Tuning Reactivity of Platinum(II) Complexes
Tuning Reactivity of Platinum(II) Complexes Tuning Reactivity of Platinum(II) Complexes
[H 2 O-Pt-(NN)-Pt-OH 2 ] +4 [NU-Pt-(NN)-Pt-NU] +4 k 2(1 st ) +NU -H 2 O k 2(3 rd ) +2NU [H 2 O-Pt-(NN)-Pt-NU] +4 where, (NN) = pzn, pmn, pdn, qzn, pht bridging ligand NU = nucleophile 2 [(NU) 4 Pt] +2 + (NN) 22 k 2(2 nd ) +NU -H2O [NU-Pt-(NN)-Pt-NU] +4 Scheme 5.4: Suggested Substitution Mechanism for the Dinuclear Pt(II) complex system with Thiourea and its substituted derivatives. The observed pseudo first order rate constants, kobs, as a function of total concentration of nucleophile are shown in Figures 5.6, 5.7 and 5.8 for pmn complex (0.17 mM) with the TU, DMTU and TMTU, and can be described by equation 1. kobs(1 st /2 nd /3 rd) = k2( 1 st /2 nd /3 rd) [NU] (1) The plots show that all the kobs linearly depend on concentration of the entering nucleophile with zero intercepts, an indication that there was little or no reverse reaction. The values of the observed rate constants, kobs, used in determining k2(1 st ) were an average of five to seven independent runs obtained from the stopped-flow; while an average of multiple readings obtained from the UV-Vis spectrophotometer were used for the second and third steps. The second-order rate constants, k2(i), for the first, second and third steps for all the reactions were obtained from the slope of plots of kobs vs. [NU], using Origin 7.5 ®37 program. The values of the second order rate constants are summarized in Table 5.4.
Table 5.4: Summary of second order rate constants of diazine-bridged dinuclear Pt(II) complexes; I = 0.1 M (NaClO4, adjusted with HClO4), T = 298.15 K. Complex NU k2( 1 st ) /M -1 s -1 k2( 2 nd ) /M -1 s -1 k2( 3 rd ) /10 -3 M -1 s - NH 3 N H 3 N H 3 H 2 O N H 3 NH 3 NH 3 H 2 O N H 3 H 2 O Pt NH 3 pzn TU 42.04 ± 0.56 0.30 ± 0.01 2.86 ± 0.07 NH 3 Pt H 2 O NH 3 4+ DMTU 22.46 ± 0.23 0.15 ± 0.001 3.65 ± 0.15 TMTU 4.02 ± 0.06 0.09 ± 0.003 1.54 ± 0.10 pmn TU 8.50 ± 0.07 0.12 ± 0.002 27.81± 1.53 N N P t P t H O 2 N H 3 H 2 O N H 3 4 + DMTU 13.15 ± 0.76 0.073 ± 0.001 23.16 ± 1.64 TMTU 0.83 ± 0.003 0.04 ± 0.001 3.45 ± 0.01 pdn TU 2.04 ± 0.03 0.12 ± 0.003 4.64 ± 0.10 N N P t P t Pt N H 3 H 2O N H 3 N H 3 4 + DMTU 2.78 ± 0.07 0.17 ± 0.001 9.56 ± 0.46 TMTU 0.70 ± 0.01 0.07 ± 0.001 1.59 ± 0.03 qzn TU 19.80 ± 0.26 0.11 ± 0.002 12.15 ± 0.06 N N H2O NH3 Pt H 2 O NH 3 4+ DMTU 15.63 ± 0.27 0.09 ± 0.001 5.92 ± 0.004 TMTU 2.99 ± 0.02 0.03 ± 0.001 3.73 ± 0.03 pht TU 0.94 ± 0.01 0.054 ± 0.0001 17.40 ± 0.14 N N P t P t N H 3 H 2 O N H 3 N H 3 4 + DMTU 0.25 ± 0.01 0.045 ± 0.0001 5.49 ± 0.02 TMTU 0.11 ± 0.02 0.002 ± 0.00003 1.03 ± 0.06 23 1
- Page 188 and 189: Absorbance at 368. 0 nm 0. 0 8 0. 0
- Page 190 and 191: Table S4.3: Average observed rate c
- Page 192 and 193: k nd obs(2 ) , s-1 0.003 TU DMTU TM
- Page 194 and 195: Table S4.7: Average observed rate c
- Page 196 and 197: Table S4.8: Average observed rate c
- Page 198 and 199: k obs2 , s -1 2.40x10 -4 2.20x10 -4
- Page 200 and 201: Table S4.13: Average observed rate
- Page 202 and 203: Table S4.14: Average observed rate
- Page 204 and 205: Table S4.18: Average observed rate
- Page 206 and 207: k obs(1 st ) , s -1 0.06 0.04 0.02
- Page 208 and 209: Table S4.23: Average observed rate
- Page 210 and 211: ln(k 2(3 rd ) /T) -10.0 -10.5 -11.0
- Page 212 and 213: SpinWorks 2.5: 2,6 pznClO4 in D2O N
- Page 214 and 215: Table of Contents-5 Chapter 5 .....
