Tuning Reactivity of Platinum(II) Complexes

Tuning Reactivity of Platinum(II) Complexes Tuning Reactivity of Platinum(II) Complexes

pfeiffer.nele60
from pfeiffer.nele60 More from this publisher
29.07.2013 Views

conventional methods are classical methods such as volumetric and gravimetric techniques that are routinely applied in standardisation of new methods. The other method is referred to as intermittent sampling where the samples are quenched immediately after they are withdrawn. This can be accomplished by addition of a chemical reagent, changing the pH or temperature of the reaction mixture to stop the reaction. 8 This method is useful for very slow reactions with a half-life in excess of several minutes. Therefore, Conventional techniques are inadequate for very fast reactions which take a very short period of time for the reaction to reach completion. Fast reactions are in the range of 1 minute to 10 -14 seconds. 25 Such reactions require automated methods such as flow-through and pulse methods. 28,29 Examples of the flow current methods in use are UV-Vis Spectrophotometry and stopped-flow techniques and are further discussed below. 2.4.1 Flow Methods For fast reactions, the period for mixing varies from 10 -3 s to 10 seconds in the flow methods. As a result, reactions whose half-lives are about 10 -2 seconds are normally studied by the flow methods, by the continuous flow or the stopped-flow method. 30 In the continuous-flow method, first pioneered by Roughton and Hartridge 29, the two solutions (A &B) are forced into the mixing chamber-where the reaction is initiated-by use of pistons (Figure 2.5). The resultant mixture immediately flows out into the observation chamber, where at some distance (d) a steady-state is attained, allowing maximum spectroscopic detection. Since the reaction passes through a steady-state, the observation may be a slow process. The method is also wasteful since large amounts of solutions are required. These problems were solved by application of the stopped-flow technique (Figure 2.6). 18

Figure 2.5: A schematic diagram of a continuous flow kinetic system. d = distance from the mixer to the point of observation. In the stopped-flow method the two reagents (A &B) are rapidly mixed under pressure (800 kPa) into the reaction chamber (Mixing jet in Figure 2.6). The mixing takes about 10 -3 s, then the solution is driven into the cuvette where the solution mixture is allowed to rest at a fixed time interval (rest period), when the stop syringe rests against its seat. During the rest period, the reactive species is monitored and detected spectrophotometrically. The reaction manifold is maintained at a pre-determined constant temperature during the reaction stage and at the injection point. Once the reactants impinge on each other in the observation chamber, the data acquisition system promptly records the absorbance-time resolved kinetic trace at a set wavelength. The kinetic traces are processed and the observed (pseudo) first-order rate constants evaluated by an online computer program. 16,28 A typical single exponential kinetic trace acquired on a stopped-flow reaction analyzer is shown in Figure 2.7. 19

conventional methods are classical methods such as volumetric and gravimetric<br />

techniques that are routinely applied in standardisation <strong>of</strong> new methods.<br />

The other method is referred to as intermittent sampling where the samples are<br />

quenched immediately after they are withdrawn. This can be accomplished by addition<br />

<strong>of</strong> a chemical reagent, changing the pH or temperature <strong>of</strong> the reaction mixture to stop<br />

the reaction. 8 This method is useful for very slow reactions with a half-life in excess <strong>of</strong><br />

several minutes. Therefore, Conventional techniques are inadequate for very fast<br />

reactions which take a very short period <strong>of</strong> time for the reaction to reach completion.<br />

Fast reactions are in the range <strong>of</strong> 1 minute to 10 -14 seconds. 25 Such reactions require<br />

automated methods such as flow-through and pulse methods. 28,29 Examples <strong>of</strong> the flow<br />

current methods in use are UV-Vis Spectrophotometry and stopped-flow techniques and<br />

are further discussed below.<br />

2.4.1 Flow Methods<br />

For fast reactions, the period for mixing varies from 10 -3 s to 10 seconds in the flow<br />

methods. As a result, reactions whose half-lives are about 10 -2 seconds are normally<br />

studied by the flow methods, by the continuous flow or the stopped-flow method. 30<br />

In the continuous-flow method, first pioneered by Roughton and Hartridge 29, the two<br />

solutions (A &B) are forced into the mixing chamber-where the reaction is initiated-by<br />

use <strong>of</strong> pistons (Figure 2.5). The resultant mixture immediately flows out into the<br />

observation chamber, where at some distance (d) a steady-state is attained, allowing<br />

maximum spectroscopic detection. Since the reaction passes through a steady-state, the<br />

observation may be a slow process. The method is also wasteful since large amounts <strong>of</strong><br />

solutions are required. These problems were solved by application <strong>of</strong> the stopped-flow<br />

technique (Figure 2.6).<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!