Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

aging.senate.gov
from aging.senate.gov More from this publisher
29.07.2013 Views

209 At the forefront of Wisconsin's managed care infrastructure is a broad public/private partnership. We all must work together to implement our multi-prolonged quality improvement (QI) process. The goals of our Ql process are simple, but broader than many commercial managed care programs. First, we strive to ensure that ong>Medicaidong> managed care enrollees achieve the highest possible health outcomes, whether the enrollee is a 2-year-old needing to be ftolly immunized, or an 80year-old needing assistance with appropriate medication administration. We defin desired health care outcomes differently, for differet populations- We strive to define outcomes that are both objectively and clinically acceptable and subjectively important to consumers. We are learning that there is a lot of work to be done to define outcomes that are acceptable to the elderly and disabled. Traditional quality measures, such as those defined in HEDIS, for - example, are just a starting point. Secondly, we strive to make sure our managed care erollees access th care mmty need, whether that means assuring transportation to clinic appointments or locating translators-for non-English speaking enrollees. Again, we define opportunities for improved access differently for targeted populations. For example, we are learning that-elderly persons are more likely to access health care if they feel they have a comfortable personal relationship with their health care provider. This is not a common goal in commercial managed care. Finally, we are committed to ensuring enrollees maximum choice of managed care plans and health care providers within thoe plans. Whenever we canot guarantee reasonable choice - we do not enroll. We implement these QI goals through a variety of strategies. Most importantly, we have established basic contract requirements, some of which apply to all ong>Medicaidong> managed care enrollees and others which are unique to each population. The contract requirements are routinely and rigorously monitored for all programs. Examples of these contract requirements are: asstring round-the-clock easy access to appropriate care; assuring the location of health care providers within 20 miles of consumers' residences; requiring that managed care organizations offer a comprehensive range of services equivalent to ong>Medicaidong> fee-for-service; assuring calturally responsive health care providers, education and communication; requiring formal and informal comqplaint and grievance processes; and requiring managed care organizations to maitain comprehensive internal QI system. Almost all state ong>Medicaidong> managed care programs include such requiremnts. Examples of contract requirements that are munique to Wisconsia's statewide managed care program for low-income women and children that could be adapted for mandatory programs for the elderly and disabled include the following featues: 1) We use an independent enrollment contractor to assure that ong>Medicaidong> recipients enrolling in HMOs are fully informed about how to chose an HMO that best meets the health care needs of their family. The enrollment contractor helps Wisconsin avoid excessive and inappropriate marketing to consumers by HMOs. -3-

210 2) Our contract requires each HMO to hire at least one full-time ong>Medicaidong> advocate to help enrollees navigate the managed care system and learn how to use their HMO effectively. 3) We contract with two ombudsmen to help managed care enrollees with more systemic complaints and grievances about managed care. 4) We allow voluntary HMO participation for children who qualify for the federal 'Birthto-Three" program - a program targeted for children with special health care needs. Most parents and caregivers opt to keep their children in the HMO program. Specific, targeted contract requirements for the elderly and disabled also incl the following: each managed care organization must have a Board of Dectrs including ong>Medicaidong> consumer representatives; our plans must have working Memoranda of Understanding with affected counties (in Wisconsin, many behavioral health and supportive home case services are county based); and required quality studies must reflect some subjects of importance to consumers. All of our special managed care programs are undergoing extensive quality evaluations by outside evaluators. This has been the Wisconsin way: we start slowly, evaluate and-improve. then expand to larger mmbers of covered persons. Another critical aspect of our multi-pronged QI approach is public accountability. We use an extensive network of community-based forums as vehicles for public input on an aspects of managed care. Examples of these meetings include: a Statewide Advisory Group, quarterly rneetngs wit HMO technicnl staff, monthly meetings with EMO contract administrators,quarterly regional forums and workgroups (statewide or regional) to address specific areas of concerns (e.g., behavioral health). We foster and encourage proactive advocacy and community involvement as part of our public/private partnerhip. Every year Wisconsin produces an MO/Fee-For-Service Comparison Report for the lowincome women and children managed care enrollees. This report is based on a combination of survey and encounter data submitted and processed by HMOs. The rxport is always made public with the results discussed in public forums. Areas needing improvement may be further studied by workgroups and audited. We will be producing similar reports for our other programs also. Wisconsin has a strong audit and utilization reporting component to its multi-pronged QI approach. We target specific areas of oncern, such as behavioral health and dcntal services. We also regularly conduct comprehensive medical chart reviews of both fC0-for-service and managed care recipients through an independent peer review organization. We review twice as many charts for ong>Medicaidong> managed care enrollees as for those on ong>Medicaidong> fee-for-service. AU of these strategies - contract requirements, enrollment codactorm, advocates, public forums, public reporting of data, audits and chart reviews - can be adapted to all special ong>Medicaidong> populations, including persons with special health care needs. -4-

