Consultant's Report - Minnesota State Legislature
Consultant's Report - Minnesota State Legislature
Consultant's Report - Minnesota State Legislature
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Technological Controls<br />
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES<br />
Feasibility Study to Limit the Spread of Zebra Mussels from Ossawinnamakee Lake<br />
As outlined above, technological control methods include acoustic, chemical, electrical, and<br />
physical treatments. Acoustic control methods can be utilized at high frequencies to induce<br />
mortality, or at lower frequencies to prevent settlement and typically affect all life stages.<br />
Electrical control methods have a similar effect at high and low frequencies, although most of<br />
these methods are most effective in controlling juvenile and adult mussels. Most ofthe physical<br />
control methods are utilized to prevent all zebra mussel life stages from spreading to particular<br />
locations, and subsequently induce mortality. Chemical control methods are generally utilized to<br />
induce mortality, but there are several that only prevent substrate attachment. Each of these<br />
control method categories and specific alternatives are described in detail below.<br />
Acoustic Deterrents<br />
Cavitation, sound treatment, and vibration are three acoustic treatments that can be utilized to<br />
control zebra mussel populations. The impacts and effectiveness ofthese treatments are not fully<br />
proven, especially in high-flow areas, but they are fairly low maintenance technologies that have<br />
a low likelihood ofharming nontargeted organisms. There is a possibility that resident fish may<br />
be affected by cavitation, but migratory fish should not be affected at short exposure times. In<br />
addition, acoustic control methods are environmentally friendly and do not have associated<br />
safety issues. Although acoustic technology is still under investigation, there is evidence<br />
suggesting that sound energy could be an attractive alternative to chemical or electrical<br />
treatment. In order to implement acoustic treatment options, site considerations are required for<br />
constructability and periodic maintenance access. In addition, electrical service is required for<br />
signal generation and amplification. Figure V-I demonstrates a conceptual view of a cavitation<br />
or sound treatment deterrent system.<br />
Figure V-1. General Schematic of an Acoustic Deterrent System<br />
V-3<br />
Review oCPotential Control Methods