Consultant's Report - Minnesota State Legislature
Consultant's Report - Minnesota State Legislature Consultant's Report - Minnesota State Legislature
VII-F. Meeting Summaries
Consulting Engineers & Scientists MEETING SUMMARY for February 25,2005 Review Meeting on Feasibility Study to Limit the Spread ofZebra Mussels from Ossawinnamakee Lake FP/CWI No. 05008 A 50% review meeting was held on February 16, 2005 at 11 :30 a.m. CST in Brainerd, Minnesota. The purpose of the meeting was to bring together the project team and MN DNR to discuss the progress and expectations of the study. A brief outline of the topics discussed at the meeting is provided below. The following were in attendance: Gary Montz, MN DNR Tim Bratsrup, MN DNR Rich Rezanka, MN DNR Matt Cochran, FishPro/CWI Richard Dirks, FishProlCWI Ryan Keith, FishProlCWI Meghan Oh, FishPro/CWI The following outline reflects FishPro 's understanding ofthe discussions that took place and any 'decisions that were made at the review meeting, Ifyou have any questions, comments, or additions, please contact Matt Cochran. We will consider the minutes to be accurate unless we receive notice ofany changes within ten working days ofthe issue date. 1. Matt Cochran initiated the meeting with a short overview ofthe FishPro study and the approach we plan to take to complete the study. Gary Montz replied with general comments: 1) The study is developing well and gives a good introduction to those not directly involved with zebra mussels 2) The background infoffilation on the lake and the species was good. Expansion of these areas of the report is not necessary beyond what is already included in the 50% draft. 3) It is good to include technologies that may not necessarily be feasible 4) It is important to list the reasons for discontinuing consideration ofeach method 5) Stay away from references to total eradication. 2. Section 1. Gary commented that we should rephrase the last sentence in the second paragraph on page I-I. The intention of the study is not to wipe out the population in the lake, but rather stop the spread of downstream transport of zebra mussels. He also informed FishPro that the official contract date should be January 3, 2005. 3. Matt informed MN DNR that Section II would provide a very concise overview of the report; this will be presented at 95%. 4. Section III. Matt informed MN DNR that the figures in Section III would be further developed and that some ofthe information in this section may be expanded.
- Page 144 and 145: Zebra Mussel Feasibility Study-Main
- Page 146 and 147: Zebra Mussel Feasibility Study-Main
- Page 148 and 149: Zebra Mussel Feasibility Study-Main
- Page 150 and 151: Zebra Mussel Feasibility Study-Main
- Page 152 and 153: Zebra Mussel Feasibility Study-Main
- Page 154 and 155: Zebra Mussel Feasibility Study-Main
- Page 157: FINAL REPORT OF THE EFFECTS OF CUTR
- Page 160 and 161: Limitations in this data set hav.e
- Page 162 and 163: Appendix 1. Development of D. polym
- Page 165 and 166: Figure 2 demonstrates that hatching
- Page 167 and 168: Experimental designs were modified
- Page 169 and 170: Pre-fertilization andpost-fertiliza
- Page 171: Expt Chemical 1 2 3 Table 3. Summar
- Page 174: Appendix 4: Effect of Exposure Time
- Page 178 and 179: Aquatic invertebrates in upper Peli
- Page 180 and 181: In contrast, fall sampling revealed
- Page 184 and 185: Lake Ossawinnamakee and Pelican Bro
- Page 188 and 189: Rich Rezanka would like us to refer
- Page 190 and 191: VII-G. List of Abbreviations Used
- Page 192: VII-H. Glossary of Terms
- Page 195 and 196: MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RES
- Page 197: Secchi disc MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
VII-F. Meeting Summaries
Change language