210<br />

2) Our c<strong>on</strong>tract requires each HMO to hire at least <strong>on</strong>e full-time <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> advocate to help<br />

enrollees navigate the managed care system and learn how to use their HMO effectively.<br />

3) We c<strong>on</strong>tract with two ombudsmen to help managed care enrollees with more systemic<br />

complaints and grievances about managed care.<br />

4) We allow voluntary HMO participati<strong>on</strong> for children who qualify for the federal 'Birthto-Three"<br />

program - a program targeted for children with special health care needs.<br />

Most parents and caregivers opt to keep their children in the HMO program.<br />

Specific, targeted c<strong>on</strong>tract requirements for the elderly and disabled also incl the following:<br />

each managed care organizati<strong>on</strong> must have a Board of Dectrs including <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>sumer<br />

representatives; our plans must have working Memoranda of Understanding with affected<br />

counties (in Wisc<strong>on</strong>sin, many behavioral health and supportive home case services are county<br />

based); and required quality studies must reflect some subjects of importance to c<strong>on</strong>sumers.<br />

All of our special managed care programs are undergoing extensive quality evaluati<strong>on</strong>s by<br />

outside evaluators. This has been the Wisc<strong>on</strong>sin way: we start slowly, evaluate and-improve.<br />

then expand to larger mmbers of covered pers<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

Another critical aspect of our multi-pr<strong>on</strong>ged QI approach is public accountability. We use an<br />

extensive network of community-based forums as vehicles for public input <strong>on</strong> an aspects of<br />

managed care. Examples of these meetings include: a Statewide Advisory Group, quarterly<br />

rneetngs wit HMO technicnl staff, m<strong>on</strong>thly meetings with EMO c<strong>on</strong>tract administrators,quarterly<br />

regi<strong>on</strong>al forums and workgroups (statewide or regi<strong>on</strong>al) to address specific areas of<br />

c<strong>on</strong>cerns (e.g., behavioral health). We foster and encourage proactive advocacy and<br />

community involvement as part of our public/private partnerhip.<br />

Every year Wisc<strong>on</strong>sin produces an MO/Fee-For-Service Comparis<strong>on</strong> Report for the lowincome<br />

women and children managed care enrollees. This report is based <strong>on</strong> a combinati<strong>on</strong> of<br />

survey and encounter data submitted and processed by HMOs. The rxport is always made<br />

public with the results discussed in public forums. Areas needing improvement may be further<br />

studied by workgroups and audited. We will be producing similar reports for our other<br />

programs also.<br />

Wisc<strong>on</strong>sin has a str<strong>on</strong>g audit and utilizati<strong>on</strong> reporting comp<strong>on</strong>ent to its multi-pr<strong>on</strong>ged QI<br />

approach. We target specific areas of <strong>on</strong>cern, such as behavioral health and dcntal services.<br />

We also regularly c<strong>on</strong>duct comprehensive medical chart reviews of both fC0-for-service and<br />

managed care recipients through an independent peer review organizati<strong>on</strong>. We review twice<br />

as many charts for <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> managed care enrollees as for those <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> fee-for-service.<br />

AU of these strategies - c<strong>on</strong>tract requirements, enrollment codactorm, advocates, public<br />

forums, public reporting of data, audits and chart reviews - can be adapted to all special<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> populati<strong>on</strong>s, including pers<strong>on</strong>s with special health care needs.<br />

-4-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!