Writing history essays july 2011 - Victoria University of Wellington
Writing history essays july 2011 - Victoria University of Wellington
Writing history essays july 2011 - Victoria University of Wellington
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Writing</strong> History Essays<br />
July <strong>2011</strong><br />
Contents<br />
How to use this booklet 1<br />
1. Reading 6<br />
2. Note Taking 12<br />
3. Planning Your Essay 14<br />
4. Drafting 17<br />
5. Grammar, Spelling, and Other Technical Bits 31<br />
6. Footnotes 38<br />
7. Bibliographies 50<br />
8. Presentation and Style Guide 52<br />
9. Assessment 55
HOW TO USE THIS BOOKLET<br />
This booklet is a guideline for <strong>history</strong> <strong>essays</strong>. It <strong>of</strong>fers advice for preparing assignments and gives<br />
particular advice on referencing and presentation techniques. While the ideas and tips it contains may<br />
be useful for writing in other Programmes, each Programme will undoubtedly have different<br />
formatting, layout and style requirements. If in doubt, ask.<br />
This booklet is designed to be used by <strong>history</strong> students at all levels. It contains information on the<br />
‘hows’ and ‘whys’ and <strong>of</strong>fers examples to clarify points. We suggest that students new to <strong>history</strong> at<br />
university read this guide before writing their first essay. As you become familiar with essay writing<br />
you can use this as a reference booklet, looking up the sections you need for further information by<br />
using the table <strong>of</strong> contents.<br />
We have included a One Page Summary (p.2) that contains the basic principles in <strong>Writing</strong> History<br />
Essays. This summary is not a substitute, however, for reading the whole text. Your <strong>essays</strong> will be<br />
assessed and marked on the assumption that you have read and applied the advice in this booklet. If<br />
you would like further information, talk to your tutor or lecturer.<br />
1
Summary<br />
First, ask yourself: ‘What is the question actually asking?’<br />
Read widely, but also read critically and selectively.<br />
Consider your sources carefully. Of what are they trying to convince you? What are they<br />
trying to explain or argue? When were they written, and by whom?<br />
Take notes in your own words as you read.<br />
Note all the necessary bibliographical information from each text.<br />
Quotes should be taken sparingly and accurately.<br />
Avoid plagiarism.<br />
Plan your argument.<br />
Give your essay a logical structure that develops your argument.<br />
Write a draft, and take time to improve the final product.<br />
Your essay should be your argument based on informed reading.<br />
Your essay’s argument should answer the question, be supported with evidence, and be<br />
written clearly.<br />
An essay is a structured answer requiring an introduction, a main body and a conclusion.<br />
Your introduction should present the argument <strong>of</strong> your essay to the reader.<br />
Your conclusion should sum up the argument <strong>of</strong> your essay.<br />
Your essay requires well structured paragraphs with complete sentences.<br />
Submit your work on time.<br />
Late <strong>essays</strong> have valuable marks deducted.<br />
Correct spelling and grammar are important.<br />
Quotations should be accurate and be placed in quotation marks.<br />
Footnotes show your use <strong>of</strong> evidence.<br />
You should footnote quotes, figures, statistics, and your paraphrases <strong>of</strong> factual material or<br />
another author's argument.<br />
Your bibliography lists the sources you have used to construct your argument.<br />
Your essay should be printed in a readable typeface, double spaced, with a wide left margin,<br />
paragraphs indented, and each page numbered.<br />
Finally, read the marker’s comments. Just before you start your next essay, re-read the<br />
marked essay and the comments. Try to improve your essay technique and your<br />
understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>history</strong>.<br />
2
Why we write <strong>history</strong> <strong>essays</strong><br />
History courses require you to submit written <strong>essays</strong> as part <strong>of</strong> your assignment work. Essay writing<br />
helps develop abilities that will enable you to participate in the continuing discussion about the past,<br />
including developing and stating a reasoned argument, quickly and effectively analysing and<br />
summarising texts, and presenting a scholarly, well documented final product. Such skills have wide<br />
application in many areas beyond <strong>history</strong>.<br />
What is a <strong>history</strong> essay?<br />
The word ‘essay’ is derived from the French, essayer, which means ‘to try, to attempt, to test’. An essay<br />
is an attempt to establish a case or test a hypothesis. Specifically for our purposes, an essay is a<br />
reasoned and orderly argument with properly acknowledged supporting evidence. The argument in<br />
your essay should be your coherent explanation for ‘Why?’ or ‘How?’ events and processes happened,<br />
supported by evidence in the form <strong>of</strong> the ideas and writings <strong>of</strong> other historians, people <strong>of</strong> the time, and<br />
other historical sources. The material you find and read on the question will constrain your argument<br />
and its supporting evidence.<br />
Not all questions are valid <strong>history</strong> questions. ‘Why did the chicken cross the road?’ is not an<br />
appropriate historical question. It does not have ideological, social or historical importance (except<br />
perhaps in the field <strong>of</strong> comedy).<br />
‘Why did Julius Caesar cross the Rubicon?’ ‘Why was Captain Cook sent to explore the Pacific<br />
Ocean?’ ‘What was the importance <strong>of</strong> Nixon’s visit to China?’ These questions ask something deeper.<br />
The motives and reasons behind these crossings go beyond the individuals, and involve complex<br />
national ideologies, political struggles, and were part <strong>of</strong> much larger historical events. The complexity<br />
<strong>of</strong> such events means that new insights and analyses are <strong>of</strong>fered constantly.<br />
What is the question?<br />
Every research essay has a question (or topic), and your task is to respond in a series <strong>of</strong> logical<br />
paragraphs. It sounds simple, yet one <strong>of</strong> the most common essay problems is not answering the set<br />
question. Often <strong>essays</strong> do not answer the question posed and so do not get the desired grade. Essay<br />
questions use specific language, and so understanding the question before you start is the first step in<br />
the essay writing process.<br />
Identify the key concepts in a question. Questions will ask you to examine, account for, evaluate,<br />
3
assess, discuss, compare, contrast, or consider the relative importance <strong>of</strong>, etc. etc. You will not be<br />
asked to describe a sequence <strong>of</strong> events or simply write down everything you can find out on a topic.<br />
For example, you will not be assigned a question such as, ‘What happened in the Industrial<br />
Revolution?’ Rather, the question will focus on an area <strong>of</strong> debate, so that you can contribute to<br />
that debate. So, for example, a more likely question would be, ‘The Industrial Revolution was<br />
not at all revolutionary. Discuss.’ In response you could find many sources that argue against<br />
the premise and many that support it. Your task would be to present both sides, assessing their<br />
strengths and weaknesses and come to your own conclusion regarding the debate.<br />
Stay focused on the question. Do not wander far away from your essay-writing task.<br />
For example, when answering the question ‘Assess the impact <strong>of</strong> the Reform Bill <strong>of</strong> 1832 on the<br />
working class in Britain’, devoting half your essay to the French working class is not a good<br />
idea.<br />
Be sure you cover the topic. Answer the entire question, not just a section <strong>of</strong> it. Topics may be very<br />
broad.<br />
For example, if you are answering the same question ‘Assess the impact <strong>of</strong> the Reform Bill <strong>of</strong><br />
1832 on the working class in Britain’, then an essay that discusses only English children in<br />
poverty is not answering the whole question. What about men and women? What about<br />
workers living in other parts <strong>of</strong> Britain?<br />
You might be given a seemingly simple question or statement, yet under the surface may lie complex<br />
issues that need to be explored.<br />
For example, take the question ‘Did the state simply ignore Māori health before 1936?’ There<br />
appears to be an obvious single word answer: ‘Yes’ or ‘No’. However, the question requires a<br />
more considered response. Within the given question there are more questions to be explored<br />
and answered. For instance, ‘Did the state devote adequate attention to Māori health before<br />
1936?’ ‘Did the state have a policy (<strong>of</strong>ficial or un<strong>of</strong>ficial) regarding Māori health before 1936?’<br />
‘What efforts, if any, were made to bring the issues <strong>of</strong> Māori health to the state before 1936?’<br />
‘Why did the state ‘suddenly’ devise a policy in 1936?’ ‘Why is 1936 an important date for<br />
Māori health?’ These and other questions need to be answered in any essay that tackles<br />
what—at first glance—seems to be a straightforward question. The key words in the question<br />
are ‘simply ignore’. What does this phrase mean?<br />
Another common problem is the ‘blind’ selection <strong>of</strong> familiar or ‘cool sounding’ topics, questions that<br />
seem to be about something in which you may be interested.<br />
4
For example, First World War questions are very popular, and you may have studied this broad<br />
topic in high school. An essay answering the question ‘What was the demographic impact <strong>of</strong><br />
the First World War on European societies?’ should not contain a summary <strong>of</strong> the major battles<br />
or a discussion <strong>of</strong> who won the war. Rather, it should comment on population movements and<br />
trends, comparing pre-war and post-war European societies.<br />
If you do not understand the nature <strong>of</strong> the question, the chances are that you will not answer the<br />
question adequately. Think about what you are being asked to do, and if you want clarification ask<br />
your tutor.<br />
Essays are NOT...<br />
The study <strong>of</strong> History at university is not designed to teach you ‘facts’, which you can learn by heart.<br />
You will not be asked to memorise large lists <strong>of</strong> names, places and dates. Specific points <strong>of</strong><br />
information, data, chronologies and other forms <strong>of</strong> factual detail can be located in the sources you use<br />
to research your topic, so there is no excuse for getting them wrong in your <strong>essays</strong>.<br />
While there is room in an essay for imagination and creativity you cannot fabricate information. You<br />
are being asked to present your argument and your ideas; however, these must be based on careful<br />
research and informed reading.<br />
History questions are not ‘true’ or ‘false’ tests. There is no one right way <strong>of</strong> answering a <strong>history</strong><br />
question. Rather, a <strong>history</strong> essay is an opportunity to enter an ongoing debate, to read and think<br />
about questions that may never—indeed <strong>of</strong>ten cannot—be finally resolved. There are always new<br />
ways <strong>of</strong> looking at material, new methods to apply, and new ideas to incorporate.<br />
5
1) READING<br />
1.1—Before You Start<br />
Reading for a <strong>history</strong> essay is not the same as reading for leisure. The first difference is that you<br />
should take notes as you read (see section (2) Note Taking below).<br />
The second difference is that you should read with discrimination. Read extensively, but read wisely.<br />
Concentrate on material that is relevant to the question. You should normally start with a general<br />
book or website, to gain an overview <strong>of</strong> your topic, and then move to more specialised books and<br />
articles.<br />
Use tables <strong>of</strong> contents and indexes to find the sections that apply to your topic. Often books and<br />
articles have abstracts, prefaces, introductions and conclusions, which summarise the argument.<br />
Read these first, and use them to guide you to the key parts <strong>of</strong> the text.<br />
The third difference is that you should read with specific questions in mind. It is important to read<br />
critically. Weigh the evidence each author uses, compare texts, think about what each author is<br />
trying to argue and why. Historians try to convince you <strong>of</strong> why particular changes occurred in the<br />
past, and they also suggest ways for us to think about the past. Reading a historical text is always a<br />
challenge; you should try to see the assumptions behind the argument. Who made the source? Why?<br />
When? Is it supported by other sources?<br />
1.2—Sample Reading<br />
On the following page is a short excerpt from a journal article about livestock husbandry in colonial<br />
Maryland and Virginia. There is no need to study or fully comprehend this text, only to note how it is<br />
used in examples later in this guide.<br />
The excerpt derives from the following article:<br />
Virginia DeJohn Anderson, ‘Animals into the Wilderness: The Development <strong>of</strong> Livestock<br />
Husbandry in the Seventeenth-Century Chesapeake’, William and Mary Quarterly, Vol. 59, no. 2,<br />
April 2002, pp. 377–409, p.379.<br />
6
Sample Reading<br />
Source: Virginia DeJohn Anderson, ‘Animals into the Wilderness: The Development <strong>of</strong><br />
Livestock Husbandry in the Seventeenth-Century Chesapeake’, William and Mary Quarterly,<br />
Vol. 59, no. 2, April 2002, pp.377-408.<br />
7
1.3—Types <strong>of</strong> Sources<br />
You will encounter a wide variety <strong>of</strong> sources in the course <strong>of</strong> studying <strong>history</strong>: books, periodicals (or<br />
journals); book reviews; newspapers; photographs; interviews; micr<strong>of</strong>ilms; CD-ROMs; videos;<br />
databases; websites; and a range <strong>of</strong> digitised material available through the internet. Historians<br />
classify these sources into two broad categories: primary and secondary material.<br />
Primary sources are the documents, papers, articles, books, personal recollections, archaeological and<br />
visual remains produced by people at, or very near, the time <strong>of</strong> the historical actions in question. They<br />
are first-hand evidence, sources immediate to the historical actors and actions. Often they are<br />
personal materials, such as diaries, letters and memos; however, they can be more public documents,<br />
such as newspapers, magazines, television programmes and songs.<br />
For example, Captain James Cook’s journals (written during or shortly after the actual events)<br />
are considered primary sources <strong>of</strong> information for study <strong>of</strong> Cook or his times. The brief<br />
quotations from Governor Francis Wyatt in the sample reading (1.2) are primary quotations, as<br />
they were written in the time being analysed.<br />
Secondary materials are documents written or created at some time removed from the events they<br />
discuss. They are sources subsequent to the historical actors and actions. A secondary text uses a<br />
