29.07.2013 Views

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Medicaid Managed Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

166 Communicating the Quality Message<br />

109<br />

Minnesota's motivati<strong>on</strong> for c<strong>on</strong>tracting <strong>on</strong> a mandatory basis with managed care plans<br />

was threefold: affordability, accountability, and accessibility. State legislators wanted not<br />

<strong>on</strong>ly to keep <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> costs under c<strong>on</strong>trol, but also to ensure that the health care received<br />

by the state's <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> beneficiaries was accessible and of a c<strong>on</strong>sistent quality. Even at that<br />

time, managed care was a very comm<strong>on</strong> opti<strong>on</strong> in Minnesota's private sector, particularly<br />

in the Twin Cities metropolitan area, so c<strong>on</strong>tracting with HMOs to enroll MA recipients<br />

was not the big leap that it was in other states where managed care was not so prevalent.<br />

Although it has had its share of bumps and glitches, PMAP is generally viewed as being<br />

very successful in Minnesota, which is why the state has c<strong>on</strong>tinued to expand the program.<br />

Today, as a c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> of licensure and in order to participate in other state-funded programs,<br />

such as workers' compensati<strong>on</strong>, HMOs operating in Minnesota are required to c<strong>on</strong>tract<br />

with the state to enroll MA recipients. Furthermore, each HMO must be willing to<br />

enroll a proporti<strong>on</strong> of the market share of recipients based <strong>on</strong> a formula specified in law<br />

which factors in private market share within a particular geographical area. Under PMAP,<br />

a participating health plan must cover all medically-necessary <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g>-covered services,<br />

including the medical, dental, mental health, and home care needs of its MA recipients. It is<br />

not required to provide the room and board costs for people living in nursing homes or in<br />

group homes for the mentally disabled. Those costs are covered by the state outside of the<br />

capitati<strong>on</strong> payments.<br />

MEDICA HEALTH PLANS AND MEDICAID<br />

Medica Health Plans, part of Allina Health System, is a direct descendent of Physicians<br />

Health Plan-<strong>on</strong>e of the eight initial prepaid health plans that Minnesota c<strong>on</strong>tracted with<br />

in 1985 for its PMAR. Thus, Medica Health Plans, through a direct predecessor, has been a<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sistent participant in Minnesota's managed care <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> program from its incepti<strong>on</strong>.<br />

PMAP began as a relatively small dem<strong>on</strong>strati<strong>on</strong> project. Originally, <strong>on</strong>ly three counties<br />

participated: Dakota, a generally suburban county; Itasca, a rural county; and Hennepin<br />

County, home to the city of Minneapolis. However, Hennepin, which has more than half-<br />

74,000-of the state's MA recipients, did not come fully into the program until 1991.<br />

Although it was clear from PMAP's <strong>on</strong>set that <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> recipients had specific health care<br />

needs, as the program grew-especially after Hennepin County came fully into it-those<br />

needs became further clarified. As the program evolved it also became increasingly clear that<br />

meeting the needs of <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> recipients would require an entirely new and creative<br />

approach to the delivery of health care, which, in turn, woult require new methods of<br />

communicati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

A NEED FOR A REEVALUATION<br />

By the early 1990s, Medica noticed a troubling trend reported by its providers: <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

members had a very high-about 45 percent-no-show rate for doctor appointments. Many<br />

of Medica's providers were justifiably upset with such a high level of patients missing<br />

appointments, for it made the running of their practices more difficult. But the providers<br />

had an even greater c<strong>on</strong>cern: These no-shows meant that many <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> recipients were not<br />

receiving the health care they needed.<br />

In 1992, the Medica Foundati<strong>on</strong> (now the Allina Foundati<strong>on</strong>) decided to look more<br />

closely at the health care needs of its <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> members. It commissi<strong>on</strong>ed a comprehensive<br />

study of <str<strong>on</strong>g>Medicaid</str<strong>on</strong>g> recipients in Minnesota's Hennepin and Dakota counties, two of the<br />

three original counties included in the PMAP dem<strong>on</strong>strati<strong>on</strong> project. The study looked at<br />

recipients who were enrolled in Medica Choice <str<strong>on</strong>g>Care</str<strong>on</strong>g> and two n<strong>on</strong>-Medica managed care<br />

plans, Metropolitan Health Plan and U<str<strong>on</strong>g>Care</str<strong>on</strong>g>. During the entire study, which lasted from

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!