Tuning Reactivity of Platinum(II) Complexes

Tuning Reactivity of Platinum(II) Complexes Tuning Reactivity of Platinum(II) Complexes

pfeiffer.nele60
from pfeiffer.nele60 More from this publisher
29.07.2013 Views

the concentration of one of the reactants is at least ten-fold excess, e.g. [B]0 >> [A]0. The equation can be treated as a reversible reaction and the rate of formation of C can be given as: d [A ] - = - d t d [B ] d t = d [C ] d t = k 2 [A ] t [B ] t - k -2 [C ] t Where k2 = second-order rate constant = k 2 [A ] t [B ] t - k -2 [A ] 0 - [A ] t = k 2 [A ] t [B ] t - k -2 [A ] t - k -2 [A ] 0 k-2 = observed first-order rate constant for the reverse reaction. By applying a mass balance for a given stoichiometry of 1:1:1, at time, t0 and t [A ] t = [A ] 0 - [C ] t , a n d [B ] t = [B ] 0 - [C ] t At equilibrium, [A ] e q = [A ] 0 - [C ] e q , a n d [B ] e q = [B ] 0 - [C ] e q = [B ] 0 - [A ] 0 + [A ] e q 8 (2 .5 ) (2 .6 ) (2 .7 ) Thus, at equilibrium the rates of the forward and reverse reactions are equal resulting in -d[A ] d t = k 2 [A ] eq [B ] eq + k -2 [A ] eq - k -2 [A ] 0 = 0 k -2 [A ] 0 = k 2 [A ] eq [B ] eq + k -2 [A ] eq (2 .8 ) Substitution of k-2[A]t from Equation 2.8 into Equation 2.4 gives -d[A] dt = k 2 [A] t [B] t - k -2 {(k 2 [A] eq [B] eq ) +k -2 [A] eq } - k -2 [A] t (2.9) Substitution of [ B ] t and [ B ] eq in Equations 2.6 and 2.7 into (2.9), and approximating k2[A]t[A]o ≈ k2[A]eq[A]o and k2[A] 2 t ≈ k2[A] 2 eq leads to − d dt [ A] = k2[A]t[B]o - k2[A]eq[B]o +k-2[A]t - k-2[A]eq

= (k2[B]o + k-2) ([A]t- [A]eq) (2.10) Separation of variables and integration gives: This results in ln [ ] d[ A] ( [ A] − [ A] ) t ( [ ] ) dt A t ∫ [ A] = − 2 B 0 + k− [ A ] t - [ A ] e q [ A ] 0 - [ A ] e q k 2 ∫ 0 0 (2.11) t eq = - ( k 2 [ B ] 0 + k -2 ) t = -k o b s t w h e r e , k o b s = k 2 [ B ] 0 + k -2 9 ( 2 .1 2 ) Under pseudo first-order conditions, the experimental first order rate constant, kobs, is given by: -d [M L 3 X ] d t w ith = k o bs [M ] k o b s = k 2 [Y ] + k -2 (2 .1 3 ) A plot of kobs versus the initial concentration of the nucleophile, [B]0 = [Y]0, is linear with a slope equal to the second-order rate constant, k2, and the y-intercept value equal to the first-order rate constant, k-2. Typical kinetic plots are shown in Figure 2.3. A plot which passes through zero implies that the forward reaction is irreversible and directly goes to completion, whereas a non-zero y-intercept signifies a back reaction in which the nucleophile Y is being substituted from the metal centre by the solvolysis process.

the concentration <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the reactants is at least ten-fold excess, e.g. [B]0 >> [A]0. The<br />

equation can be treated as a reversible reaction and the rate <strong>of</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> C can be<br />

given as:<br />

d [A ]<br />

- = -<br />

d t<br />

d [B ]<br />

d t<br />

=<br />

d [C ]<br />

d t<br />

= k 2 [A ] t [B ] t - k -2 [C ] t<br />

Where k2 = second-order rate constant<br />

= k 2 [A ] t [B ] t - k -2 [A ] 0 - [A ] t<br />

= k 2 [A ] t [B ] t - k -2 [A ] t - k -2 [A ] 0<br />

k-2 = observed first-order rate constant for the reverse reaction.<br />

By applying a mass balance for a given stoichiometry <strong>of</strong> 1:1:1, at time, t0 and t<br />

[A ] t = [A ] 0 - [C ] t , a n d [B ] t = [B ] 0 - [C ] t<br />

At equilibrium,<br />

[A ] e q = [A ] 0 - [C ] e q , a n d [B ] e q = [B ] 0 - [C ] e q = [B ] 0 - [A ] 0 + [A ] e q<br />

8<br />

(2 .5 )<br />

(2 .6 )<br />

(2 .7 )<br />

Thus, at equilibrium the rates <strong>of</strong> the forward and reverse reactions are equal resulting in<br />

-d[A ]<br />

d t<br />

= k 2 [A ] eq [B ] eq + k -2 [A ] eq - k -2 [A ] 0 = 0<br />

k -2 [A ] 0 = k 2 [A ] eq [B ] eq + k -2 [A ] eq (2 .8 )<br />

Substitution <strong>of</strong> k-2[A]t from Equation 2.8 into Equation 2.4 gives<br />

-d[A]<br />

dt = k 2 [A] t [B] t - k -2 {(k 2 [A] eq [B] eq ) +k -2 [A] eq } - k -2 [A] t (2.9)<br />

Substitution <strong>of</strong> [ B ] t and [ B ] eq in Equations 2.6 and 2.7 into (2.9), and approximating<br />

k2[A]t[A]o ≈ k2[A]eq[A]o and k2[A] 2 t ≈ k2[A] 2 eq leads to<br />

− d<br />

dt<br />

[ A]<br />

= k2[A]t[B]o - k2[A]eq[B]o +k-2[A]t - k-2[A]eq

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!