mixture <strong>of</strong> primary and secondary material to create a new interpretation <strong>of</strong> the source material. Any<br />
essay you may write on a historical subject is a secondary piece.<br />
For example, Richard Hough’s biography <strong>of</strong> Cook, Captain James Cook, written in 1994 (well after<br />
the events, and drawing on many sources including Cook’s personal journals), is a secondary<br />
source. The sample reading (1.2) is also secondary material (containing some primary<br />
quotations as noted above).<br />
As you progress in the study <strong>of</strong> <strong>history</strong>, primary material will become increasingly important. First<br />
and second year courses will mainly be concerned with secondary readings. Do not be afraid to use<br />
primary sources. Material from the time provides strong evidence in an essay.<br />
You should examine sources critically (1.1). There are some extra questions you can ask <strong>of</strong> a primary<br />
source. Why has it survived? Is the source authentic? Has it been corrupted? What have other<br />
historians written about the source?<br />
Be wary <strong>of</strong> older secondary texts. History is not a fixed interpretation <strong>of</strong> events: it is an ongoing<br />
8
debate on the ‘whys’ <strong>of</strong> past events. Debates move on and scholarly opinions change. At least<br />
consider the most recent secondary sources you can find.<br />
Be wary <strong>of</strong> what are sometimes called ‘tertiary’ sources, or school textbooks. These are very general<br />
works written from secondary sources and usually contain limited scholarly value. Often they are<br />
little more than a source <strong>of</strong> dates and names, with little interpretation <strong>of</strong> events. While encyclopaedias<br />
(including Wikipedia) are very important reference tools—they can give you important definitions,<br />
‘facts’ and dates—they do not usually contain historical analysis.<br />
1.4—Where to Find Sources<br />
Most courses require you to purchase a Book <strong>of</strong> Readings, which will contain selections <strong>of</strong> books,<br />
articles and documents carefully compiled by your lecturers as well as recommended reading lists.<br />
A wide variety <strong>of</strong> sources is available in the <strong>Victoria</strong> <strong>University</strong> Library: books, periodicals (or<br />
journals), newspapers, micr<strong>of</strong>ilms, CD-ROMs, slides, DVDs and electronic databases. Take advantage<br />
<strong>of</strong> the library tours to introduce yourself to the computer catalogue and to the variety and location <strong>of</strong><br />
the materials.<br />
The university library provides reading areas and study rooms. It also has photocopying facilities that<br />
can be useful if you need only a few relevant pages in a text. Remember: when photocopying<br />
material, ensure you take down all the relevant bibliographical details (2.2 and 7).<br />
<strong>Wellington</strong> has the distinct advantage <strong>of</strong> being the location <strong>of</strong> the National Library <strong>of</strong> New Zealand—<br />
Te Puna Mātauranga o Aotearoa and the Alexander Turnbull Library. Sources housed here include<br />
Photographic and Portrait collections, the Oral History Archive, Newspaper archive, the New Zealand<br />
Manuscript Collection, and vast micr<strong>of</strong>ilm sources, including all books printed in Britain from 1475 to<br />
the eighteenth century. <strong>Wellington</strong> also has Archives New Zealand—Te Rua Mahara o te<br />
Kāwanatanga, which contains government records, The Treaty <strong>of</strong> Waitangi, business records,<br />
personal documents, and more.<br />
You also should consider the <strong>Wellington</strong> Public Library as a further source, especially if the<br />
<strong>University</strong> Library shelves empty out before you find all you need. Especially useful is the New<br />
Zealand reference collection located on the second floor.<br />
While the internet contains a vast array <strong>of</strong> historical information, care is needed in utilizing material<br />
from the web. There are a number <strong>of</strong> strange, eccentric sites that pose as academic but are not<br />
9
necessarily reliable. Articles in scholary journals and books have been reviewed before publication by<br />
experts in the field. They meet academic standards <strong>of</strong> evidence and argument. In contrast, anyone can<br />
create a website. Think carefully about the reliability <strong>of</strong> a site by asking:<br />
Is the author <strong>of</strong> the material named?<br />
Are his/her credentials given?<br />
Is the owner <strong>of</strong> the website named? Does it appear to be promoting a particular agenda?<br />
Are the views presented on the site consistent with what you have read in books and articles?<br />
Remember, authoritative information is able to be verified. It is more than a personal opinion.<br />
Is the website up-to-date?<br />
Is the website maintained by a university—and hence the URL ends in ‘ac.nz’ or ‘ac.uk’ or<br />
‘edu’?<br />
1.5—Searching for Printed Sources<br />
There are many ways to search for texts, and it can be confusing at first. Most library catalogues allow<br />
you to search by title, personal name (author or editor), and subject. Searching also can be done by<br />
keywords, either in titles or subjects.<br />
For example, to find books on the Cold War, once you have exhausted the obvious searches for books<br />
with ‘cold war’ in the title or subject field, you could try searching in the subject field for ‘united states<br />
foreign relations’, or ‘united states soviet union’.<br />
How do you know what keywords to search? If you can find one book on the subject in a catalogue it<br />
will help guide you to others, as it will tell you what subjects it is classified under. Try it. Find a book<br />
on a specific subject, scroll through the catalogue listing until you get to subject, then use those listings<br />
to search for more books. This is a far more efficient way <strong>of</strong> finding keywords than trying to think <strong>of</strong><br />
them yourself.<br />
Browsing the shelves can also be useful, as books and periodicals are grouped together by subject.<br />
10
1.6—Searching for Web-based Sources<br />
There are thousands <strong>of</strong> useful historical sites and with valuable historical information on the internet.<br />
To find material <strong>of</strong> interest quickly you must use effective keyword searches. Google, the most<br />
common search engine, deploys a mathematical ranking system to ‘order’ your search results. Since<br />
historians are not the biggest users <strong>of</strong> Google, the results you retrieve in your searches may instead<br />
point you to tourist sites or marketing sites or other consumer-related sites.<br />
For example, suppose you are researching the question on slave societies in eighteenth-century<br />
Jamaica.<br />
Typing Jamaica slaves<br />
into the Google search box would retrieve<br />
hundreds <strong>of</strong> sites without useful historical information.<br />
More effective keyword searches:<br />
include words in quote marks<br />
include unusual, <strong>of</strong>ten historically-specific, keywords<br />
include time references—even a ‘random’ year is a useful keyword<br />
include archival references<br />
include database acronyms, such as JSTOR (for Journal Storage)<br />
include university URL references, such as ac.nz or ac.uk or edu<br />
exclude keywords linked to business or tourism or corporations<br />
exclude corporation URL references, such as .com or .org<br />
Use the Advanced Google search feature to enter information on keywords, the URL’s domain, or the<br />
file type <strong>of</strong> the digitalised source (Word or PDF or Excel)—or use Advanced Search to exclude words.<br />
You also may replicate the Advanced Google features in the standard Google search box by typing<br />
‘site:’ (as in site:ac.nz) or by typing ‘–‘ to exclude words (as in –beach –tourism –hotel –sun).<br />
The following are effective Google searches to find information about Jamaican slave societies:<br />
Jamaica ‘slave societies’ 1751<br />
[now type] -beach –tourism site:edu<br />
[now type] JSTOR CO142<br />
retrieves sites with exact phrase ‘slave societies’ and ‘1751’<br />
11<br />
reduces further your search results without words ‘beach’<br />
or ‘tourism’ but from educational (edu) sites<br />
now locates articles from JSTOR database that cite, in<br />
footnotes, the reference CO (Colonial Office) series 142
2) NOTE TAKING<br />
2.1—Why we Take Notes<br />
Notes are necessary to ensure that you have the information you require from the text, when you want<br />
it. You need to take notes from the texts you read so that you can use the information from these<br />
sources clearly, accurately, and in a scholarly manner. Remember that a <strong>history</strong> essay is a reasoned<br />
and orderly argument with properly acknowledged supporting evidence. The notes you take as you<br />
read will be the source <strong>of</strong> evidence for your argument and will allow you to create footnotes (6) and<br />
your bibliography (2.2 and 7). Clear and precise notes also will help you avoid plagiarism (4.6, 4.8).<br />
You will read many texts in a trimester <strong>of</strong> study, and remembering all the arguments, strengths, faults,<br />
and specific page references, is not practical. If you take good notes, you may only need to read a text<br />
once. However, do not hesitate to re-read a text, especially one that is important to your topic.<br />
2.2—Starting your Bibliography<br />
You should complete the bibliography first, before writing a word <strong>of</strong> the essay. A bibliography lists<br />
the sources you use in the essay. Before taking notes from any source, it is most important to record<br />
all the information about the source required for your footnotes and bibliography.<br />
Bibliography format<br />
For books:<br />
Author last name, author first name, Title (Place <strong>of</strong> publication: Publisher, year <strong>of</strong> publication).<br />
For journal articles:<br />
Author last name, author first name, 'Title <strong>of</strong> Article', Title <strong>of</strong> Journal, Vol. X , no. X , year <strong>of</strong><br />
publication, pp.XXX-YYY [full page range].<br />
For chapters in edited collections:<br />
Author last name, author first name, 'Title <strong>of</strong> Chapter', in Editor1 first name last name, Editor2<br />
first name last name, and Editor3 first name last name (ed. or eds.), Title <strong>of</strong> Collection, X ed.<br />
(Place <strong>of</strong> publication: Publisher, year <strong>of</strong> publication), pp.XXX-YYY [full page range].<br />
See section 6.3 (the style <strong>of</strong> footnotes) and 7 (bibliographies) on the styles to use and examples.<br />
Now is the time to format the required information correctly. Paying attention now to citation style<br />
will free time at the crunch stage to focus on your writing and ideas.<br />
12
2.3—How to Take Notes<br />
There are many ways <strong>of</strong> taking notes, and you may have developed your own style that works for<br />
you. Some guidelines are <strong>of</strong>fered below.<br />
Organisation is the key to note taking. Nothing is worse than spending valuable time searching for a<br />
lost scrap <strong>of</strong> paper containing vital information. Use a ring binder, a laptop, a bound exercise book, or<br />
a card index rather than random, loose (easily misplaced) pages.<br />
Your notes should enable you to construct footnotes (6) and bibliographical entries, so it is important<br />
to record the details <strong>of</strong> each text (2.2). You must note from which page or pages the information came.<br />
Arrange notes by subtopics. A single text may have widely different ideas and arguments. Several<br />
different texts may all comment on the same aspect <strong>of</strong> your topic. By keeping all the notes from<br />
separate books on the same subtopic together you can see where authors agree and disagree with each<br />
other.<br />
Tip to avoid plagiarism: Quote now, paraphrase later. Be sure to use quotation marks.<br />
Keep the question in mind. Only take notes that relate to the question you are answering.<br />
Photocopying is no substitute for good notetaking.<br />
For example, here are some possible notes from our sample readings (1.2) for a question such as<br />
‘Discuss the assumptions <strong>of</strong> the first English arrivals to Virginia.’<br />
Firstly we must record the details we will need for footnotes and bibliography entries later (2.2).<br />
So we note in bibliography format,<br />
Anderson, Virginia DeJohn, ‘Animals into the Wilderness: The Development <strong>of</strong> Livestock<br />
Husbandry in the Seventeenth-Century Chesapeake’, William and Mary Quarterly, Vol. 59, no. 2,<br />
April 2002, pp.377-408.<br />
Specific notes from the reading may fall into separate subtopics. For instance, we might take<br />
notes under the subtopic ‘Animals in the Virginia colonies’.<br />
Animals in the Virginia colonies<br />
Anderson , ‘Animals into the Wilderness’.<br />
p.379 'Two years after the first ships landed, the colony had "6 mares and a horse, 5 or 600<br />
swine, as many hens and chickens; some goates [and] some sheep"'.<br />
Be sure to include page numbers <strong>of</strong> your sources (6.4). Page numbers enable you and your readers to<br />
quickly relocate any material you cite, and are important in constructing your footnotes (6).<br />
13
3) Planning your Essay<br />
3.1—Remembering the Question<br />
It is all too easy to lose sight <strong>of</strong> the question during your reading and note taking. Remind yourself <strong>of</strong><br />
the exact question you are answering before you start planning your essay. One <strong>of</strong> the keys to essay<br />
writing is staying focused. There are many interesting tangents to the topics you will study, and you<br />
must be careful not to stray from the question.<br />
3.2—Why write an Essay Plan or Outline?<br />
In order to answer a question effectively an essay needs to be structured carefully. An essay must<br />
persuade and convince the reader (and marker). Every sentence (4.3) and every paragraph (4.4)<br />
should be relevant to the question, and provide a step by step link in the development <strong>of</strong> the<br />
argument. Without planning, an essay will not stay coherent and focused.<br />
A <strong>history</strong> essay should have a definite structure, with an introduction (3.3, 4.2, 4.12), a main body<br />
(3.4) containing your argument and evidence, and a conclusion (4.2, 4.11). You should sketch out<br />
these components and make sure they will add up to a comprehensive answer to the question.<br />
3.3—Planning your Introduction<br />
An introduction is a clear one-paragraph roadmap <strong>of</strong> your essay. It tells the reader what you will<br />
prove in the essay (the destination) and the subtopics you will cover (the route to the destination—the<br />
stops along the way). After reading your introduction the marker should know exactly what you<br />
intend to argue.<br />
Your plan need not be complete, as during the drafting <strong>of</strong> your essay you may refine your ideas.<br />
However, it is useful to note down what you think you are going to prove, and you can use your<br />
introduction plan to ensure that you do not forget to include important points as you go. Your<br />
reading (1) and note taking (2) should give you a sufficient number <strong>of</strong> ideas with which to start.<br />
