms. CHRISTENSEN. Thank you. Go
- Page 206 and 207: 203 We implement these QI goals thr
- Page 208 and 209: 205 Medicaid recip
- Page 210 and 211: 207 My name is Peggy Bartels. I am
- Page 212 and 213: 209 At the forefront of Wisconsin's
- Page 214 and 215: 211 Finally, we believe that high q
- Page 216 and 217: 213 WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
- Page 218 and 219: 2 SELECTED INDICATORS Access to <st
- Page 220 and 221: Mental Health 217 * HMOs reported f
- Page 222 and 223: 'Nisconsin Medicaid</strong
- Page 224 and 225: Program for Program Chareolorletice
- Page 226 and 227: Primary Program AFDC/H8 Provlqar Ch
- Page 228 and 229: 225 Children Come First of Dane Cou
- Page 230 and 231: 227 Wraparound Milwaukee saving dol
- Page 232 and 233: 229 Another positive outcome of the
- Page 234 and 235: 231 AltDoughl Nkvie' iniCil costs i
- Page 236 and 237: 233 CCE's staff consist of a variet
- Page 238 and 239: 235 Al the cturent time, there is n
- Page 242 and 243: 239 necessarily relevant to the AFD
- Page 244 and 245: 241 about including these specialty
- Page 246 and 247: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Ct-u B.1r- M.mb
- Page 248 and 249: Considerations: 245 Enrolling <stro
- Page 250 and 251: 247 Medicaid <stro
- Page 252 and 253: a. some counties 249 b. mandatory e
- Page 254 and 255: 251 counties as well-of managed car
- Page 256 and 257: 253 In other States devolution is m
- Page 258 and 259: 255 /-LCenter for Health Ca
- Page 260 and 261: 257 Forums on Managed</stro
- Page 262 and 263: 259 Medicaid Carve
- Page 264 and 265: 261 So I view Medicaid</str
- Page 266 and 267: 264 Medicaid: Spen
- Page 268 and 269: 266 a 50 percent match. 2 Since 198
- Page 270 and 271: 268 If enrollment of eligible indiv
- Page 272 and 273: 270 drugs, ICF services, and optome
- Page 274 and 275: 272 Table 20-1. Medicaid</s
- Page 276 and 277: 274 The slowdown in spending after
- Page 278 and 279: 276 Section 1115 Demonstration Waiv
- Page 280 and 281: 278 primary care case management ar
- Page 282 and 283: 280 Table 20-2. Enrollment in <stro
- Page 284 and 285: 282 / Figure 20-6. Enrollment Growt
- Page 286 and 287: 284 Marnaged-care growth at the sta
- Page 288 and 289: 286 Figure 20-9. Enrollment in Risk
238<br />
Ms. CHRISTENSEN. Thank you.<br />
I think Jane is going to tell us about some of the other States<br />
and what they are doing.<br />
STATEMENT OF JANE HORVATH, DIRECTOR OF MEDICAID<br />
PROJECTS, NATIONAL ACADEMY FOR STATE HEALTH POLICY<br />
Ms. HORVATH. I am going to take probably a more shotgun approach<br />
to this issue this morning. I appreciate the opportunity to<br />
be here, and thank you for inviting me.<br />
The Nati<strong>on</strong>al Academy for State Health Policy is a n<strong>on</strong>profit organizati<strong>on</strong><br />
based in Portland, ME. We receive most of our funding<br />
through foundati<strong>on</strong>s and do work with specific States around issues.<br />
We have d<strong>on</strong>e a lot of work around enrollment of elderly and<br />
disabled populati<strong>on</strong>s into <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care programs for a<br />
number of years, and I myself am working <strong>on</strong> a project with another<br />
very special populati<strong>on</strong> within <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g>, which is foster care<br />
children enrollment into <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care. I am working <strong>on</strong><br />
a Cummings Foundati<strong>on</strong> project specifically with five States, building<br />
interagency teams, to look at how best to do this for I think<br />
what is arguably the most vulnerable of generally vulnerable populati<strong>on</strong><br />
of <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> clientele.<br />
I want to just give you some background, and I really wanted to<br />
zero in <strong>on</strong> special needs adults and children within <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> and,<br />
in our experience, the things that States have to c<strong>on</strong>sider, I want<br />
to give some brief examples of how States have approached the<br />
issue of <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care and vulnerable populati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
I have some handouts with charts that I'm not going to go into<br />
detail <strong>on</strong>, but just reference.<br />
Our records show that as of January of this year, there were 26<br />
States that were enrolling elderly and/or some porti<strong>on</strong> of disabled<br />
populati<strong>on</strong>s into risk-based <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care. I think what<br />
is most important to keep in mind when you think about this populati<strong>on</strong><br />
and you think about what States are doing is to understand<br />
that currently, of the 38 risk-c<strong>on</strong>tracting States, that most <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
managed care programs as of yet do not integrate l<strong>on</strong>g-term<br />
care or l<strong>on</strong>g-term support under a capitated program, which becomes<br />
a crucial aspect when you are talking about children and<br />
adults with special health care needs.<br />
C<strong>on</strong>current with that, the other important caveat to keep in<br />
mind is that most <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> programs, whether or not they are enrolling<br />
elderly and disabled, do not integrate Medicare into their<br />
system of care. It is an extremely difficult thing to do. It is not for<br />
lack of desire <strong>on</strong> the part of State <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> agencies, but that's another<br />
whole issue of politics and policies. You need to keep in mind<br />
because both of those caveats when l<strong>on</strong>g-term care services and<br />
supports are not integrated, people have to walk through at least<br />
two systems, and it can create cost-shifting incentives that did not<br />
necessarily exist in the fee-for-service system. When Medicare is<br />
not integrated, it can certainly create cost-shifting incentives that<br />
did not exist under fee-for-service.<br />
So we try to keep these things in mind when we are thinking<br />
about enroling special needs populati<strong>on</strong>s, elderly/disabled adults<br />
and children, into <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care. These issues are not