Consultant's Report - Minnesota State Legislature
Consultant's Report - Minnesota State Legislature Consultant's Report - Minnesota State Legislature
Limitations in this data set hav.e direct consequences on the ability to make recommendations for field application of Cutrine®-Ultra and CUS04 to control D. polymorpha larvae. As a result of these limitations, implicit and explicit uncertainty should be considered in determining the use of Cu and Cu-based products to control zebra mussels. Limitations and uncertainty include: This report does not sanction the use of Cu or Cu-based products in the control of zebra mussels. This decision is the responsibility ofMN DNR, or any other party, with due regard to relevant permits and regulations. EERT and ERDC do not take responsibility for actions taken by any party based upon information in this report. • Cu toxicity data are highly dependent upon the temperature, hardness, and alkalinity of water. These data only apply for the water quality parameters stated in Table 1, Appendix 1. If necessary, the data can be used to model toxicity estimates under other water quality conditions. • Larval data only pertain to 0 - 96-h old larvae. While these are key planktonic phases, we were not able to test Cutrine®-Ultra efficacy on later life stages. LC99 data are modeled estimates, not observations. • Similarly, the 95 % confidence intervals are modeled estimates, not observations. • These tests were performed under controlled laboratory conditions. There remains uncertainty as to the application of mussel sensitivity data to field situations. Recommendationsfor monitoring ofCutrine@-Ultra We recommend daily measurements of aqueous Cu to ensure adequate control. Accurate, field-based analytical techniques are widely available. Concentrations of Cutrine®-Ultra should be maintained at approximately 0.3 mg CulL, should a lOx protection factor be required. In addition, water residence time in the treated area should be assessed and used to gauge the suitability of these data for the measured water residence time in the treated area. We also recommend that any Cu treatment regime be amended to reflect any residual Cu in the water column at time of treatment, to ensure that Cu concentrations in the water body do not exceed 1 mg CulL at any time. Recommendationsfor monitoring D. polym01pha We recommend regular plankton screening in the spring and summer, to monitor for occurrence of D. polymorpha larvae in the water column. Observations of D. polymorpha larvae during these screens may be used to initiate Cutrine®-Ultra treatment prior to onset of 12°C water temperatures. In the absence of D. polymorpha Cutrine® Ultra treatment can be suspended. In addition, regular monitoring of suitable settlement sites downstream for emergent adult D. polymorpha populations is recommended. 5
Recommendations for physical treatment Both physical methods of control and physical aspects of stream habitat deserve brief consideration. With respect to physical habitat limitations, it is noteworthy that Strayer (1991), based on a thorough analysis of European zebra mussel distribution, concluded that this species does not reside in streams less than 20 m wide. In slight contrast, Horvath et al. (1996) found that zebra mussel colonization of small streams is possible, but only if there is a nearby, upstream lake source. Even then, populations declined exponentially with downstream distance from the source such that only isolated mussels were found much more than one km downstream. The outlet brook from Lake Ossawilmamakee is probably too small to sustain a zebra mussel population, although the larger streams farther downstream may provide suitable habitat. There is no doubt that this species is best adapted to the sublittoral zones ofvery large lakes (such as Lake Erie in North America) and impounded reaches oflarge rivers (such as the series of pools in the Upper Mississippi River). Physical methods of control (e.g., filtration, heat, aerial exposure) can be reliably used in some settings, but appear to be oflimited value in the present situation. The most viable physical control method may be the use of disposable substrates in the upstream end of the outlet brook. Large numbers of disposable substrates (e.g., nylon or fabric "mops") placed in several row,s along the channel (parallel to flow) or in the lake at the channel inlet (perpendicular flow) could reduce the number of veliger$ entrained into the flowing brook. These substrates create ideal settling conditions for the planktonic veligers by providing a firm surface and reduced flow velocity. Periodically (at least annually) the substrates would have to be removed and replaced. Disposable substrates have not been used much, as they are only partially effective. Percent control of 50 % is probably a reasonable expectation (O'Neill 1996). 6