For example, an introduction plan to a question such as ‘Discuss the assumptions <strong>of</strong> the first<br />
English arrivals to Virginia’, might contain the following sketchy ideas:<br />
Introduction plan:<br />
What did the first English arrivals to Virginia assume about:<br />
what they would find (what sources <strong>of</strong> information did they have?)?<br />
inhabitants? climate? plants/animals?<br />
14
what they could accomplish (things possible in Virginia, not in England?)?<br />
how Virginia would differ from England?<br />
the obstacles they might face in Virginia?<br />
3.4—Using Notes: Planning the Main Body<br />
The body <strong>of</strong> your essay provides the in-depth argument and analysis that you have outlined in your<br />
introduction plan. The plan <strong>of</strong> the body <strong>of</strong> your essay needs to <strong>of</strong>fer a coherent structure for your<br />
evidence and argument. Develop your argument in clear steps. The most effective way to construct<br />
an answer is to support each major step in your argument by reference to supporting evidence and/or<br />
examples.<br />
Taking the ideas from your introductory plan (3.3), add in the notes (2.3) that you have taken and any<br />
<strong>of</strong> your own ideas and deductions. Your notes should help you plan your essay, and your plan should<br />
help you see any gaps in your notes.<br />
For example, using the same question as (3.3) above, ‘Discuss the assumptions <strong>of</strong> the first<br />
English arrivals to Virginia’, you could expand the introduction plan into an outline <strong>of</strong> the<br />
entire essay. Here is a small sample, which could become a partial or whole paragraph in your<br />
final copy. (See (4.4) for further details).<br />
Assumptions about animals (IDEA OR PARAGRAPH TOPIC FROM INTRO PLAN)<br />
They thought food alone limited how (OWN IDEAS ON SUBJECT<br />
well familiar animals would thrive. BASED ON READING)<br />
Barber, Jamestown Voyages, p.161, in (NOTES THAT RELATE<br />
Anderson, 'Animals ,' p. 379 DIRECTLY TO THE TOPIC;<br />
Francis Perkins noted 'an abundance <strong>of</strong> fresh fodder, EVIDENCE)<br />
for any kind <strong>of</strong> livestock . . . even if there were a<br />
million <strong>of</strong> them'.<br />
Anderson, 'Animals', p. 379<br />
Governor Francis Wyatt asserted that livestock<br />
would flourish in Virginia, and so the colony (MORE EVIDENCE)<br />
would succeed.<br />
Anderson, 'Animals', p.379 (MORE EVIDENCE)<br />
By 1609, the colony already supported 500 pigs,<br />
500 chickens, and 7 horses, as well as goats and sheep.<br />
15
When taking notes you may start thinking <strong>of</strong> useful sentences to include in your essay. Thus consider<br />
the note-taking process and the writing process as <strong>of</strong>ten going hand-in-hand.<br />
Taking notes and writing topic sentences<br />
Topic sentences (4.4) appear in sentence one <strong>of</strong> the paragraph, and, to help your reader, they should<br />
state the main point <strong>of</strong> the paragraph. These topic sentences are thus important points that you want<br />
to make in your essay, and each topic sentences tells your reader what you will prove in that<br />
paragraph.<br />
For example, in researching the English colonists’ animal husbandry in colonial Maryland and<br />
Virginia, you may find primary source evidence from settlers or indigenous peoples about the cold<br />
winters in the Chesapeake Bay region. You might think to yourself: ‘English settlers were unprepared<br />
for the cold winters in the Chesapeake’. If you wrote down such a thought in a complete sentence, you<br />
may find that your thought/sentence becomes a topic sentence to a paragraph discussing colonialism<br />
and the environment.<br />
16
4) DRAFTING<br />
4.1—Why Write a Draft?<br />
Effective essay writing is much more than knowing what you need to say, sitting down, and writing it<br />
all in one go. Even with a good set <strong>of</strong> notes (2) and an effective plan (3) you can never be sure how<br />
your argument will evolve. You may discover a logical inconsistency in your structure, come across<br />
new information, or have a blinding insight in the middle <strong>of</strong> the night. Thus drafting is important.<br />
Drafting is a process <strong>of</strong> discovering what you really need to say. <strong>Writing</strong> a rough draft is an essential<br />
step towards producing a coherent, logical and complete essay. Start your draft as soon as possible.<br />
Do not delay beginning a draft because you are not completely sure <strong>of</strong> your arguments. Drafting—<br />
actually writing your ideas down and trying arguments out—is the best way to make progress.<br />
4.2—What to Consider While Drafting<br />
When drafting it is important to keep the end product—your final submitted essay—clear in your<br />
mind. You will need footnotes (6) and a bibliography (7) in your final copy, so ensure you include all<br />
the necessary information for these as you go.<br />
Introduction as Road Map<br />
The introduction functions as a one-paragraph road map for the reader. It tells the reader where the<br />
essay is going (the argument, or thesis statement) and the route it will take (the subtopics). Start by<br />
drafting your thesis statement. What will you prove (thesis)? What subtopics will you cover to prove<br />
it? Check that your thesis addresses the essay question.<br />
Thesis test: can somebody argue against your thesis statement?<br />
Yes: develop further<br />
No: rethink your thesis or argument.<br />
For example: the thesis statement or argument ‘World War Two devastated Europe’ is not arguable<br />
(could anyone disagree?), whereas ‘During World War Two the Soviet Union suffered the most <strong>of</strong> any<br />
nation‛ is arguable.<br />
Body See 4.3–4.8.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The conclusion briefly summarises your whole argument and position in one paragraph. It relates<br />
closely to your introduction, although it should not be exactly the same. Rather a conclusion should<br />
express similar information in a more developed form and bring the essay to an end.<br />
In general, no new evidence should appear in a conclusion.<br />
17
If you can, allow yourself a break in your essay writing between the draft and the final copy to let<br />
your mind absorb what you have done and what needs to be added. Let the essay have time to ripen.<br />
Most <strong>essays</strong> have a word limit, plus or minus ten per cent. Keep the word count in mind while<br />
drafting. If you find yourself below the word count, you may need to do some more research and<br />
thinking about the topic. If you find yourself well over the limit, then edit your draft down by<br />
summarising or shortening your text. Rewrite rather than randomly deleting or adding sections.<br />
4.3—Effective Sentences<br />
(a) Structure: A sentence expresses a complete thought and contains a subject and a verb. The<br />
subject is the word or phrase that the sentence is about. The verb is a word that shows an<br />
action or state <strong>of</strong> being.<br />
For example, ‘Curly ran away’.<br />
(SUBJECT) (VERB)<br />
‘The pr<strong>of</strong>essor thought about the essay’.<br />
(SUBJECT) (VERB)<br />
A sentence is not the same as a phrase or clause.<br />
For example, Printers produced more books than ever before. On all sorts <strong>of</strong> topics.<br />
The phrase ‘On all sorts <strong>of</strong> topics’ is not a sentence. It has no verb.<br />
A more correct construction would be<br />
‘Printers produced more books than ever before, on all sorts <strong>of</strong> topics’.<br />
Ordering <strong>of</strong> Elements: A good order to follow when writing sentences for <strong>history</strong> <strong>essays</strong> is<br />
time–manner (subject/verb)–place. The sentence then answers the following questions in a<br />
logical order. When did it happen? Who did it? What action occurred? Where did it take place?<br />
A sentence may occasionally work better with these components in a different order.<br />
18
(b) The verb to be: Avoiding reliance on the actionless verb ‘to be’ will improve your essay writing<br />
dramatically. The verb ‘to be’, in its conjugated forms: am/is/are/was/were/be/been/being.<br />
(i) The verb ‘to be’ indicates equivalence, and <strong>of</strong>ten between a subject and adjective.<br />
For example, ‘The All Blacks were triumphant’.<br />
=<br />
(SUBJECT) (ADJECTIVE)<br />
‘Napoleon was short’.<br />
=<br />
(SUBJECT) (ADJECTIVE)<br />
Such a construction is an acceptable use <strong>of</strong> ‘to be’, but note how minor editing creates a more<br />
elegant sentence: ‘The All Blacks, triumphant in 1987, returned to form
(c) Precision: reducing your reliance on the actionless verb ‘to be’ is one way to add precision to your<br />
essay writing. Your aim in History essay writing in to convey information clearly and<br />
effectively.<br />
Avoid vague words<br />
Conveying information clearly requires you to avoid vague words, such as ‘this’ or ‘these’ or ‘those’,<br />
or weak verbs such as ‘to involve’ or ‘to deal’ or ‘to effect’. ‘This’ is probably the worst essay-<br />
writing work in the English language, and generally should be used only in a construction such<br />
as ‘This essay argues that ....’<br />
For example, consider the following two sentences.<br />
‘Columbus decided to eliminate Indian slavery, even though few Spanish farmers had<br />
emigrated to the Caribbean. This brought the Spanish colonists out in protest’.<br />
Does This refer to the elimination <strong>of</strong> slavery or to the few Spanish farmers?<br />
In particular, avoid ‘this’ in topic sentences, as you will force your reader to re-read your previous<br />
paragraphs to figure out to what ‘this’ refers.<br />
Using weak verbs force your reader to imagine the action taking place in your sentence.<br />
For example, notice how the italicized sentences use action verbs to add clarity:<br />
‘Many crew were involved in a mutiny’ uses the weak verb ‘to involve’<br />
‘Many crew seized control <strong>of</strong> the ship’ uses the action verb ‘to seize’<br />
‘The captain dealt with the mutineers’ uses the weak verb ‘to deal’<br />
‘The captain flogged the mutineers’ uses the action verb ‘to flog’<br />
‘Captains involved themselves in sailing the ship’ uses the weak verb ‘to involve’<br />
‘Captains navigate ships’ uses the action verb ‘to navigate’<br />
Tip: reducing your reliance on vague words will improve your essay writing dramatically, and it is<br />
much harder to write <strong>essays</strong> without ‘this’ and other vague words than you may think.<br />
20
(d) Formal language: Remember, an essay is a formal piece <strong>of</strong> writing. Read your sentences aloud and<br />
ask yourself if the language is appropriate.<br />
For example, ‘Seddon worked tirelessly to promote New Zealand interests’ is more appropriate<br />
for a scholarly piece <strong>of</strong> writing than ‘Seddon worked really hard and did his bit for New<br />
Zealand’, which may be okay for Campbell Live.<br />
(c) Streamline: When pro<strong>of</strong>reading your essay, read each sentence aloud to check for 'wordiness'.<br />
Beware <strong>of</strong> long sentences, especially those more than three lines long. They are probably<br />
unbalanced or tangled. Avoid interrupting elements between a subject and its verb: it is better<br />
to place the subject as near to its verb as possible. Follow the tips below to streamline your<br />
sentences:<br />
(i) Three-preposition test: A quick way to check for wordiness is to 'count prepositions'. In<br />
general, readers have difficulty following sentences that contain more than three prepositions.<br />
The most commonly used prepositions are:<br />
after at by for from in <strong>of</strong> on since to with<br />
For example, the following sentence is difficult for your reader to absorb, because it<br />
contains eight prepositions.<br />
In 1815 Emperor Napoleon I returned from exile on Elba and led his forces to the<br />
Battle <strong>of</strong> Waterloo where he was defeated by an Anglo-Allied army under the<br />
command <strong>of</strong> the Duke <strong>of</strong> <strong>Wellington</strong>.<br />
(ii) Redundancy: To further streamline your sentences avoid redundancy. A redundancy is an<br />
expression that conveys the same meaning more than once.<br />
Redundant Concise<br />
adequate enough adequate<br />
advance planning planning<br />
both together both<br />
but yet but<br />
contributing factor factor<br />
equally as far as far<br />
few in number few<br />
final outcome outcome<br />
large in size large<br />
past experience experience<br />
past <strong>history</strong> <strong>history</strong><br />
share in common share<br />
two different two<br />
21
4.4—Coherent Paragraphs<br />
A paragraph is a coherent collection <strong>of</strong> separate sentences that form one major idea and a group <strong>of</strong><br />
lesser related ideas. A paragraph should contain only one major point, and all the minor elements in<br />
a paragraph should be connected. If the major point appears in the first sentence, it appears in the<br />
topic sentence. <strong>Writing</strong> topic sentences as major points is useful, as your reader sees this sentence first<br />
in the paragraph. In general, your paragraphs should total 100-175 words. If they are less than 100<br />
words, the information may not be sufficiently important to warrant a paragraph; as paragraphs begin<br />
exceeding 175 words, they begin to discuss more than one major point or topic. In the sample reading<br />
(1.2), Anderson’s top two paragraphs on p.379 are well-sized: they total 163 and 121 words,<br />
respectively.<br />
Think <strong>of</strong> a paragraph as a micro-essay containing an introductory sentence that states the topic, then<br />
further sentence(s) that develop that argument and support it with evidence, and then bring the idea<br />
to some closure.<br />
For example, in the sample reading (1.2) the first paragraph starts by stating that Virginia<br />
colonists celebrated the discovery <strong>of</strong> hay. Then Anderson provides specific details. The second<br />
and following sentences <strong>of</strong>fer examples, and the whole paragraph is footnoted, showing the<br />
sources Anderson used to help construct the point. The final sentence elaborates the main idea.<br />
4.5—Paragraph Transitions<br />
Your paragraphs should link into each other conceptually, so that your essay flows and develops<br />
logically.<br />
Logical Development: One hint for checking the structure <strong>of</strong> your essay is to read just the first<br />
sentence in each paragraph and see if you can still understand your essay’s argument. If not<br />
then you may need to re-write some paragraphs or change your structure.<br />
For example, Anderson’s three topic sentences (1.2) read:<br />
Whatever visions <strong>of</strong> gold or other riches inflamed their imaginations, the first English colonists<br />
in the Chesapeake celebrated the discovery <strong>of</strong> a very different resource: hay.<br />
The Virginia Company aimed to supply its fledgling colony with all the ‘domesticall’ beasts it<br />
needed.<br />
English colonization <strong>of</strong> the Chesapeake took place just as the region’s climate experienced<br />
severe fluctuations that imposed unexpected hardships on animals weakened by lengthy<br />
voyages.<br />
22
Using ‘whereas’: There are other methods to link ideas between paragraphs. The word whereas is<br />
useful for making neat transitions between paragraphs that contrast two ideas on the same<br />
topic.<br />
