Consultant's Report - Minnesota State Legislature
Consultant's Report - Minnesota State Legislature Consultant's Report - Minnesota State Legislature
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Feasibility Study to Limit the Spread of Zebra Mussels from Ossawinnamakee Lake scenario, the public is encouraged to report suspected locations ofzebra mussels in areas around the Ossawinnamakee Lake. This scenario allows the public to be an active participant in the control process. Objective 2 Ossawinnamakee Lake has one outlet structure that represents the only in-water dispersal point for zebra mussels from the lake to Pelican Brook. Protection ofthis outlet from the population in the lake represents the most critical control point for downstream transport. Several treatment alternatives could be applied to control the movement out of the lake at the outlet structure; however, the size and anticipated flow rates through the structure present a challenge for implementation of a control strategy that is feasible to construct and economically responsible to operate. As an alternative to an aggressive solution at the outlet structure, a more passive system could be implemented at the exit ofMuskie Bay. Under this scenario, a pelmeable barrier could be employed that would allow for the movement ofwater but would restrict the movement ofinwater organisms, including veligers. A barrier similar to the Marine Life Exclusion System manufactured by Gunderboom, Inc. (discussed in Section V) may be a viable option. A physical barrier of this type would encompass the entire water column at the exit area of Muskie Bay (Figure VI-I). The barrier would protrude slightly out of the water and stretch to the bottom of the lake. The barrier would be moored into place presumably at each shore and also be anchored along the bottom of the lake to exclude mussels from the outlet area oflake (see Figure V-2 in Section V). VI-12 Alternatives Analysis and Recommendations
Loke MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Feasibility Study to Limit the Spread of Zebra Mussels from Ossawinnamakee Lake Outlet Structure Figure VI-1. Permeable Barrier Location Permeable Border Muskie 80y FIGURE VI-1 Figure VI-I displays a conceptual plan view that illustrates the potential location of the permeable barrier system. This type ofphysical dispersal control strategy has several advantages that would aid the zebra mussel control efforts. These advantages include relatively low maintenance, reduced on-site staff time, limited moving parts, minimal utility costs, and the capability to pass large volumes of water. Disadvantages of this system include the likelihood that floating debris will require routine but random removal, exclusion ofboat traffic to the outlet area. of the lake, potential blockage of desirable species movement into the area of Ossawinnamakee Lake downstream of Muskie Bay and upstream of the outlet structure, and possible limitations ofcertain chemical treatments due to clogging. Objective 3 While evaluating the downstream movement of zebra mussels, it was determined that control of the population within Ossawinnamakee Lake in addition to control of zebra mussels that are dispersing or moving downstream is critical. While the size of the lake can present a logistical challenge for many of the evaluated treatment alternatives, it is believed that measures targeting the adult populations established in the lake may reduce the veliger densities that represent the probability ofdownstream dispersal. VI-13 Alternatives Analysis and Recommendations
- Page 28 and 29: Age and Growth MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT
- Page 32 and 33: MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RES
- Page 35 and 36: MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RES
- Page 37 and 38: MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RES
- Page 39 and 40: Works Cited MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
- Page 41 and 42: MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RES
- Page 43 and 44: MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RES
- Page 46 and 47: Table V-1. Methods Available for Co
- Page 48 and 49: Cavitation MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
- Page 50 and 51: MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RES
- Page 52: Potassium Salts MINNESOTA DEPARTMEN
- Page 56 and 57: MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RES
- Page 58 and 59: MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RES
- Page 60 and 61: MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RES
- Page 62 and 63: MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RES
- Page 64 and 65: Works Cited MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
- Page 67: MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RES
- Page 72 and 73: MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RES
- Page 74: Combined Treatments MINNESOTA DEPAR
- Page 80 and 81: MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RES
- Page 82 and 83: Feasibility Study To Limit the Spre
- Page 84 and 85: METHOD OF INVESTIGATION MINNESOTA D
- Page 87 and 88: VII-B. Treatment Alternatives Expan
- Page 91 and 92: Message Page 3 of4 3/21/2005 best.
- Page 96: enougl1 to eV8Juatc £1'
- Page 101 and 102: I \ I iV!1';UJIOOiS for Estimaling
- Page 103 and 104: FishPro Consulting Engineers and Sc
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES<br />
Feasibility Study to Limit the Spread of Zebra Mussels from Ossawinnamakee Lake<br />
scenario, the public is encouraged to report suspected locations ofzebra mussels in areas around<br />
the Ossawinnamakee Lake. This scenario allows the public to be an active participant in the<br />
control process.<br />
Objective 2<br />
Ossawinnamakee Lake has one outlet structure that represents the only in-water dispersal point<br />
for zebra mussels from the lake to Pelican Brook. Protection ofthis outlet from the population in<br />
the lake represents the most critical control point for downstream transport. Several treatment<br />
alternatives could be applied to control the movement out of the lake at the outlet structure;<br />
however, the size and anticipated flow rates through the structure present a challenge for<br />
implementation of a control strategy that is feasible to construct and economically responsible to<br />
operate. As an alternative to an aggressive solution at the outlet structure, a more passive system<br />
could be implemented at the exit ofMuskie Bay. Under this scenario, a pelmeable barrier could<br />
be employed that would allow for the movement ofwater but would restrict the movement ofinwater<br />
organisms, including veligers. A barrier similar to the Marine Life Exclusion System<br />
manufactured by Gunderboom, Inc. (discussed in Section V) may be a viable option. A physical<br />
barrier of this type would encompass the entire water column at the exit area of Muskie Bay<br />
(Figure VI-I). The barrier would protrude slightly out of the water and stretch to the bottom of<br />
the lake. The barrier would be moored into place presumably at each shore and also be anchored<br />
along the bottom of the lake to exclude mussels from the outlet area oflake (see Figure V-2 in<br />
Section V).<br />
VI-12 Alternatives Analysis and Recommendations