29.07.2013 Views

Tuning Reactivity of Platinum(II) Complexes

Tuning Reactivity of Platinum(II) Complexes

Tuning Reactivity of Platinum(II) Complexes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The decrease in reactivity <strong>of</strong> 2,6pzn for the first substitution is due to the positive<br />

inductive effect <strong>of</strong> the 2,6-dimethylpyrazine ring that leads to accumulation <strong>of</strong> electron<br />

density at metal centre. This makes the Pt1(<strong>II</strong>) centre less electrophilic, resulting in<br />

lower reactivity towards the nucleophiles. This is well supported by the large HOMO-<br />

LUMO energy gap coupled with reduced positive NBO charges (Table 4.1) for 2,6pzn.<br />

Smaller values <strong>of</strong> k1 were observed for the first substitution step <strong>of</strong> the aqua ligand in<br />

the complexes 2,3pzn and 2,5pzn by a factor <strong>of</strong> 10 than pzn and also smaller than that<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2,6pzn. Previous studies have shown that methyl groups and other electron-donating<br />

groups collectively lead to a reduction in the rate <strong>of</strong> ligand substitution, by reducing the<br />

positive charge density on the platinum atom, thereby lowering the electrophilicity <strong>of</strong><br />

the metal centre. 3,31,32,36,44,45 As a result, the incoming nucleophile is repelled by the<br />

increased amount <strong>of</strong> electron density around the metal centre, leading to a less stable<br />

five-coordinate transition state and decreased rate <strong>of</strong> substitution.<br />

The difference between the 2,6pzn and the 2,3pzn and 2,5pzn indicates that the<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> the methyl groups around the pyrazine linker plays a role in controlling<br />

the reactivity. This is because the position <strong>of</strong> the methyl group influences the electronic<br />

as well as the steric effects around the Pt(<strong>II</strong>) centres. The reactivity <strong>of</strong> 2,3pzn and<br />

2,5pzn are similar because <strong>of</strong> having symmetrically equal effects in terms <strong>of</strong> electronic<br />

and steric hindrance.<br />

The reactions for the second step are significantly slower, by a factor <strong>of</strong> 10, than for the<br />

first in all cases. This is probably because <strong>of</strong> the electronic communication between the<br />

two platinum atoms and also steric hindrance from the first substitution at the Pt(<strong>II</strong>)<br />

centre. The DFT calculations show a change in NBO charges if TU is substituted to one<br />

platinum centre as can be seen in Table 5, suggesting that electronic information is<br />

somehow conveyed through the bridging ligand. The order <strong>of</strong> reactivity for the second<br />

step is pzn > 2,3pzn ≈ 2,5pzn > 2,6pzn. In case <strong>of</strong> 2,6pzn there is additional steric<br />

effect which blocks entry <strong>of</strong> the incoming nucleophile on both sides <strong>of</strong> the Pt2 centre<br />

(Figure 4.14), 3, 39,46-52 accounting for the slowest rate <strong>of</strong> reactivity.<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!