For example, after a paragraph on the ease <strong>of</strong> livestock farming in the English climate:<br />
Whereas cattle thrived in the temperate English climate, livestock farmers struggled<br />
in the tropical Australian north.<br />
Using a linking adverbial clause: Start the new topic sentence with a adverbial clause that repeats<br />
words from the immediately preceding sentence:<br />
For example, write a new topic sentence to follow the first paragraph in the sample (1.2):<br />
'Colonists had little reason to expect anything other than the easy transfer <strong>of</strong> animal<br />
husbandry to the Chesapeake, for the region appeared to be nothing less than an earthly<br />
paradise for livestock'.<br />
As the colonists expected animal husbandry to transfer easily, the Virginia Company<br />
[Adverbial clause that looks back] [new idea starts]<br />
sought to furnish them with sufficient livestock.<br />
Useful Subordinating conjunctions to begin a sentence in a transitional paragraph: as, after,<br />
before, when, while, until, whereas, although, unless, if, since, because, as if, as long as, as<br />
soon as, as though<br />
Using ‘Echoing’: Echoing a verb from the previous topic sentence (by changing its conjugated form,<br />
usually from –ed to –ing), is another method to link paragraphs.<br />
For example,<br />
Topic sentence 1: Between 1886 and 1890, the Evening Post reported 200 stories on<br />
‘sweating’ (the use <strong>of</strong> sweat shop labour) in New Zealand.<br />
Topic sentence 2: Newspaper reporting stimulated the Atkinson Government in late<br />
1889 to establish a Royal Commission on Sweating.<br />
23
4.6—Paraphrasing Evidence<br />
Remember to footnote (6) your paraphrase. To paraphrase, rewrite information in your own words.<br />
Historians <strong>of</strong>ten paraphrase in order to briefly summarize some aspect <strong>of</strong> a complex idea; most<br />
paraphrases will be significantly shorter than the original text.<br />
Students frequently paraphrase incorrectly. Paraphrasing requires a complete rewording <strong>of</strong> the<br />
author’s ideas. Consider a sample text,<br />
By 1850 there was hardly a trading or a manufacturing town in England, which was not in<br />
some way connected to overseas markets. The pr<strong>of</strong>its obtained from overseas trade<br />
provided one <strong>of</strong> the main streams <strong>of</strong> that accumulation <strong>of</strong> capital in England which<br />
financed the Industrial Revolution.<br />
The text below is not paraphrased, but plagiarized, as the writer has only substituted a few synonyms<br />
into the sentences, and hence has stolen the author’s sentence structures:<br />
By the mid-1800s there was hardly a commercial or a manufacturing city in England,<br />
which was not linked to overseas markets. The pr<strong>of</strong>its obtained from overseas trade<br />
provided one <strong>of</strong> the principal streams <strong>of</strong> capital in England, which funded the Industrial<br />
Revolution.<br />
An acceptable paraphrase might look like this:<br />
In the first half <strong>of</strong> the nineteenth century, foreign exchange earnings provided sufficient<br />
capital to sustain England’s industrial revolution.<br />
Tip 1: If you read the source sentence(s) aloud and then your sentence(s) aloud, and they sound the<br />
same, then you probably have not paraphrased sufficiently.<br />
Tip 2: Try to write sentences without looking at your sources.<br />
Students found guilty <strong>of</strong> plagiarism can be given zero for the essay. See sub-section 6.2, 'When to<br />
Footnote?', for further advice; see 4.8 regarding plagiarism.<br />
24
4.7—Using Quotes as Evidence<br />
As in our sample reading (1.2), judicious use <strong>of</strong> quotations can effectively support your argument.<br />
Place the words in quotation marks (‘ ‘) and footnote (6). Use quotes sparingly and accurately.<br />
Primary material (1.3), or key secondary material, makes for the best quotations. The sample reading<br />
(1.2) is a good example. Anderson quotes only from primary sources; she paraphrases the arguments<br />
<strong>of</strong> her secondary sources.<br />
Use an author’s words in your final essay only when they say something in a particularly striking<br />
manner or summarise their thesis succinctly. There is almost no need for long quotations, and<br />
quotations should not dominate your own words.<br />
For example, when using the sample reading (1.2) for the question, ‘Discuss the assumptions <strong>of</strong><br />
the first English arrivals to the Chesapeake’, most <strong>of</strong> the ideas contained in the text are easily<br />
paraphrased (4.6). However, at the end <strong>of</strong> her first paragraph, Anderson neatly summarises<br />
early colonists’ assumptions about the similarities between livestock farming in Britain and<br />
Virginia. So we might use the following quote in the final essay:<br />
Anderson, ‘Animals into the Wilderness’, p.379,<br />
‘Colonists had little reason to expect anything other than the easy transfer <strong>of</strong> animal<br />
husbandry to the Chesapeake’.<br />
Try to integrate quotations into your argument. One way is to introduce the source and context<br />
immediately before the quotation:<br />
In exploring colonists' assumptions about livestock farming, Anderson observes: ‘Colonists had<br />
little reason to expect anything other than the easy transfer <strong>of</strong> animal husbandry to the<br />
Chesapeake’. 1<br />
Quotations must be accurate. Reproduce the words, spelling, capitalisation and punctuation <strong>of</strong> your<br />
source, exactly. If you use a quotation that contains an obvious misprint or mistake you must not<br />
alter it yourself. It is assumed that all quotes are reproduced accurately; however, if you want to<br />
stress that any mistake or error is not yours but your source's, you can place the word ‘sic’ in square<br />
brackets immediately after the incorrect item. Sic, a Latin word, means ‘thus’ or ‘so’. In its essay-<br />
writing usage, a good meaning is ‘intentionally so written’.<br />
For example, Abbot notes that ‘there is no single winning formula four *sic+ a suck-cessful [sic]<br />
academic argument’. 2<br />
When quoting primary sources, as does Anderson in the sample reading (1.2), avoid inserting [sic]<br />
25
when your reader knows that spelling varied earlier, as in the seventeenth century.<br />
Occasionally you may need to add in your own words or letters to a quotation. Additional material<br />
must be enclosed in square brackets to distinguish it clearly from the quotation. You can use this<br />
method to replace a capital letter with the lower case equivalent, or to add in clarifying phrases that<br />
give context to the quote.<br />
For example, taking some quotes from our sample reading (1.2) you can replace a capital letter<br />
with a lower case equivalent;<br />
Anderson states that ‘*t]he Virginia Company aimed to supply its fledgling colony with all the<br />
"domesticall" beasts it needed’.<br />
Or add in a descriptive and clarifying phrase,<br />
‘These animals arrived in a land [Northern Virginia] with seemingly limitless amounts <strong>of</strong><br />
natural meadow and a temperate climate roughly similar to England’s.’<br />
However, it would not be acceptable to change the meaning <strong>of</strong> the quote by additions such as,<br />
‘These animals arrived in a land [the Waikato] with seemingly limitless amounts <strong>of</strong> natural<br />
meadow and a temperate climate roughly similar to England’s.’<br />
Long quotations, more than four or five lines, are seldom justified: as quotes increase in length they<br />
increase in complexity and in amount <strong>of</strong> information they contain. So your reader may have difficulty<br />
understand the main point <strong>of</strong> the quote.<br />
If you cite long quotations (more than three lines) then the accepted format is to indent the quotation<br />
(left and right margins) and omit the quotation marks. You also may indent quotations <strong>of</strong> particular<br />
importance, to highlight the words for your reader.<br />
For example, The Deputy Prime Minister, J. R. Marshall, chose to emphasise other reasons for<br />
the New Zealand commitment in the House <strong>of</strong> Representatives:<br />
Quote-splitting<br />
The crux <strong>of</strong> the matter for us is that Communist aggression in Vietnam is a threat<br />
to us. If South Vietnam is overrun and becomes a Communist State it becomes the<br />
base for the next move in the Communist plan for world revolution.... Our<br />
security and way <strong>of</strong> life are at stake and we cannot stand aside. 3<br />
Splitting long quotes adds elegance to your writing. For example, in the sample reading (1.2)<br />
Anderson inserts her own words to split the long quote ‘healthfull and prosperous estate <strong>of</strong> this<br />
Colony depends upon nothing more, then the plentifull increasing and preserving <strong>of</strong> all sorts <strong>of</strong> Beats<br />
26
and birds <strong>of</strong> domesticall or tame nature’:<br />
The ‘healthfull and prosperous estate <strong>of</strong> this Colony’, he announced in 1623, ‘depends upon nothing<br />
more, then the plentifull increasing and preserving <strong>of</strong> all sorts <strong>of</strong> Beats and birds <strong>of</strong> domesticall or<br />
tame nature’.<br />
4.8—Reference to Avoid Plagiarism:<br />
Plagiarism is copying without proper acknowledgement. It is the use <strong>of</strong> another person's words, ideas<br />
or specific information without referencing. It is passing <strong>of</strong>f someone else’s work as your own.<br />
Plagiarism is academic dishonesty and incurs serious penalties in all university departments. The<br />
following is <strong>Victoria</strong> <strong>University</strong>’s <strong>of</strong>ficial policy regarding plagiarism:<br />
Academic integrity and Plagiarism<br />
Academic integrity is about honesty – put simply it means no cheating. All members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>University</strong><br />
community are responsible for upholding academic integrity, which means staff and students are<br />
expected to behave honestly, fairly and with respect for others at all times. Plagiarism is a form <strong>of</strong><br />
cheating which undermines academic integrity. Plagiarism is prohibited at <strong>Victoria</strong>.<br />
The <strong>University</strong> defines plagiarism as follows:<br />
Plagiarism is presenting someone else's work as if it were your own, whether you mean to or not.<br />
‘Someone else’s work’ means anything that is not your own idea, even if it is presented in your own style.<br />
It includes material from books, journals or any other printed source, the work <strong>of</strong> other students or staff,<br />
information from the Internet, s<strong>of</strong>tware programmes and other electronic material, designs and ideas. It<br />
also includes the organization or structuring <strong>of</strong> any such material.<br />
Plagiarism is not worth the risk.<br />
Any enrolled student found guilty <strong>of</strong> plagiarism will be subject to disciplinary procedures under the<br />
Student Conduct Statute (www.victoria.ac.nz/policy/studentconduct) and may be penalized severely.<br />
Consequences <strong>of</strong> being found guilty <strong>of</strong> plagiarism can include:<br />
• an oral or written warning<br />
• suspension from class or university<br />
• cancellation <strong>of</strong> your mark for an assessment or a fail grade for the course.<br />
Find out more about plagiarism and how to avoid it, on the <strong>University</strong>’s website at:<br />
www.vuw.ac.nz/home/studying/plagiarism.html.<br />
<strong>Writing</strong> a <strong>history</strong> essay requires you to use the words and ideas <strong>of</strong> other authors, and there is nothing<br />
wrong with this use, if they are referenced correctly. Referencing, in the form <strong>of</strong> footnotes (6) is the<br />
method <strong>of</strong> acknowledging your use <strong>of</strong> other people’s ideas and phrases. If you use the words <strong>of</strong><br />
anyone other than yourself, you must use quotation marks.<br />
For example, if you were writing an essay that used ideas from our sample reading (1.2), then<br />
you would need to reference it with a footnote, even if it is paraphrased (written in your own<br />
words) (6). If you were to use words directly from the sample reading in a sentence then they<br />
must be placed in quote marks, such as: Anderson states that ‘the first English colonists in the<br />
Chesapeake celebrated the discovery <strong>of</strong> a very different resource: hay'. 4<br />
27
4.9—Steps to the Final Copy<br />
Revision is not simply checking your spelling and punctuation. Rather, revising means checking the<br />
logic and consistency <strong>of</strong> your argument and making sure that you have answered the question. 'Re-<br />
vision' or 're-seeing' your draft leads to substantive changes in structure, argument, and phrasing. To<br />
be useful, revision needs to be thorough. After revision, pro<strong>of</strong>read to check your spelling and<br />
punctuation.<br />
Ask others to read your draft if you can. A new set <strong>of</strong> eyes can pick up errors you may miss. If a<br />
reader has trouble with a sentence, rephrase it. Rephrasing uses your limited time more effectively<br />
than trying to understand the reader's difficulty. Support, suggestions, pro<strong>of</strong>-reading and debate are<br />
all useful to the essay-writing process.<br />
4.10—Questions to Ask <strong>of</strong> your Draft<br />
Have you answered the question? This is the first question that you should ask <strong>of</strong> your work. This is,<br />
after all, the purpose <strong>of</strong> the assignment.<br />
What is the answer you have given? Could you easily explain it to a friend or flatmate? Is the<br />
argument obvious? Do not hide your argument under facts. Support it with the most striking facts<br />
only. Omit all facts that do not make a significant contribution.<br />
Is your essay well organised? Make sure that your paragraphs are arranged logically, and that there<br />
is no needless repetition. ‘As has been discussed earlier’ or similar phrases are red flags for repetition.<br />
Reorganising your structure can sometimes improve the impact <strong>of</strong> your argument. Reorder the list <strong>of</strong><br />
subtopics in your introduction after reorganising.<br />
Have you supported your arguments with evidence? While your essay should be your own argument,<br />
in your own words, you cannot create it solely from your imagination. Your ideas and argument<br />
must come from informed reading and analysis, and you must show your sources, in the form <strong>of</strong><br />
footnotes (6), in your final copy.<br />
Is your essay interesting? While this booklet stresses the use <strong>of</strong> sources and the marshalling <strong>of</strong><br />
arguments from other authors, your writing does not need to be dull. You can use your ideas and<br />
imagination as long as you are guided by informed reading. The past is a foreign country, and to visit<br />
it you must use your imagination.<br />
28
Is your writing clear? Avoid jargon when you can, explain jargon when you cannot. Do not bombard<br />
the reader with obscure allusions. In other words, write considerately. Your task is to explain and<br />
convince the marker <strong>of</strong> your argument, not to confuse her/him.<br />
Use the tips in Paragraph Transitions (4.5) to improve the flow <strong>of</strong> the essay.<br />
