29.07.2013 Views

Consultant's Report - Minnesota State Legislature

Consultant's Report - Minnesota State Legislature

Consultant's Report - Minnesota State Legislature

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Technological Controls<br />

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES<br />

Feasibility Study to Limit the Spread of Zebra Mussels from Ossawinnamakee Lake<br />

As outlined above, technological control methods include acoustic, chemical, electrical, and<br />

physical treatments. Acoustic control methods can be utilized at high frequencies to induce<br />

mortality, or at lower frequencies to prevent settlement and typically affect all life stages.<br />

Electrical control methods have a similar effect at high and low frequencies, although most of<br />

these methods are most effective in controlling juvenile and adult mussels. Most ofthe physical<br />

control methods are utilized to prevent all zebra mussel life stages from spreading to particular<br />

locations, and subsequently induce mortality. Chemical control methods are generally utilized to<br />

induce mortality, but there are several that only prevent substrate attachment. Each of these<br />

control method categories and specific alternatives are described in detail below.<br />

Acoustic Deterrents<br />

Cavitation, sound treatment, and vibration are three acoustic treatments that can be utilized to<br />

control zebra mussel populations. The impacts and effectiveness ofthese treatments are not fully<br />

proven, especially in high-flow areas, but they are fairly low maintenance technologies that have<br />

a low likelihood ofharming nontargeted organisms. There is a possibility that resident fish may<br />

be affected by cavitation, but migratory fish should not be affected at short exposure times. In<br />

addition, acoustic control methods are environmentally friendly and do not have associated<br />

safety issues. Although acoustic technology is still under investigation, there is evidence<br />

suggesting that sound energy could be an attractive alternative to chemical or electrical<br />

treatment. In order to implement acoustic treatment options, site considerations are required for<br />

constructability and periodic maintenance access. In addition, electrical service is required for<br />

signal generation and amplification. Figure V-I demonstrates a conceptual view of a cavitation<br />

or sound treatment deterrent system.<br />

Figure V-1. General Schematic of an Acoustic Deterrent System<br />

V-3<br />

Review oCPotential Control Methods

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!