29.07.2013 Views

an examination of the role of antenatal care attendance in ...

an examination of the role of antenatal care attendance in ...

an examination of the role of antenatal care attendance in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Where Y = In P, is <strong>the</strong> probability <strong>of</strong> experienc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>an</strong> adverse birth outcome.<br />

}-P..<br />

P X\ + P X7 + — P X are estimated coefficients associated with <strong>in</strong>dividual level<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> experienc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> recent adverse birth outcomes, <strong>an</strong>d // are <strong>the</strong><br />

disturb<strong>an</strong>ces <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> regression models. The assumption <strong>in</strong> this <strong>an</strong>alysis is that EI//J= 0<br />

(Zambuko <strong>an</strong>d Mturi 2005).<br />

Miss<strong>in</strong>g values are a big concern <strong>in</strong> data <strong>an</strong>alysis <strong>an</strong>d <strong>the</strong> dilemma is whe<strong>the</strong>r to <strong>in</strong>clude or delete <strong>the</strong>m<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> data. Includ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> miss<strong>in</strong>g values <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>an</strong>alysis may result <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> distortion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> result, c<strong>an</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>flate or deflate summary statistics <strong>an</strong>d c<strong>an</strong> destroy <strong>the</strong> ord<strong>in</strong>al <strong>an</strong>d <strong>in</strong>terval character <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> variables.<br />

While on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>an</strong>d, <strong>the</strong> exclusion <strong>of</strong> miss<strong>in</strong>g values may <strong>in</strong>troduce bias <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample <strong>an</strong>d may<br />

reduce it to non-acceptable levels (de Vaus: 2002). In order to avoid confusion <strong>an</strong>d distortion <strong>of</strong> results,<br />

miss<strong>in</strong>g values were <strong>the</strong>refore excluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>an</strong>alysis, with <strong>the</strong> assumption that <strong>the</strong> distribution for<br />

miss<strong>in</strong>g values was normal. The deleted data accounted for 10% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> target population.<br />

3.5 Limitations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g limitations should be taken <strong>in</strong>to account when <strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> results for this study.<br />

Firstly, data used was retrospective <strong>in</strong> nature, thus <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> recall bias. To address this<br />

limitation, <strong>the</strong> researcher selected data from J<strong>an</strong>uary 1997 to December 1998 <strong>in</strong> order to m<strong>in</strong>imize<br />

recall bias.<br />

Secondly, <strong>the</strong> demographic <strong>an</strong>d health survey did not collect <strong>in</strong>formation on critical factors that have<br />

been shown to <strong>in</strong>fluence frequency <strong>an</strong>d tim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong>tenatal <strong>care</strong> visits. As a result, <strong>the</strong> study could not<br />

exam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> <strong>role</strong> <strong>of</strong> environmental factors such as dist<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>an</strong>d tr<strong>an</strong>sport to <strong>the</strong> <strong>an</strong>tenatal <strong>care</strong> facility,<br />

which might be critical factors determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> frequency <strong>an</strong>d tim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong>tenatal <strong>care</strong> visits.<br />

The data for <strong>the</strong> study is primarily qu<strong>an</strong>titative <strong>an</strong>d does not allow for <strong>the</strong> exploration <strong>of</strong> issues <strong>in</strong> <strong>an</strong>y<br />

detail <strong>an</strong>d <strong>in</strong> particular <strong>the</strong> reasons beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> late <strong>in</strong>itiation <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong>tenatal <strong>care</strong>. In addition, some<br />

variables were not readily available <strong>an</strong>d as a result it was necessary to construct new variables.<br />

Moreover, <strong>the</strong> depend<strong>an</strong>t variable <strong>in</strong>cludes caesare<strong>an</strong> as <strong>an</strong> adverse birth outcomes, however, caesare<strong>an</strong><br />

section c<strong>an</strong> be a choice <strong>of</strong> convenience irrespective that <strong>the</strong>re is no adverse effect on <strong>the</strong> baby or <strong>the</strong><br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!