- Page 129: ./}' 03/16/2005 14:40 FAX 217585189
- Page 144 and 145: Zebra Mussel Feasibility Study-Main
- Page 146 and 147: Zebra Mussel Feasibility Study-Main
- Page 148 and 149: Zebra Mussel Feasibility Study-Main
- Page 150 and 151: Zebra Mussel Feasibility Study-Main
- Page 152 and 153: Zebra Mussel Feasibility Study-Main
- Page 154 and 155: Zebra Mussel Feasibility Study-Main
- Page 157: FINAL REPORT OF THE EFFECTS OF CUTR
- Page 162 and 163: Appendix 1. Development of D. polym
- Page 165 and 166: Figure 2 demonstrates that hatching
- Page 167 and 168: Experimental designs were modified
- Page 169 and 170: Pre-fertilization andpost-fertiliza
- Page 171: Expt Chemical 1 2 3 Table 3. Summar
- Page 174: Appendix 4: Effect of Exposure Time
- Page 178 and 179: Aquatic invertebrates in upper Peli
- Page 180 and 181: In contrast, fall sampling revealed
- Page 184 and 185: Lake Ossawinnamakee and Pelican Bro
- Page 186 and 187: VII-F. Meeting Summaries
- Page 188 and 189: Rich Rezanka would like us to refer
- Page 190 and 191: VII-G. List of Abbreviations Used
- Page 192: VII-H. Glossary of Terms
- Page 195 and 196: MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RES
- Page 197: Secchi disc MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
Limitations in this data set hav.e direct consequences on the ability to make<br />
recommendations for field application of Cutrine®-Ultra and CUS04 to control D.<br />
polymorpha larvae. As a result of these limitations, implicit and explicit uncertainty<br />
should be considered in determining the use of Cu and Cu-based products to control<br />
zebra mussels. Limitations and uncertainty include:<br />
This report does not sanction the use of Cu or Cu-based products in the control of<br />
zebra mussels. This decision is the responsibility ofMN DNR, or any other party,<br />
with due regard to relevant permits and regulations. EERT and ERDC do not take<br />
responsibility for actions taken by any party based upon information in this report.<br />
• Cu toxicity data are highly dependent upon the temperature, hardness, and<br />
alkalinity of water. These data only apply for the water quality parameters stated<br />
in Table 1, Appendix 1. If necessary, the data can be used to model toxicity<br />
estimates under other water quality conditions.<br />
• Larval data only pertain to 0 - 96-h old larvae. While these are key planktonic<br />
phases, we were not able to test Cutrine®-Ultra efficacy on later life stages.<br />
LC99 data are modeled estimates, not observations.<br />
• Similarly, the 95 % confidence intervals are modeled estimates, not observations.<br />
• These tests were performed under controlled laboratory conditions. There<br />
remains uncertainty as to the application of mussel sensitivity data to field<br />
situations.<br />
Recommendationsfor monitoring ofCutrine@-Ultra<br />
We recommend daily measurements of aqueous Cu to ensure adequate control.<br />
Accurate, field-based analytical techniques are widely available. Concentrations of<br />
Cutrine®-Ultra should be maintained at approximately 0.3 mg CulL, should a lOx<br />
protection factor be required. In addition, water residence time in the treated area should<br />
be assessed and used to gauge the suitability of these data for the measured water<br />
residence time in the treated area.<br />
We also recommend that any Cu treatment regime be amended to reflect any<br />
residual Cu in the water column at time of treatment, to ensure that Cu concentrations in<br />
the water body do not exceed 1 mg CulL at any time.<br />
Recommendationsfor monitoring D. polym01pha<br />
We recommend regular plankton screening in the spring and summer, to monitor<br />
for occurrence of D. polymorpha larvae in the water column. Observations of D.<br />
polymorpha larvae during these screens may be used to initiate Cutrine®-Ultra treatment<br />
prior to onset of 12°C water temperatures. In the absence of D. polymorpha Cutrine®<br />
Ultra treatment can be suspended.<br />
In addition, regular monitoring of suitable settlement sites downstream for<br />
emergent adult D. polymorpha populations is recommended.<br />
5