Tuning Reactivity of Platinum(II) Complexes
Tuning Reactivity of Platinum(II) Complexes Tuning Reactivity of Platinum(II) Complexes
eaction with different nucleophiles a small intercept corresponds to a large S values. 18,26 Another important factor that affects the rate of substitution on the square-planar geometry is the polarisability of the incoming nucleophile. In many substitution reactions high nucleophilicity constants are reported for polarisable ligands such as iodide and S-donor nucleophiles. 39 These are attributed to the large size and markedly diffuse valence orbitals of the Pt atom, which enables the metal ion to form stronger bonds with softer (easily polarisable) ligands. Thus, highly polarisable ligands substitute the leaving groups more rapidly at the Pt(II) centre. It is now clear that the n o pt scale is more applicable to charged nucleophiles. This because charged nucleophiles have been observed to have a greater influence on reactivity as opposed to steric crowding which only has a minor effect. 17,40 In addition nucleophiles such as SeCN ¯ and NO2 2- deviate from LFER as seen in Figure 2.9. The plausible explanation put forward is that such entering groups with better π-acceptor ability would accelerate reactivity by lowering the energy of the transition state through metal to ligand π-interactions. 38 Hence the complex [PtCl4] 2- would be more reactive to these π-acceptor nucleophiles than [Pt(dien)Br] + that has a poor π-donating ability relative to the reference trans-[Pt(py)2Cl2]. 41 2.5.2 Effect of the Leaving Group The effect of the leaving group is of less importance in reactions following the associative mode of substitution. However, in order for one to investigate the effect of the leaving group the cis and the trans ligands should be the same. The reaction below has been extensively studied. 42,43 [Pt(dien)X] (2-n) + py [Pt(dien)py] 2+ The data for this reaction is shown in Table 2.2. 28 + X n- (2.44)
Table 2.2: The effect of the leaving group on the lability of [Pt(dien)X] + Leaving group (X) kobs (s -1) NO3 ¯ Very fast H2O 1900 Cl ¯ 35 Br ¯ 23 I ¯ 10 N3 ¯ 0.83 SCN ¯ 0.30 NO2 2- 0.050 CN ¯ 0.017 This produces a leaving group dependence of the order: NO3 ¯ > H2O >> Cl ¯ > Br ¯ > I ¯ >>N3 ¯ >SCN ¯ > NO2 2- > CN ¯ In general it easier to substitute leaving groups which have a low nucleophilicity. For example the replacement of CN ¯ as the leaving group by Cl ¯ results in the reduction of the rate by a factor of 2 x 10 3. But when CN ¯ is the entering group, it is 10 4 times better than Cl ¯. 18 Therefore for an associative mechanism, a substantial amount of metal-ligand bond breaking occurs in the transition state which depends on a specific reaction. 26,35 2.5.3: Effect of Steric Hindrance Steric effects are generally space-filling effects 37 and are categorised as, steric bulky and steric hindrance. Steric bulky is due to mutual repulsion of electron densities brought about by overcrowding of a group of atoms around the metal atom. The magnitude of resulting steric effect is proportional to the spatial size (i.e. a volume effect) of the substituent(s) that causes it. On the other hand, steric hindrance is the shielding of the 29
- Page 38 and 39: H 3N OH 2 Pt H 3N OH 2 Active Pt(II
- Page 40 and 41: transformational pathways that comp
- Page 42 and 43: the hydrolysis of the complex, wher
- Page 44 and 45: 1.3.4 Terpyridine Platinum(II) Comp
- Page 46 and 47: H 3 N Cl Pt NH 3 H 3 N NH 2 (CH 2 )
- Page 48 and 49: 1.4 Kinetic Interest The platinum-b
- Page 50 and 51: 3. The effect of varying the positi
- Page 52 and 53: 17 R. A. Henderson, The Mechanism o
- Page 54 and 55: Altona J. H. van Boom, G. A. van de
- Page 56 and 57: 76 (a)J. Kašpárková, J. Zehnulov
- Page 58 and 59: Table of Contents-2 Chapter Two ...
