28.07.2013 Views

A Study of Shelters for Street Children from an Organizational ...

A Study of Shelters for Street Children from an Organizational ...

A Study of Shelters for Street Children from an Organizational ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2. Establish the methodology <strong>of</strong> the research according to research dem<strong>an</strong>ds <strong>an</strong>d<br />

focus. The characteristics <strong>of</strong> the qualitative research methodology <strong>an</strong>d methods were<br />

chosen to elucidate the views <strong>an</strong>d experiences <strong>of</strong> shelter m<strong>an</strong>agers, staff <strong>an</strong>d shelter<br />

residents as this fitted well with the research objectives. Four research sites were<br />

chosen through the principle <strong>of</strong> first come first served. The process <strong>of</strong> identifying the<br />

shelters was: letters <strong>of</strong> consent were written to various shelters in the region. This was<br />

to ensure that <strong>an</strong>y shelter had a ch<strong>an</strong>ce to participate in the project. The first four who<br />

responded in time indicating their willingness to take part in the research project were<br />

chosen.<br />

3. Gaining Access <strong>an</strong>d Exiting <strong>from</strong> the Sites L<strong>of</strong>l<strong>an</strong>d <strong>an</strong>d L<strong>of</strong>l<strong>an</strong>d (1984: 25)<br />

believe that researchers are more likely to gain successful access to situations if they<br />

make use <strong>of</strong> contacts that c<strong>an</strong> help remove barriers to entr<strong>an</strong>ce; if researchers avoid<br />

wasting respondent's time by doing adv<strong>an</strong>ce research <strong>for</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation that is already<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the public record; <strong>an</strong>d if they treat respondents with courtesy. It is also import<strong>an</strong>t<br />

to provide respondents with a straight<strong>for</strong>ward description <strong>of</strong> the goals <strong>of</strong> the research.<br />

Neum<strong>an</strong> (1997:351-353) argues that researchers need to know how best to deal with<br />

'gatekeepers'. Bearing this in mind, researchers have to consider negotiating <strong>an</strong>d re­<br />

negotiating entry to the site <strong>an</strong>d their role once inside the site. This consideration must<br />

take into account the time factor <strong>for</strong> the researcher, the subjects, <strong>an</strong>d remain in line<br />

with the research time frame. In this regard, this researcher made prior arr<strong>an</strong>gements<br />

<strong>an</strong>d arr<strong>an</strong>ged appointments telephonically with the four shelters m<strong>an</strong>agers. Following<br />

this, interview schedules were drawn up <strong>an</strong>d in every shelter a timetable was worked<br />

out that suited the researcher <strong>an</strong>d the interviewees. In every shelter, interviews were<br />

conducted on separate days but within the same month. This arr<strong>an</strong>gement gave due<br />

consideration to the respondents' working schedule but also allowed consistency in the<br />

research process. The researcher also discussed the criteria <strong>of</strong> selecting staff <strong>an</strong>d<br />

children who would take part in the focus groups (Krueger, 1988). The early<br />

appointment helped to speed up data collection <strong>an</strong>d provided the researcher the<br />

opportunity to be familiar with shelters environment <strong>an</strong>d duty schedules <strong>of</strong> staff <strong>an</strong>d<br />

children routines.<br />

4. The researcher drew a schedule <strong>for</strong> interviews in individual shelters at different<br />

days <strong>an</strong>d times, <strong>an</strong>d with full consultation with m<strong>an</strong>agement, due consideration was<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!