4.11—Polishing Your Conclusion<br />
Ask yourself the following questions:<br />
‘Does my conclusion relate closely to the topic and sum up the argument satisfactorily?’<br />
‘If my conclusion was all that a reader read <strong>of</strong> my essay, would they understand not only my<br />
answer, but my question?<br />
Check that no new evidence (nothing requiring footnotes) appears in the conclusion.<br />
Avoid using the words <strong>of</strong> the question directly in your conclusion (or introduction). Instead, try to<br />
answer the question in a way that makes the nature <strong>of</strong> the question obvious.<br />
4.12—Polishing Your Introduction<br />
While you write the introduction first (4.2), revise it last. Since we learn through writing, the thesis<br />
proved in the body <strong>of</strong> your essay may differ from that stated in your introduction. Similarly, you may<br />
need to add or remove subtopics or change their order. Revise to make the introduction an accurate<br />
roadmap <strong>of</strong> the essay. Polishing your introduction pays.<br />
Questions:<br />
‘Does my introduction succinctly state my argument in response to the question?’<br />
‘If I did not know the essay topic would I be able to figure out its essence from my introduction?’<br />
Ask someone else to read your essay and tell you what you have argued and answered.<br />
4.13—Due Dates and How to Keep Them<br />
Essays are due on a certain date. Start your reading and note-taking as early as possible. Even if you<br />
then need to put aside the essay in order to do other work, an essay that has been started will let your<br />
mind ponder the topic and notice unusual connections. Starting early gives you time to negotiate<br />
unexpected roadblocks, such as trouble finding sources, or realizing that the question confuses you.<br />
Essays must be handed in to meet the mandatory requirements <strong>of</strong> any course. You must fulfil the<br />
mandatory requirements <strong>of</strong> a course in order to be allowed to sit the final examination or be assessed<br />
29
for a final grade. Therefore, it is better to hand something in for marking than hand in nothing and<br />
either get a zero or fail to meet the mandatory requirements. Be aware that there is usually a<br />
minimum standard or average mark to be achieved in most courses in order to be satisfy the<br />
mandatory requirements. The Book <strong>of</strong> Readings for a course will contain specific information<br />
regarding that course’s mandatory requirements.<br />
Plan ahead, and if you are having problems talk to your tutor or lecturer as soon as the problem<br />
becomes known. Sickness extensions are available (with documented medical practitioners’<br />
certificates), and there are provisions for extensions in case <strong>of</strong> family bereavements and crises.<br />
30
5) GRAMMAR, SPELLING, AND OTHER TECHNICAL BITS<br />
5.1—General Grammar<br />
Correct grammar helps your essay flow smoothly and makes your meaning clear. Poor grammar is<br />
distracting and frustrating to the reader. If you doubt the punctuation and grammar <strong>of</strong> a sentence,<br />
then re-write it in a simpler manner.<br />
(a) Sentence construction: Remember that a sentence (see 4.3) requires a verb, not just a<br />
subject, and should be a complete thought. If a sentence is hard to punctuate, re-write it in a<br />
simpler manner.<br />
(b) Do not use contractions. Do not use 'don't'; contractions are not formal language, and are<br />
best avoided in an essay. Write words out in full: 'cannot' not can't; 'have not' not haven't; 'it<br />
is' not it's.<br />
Contraction masquerading as a preposition: 'could <strong>of</strong>' and 'might <strong>of</strong>' are really the<br />
contracted verbs 'could've' and 'might've'. In a formal essay, use 'could have' and 'might<br />
have'.<br />
(c) No abbreviations or symbols. Write: 'for example' not e.g.; 'that is' not i.e.; 'and' not &;<br />
'percent' not %; 'New Zealand' not N.Z. Spell centuries out in full: 'the seventeenth century'<br />
not the 17th century.<br />
(d) Plurals: Normally English plurals simply require an 's', so that 'ship' becomes 'ships'. For<br />
words ending in 'y', the 'y' is changed to 'ies' 'colony' - for example, becomes 'colonies'. A<br />
small group <strong>of</strong> nouns, such as the military term 'corps', retain the same form in both singular<br />
and plural. Remember that the plural <strong>of</strong> Māori is Māori, not 'Māoris', and <strong>of</strong> Pākehā is<br />
Pākehā, not 'Pākehās'.<br />
(e) Apostrophes: Apostrophes are only used to indicate possession and contractions (not to<br />
make a word plural). As noted above, <strong>history</strong> <strong>essays</strong> should not use contractions. Below are<br />
guidelines for the use <strong>of</strong> the apostrophe to indicate possession.<br />
(i) Possession may be expressed equally well by '<strong>of</strong>' or by using the apostrophe and<br />
shifting the word order<br />
the dress <strong>of</strong> the girl the girl's dress<br />
So too for a plural possessor<br />
the dresses <strong>of</strong> the girls the girls' dresses<br />
31
(ii) The rule is to put the apostrophe after the possessor and add an 's' if the possessor is<br />
in the singular<br />
the girl's dress this class's teacher the quiz's difficulty<br />
(iii) If the possessor is in the plural simply put the apostrophe after the plural possessor<br />
all the girls' dresses all the classes' teachers<br />
The rule for a plural possessor remains the same with both a singular and a plural<br />
object <strong>of</strong> possession. So<br />
the idea <strong>of</strong> all the students and the ideas <strong>of</strong> all the students will both be expressed<br />
with an apostrophe as<br />
all the students' idea and all the students' ideas<br />
(iv) The only exception to these rules for the use <strong>of</strong> the apostrophe indicating possession is<br />
for personal pronouns, which do NOT have an apostrophe<br />
his hers theirs ours yours its<br />
Note: ‘It's’ is a contraction from ‘it is’ or ‘it has’ and is not the possessive.<br />
(v) Proper nouns (names <strong>of</strong> people, places, etc and usually capitalised) which end in 's'<br />
are treated like singular nouns ending in 's'. Add an apostrophe and an 's' to form the<br />
possessive.<br />
Keats's poetry Jesus's life<br />
(f) Commas: The comma has more uses than any other punctuation mark. We include here the<br />
uses that <strong>of</strong>ten bemuse students.<br />
(i) A comma and conjunction together can join two independent clauses, clauses that<br />
could each stand on their own as sentences.<br />
Incorrect Congress passed the law, the president vetoed it.<br />
Correct Congress passed the law, but the president vetoed it.<br />
Coordinating conjunctions: and, or, but, nor, for, so, yet<br />
Subordinating conjunctions: although, because, while, since, if, as, until<br />
(ii) After an introductory element, a comma signals the subject <strong>of</strong> the sentence:<br />
Introductory Subordinate clause Since you asked, I will admit that I am exhausted.<br />
Introductory Modifying phrase In a wave <strong>of</strong> enthusiasm, the audience rose to its feet.<br />
(iii) A comma separates the items in a series: bananas, cherries, and peaches<br />
Test: Comma before and ( , and ) : What follows the and?<br />
an independent clause keep the comma<br />
the final item in a series keep the comma<br />
anything else remove the comma<br />
32
(g) Semi-colons The semi-colon creates a pause longer than a comma and shorter than a full<br />
stop.<br />
(i): The semi-colon ';' is a punctuation mark that separates clauses that could function<br />
independently as sentences. No conjunction is necessary. It keeps two closely related<br />
statements within the same sentence.<br />
For example, Some <strong>of</strong> those painters influenced Cézanne; others were influenced by<br />
him.<br />
Semi-colon Test: Replace the semicolon with a period. Do you have two complete<br />
sentences? If not, use a different punctuation mark.<br />
(ii): The semi-colon ';' also separates items in a list, when the items themselves contain<br />
commas.<br />
For example, The company has <strong>of</strong>fices in San Francisco, California; Portland, Oregon;<br />
and Vancouver, British Columbia.<br />
(h) Colons: The colon ':' shows an equivalence between the items on either side <strong>of</strong> it. It<br />
introduces a restatement, a list, or a quotation. Make sure you have a complete statement<br />
before the colon.<br />
For example, Lunch arrives: a tuna fish sandwich and a cup <strong>of</strong> tea.<br />
The mosquito has four life stages: egg, larva, pupa and adult.<br />
George Percy enthusiastically reported: 'I have seene many great and<br />
large medowes having excellent good pasture for any Cattle'.<br />
Test: To test a colon, insert namely after it:<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> the poll were surprising: 7 percent in favour, 11 percent<br />
opposed, and 82 percent no opinion.<br />
Namely works, and so does the colon.<br />
We slaved for years: we remained as poor as ever.<br />
Namely does not fit, because the second clause makes a new point.<br />
Use a semicolon.<br />
(i) Parentheses: '( )' are used to enclose remarks not intended to be in the main statement, or to<br />
insert a phrase or explanation not belonging to the main statement. It is important to open '('<br />
and close ')' parentheses. Parenthetical statements should be used sparingly. If something is<br />
important it should be in your main text, if it is unimportant then consider deleting it.<br />
33
For example, From Grimm’s tales the child (or adult) learns that wishing is not a<br />
substitute for action.<br />
Larry (to Moe and Curly): ‘You knuckle-heads!’<br />
(j) Dash: There are two types <strong>of</strong> dash in common usage: the en dash (–) and the em dash (—).<br />
Beware <strong>of</strong> using either where other punctuation will do. To insert them in a Micros<strong>of</strong>t Word<br />
document, go to Insert, Symbol, Special Characters. Alternatively, the'F1' key will generate<br />
an en dash (–).<br />
The en dash (–) is used between numbers expressing a range (pp.3–5, 1998–2002). Where you<br />
can use the word 'through'(Pages 3 through 5, years 1998 through 2002), use an en dash. The<br />
en dash also shows a relationship between two entities (the Liberal–Labour coalition).<br />
The em dash (—) is shows a break <strong>of</strong> thought. It provides a longer break than those provided<br />
by commas or parentheses. When using it this way, it is important to open and close the<br />
dashes, as you would commas and parentheses.<br />
For example, ... In post-colonial Nigeria the largest ethnic groups in each region—the<br />
Hausa, Yoruba, and Igbo in the Northern, Western, and Eastern regions respectively—<br />
therefore came to dominate local politics and to contest for power at the federal level.<br />
(k) That vs. Which: That and which are commonly considered interchangeable, yet there is a<br />
subtle difference in the way they should be used. That introduces a restrictive clause, while<br />
which introduces a non-restrictive clause. Use the following test to determine whether a<br />
clause is restrictive or non-restrictive.<br />
Test: Can you remove the clause without changing the meaning <strong>of</strong> the sentence?<br />
(l) Capitals:<br />
No The clause is restrictive: it restricts the meaning <strong>of</strong> the sentence.<br />
Use that with no preceding comma to introduce the clause.<br />
Example: Sports that involve physical contact should not be played at school.<br />
Yes The clause is non-restrictive. Introduce it with a comma and a which.<br />
Example: Contact sports, which are played in schools throughout New Zealand,<br />
Remember: no comma before that<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten cause preventable injuries.<br />
comma before which<br />
(i) Should be used for names and titles <strong>of</strong> persons, for political and legislative terms, and<br />
34
for many historical terms. Capitals show that the named entity is specific.<br />
For example, the New Zealand Government; the Ross Dependency; the Province <strong>of</strong><br />
Quebec; Labour Party; Copyright Act; Minister <strong>of</strong> Social Welfare; Mr Speaker; First<br />
World War; Indian Mutiny; the Reformation; the Depression; ANZUS Pact.<br />
(ii) In titles and subtitles <strong>of</strong> books and articles, capitalize the first word. Capitalize every<br />
subsequent word that is not an article (a, an, the), a coordinating conjunction (and, or,<br />
but, nor, for, so, yet), or a preposition (<strong>of</strong>, by, from, after, etc.).<br />
The Mismeasure <strong>of</strong> Man<br />
'Peasants into Frenchmen: The Modernization <strong>of</strong> Rural France, 1870–1914'<br />
(m) Foreign words: (i) do not translate well known terms such as raison d'etre, coup d'etat,<br />
Realpolitik. The French parlement, for example, is entirely different from the English<br />
'parliament', and should not be translated. (ii) Foreign words should be put in italics or<br />
underlined (see (8.5) for more details). Māori words are not considered foreign, and should<br />
not be italicised.<br />
(n) Past tense: As a rule it is a good idea to keep the past in the past tense. Avoid confusing<br />
statements such as ‘Reading is slow as scribal Latin can be difficult to understand’. Keeping<br />
the past in the past tense avoids confusion, so a more appropriate version would be,<br />
‘Reading was slow as scribal Latin could be difficult to understand.’<br />
(o) No <strong>of</strong>fensive language: There is no excuse for <strong>of</strong>fensive, racist, sexist or insulting<br />
stereotypical language in your <strong>essays</strong>.<br />
(p) Avoid mixed metaphors, as they are usually impossible, and at best silly.<br />
For example, you cannot ‘Grasp the nettle firmly in one hand, and take the bull by the<br />
horns’, unless you have three hands, or want to get gored by the bull. Similarly, ‘To<br />
stand firmly together while forging ahead in new directions’, is just ridiculous.<br />
Metaphors can add interest to your writing, but use them wisely, and one at a time.<br />
(q) Avoid journalese, or hackneyed phrases such as 'meaningful' or 'credibility'. These only<br />
obscure meaning and make a critical reader suspicious.<br />
(r) Avoid colloquial expressions. Remember an essay is a formal piece <strong>of</strong> writing. Use formal<br />
language, not everyday street talk.<br />
35
5.2—Spelling<br />
Avoid mis-spelling words in your <strong>essays</strong>. If you are in doubt as to the spelling <strong>of</strong> a word there are<br />
dictionaries available in the university library and on the web.<br />
For example, some commonly mis-spelt words are: fief; feudal; naval/navel; woman/women;<br />
there/their; sort/sought; government; Parliament; independent; prerogative; separate.<br />
Ensure the language on your computer spelling checker is set to ‘English (New Zealand)’ by setting<br />
English as the default language for all documents (refer to your s<strong>of</strong>tware manual or on-line tutorial for<br />
help). However, be cautious <strong>of</strong> computer spelling checkers accepting correctly spelt words in the<br />
wrong context.<br />
For example, ‘Two bee ore knot too bee’ is 'correct' as far as a spelling checker is concerned.<br />
Another problem with word processing programmes is they do not recognise many correctly spelt<br />
academic words and names, and if you are not careful the checker may change them to a correctly<br />
spelt but inappropriate word.<br />