- Page 60 and 61: List of Tables Table 2.1: A selecti
- Page 62 and 63: The mononuclear Pt(II) complexes 1-
- Page 64 and 65: Potential Energy R + X RX 1 transit
- Page 66 and 67: For the associative mechanism (A),
- Page 68 and 69: the concentration of one of the rea
- Page 70 and 71: k obs , s -1 0.00030 0.00025 0.0002
- Page 72 and 73: k = Ae -Ea/RT 2.14 lnk = lnA - E a
- Page 74 and 75: = 23.76 + R Hence, a plot of ln ⎛
- Page 76 and 77: iii. # Δ V ≈ 10 cm3 mol-1 featur
- Page 78 and 79: conventional methods are classical
- Page 80 and 81: Figure 2.6: Schematic diagram of a
- Page 82 and 83: The light transmitted from the samp
- Page 84 and 85: c. Oxidizability: Ligands that are
- Page 86 and 87: Table 2.1: A selection of n o pt va
- Page 90 and 91: eaction site from direct attack by
- Page 92 and 93: PEt 3 PEt 3 R PEt 3 Pt Pt Y Y Cl R
- Page 94 and 95: direct displacement of the leaving
- Page 96 and 97: therefore, weaken the bond of the l
- Page 98 and 99: σ-Donation According to classical
- Page 100 and 101: References 1 (a) J. Reedijk, Chem.
- Page 102 and 103: 34 R. B. Jordan, Reaction Mechanism
- Page 104 and 105: Table of Contents-3 Chapter 3.The
- Page 106 and 107: Chapter 3 The π-Acceptor Effect in
- Page 108 and 109: In order to extend our understandin
- Page 110 and 111: after which water was added to quen
- Page 112 and 113: O CH 3 + I + N O oH - N O O 7 CH 3
- Page 114 and 115: 84% (34.7 mg, 0.0618 mmol). 1 H NMR
- Page 116 and 117: PhCN PhCN Pt Cl Cl + N N CH 3 N CH
- Page 118 and 119: Complex Structure HOMO LUMO PtCl CH
- Page 120 and 121: The geometry-optimised structures i
- Page 122 and 123: against the concentration of the in
- Page 124 and 125: Table 3.2: Summary of the second-or
- Page 126 and 127: constants of CH3PhisoqPtCl decrease
- Page 128 and 129: with π*-orbitals of the ligand. Th
- Page 130 and 131: 3.6 References 1 D. Rosenberg, L. V
- Page 132 and 133: 30 Microcal TM Origin TM Version 5.
- Page 134 and 135: Figure S3.1: Kinetic trace at 448 n
- Page 136 and 137: ln(k 2 /T) -6.0 -7.5 -9.0 -10.5 -12
Table 2.2: The effect <strong>of</strong> the leaving group on the lability <strong>of</strong> [Pt(dien)X] +<br />
Leaving group (X) kobs (s -1)<br />
NO3 ¯ Very fast<br />
H2O 1900<br />
Cl ¯ 35<br />
Br ¯ 23<br />
I ¯ 10<br />
N3 ¯ 0.83<br />
SCN ¯ 0.30<br />
NO2 2- 0.050<br />
CN ¯ 0.017<br />
This produces a leaving group dependence <strong>of</strong> the order:<br />
NO3 ¯ > H2O >> Cl ¯ > Br ¯ > I ¯ >>N3 ¯ >SCN ¯ > NO2 2- > CN ¯<br />
In general it easier to substitute leaving groups which have a low nucleophilicity. For<br />
example the replacement <strong>of</strong> CN ¯ as the leaving group by Cl ¯ results in the reduction <strong>of</strong><br />
the rate by a factor <strong>of</strong> 2 x 10 3. But when CN ¯ is the entering group, it is 10 4 times better<br />
than Cl ¯. 18 Therefore for an associative mechanism, a substantial amount <strong>of</strong> metal-ligand<br />
bond breaking occurs in the transition state which depends on a specific reaction. 26,35<br />
2.5.3: Effect <strong>of</strong> Steric Hindrance<br />
Steric effects are generally space-filling effects 37 and are categorised as, steric bulky and<br />
steric hindrance. Steric bulky is due to mutual repulsion <strong>of</strong> electron densities brought<br />
about by overcrowding <strong>of</strong> a group <strong>of</strong> atoms around the metal atom. The magnitude <strong>of</strong><br />
resulting steric effect is proportional to the spatial size (i.e. a volume effect) <strong>of</strong> the<br />
substituent(s) that causes it. On the other hand, steric hindrance is the shielding <strong>of</strong> the<br />
29