29.07.2013 Views

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

136<br />

While we are in the midst of this evoluti<strong>on</strong> of measures that can be used to assess the quality of care,<br />

we also need to c<strong>on</strong>sider whether we should allow the current state of our knowledge about quality<br />

measures to lead to acti<strong>on</strong>s that could preclude future improvement. In particular, <strong>on</strong>e issue is<br />

whether plans should collect and provide purchasers encounter data describing all the services<br />

delivered. While there is increasing provisi<strong>on</strong> of HEDIS or FACCT measures to purchasers, there<br />

is some resistance to furnishing comprehensive encounter data.<br />

In part, the oppositi<strong>on</strong> to the provisi<strong>on</strong> of encounter data may be associated with the fact that, at this<br />

point, there are limited uses for such data because of the lack of appropriate c<strong>on</strong>ceptual measures<br />

for either the receipt of particular services or outcomes associated with services. While I believe that<br />

our set of valid and useful measures is going to improve over time, we need to be c<strong>on</strong>cerned about<br />

our ability to produce that informati<strong>on</strong> in the future. We need to be aware of the fact that if today<br />

we are developing informati<strong>on</strong> systems that are focused <strong>on</strong> the existing sets of HEDIS or FACCT<br />

measures, we are going to incur expensive retooling in the future in order to be able to provide the<br />

new measures for future HEDIS or future FACCT systems, or for some of their successors. By<br />

developing the capacity to collect encounter data today, there will be an opportunity to quickly<br />

implement different measures as they are developed.<br />

It is also an often overlooked fact that encounter data will be essential for the rate setting process in<br />

the future. At this point, rate setting is an easy task -- let us say a relatively easy task, given all that<br />

has been said about the difficulties of risk adjustment-- because fee-for-service informati<strong>on</strong> about<br />

the receipt of services does exist and can be used as a benchmark for establishing rates. In the<br />

future, more and more individuals enrolling in managed care will result in much less fee-for-service<br />

data. The lack of encounter data then will be a significant barrier to establishing appropriate rates<br />

for the payment of services. One can <strong>on</strong>ly imagine how quickly this is going to happen, given the<br />

movement to managed care, as well as significant changes that the provisi<strong>on</strong> of medical services<br />

undergo as medical knowledge develops over time.<br />

Comments of Dr. Scanl<strong>on</strong> Summarizing Discussi<strong>on</strong> in Forum Three: Quality and Outcome<br />

Measures, July 15, 1997 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!