For example, the suggestion my spelling checker gives for the name 'John Ballance' is 'John<br />
Balance'. A simple press <strong>of</strong> the 'change all' button and all versions <strong>of</strong> this name in an essay<br />
would be incorrect, yet not to the spelling checker. Nothing is more embarrassing than finding<br />
that your 2000 word masterpiece on the importance <strong>of</strong> John Ballance to pre-First World War<br />
New Zealand politics, is actually an essay about some unknown called John Balance.<br />
Nothing beats checking your work yourself, and if you can find someone else to check it as well, all<br />
the better. It is <strong>of</strong>ten useful to read your writing aloud, as the act <strong>of</strong> reading aloud forces you to<br />
examine every word on the page.<br />
5.3—Ellipsis to show omitted text (...)<br />
Sometimes a quotation can be shortened by omitting phrases or sentences that do not contribute to<br />
your argument. Be careful that such omissions do not alter the sense or emphasis <strong>of</strong> the author's<br />
words. If in doubt, do not omit anything, and if the quote is too long and obscure, then consider<br />
omitting it.<br />
Omission from a quotation is shown by an ellipsis, three unspaced periods '...' preceded and followed<br />
by a space. If the omission contains a full stop then four periods ' ....' followed by a space are used, the<br />
first period right next to the last word. Omissions from the end <strong>of</strong> a quote do not need to be<br />
acknowledged.<br />
36
For example, you need to shorten the following quote:<br />
'The crux <strong>of</strong> the matter for us is that Communist aggression in Vietnam is a threat to us. If South<br />
Vietnam is overrun and becomes a Communist State it becomes the base for the next move in<br />
the Communist plan for world revolution.... Our security and way <strong>of</strong> life are at stake and we<br />
cannot stand aside.'<br />
You could insert the following ellipses:<br />
‘... Communist aggression in Vietnam is a threat to us. If South Vietnam ... becomes a<br />
Communist State it becomes the base for the next move in the Communist plan for world<br />
revolution.... Our security and way <strong>of</strong> life are at stake’.<br />
5.4—Word Count<br />
Most <strong>history</strong> assignments have a word limit. Part <strong>of</strong> the set task <strong>of</strong> an essay answer is to keep close to<br />
this limit, and yet fully answer the question. As a rough guide, you should try to stay within ten<br />
percent <strong>of</strong> the word limit. Specific assignments may require more precise limits, so be sure to check<br />
any instructions.<br />
The key is to be concise yet informative, brief yet explanatory. When drafting your essay keep the<br />
word limit in mind, and aim for about the limit, or maybe a little more. When revising, you can<br />
tighten your text, deleting less effective portions <strong>of</strong> your writing and bringing your essay closer to the<br />
word count.<br />
5.6—Miscellaneous Technical Points<br />
Since it is your essay that you are submitting, it is understood that all the opinions in the essay are<br />
yours alone, except those you attribute to another author by way <strong>of</strong> footnotes (6). Therefore there is no<br />
need for expressions such as 'I think' or 'in my opinion'. It is better to use neutral phrases such as 'it<br />
follows' or ‘the evidence suggests’. Do not use 'we' or 'our' since others may not share your opinion.<br />
Also avoid 'the writer thinks'; when stating the author's opinion, use a less emphatic verb.<br />
For example, ‘Evidence suggests that in the Middle Ages reading was laborious’ is more<br />
appropriate than ‘I think that in the Middle Ages reading was laborious’.<br />
‘Anderson states that ...’ is better than ‘Anderson thinks that ...’. For all we know Anderson<br />
may now have changed her mind.<br />
If you use phrases such as 'some historians' or 'many historians', be sure to back up the point with a<br />
footnote that lists some or many historians with that opinion. One or two is not many.<br />
37
6) FOOTNOTES<br />
6.1—What is a Footnote?<br />
Footnotes are linked numbered references that point from a particular sentence (or sentences) <strong>of</strong> your<br />
essay to the location <strong>of</strong> the sources <strong>of</strong> your direct quotations, figures and statistics, factual material,<br />
and ideas or arguments you have taken from other authors. They are placed at the 'foot' <strong>of</strong> the page,<br />
in contrast to ‘endnotes’, which appear at the end <strong>of</strong> your document. In your <strong>history</strong> essay writing, use<br />
footnotes rather than endnotes or in-text referencing. In-text referencing, in which the source appears<br />
between parentheses at the end <strong>of</strong> a sentence, is a type <strong>of</strong> referencing used only in a few specialised<br />
economic <strong>history</strong> or <strong>history</strong> <strong>of</strong> science journals, and thus is not standard historical practice.<br />
Footnotes are an important craft to master as they represent expertise, rigour and accuracy in your use<br />
<strong>of</strong> evidence. They provide a basis for your essay's argument, and should provide sufficient<br />
information to allow the reader to find your sources. The key to footnoting, as with so many other<br />
aspects <strong>of</strong> essay writing, is accuracy and consistency.<br />
The sample reading (1.2) has footnotes at the bottom <strong>of</strong> each page. Each footnote is related to the text<br />
by a small number, which is also inserted at the end <strong>of</strong> a sentence.<br />
6.2—When to Footnote?<br />
You must provide footnotes for direct and indirect borrowing. Specifically, whenever:<br />
(i) you quote another author (4.7).<br />
For example, to use a quote from the sample reading (1.2), you must give a footnote.<br />
'Anderson states that ‘[t]he Virginia Company aimed to supply its fledgling colony with<br />
all the "domesticall" beasts it needed.’ (FOOTNOTE REQUIRED HERE)<br />
(ii) you present figures, number, percentages, or other statistics.<br />
For example, In 1851 Governor Grey estimated that the Māori population <strong>of</strong> the colony<br />
was 120,000. (FOOTNOTE REQUIRED HERE)<br />
(iii) when summarising detailed factual material from your sources.<br />
For example, Over the course <strong>of</strong> his life Francois Viète correctly expanded the estimation<br />
<strong>of</strong> pi out to thirty five places, the value <strong>of</strong> which his wife placed on his tombstone.<br />
(FOOTNOTE REQUIRED HERE)<br />
Note: this is not a summary <strong>of</strong> an argument, it is a summary <strong>of</strong> factual material that is all<br />
easily verifiable, yet you must still indicate the source.<br />
38
(iv) to acknowledge a summary <strong>of</strong> an argument or opinion <strong>of</strong> an author, even when the exact<br />
words are not used.<br />
For example, Anderson argues that lengthy voyages between England and America<br />
weakened livestock shipped on board. (FOOTNOTE REQUIRED HERE)<br />
Note: this is the summary <strong>of</strong> an argument, not factual material, as Anderson is not merely<br />
stating verifiable facts, but rather making an argument about a subject and supporting it<br />
with evidence.<br />
Hint: if you find that most <strong>of</strong> your footnotes are <strong>of</strong> type (i), it indicates that you are over-<br />
quoting or not recognising your use <strong>of</strong> other authors' ideas. You should do more<br />
summarising <strong>of</strong> others' ideas in your own words, so more <strong>of</strong> your footnotes become type<br />
(iv).<br />
You do not need to footnote matters <strong>of</strong> common knowledge.<br />
For example,'The Normans invaded England in the year AD 1066', does not require a footnote<br />
as it is common knowledge. However, a more controversial or debated point always needs to<br />
be footnoted. So, 'The Normans would have invaded England in AD 1065 if it had not been for<br />
bad omens', would require some evidence in the form <strong>of</strong> a footnote to a source (or sources) that<br />
contains this analysis.<br />
You do not need to footnote your own opinions and ideas. This is <strong>of</strong>ten the hardest part <strong>of</strong> footnoting<br />
to work out, as your ideas <strong>of</strong>ten come from your reading. However, new connections and concepts<br />
that you have made regarding the topic, even though they are based on your reading, are considered<br />
your own. If in doubt it is better to over-footnote, rather that under-footnote.<br />
Be wary <strong>of</strong> using material that requires footnotes in your introduction and conclusion (4.2), as these<br />
should not introduce new evidence. An exception would be if you launch your introduction with a<br />
historical story, as in ‘In 1610 Jesuit Priest ... travelled from Lisbon to Rio de Janeiro. During his trip....’<br />
6.3—The Style <strong>of</strong> Footnotes<br />
The main requirements for your footnotes are consistency and clarity in identifying a text. The<br />
specific information required in each footnote depends on the material being referenced. In general<br />
this is the author name, text title, publisher, place and year <strong>of</strong> publication, and the page number(s) <strong>of</strong><br />
the text to which your writing refers. The various details <strong>of</strong> footnotes for specific sources are detailed<br />
39
elow.<br />
Note: Your footnotes should be numbered continuously throughout your essay. (1,2,3,...,n).<br />
Place the referring footnote number slightly above the line <strong>of</strong> text, a little smaller than the main text<br />
(Micros<strong>of</strong>t Word does this automatically). The referring footnote number should be placed after the<br />
fullstop <strong>of</strong> the sentence to which the sources relate.<br />
For example, a sentence from the sample draft paragraph from (4.4) might have a referring<br />
footnote number as shown:<br />
Most livestock shipped by the Virginia Company in the 1620s died on the Atlantic voyage,<br />
exacerbating food shortages in the colony. 6 [This would refer to the sixth footnote <strong>of</strong> the essay.]<br />
The footnotes themselves are placed on the same page as the corresponding reference number. It is<br />
always best to use auto-numbered footnotes that will automatically change the numbers if you add or<br />
subtract footnotes as you go.<br />
There are different conventions for citing books, periodicals, edited collections and translations, et<br />
cetera.<br />
Footnote vs. Bibliography Style: Footnotes First name Last name,<br />
Citing Secondary Sources<br />
a) Citing books:<br />
Bibliography Last name, First name,<br />
Author First Name Last Name, Book Title (Place <strong>of</strong> publication: Publisher, Year <strong>of</strong><br />
publication), pp.XX. Cite the exact page(s) where you found the material.<br />
For example,<br />
(AUTHOR) (TITLE) (CITY)<br />
6 Mark Alrich, Death Rode the Rails: American Railroad Accidents and Safety, 1828-1965 (Baltimore: The<br />
Johns Hopkins <strong>University</strong> Press, 2006) pp.134-5.<br />
(PUBLISHER) (YEAR) (PAGES)<br />
b) Citing printed journal articles:<br />
Author First Name Last Name, 'Article Title' (in single quotation marks), Journal Title (in<br />
italics), Vol. x, no. y, Month (if there is no month provided give whatever information listed,<br />
such as a season) year, pp.XX.<br />
40
For example,<br />
(AUTHOR) (ARTICLE TITLE IN INVERTED COMMAS)<br />
Erik Olssen, 'Mr Wakefield and New Zealand as an Experiment in Post-Enlightenment<br />
Experimental Practice', The New Zealand Journal <strong>of</strong> History, Vol. 31, no. 2, October 1997, p.210.<br />
(JOURNAL TITLE) (VOLUME) (NUMBER) (DATE) (PAGE)<br />
Although most printed journal articles now have been digitalised and are sourced from the<br />
<strong>University</strong> Library’s online databases, you need not list a database URL in your footnotes or<br />
bibliography so long as you follow the above rules. If in doubt, consult your lecturer or course<br />
coordinator. Exception: electronic journals that do not appear in print—see e) below.<br />
c) Citing articles from edited collections:<br />
Author First Name Last Name, 'Article Title' (in single quotation marks), in editor First<br />
Name Last Name (ed.), Book Title, (Place <strong>of</strong> publication: Publisher, Year), pp.XX.<br />
For example,<br />
(AUTHOR) (ARTICLE TITLE) (EDITOR) (BOOK TITLE) (PLACE)<br />
13 C. Davis, 'Clio's Lost Sheep', in Jock Phillips (ed.), Biography in New Zealand (<strong>Wellington</strong>:<br />
HarperCollins, 1985), pp.9–12.<br />
(PUBLISHER) (DATE) (PAGES)<br />
Even when the author <strong>of</strong> the article is the same person as the editor <strong>of</strong> the collection you<br />
should still list the names in both places.<br />
For example,<br />
(AUTHOR) (EDITOR)<br />
14 Jock Phillips, 'Introduction', in Jock Phillips (ed.), Biography in New Zealand (<strong>Wellington</strong>:<br />
HarperCollins, 1985), p.l.<br />
d) Citing films and videos<br />
Give the producer’s and/or director’s name (or names), the title, the distributor, the year <strong>of</strong><br />
production.<br />
For example,<br />
(PRODUCER) (TITLE) (DISTRIBUTOR) (YEAR)<br />
15 Ken Burns et al., The West (PBS Video, 1996).<br />
(PRODUCER) (WRITER/INTERVIEWER) (TITLE)<br />
16 Gaylene Preston and Judith Fyfe, War Stories Our Mothers Never Told Us<br />
(DISTRIBUTOR) (YEAR)<br />
(Ronin Films, 1995; released on video, 1996).<br />
41
e) Citing digital-only material from the internet:<br />
Each day more and more useful historical material appears only in digital versions and is<br />
placed on the internet. In referencing such material, determine whether the source is<br />
unchanged or unchangeable or may be changed. The content in a journal article in the<br />
Electronic Journal <strong>of</strong> Australian and New Zealand History, for instance, would never be changed;<br />
the content on a website such as www.slavevoyages.org may be edited and updated.<br />
(i) Unchanged or unchangeable sources<br />
If you use material from a digitalised journal article or e-book, you must provide a full, first<br />
reference that contains: author’s name (first name comes first); title <strong>of</strong> work <strong>of</strong> the list/site as<br />
appropriate; and access path (Universal resource locator, URL).<br />
For example,<br />
(AUTHOR) (TITLE OF WORK)<br />
18 Graeme Davison, ‘On History and Hypertext,’ Electronic Journal <strong>of</strong> Australian and New Zealand<br />
History; www.jcu.edu.au/aff/<strong>history</strong>/new.htm<br />
(URL)<br />
Note: Some <strong>of</strong> these e documents now have DOIs (Digital Object Identifiers). Since these<br />
identifiers are unique and permanent, you may use DOIs rather than URLs for sources that<br />
supply DOIs.<br />
(ii) Changeable sources<br />
If you use material from the Internet from a changeable website, you also must give your<br />
access date.<br />
For example,<br />
(AUTHOR) (TITLE OF WORK)<br />
18 David Eltis, ‘A Brief Overview <strong>of</strong> the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade’, Voyages: The Trans-Atlantic Slave<br />
Trade Database; www.slavevoyages.org; accessed 22 July <strong>2011</strong>.<br />
f) Citing revised editions:<br />
(URL) (ACCESS DATE)<br />
If a book is a revised edition then you should note the current edition you are using and that<br />
edition's year <strong>of</strong> publication.<br />