- Page 216 and 217: List of Tables Table 5.1: A summary
- Page 218 and 219: 5.1 Introduction Multinuclear plati
- Page 220 and 221: onding. For this reason, pKa titrat
- Page 222 and 223: 400-300 cm -1): 3308, 3117, 3071 (N
- Page 224 and 225: 5.2.6 Spectrophotometric pKa Titrat
- Page 226 and 227: Table 5.1: A summary of DFT-calcula
- Page 228 and 229: However, because the highest occupi
- Page 230 and 231: Table 5.2: Acid dissociation consta
- Page 232 and 233: Table 5.3: A summary of DFT calcula
- Page 234 and 235: H3N 6 eq TU 0 eq TU Ha NH3 Ha Cl TU
- Page 236 and 237: third step due to the trans-effect
- Page 240 and 241: k obs(1st) / s -1 0.20 TU DMTU TMTU
- Page 242 and 243: thiourea nucleophile is large enoug
- Page 244 and 245: ln(k st 2(1 ) /T) -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8
- Page 246 and 247: is the same as the electron-withdra
- Page 248 and 249: associative mode of substitution me
- Page 250 and 251: 16 H. Ertürk, J. Maigut, R. Puchta
- Page 252 and 253: 43 (a) D. Jaganyi, A. Hofmann and R
- Page 254 and 255: 276 nm Absorbance 0 . 6 5 0 . 6 4 0
- Page 256 and 257: k obs(1 st ) , s -1 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1
- Page 258 and 259: Table S5.5: Average observed rate c
- Page 260 and 261: ln(k 2(2 nd ) /T) -8.0 TU -8.5 -9.0
- Page 262 and 263: pzn PPM -1750.0 -1850.0 -1950.0 -20
- Page 264 and 265: Table S5.9: Average observed rate c
- Page 266 and 267: Figure S5.13: UV/Visible spectra fo
- Page 268 and 269: k obs(1 st ) in s -1 0.030 0.025 0.
- Page 270 and 271: Table S5.17: Average observed rate
- Page 272 and 273: ln(k 2(2 nd ) /T) -10 -11 -12 -13 -
- Page 274 and 275: 9.61 ppm Ha PPM 9.8 9.6 9.4 9.2 9.0
- Page 276 and 277: Table S5.22: Average observed rate
- Page 278 and 279: k obs(3rd) / s -1 -5 8 .00 x 10 T U
- Page 280 and 281: ln(k st 2(1 ) /T) -1.5 TU DMTU TMTU
- Page 282 and 283: ln(k rd 2(3 ) /T) -8.5 -9.0 -9.5 -1
- Page 284 and 285: SpinWorks 2.5: znPt(II)-OP4 in D2O
- Page 286 and 287: Figure S5.31: Mass spectrum for com
[H 2 O-Pt-(NN)-Pt-OH 2 ] +4<br />
[NU-Pt-(NN)-Pt-NU] +4<br />
k 2(1 st )<br />
+NU<br />
-H 2 O<br />
k 2(3 rd )<br />
+2NU<br />
[H 2 O-Pt-(NN)-Pt-NU] +4<br />
where, (NN) = pzn, pmn, pdn, qzn, pht bridging ligand<br />
NU = nucleophile<br />
2 [(NU) 4 Pt] +2 + (NN)<br />
22<br />
k 2(2 nd )<br />
+NU<br />
-H2O [NU-Pt-(NN)-Pt-NU] +4<br />
Scheme 5.4: Suggested Substitution Mechanism for the Dinuclear Pt(<strong>II</strong>) complex system<br />
with Thiourea and its substituted derivatives.<br />
The observed pseudo first order rate constants, kobs, as a function <strong>of</strong> total concentration<br />
<strong>of</strong> nucleophile are shown in Figures 5.6, 5.7 and 5.8 for pmn complex (0.17 mM) with<br />
the TU, DMTU and TMTU, and can be described by equation 1.<br />
kobs(1 st /2 nd /3 rd) = k2( 1 st /2 nd /3 rd) [NU] (1)<br />
The plots show that all the kobs linearly depend on concentration <strong>of</strong> the entering<br />
nucleophile with zero intercepts, an indication that there was little or no reverse<br />
reaction. The values <strong>of</strong> the observed rate constants, kobs, used in determining k2(1 st ) were<br />
an average <strong>of</strong> five to seven independent runs obtained from the stopped-flow; while an<br />
average <strong>of</strong> multiple readings obtained from the UV-Vis spectrophotometer were used<br />
for the second and third steps. The second-order rate constants, k2(i), for the first,<br />
second and third steps for all the reactions were obtained from the slope <strong>of</strong> plots <strong>of</strong> kobs<br />
vs. [NU], using Origin 7.5 ®37 program. The values <strong>of</strong> the second order rate constants are<br />
summarized in Table 5.4.