For example,<br />
(AUTHOR) (TITLE) (EDITION) (CITY) (PUBLISHER) (YEAR ED. PUB.) (PAGE)<br />
7 E. H. Carr, What is History?, 2d ed. (London: Macmillan, 1987), p.88.<br />
(AUTHOR) (TITLE)<br />
42
8 Maurice Meisner, Mao's China and After: A History <strong>of</strong> the People's<br />
Republic, rev. ed. (New York: Free Press, 1986), p.1<br />
g) Citing translations:<br />
(EDITION) (CITY) (PUBLISHER) (YEAR REV. ED.) (PAGE)<br />
If a source has been translated also include the translator's name.<br />
For example,<br />
(AUTHOR) (TRANSLATOR)<br />
32 Fernand Braudel, On History, trans. Sarah Matthews (Chicago: <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Chicago Press, 1980),<br />
p.114.<br />
h) Citing lectures:<br />
Footnoting notes from a lecture should only be done if the information or argument cannot<br />
be found in more conventional sources. Avoid using lecture notes as references where<br />
possible, as they are likely to be incomplete and possibly inaccurate; <strong>of</strong>ten they have been<br />
taken in a rush. You should include the lecturer's name, the 'lecture title', the course, the<br />
place, and the date.<br />
For example,<br />
(AUTHOR) (TITLE) (COURSE) (PLACE) (DATE)<br />
37 Steve Behrendt, 'Sugar in World History', HIST120 lecture, <strong>Victoria</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Wellington</strong>, 23<br />
March <strong>2011</strong>.<br />
i) Citing works quoted in another work:<br />
If you are footnoting a quote or idea from a book that does not belong to the author <strong>of</strong> the<br />
book, you must identify not only the original author, but also note the text in which you<br />
found the excerpt (or else seek out the original source).<br />
For example, if you wanted to use a quote from St. Augustine from Alfred Crosby's book<br />
The Measure <strong>of</strong> Reality, you must show that while the author <strong>of</strong> the quote may be St.<br />
Augustine, you did not obtain the quote from the original work. So the footnote would<br />
expand to include all this information.<br />
(DETAILS OF SOURCE YOU ARE USING)<br />
40 St Augustine, Confessions, trans. R. S. Pine-C<strong>of</strong>fin (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1961), p.114,<br />
in Alfred W. Crosby, The Measure <strong>of</strong> Reality: Quantification and Western Society, 1250-1600<br />
(Cambridge: Cambridge <strong>University</strong> Press, 1997), p.134.<br />
(DETAILS OF BOOK IN WHICH SOURCE WAS FOUND)<br />
43
j) Citing a Book <strong>of</strong> Readings:<br />
This is the same as footnoting a cited work. The key is to remember that it is the original<br />
author and initial source <strong>of</strong> the text you are using that you must acknowledge first. Ask<br />
yourself, ‘Who wrote the text I am using, and where did it come from?’ Then note that the<br />
material was 'in' the Book <strong>of</strong> Readings (or seek out the original source).<br />
For example, if using the text on page 361 <strong>of</strong> the HIST117 Book <strong>of</strong> Readings you must<br />
note the original author, publication, and page numbers, and then note that you took this<br />
from the Book <strong>of</strong> Readings.<br />
41 Nini Rodgers, 'Equiano in Belfast: A Study <strong>of</strong> the Anti-Slavery Ethos in a Northern Town', Slavery<br />
and Abolition, Vol. 20, no. 3, December 1999, p.74, in HIST117: Europeans, Africans and Americans Book<br />
<strong>of</strong> Readings (<strong>Wellington</strong>: 2006), p.361.<br />
Note: a Book <strong>of</strong> Readings does not list an editor, so you cannot give the editor name. Do not<br />
assume the editor is your lecturer. Where there is no information given, you cannot make it<br />
up.<br />
k) Citing multiple sources:<br />
If you have two or more sources that give the same information or argument you can<br />
footnote all <strong>of</strong> them in the same footnote. Entries for each title follow the same rules as other<br />
footnotes, and each source is separated by a semi-colon ';'.<br />
Citing Primary Sources<br />
For example, for the same (or very similar) argument found in the following two books<br />
you could footnote both.<br />
10 Francois Crouzet, The <strong>Victoria</strong>n Economy, trans. A. S. Forster (London: Methuen, 1982), p.15; S.<br />
Pollard and D. W. Crossley, The Wealth <strong>of</strong> Britain, 1085-1966 (London: Batsford, 1968), p.241.<br />
l) Citing newspaper articles:<br />
Give the author <strong>of</strong> the article (where possible), the 'article title' (in single quotation marks),<br />
the newspaper title (in italics), date <strong>of</strong> publication (date month year), and the page number<br />
where you found the material.<br />
For example,<br />
(AUTHOR) (TITLE) (NEWSPAPER) (DATE)<br />
6 Vernon Small, ‘US Envoy Defends Frank Talk in Leaked Cables’, Dominion Post, 1 December 2010,<br />
p.A5.<br />
(PAGES)<br />
44
m) Citing archival sources:<br />
Give the author <strong>of</strong> the source (where possible), the addressee (if a letter) or the title <strong>of</strong> the<br />
document (if any), the date <strong>of</strong> the source, the collection title, the archival reference number,<br />
and the archival repository and its location (you can abbreviate this in subsequent<br />
references).<br />
For example,<br />
(AUTHOR) (ADDRESSEE) (DATE) (COLLECTION TITLE)<br />
3 M. Fraser to The Secretary, New Zealand Seamen’s Union, 20 October 1921, STATS Series 1, Box<br />
29, Record 22/6/15, Archives New Zealand (ANZ).<br />
(ARCHIVAL REFERENCE NUMBER) (ARCHIVAL REPOSITORY)<br />
18 Karamea Store Book, 1875-1876, NP Series 23, Box 5, item 6, ANZ.<br />
n) Citing legislation:<br />
Give the short title <strong>of</strong> the Act, the date <strong>of</strong> theAct, the section you are referring to, and the<br />
line reference (where relevavant). Cite Bills (legislation yet to be passed by Parliament) in the<br />
same way, but remember that they consist <strong>of</strong> clauses (cl.) rather than sections (sec.).<br />
For example,<br />
(SHORT TITLE & DATE)<br />
21 Electoral Act 1993, s.60(a)(ii)<br />
(SECTION)<br />
o) Citing from the Appendices to the Journal <strong>of</strong> the House <strong>of</strong> Representatives:<br />
Give the title <strong>of</strong> the document (in single inverted commas), the title <strong>of</strong> the source (you can<br />
abbreviate to AJHR in subsequent references), the date <strong>of</strong> the source, the session, the section,<br />
and the page number.<br />
For example,<br />
(TITLE) (AJHR)<br />
7 Further Papers Relative to Mr Buller’s Leave <strong>of</strong> Absence’, Appendix to the Journals <strong>of</strong> the House <strong>of</strong><br />
Representatives (AJHR), 1872, Session 1, G-19, p.2.<br />
p) Citing Parliamentary Debates<br />
(DATE) (SESSION) (SECTION) (PAGE)<br />
Give the speaker, the title <strong>of</strong> the source (can abbreviate to NZPD on subsequent references),<br />
the date <strong>of</strong> the source, the volume number, and the page number.<br />
For example,<br />
(SPEAKER) (TITLE) (DATE) (VOLUME) (PAGE)<br />
8 Richard Seddon, New Zealand Parliamentary Debates (NZPD), 1894, Vol. 82, p.965.<br />
45
There are many other types <strong>of</strong> sources that require specialised footnoting (and bibliographical) details.<br />
This booklet cannot give a complete list. The basic principles <strong>of</strong> footnoting can be found here. If you<br />
encounter a source that does not seem to fit into any <strong>of</strong> the above categories you can ask your tutor or<br />
lecturer for advice. Footnoting may seem difficult and cumbersome at first, but it becomes routine<br />
with a little practice.<br />
6.4—Page Number References<br />
Page numbers are written as 'p.' for a reference from a single page or 'pp.' for material that spans two<br />
or more pages. If the footnote refers to two distant separate pages then each page must be listed<br />
separately as the reference does not refer to the intervening pages.<br />
For example,<br />
(i) for a reference from page nine, p.9.<br />
(ii) for a reference for material that spans pages nine, ten and eleven, pp.9-11.<br />
(iii) for a reference that takes material from page nine and page eleven (but not page ten),<br />
pp.9,11.<br />
Please note: do not use 'pg' to abbreviate ‘page’ or ‘pages’.<br />
6.5—Abbreviating Footnotes<br />
In order to avoid an essay becoming overwhelmed with long footnote references throughout,<br />
historians and publishers <strong>of</strong> History use two main conventions to shorten some footnotes: the short<br />
version and the short title. You can never shorten the first reference to any work you are citing, so the<br />
short version or short title format apply to the second or subsequent time you cite a particular work.<br />
Footnoting: the short version<br />
In an essay where you have already given a footnote to, for example,<br />
2 Greg Dening, Mr Bligh's Bad Language - Passion, Power and Theatre on the Bounty (Cambridge:<br />
Cambridge <strong>University</strong> Press, 1992), p.27.<br />
Then for subsequent footnotes you could use the short version that lists only the author's<br />
surname and the page(s) referenced.<br />
13 Dening, p.27.<br />
Footnoting: the short title<br />
However, if you are citing more than one work by the same author, or two authors with the same<br />
46
surname, you should also provide a short title to avoid confusion. The short title should be the first<br />
few key words <strong>of</strong> the full title, enough to uniquely identify that text in your essay. Thus in using the<br />
short title footnoting convention you would drop definition or indefinite articles, such as ‘the’ or ‘an’.<br />
For example, if you have already given a full footnote references for,<br />
1 Charles Webster, The Great Instauration: Science, Medicine and Reform 1626-1660 (London:<br />
Duckworth, 1975), p.163.<br />
and<br />
4 Charles Webster, 'Alchemical and Paracelsian Medicine' in Charles Webster (ed.), Health,<br />
Medicine and Mortality in the Sixteenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge <strong>University</strong> Press,<br />
1979), pp.301-3.<br />
Then you should shorten both in subsequent footnotes with a short title to identify each distinctly:<br />
8 Webster, 'Alchemical and Paracelsian Medicine', p.312.<br />
9 Webster, Great Instauration, p.14.<br />
Because your aim in footnoting is to provide accurate reference information for your reader, to avoid<br />
any confusion use the short title footnoting method.<br />
In reading works <strong>of</strong> History, you may see other footnote referencing methods, including the use <strong>of</strong> the<br />
word ‘ibid’. The term 'ibid.' is a specialised designation derived from the Latin word 'ibidem', which<br />
means 'in the same place'. The footnote reference ‘ibid’. applies to footnotes <strong>of</strong> the same work that<br />
immediately follow each other. Despite being derived from a foreign word (and being an<br />
abbreviation too) 'ibid.' does not need to be italicised.<br />
Instead <strong>of</strong> using a full or short version you can substitute 'ibid.'.<br />
For example,<br />
5 Witold Rybczynski, Waiting for the Weekend, New York, 1991, p.89.<br />
6 ibid. (SAME BOOK, SAME PAGE)<br />
7 ibid., p.78. (SAME BOOK, DIFFERENT PAGE)<br />
8 Bertrand Russell, History <strong>of</strong> Western Philosophy, London, 1946, 2nd edition, 1961, p.668.<br />
9 ibid., p.191. (NOW REFERS TO Russell's, History)<br />
10 Rybczynski, p.16. (BACK TO FIRST BOOK, THIS TIME IN SHORT TITLE)<br />
47
Take care in using ‘ibid’ as in the process <strong>of</strong> editing a draft essay, you may move main text words<br />
around by cutting and pasting. Shifting words or sentences also will re-order your footnotes, and<br />
could therefore create instances when ‘ibid.’ does not refer to the work previously cited.<br />
Tip: It is <strong>of</strong>ten wise to make all footnotes in your draft full references, and then shorten those that can<br />
be shortened only in the final copy. Remember, you must give the first citation <strong>of</strong> any work in your<br />
footnotes in complete, full format.<br />
6.6—Advanced Footnoting Techniques<br />
If, as noted in (6.3k), you reference multiple sources in the same footnote, it must be clear to the reader<br />
where the information in the sentence/ paragraph came from. You can add clarity by specifying<br />
geographical locations or the names <strong>of</strong> authors in your text.<br />
For example, this author specified geographical locations in the paragraph, enabling the<br />
reader to match the historical information to each source.<br />
In 1703, a Massachusetts law stated that after nine o’clock in the evening, no ‘Negro or<br />
mulatto servant or slave’ should be out in the streets without specific permission from his or<br />
her master. Rhode Island, which would eventually use gang slavery in the farms around<br />
Narragansett Bay, in spite <strong>of</strong> its early prohibition <strong>of</strong> slaveholding, also established curfew for<br />
‘Negroes’ or Indians in 1703. In New York, a brutal slave law was enacted in 1712 after a<br />
bloody slave insurrection left nine whites dead. 1<br />
1 R. C. Twombley and R. H. Moore, ‚Black Puritan: The Negro in Seventeenth Century Massachusetts,‛<br />
William and Mary Quarterly, Vol. 24, no. 3, 1967, pp.224-42; Records <strong>of</strong> the Colony <strong>of</strong> Rhode Island and<br />
Providence Plantations, 10 vols. (Providence, 1856-1862), Vol. 3, p. 492; K. Scott, ‚The Slave Insurrection<br />
in New York in 1712,‛ New York Historical Quarterly, Vol. 45, no. 1, 1961, pp.16-18.<br />
Another method <strong>of</strong> indicating how your references relate to the information in your text is to<br />
specify authorship, as in the following example:<br />
In the early twentieth century, ‘the plantation school’ <strong>of</strong> Southern historians worked on the<br />
assumption that the ‘Negro’ was only fitted for a subordinate position in American society, and<br />
that the plantation was the ideal vehicle for his or her civilisation. Ulrich Bonnell Phillips was the<br />
leading advocate <strong>of</strong> this ‘school’, and he and his followers stressed how blacks, who were by nature<br />
‘inferior’, needed the nurturing environment <strong>of</strong> the plantation to survive in an increasingly<br />
capitalist world. Richard H<strong>of</strong>stadter first challenged this thesis, and economists Conrad and Meyer<br />
further undermined the ‘plantation school’, by demonstrating that the standard <strong>of</strong> living <strong>of</strong> blacks<br />
48
declined precipitously on plantations. In the 1960s, Genovese led a reappraisal <strong>of</strong> Phillips’ studies<br />
on plantation slavery. 31<br />
31 Ulrich B. Phillips, American Negro Slavery (New York, 1918); T. J. Wertenbaker, The Old South: The Founding <strong>of</strong><br />
American Civilization (New York, 1942); R. H<strong>of</strong>stadter, ‘Ulrich B. Phillips and the Plantation Legend’, Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Negro History, Vol. 29 (1944), pp.109-124; A. H. Conrad and J. R. Meyer, ‘The Economics <strong>of</strong> Slavery in the Ante-<br />
Bellum South’, Journal <strong>of</strong> Political Economy, Vol. 66 (1958), pp.95-130; E. D. Genovese, ‘Race and Class in<br />
Southern History: An Appraisal <strong>of</strong> the Work <strong>of</strong> Ulrich Bonnell Phillips’, Agricultural History, Vol. 16 (1967),<br />
pp.345-58.<br />
49
7) BIBLIOGRAPHIES<br />
7.1—What is a Bibliography<br />
A bibliography is simply the alphabetical listing <strong>of</strong> the sources you have consulted to write your<br />
essay. The purpose <strong>of</strong> a bibliography is to allow a reader <strong>of</strong> your work to trace your sources. You<br />
should record the information to complete your bibliography as you read (1) and take notes (2). An<br />
essay is not complete without a bibliography. Take care to include the relevant information as<br />
detailed below.<br />
7.2—The Style <strong>of</strong> Bibliographies<br />
Your bibliography should be the final page(s) <strong>of</strong> your essay, and should begin on a separate fresh<br />
sheet <strong>of</strong> paper. The first page <strong>of</strong> your bibliography should be headed 'Bibliography'.<br />
You should list all relevant books and journal articles you consulted to write the essay. Do not<br />
include works you have not consulted. Essays are marked on the assumption that you have used all<br />
the books listed in your bibliography.<br />
Bibliographical entries are similar in style and content to footnote references (see 6) with some<br />
important exceptions.<br />
Bibliography vs. Footnote Style: Bibliography Last name, First name,<br />
Footnotes First name Last name,<br />
A bibliography is an alphabetical listing, by surname <strong>of</strong> the authors. Author names are therefore<br />
listed by surname first, then by first names (or initials). It is customary to separate your bibliography<br />
into two distinct alphabetical lists; one <strong>of</strong> primary material (if any), and the other <strong>of</strong> secondary<br />
material (see (7.3) for an example).<br />
The bibliographical entry for a book requires the author (surname first), title, place <strong>of</strong> publication,<br />
publisher and year <strong>of</strong> publication.<br />
For example,<br />
McPhee, Peter, The French Revolution, 1789-1799 (Oxford: Oxford <strong>University</strong> Press, 2002).<br />
The bibliographical listings <strong>of</strong> articles a journal should contain the author (surname first), article title<br />
(in quotation marks), journal title (in italics), volume number, issue number, year <strong>of</strong> publication, and<br />
50
the page range <strong>of</strong> the full article.<br />
For example,<br />
Dasgupta, Jyotirindra, ‘Community, Authenticity, and Autonomy: Insurgence and Institutional<br />
Development in India's Northeast', The Journal <strong>of</strong> Asian Studies, Vol. 56, no. 2, 1997, pp.345-70.<br />
For an article from an edited collection the bibliographical entry requires, the author (surname first),<br />
the article title (in quotation marks), editor'(s) name(s), collection title (in italics), place <strong>of</strong> publication,<br />
publisher, year <strong>of</strong> publication, and the full page range <strong>of</strong> the article.<br />
For example,<br />
Goodman, Dena, ‘Women and the Enlightenment’, in Renate Bridenthal, Susan Mosher Stuart<br />
and Merry E. Weisner (eds.), Becoming Visible: Women in European History, 3 rd ed. (Boston and<br />
New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1998), pp.233-62.<br />
The basic style principles for other texts are the same as for footnotes (see (6.4) for more details). The<br />
only differences to remember are to place the surname first (and list the entries alphabetically), and, if<br />
referring to an article or chapter, include the full page range. A sample bibliography, following the<br />
presentation guidelines given in section (8), is given below.<br />
7.3—A Sample Bibliography<br />
Primary sources<br />
‘Medieval Land Laws’, Ashburton Guardian, 27 February 1894, p.3.<br />
St Augustine, Confessions, trans. R.S. Pine-C<strong>of</strong>fin (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books), 1961.<br />
Secondary sources<br />
Alrich, Mark, Death Rode the Rails: American Railroad Accidents and Safety, 1828-1965 (Baltimore: The<br />
Johns Hopkins <strong>University</strong> Press, 2006).<br />
Carr, E.H., What is History? (London: Macmillan, 1961, 2 nd edition, 1987).<br />
Crouzet, Francois, The <strong>Victoria</strong>n Economy, trans. A.S. Forster (London: Methuen, 1982).<br />
Goodman, Dena, ‘Women and the Enlightenment’, in Renate Bridenthal, Susan Mosher Stuart and<br />
Merry E. Weisner (eds.), Becoming Visible: Women in European History, 3 rd ed. (Boston and New<br />
York: Houghton Mifflin, 1998), pp.233-62.<br />
Pollard S. and Crossley D.W., The Wealth <strong>of</strong> Britain, 1085-1966 (London: Batsford, 1968).<br />
Rodgers, Nini, 'Equiano in Belfast: A Study <strong>of</strong> the Anti-Slavery Ethos in a Northern Town', Slavery and<br />
Abolition, Vol. 18, no. 2, August 1997, pp.73-89.<br />
Van Helden, Albert, ‘Giordano Bruno (1548-1600)’,<br />
http://es.rice.edu/ES/humsoc/Galileo/People/bruno.html<br />
51
8) PRESENTATION AND STYLE GUIDE<br />
Below are guidelines for the presentation <strong>of</strong> your essay. Other sections in this booklet also provide<br />
specific details <strong>of</strong> presentation, particularly (6.4) and (7.2).<br />
These presentation guidelines are designed to help make your essay easy to read and mark. The<br />
ability to present your essay to a set standard is a skill that will be expected whether in the workforce<br />
or in another department.<br />
8.1—Type Size and Fonts<br />
A good size and style <strong>of</strong> font is twelve point Times New Roman. Use standard font types, such as<br />
Times New Roman, Calibri, Palatino Linotype, or Helvetica. Fancy fonts are hard to read.<br />
8.2—Doubling Spacing and Margins<br />
Double spacing your essay makes it easier to read and leaves room for your marker. Double spacing<br />
means leaving a full blank line after each written line.<br />
For example, On a computer double-spacing can usually be set up in the paragraph settings,<br />
under line spacing. Even in exams it is <strong>of</strong>ten a good idea to double-space your answers, as it<br />
makes reading and marking your work easy.<br />
Leave a wide left-hand margin in your final copy. Margins are important as they give room for your<br />
marker to comment on your work. A good margin is about thirty-five to fifty millimetres (35-50mm).<br />
See the sample page (8.10) for an example.<br />
8.3—Paragraph Indents Rather than Line-Spaces<br />
To separate paragraphs, indent the first line <strong>of</strong> each paragraph rather than leaving a line <strong>of</strong> space<br />
between paragraphs. A formal essay should flow continuously from one idea to the next. Using an<br />
indent keeps the new idea (paragraph) spatially connected to the previous one and reminds you to<br />
connect the paragraphs conceptually. Add a connecting clause to the new topic sentence to smooth the<br />
transition (4.8).<br />
For example, start a new paragraph following one from the sample reading (1.2):<br />
'Colonists had little reason to expect anything other than the easy transfer <strong>of</strong> animal<br />
husbandry to the Chesapeake, for the region appeared to be nothing less than an earthly<br />
paradise for livestock'.<br />
As the colonists expected animal husbandry to transfer easily, the Virginia Company<br />
sought to furnish them with sufficient livestock.<br />
52
8.4—Page Numbers<br />
Your submitted essay must have page numbers on the top right-hand corner <strong>of</strong> each page. Use your<br />
word processors ‘insert page number’ feature.<br />
8.5—Italics<br />
Foreign words, book titles and journal titles should all be either italicised or underlined in your essay.<br />
Sometimes you must italicise a title that already has italicised words. For instance, for a title that<br />
appear on the cover <strong>of</strong> a book as ‘Class structure in Machiavelli's The Prince', the convention is that the<br />
italics <strong>of</strong> an italicised word is in normal type. In other words two italicisations cancel each other out.<br />
So the title given above would be written in your essay as: Class structure in Machiavelli's The Prince.<br />
8.6—Numbers, Centuries and Years<br />
Numbers less than one hundred (100) should be spelled out in words. For example: ten; eighty-three;<br />
ninety-nine. Numbers greater than one hundred can be given in numerical form.<br />
It is acceptable to use numerical form for all values in tables or graphs. For presentation purposes, all<br />
graphs, tables or diagrams should be placed in an appendix at the end <strong>of</strong> your essay, and 'pointed to'<br />
in the text.<br />
Centuries should be written out in words. For instance: the sixteenth century; the fifth century BCE;<br />
the nineteenth century.<br />
Years are normally given in numerical form: so 1848, 1998, and 1066. However, full dates should be<br />
written out with the day in numerical form, and the month in words: 22 November 1998; 4 July 1066;<br />
12 March 49 BCE.<br />
8.7—Footnotes<br />
As noted in section (6), you can use either the footnote or endnote format in your essay. Footnotes<br />
must be placed at the bottom (or 'foot') <strong>of</strong> the page they relate to. Footnotes should be written in a<br />
slightly smaller type than the main text <strong>of</strong> your essay, and they do not have to be double spaced. See<br />
the sample page (8.10) for examples.<br />
53
8.8—Bibliography Format<br />
Your bibliography will be the last page(s) <strong>of</strong> your essay. Remember that your bibliography must start<br />
on a fresh page, and be titled, 'Bibliography'. Bibliography entries should follow the layout guidelines<br />
for your main text with one important exception: do not indent the first line <strong>of</strong> each paragraph (or<br />
entry). See section (7) for details, especially the sample bibliography (7.3).<br />
8.9—Retain a Copy <strong>of</strong> Your Essay<br />
Before handing in your essay make sure you have saved a copy on disk, by emailing the essay to<br />
yourself (thus keeping in on the server), by photocopying the final copy, or printing out two copies <strong>of</strong><br />
the final version. You will have the work to refer to, and you have a backup in the unlikely event that<br />
you mislay your essay.<br />
54
9) ASSESSMENT<br />
9.1—What the Grades Mean<br />
The criteria for judging <strong>essays</strong> fall into two broad categories: firstly, construction <strong>of</strong> your essay as an<br />
argument, which includes research, development <strong>of</strong> an argument, and answering the question;<br />
secondly, the presentation <strong>of</strong> your essay, including grammar, spelling and expression. The following<br />
guide to grades is some indication <strong>of</strong> what is expected in an essay. While we have tried to systematise<br />
the marking <strong>of</strong> <strong>essays</strong>, an essay may not fit into a single category. Often <strong>essays</strong> will display<br />
characteristics that run across the grades. The mark given will, therefore, <strong>of</strong>ten be the result <strong>of</strong><br />
balancing the essay's overall qualities.<br />
A+ (85+): An extremely well crafted paper that excels in all areas. It shows a high degree <strong>of</strong><br />
original thought and interpretation. It has been widely researched, making creative use <strong>of</strong> a<br />
range <strong>of</strong> resource tools.<br />
A (80-84): A paper in the 'distinction' class. It demonstrates excellent analytical and critical<br />
ability. The argument should be well constructed and based on wide reading, including as<br />
much relevant primary material as appropriate. There should be evidence <strong>of</strong> originality <strong>of</strong><br />
thought and interpretation. The areas <strong>of</strong> grammar, spelling and referencing should display a<br />
high level <strong>of</strong> competence.<br />
A- (75-79): An essay in this grade will display the skills <strong>of</strong> an A essay, but to a lesser degree. It<br />
should have a well developed argument, critically evaluate sources, and be solidly researched<br />
from a wide range <strong>of</strong> material. The essay should have no problems in the areas <strong>of</strong> grammar,<br />
sentence construction, or referencing.<br />
B+ (70-74): Should be well written, thoroughly researched, and well referenced. It should have<br />
a good argument, with some critical evaluation <strong>of</strong> sources, but may not have as much<br />
independent interpretation and analysis as an A essay. There may be a few problems with<br />
grammar, sentence construction and referencing. B+ <strong>essays</strong> should develop a solid argument<br />
that addresses the major issues <strong>of</strong> the question.<br />
B (65-69): B <strong>essays</strong> are good, solid papers based on the key sources with minimal extra reading.<br />
There are no serious faults in the essay in terms <strong>of</strong> referencing, grammar or spelling. The<br />
argument may not be as strong as it could be, or there may be little critical evaluation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
sources. There may be small problems in using evidence to support statements.<br />
55
B- (60-64): A solid essay <strong>of</strong>ten based on more general texts. It is without serious flaws, but<br />
lacks the originality and interpretation <strong>of</strong> higher graded <strong>essays</strong>. The argument may be poorly<br />
constructed or inadequately defended. There may be little or no critical analysis. There may be<br />
problems with the use <strong>of</strong> evidence, spelling or sentence construction. An attempt will have<br />
been made to answer the question but it may have missed significant issues.<br />
C+ (55-59): An average essay that shows some competence. There may be noticeable problems<br />
with grammar, spelling and referencing. Reading may be not be very wide. Often the<br />
argument may have serious problems.<br />
C (50-54): A C essay is a fair attempt to answer the question <strong>of</strong>ten based on inadequate reading.<br />
There may be problems in several areas, but overall the essay attempts to answer some <strong>of</strong> the<br />
major points <strong>of</strong> the question.<br />
D (40-49): A fail mark given to an essay that is unacceptable for a number <strong>of</strong> reasons. Often<br />
there is pr<strong>of</strong>ound inaccuracy or confusion about the question. There may be problems with the<br />
use <strong>of</strong> material. While this grade usually denotes considerable problems, <strong>of</strong>ten minor<br />
improvements will boost the grade.<br />
F (39 or less): An E grade is given only for <strong>essays</strong> that fall well below the required standard.<br />
Lateness penalties may lower a higher graded essay to a fail category. History <strong>essays</strong> are subject to<br />
the following penalties:<br />
5% deducted for the first day late;<br />
2% per day thereafter for a maximum <strong>of</strong> 8 days.<br />
Work submitted more than 8 days after the due date may not be marked, depending on the discretion<br />
<strong>of</strong> the course coordinator.<br />
9.2—Reviewing Comments<br />
When you receive your marked <strong>essays</strong> it is easy to look quickly at the grade, celebrate or commiserate<br />
with your fellow students, and then file your essay under the stack <strong>of</strong> your current work. However,<br />
aside from the basic grade your essay receives, there will be a number <strong>of</strong> helpful comments and<br />
suggestions from your marker. These comments can help you with future <strong>essays</strong>, and they also can be<br />
<strong>of</strong> assistance when it comes to tests or exams. Take time to read the comments on your marked<br />
<strong>essays</strong>, and if you have any questions see your tutor or lecturer.<br />
56